Diversity is a favourite ideal of the left; its promotion is a virtue, contrary to the deadly sin of racism. More than that, racism is the original sin, inherited by white people for the sins of their fathers: imperialism, slavery, segregation, and the genocide of the Jews. Borders, nation states and in-group preferences are all evil constructs, propped up by racism and conducive to violence and war. Nationalism is the epitome of this and must be eradicated for the sake of diversity, equality, fairness and peace. But this is misguided. What really happens in the absence of nationalism?
Imagine no national identities, preferences or borders exist, and pretend that all places to live and all potential partners are equally attractive to everyone. Populations would inevitably blend geographically, culturally and genetically, and humankind would eventually achieve a state of complete homogeneity. There would be just one coffee coloured race.
Homogeneity is thus the guaranteed ultimate state of the population of such a world. Since homogeneity is the opposite of diversity, race mixing as advocated by the liberal/left is the surest way to destroy the diversity it claims to love.
Nationalism is the only way to preserve diversity.
Of course, reality is very different to that imagined scenario. Only the West is currently experiencing this transformation since the left concentrates its efforts there. In doing so, it not only depletes the world’s diversity, but does so in a discriminatory manner, threatening the very survival of white Western civilisation (whose population is vastly outnumbered by those of other continents). Genocide is perhaps the most powerful expression of racism, and so this utopian dream of the left is self-contradicting as well as self-defeating.
Globalism has not promoted the various cultures of the world in a remotely equal fashion. American fast food, music, apparel, language and television have been inserted into virtually every place on Earth. While travelling the world used to provide a truly unique experience in every country, it is now possible to find a McDonalds anywhere you go. English is now widely spoken across most of Europe, so the need to learn the native European languages has been diminished. Practically the only parts of foreign cultures we have imported are their cuisines and their religious practices which come into conflict with our own customs and laws. Does this not make the world more boring, rather than more vibrant and special?
Nationalism is the only way to value diversity.
Maybe racism does lead to violence. Perhaps some intrinsic xenophobia lurks in the human psyche. Certainly, it is not the case that no crime was ever committed in the service of an irrational hatred or fear, although this is far from being the unique preserve of whites. Of course, this might be interpreted as a natural urge to protect oneself from ‘the other’ and it could be argued that it is not possible to be violent to an individual you live apart from. If every race inhabits its own homeland, racial violence and discrimination at an individual level simply cannot arise. This might be easier and kinder than trying to condition generations of people to pretend not to perceive foreigners as foreigners.
What of wars fuelled by racism? A study of history will show that some of the most brutal conflicts arise in parts of the world where more than once race cohabits or claims the same land as its own. Again, it is difficult to commit acts of ethnic cleansing when nobody else lives in your country. There are many reasons for war, and it would be naïve and utopian to proclaim its end through nationalism, but we can at the very least avoid some future racial conflagrations by allowing everyone their own homeland free from foreign colonisation and molestation.
It is high time we claim back diversity from the left.
By John Salisbury © 2017
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
John Murray
- Edit
Thank you for this excellent article, John.
As well as “diversity,” there are other areas that the left seem to have adopted as their own too; “Environmentalism” being one of them!
Nationalists would surely make better stewards of our planet than the globalists. The capitalist machine produces untold junk every day which is disposed of almost as fast as it is manufactured, polluting the land and the sea in equal measures. The amount of plastic crap in the oceans now is nothing short of disgusting, with the “micro beads” and other junk being consumed by the fish we then all have to eat. Plastic bags and other junk is washing up on once ‘pristine’ beaches all over the world and although our enemies shout loudly about this, in reality they support the policies which caused it in the first place, and continue to back the parties that are pushing onwards for more immigration and more globalisation.
The idea that 8 billion people can all live like whitey is absurd, in terms of the damage that will do to the environment and yet the so-called “environmentalists” on the left want more immigration. These people want us to use stupid light bulbs and shower once a week while completely ignoring the elephant in the room – millions of 3rd world people pouring into the West wanting a piece of our cake!
As well as general pollution there’s also the Climate Change issue which again, is where nationalists have dropped the ball. Whether you accept the science on this or not, and I certainly do, in propaganda terms alone this is a no-brainer that sadly our side has completely missed.
Think about this for a minute….
Climate Change – CO2 – Big Oil – Burning Fossil Fuels – Big Business – Capitalism and it’s evil twin, Mass-Immigration…… it’s the life blood on which our enemies thrive. All these things are responsible for putting billions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year, and we give that the thumbs up; we defend them and attack the people who speak out against it. Surely, from a propaganda perspective alone, Nationalists should be using the Climate issue as a weapon against mass-immigration, laissez faire Capitalism, Globalisation and the oil industries that are causing this. We should be arguing that the answer to Climate change is to stop immigration in its tracks, deport the people living in the West back to their lands of ethnic origin, a complete stop to the free movement of goods and people, an end to the absurdity of goods being shipped all over the world from China and things like beef being shipped to Britain from Brazil.
We should be shouting the loudest for local economies with food being produced in our own countries where ever possible. The nationalist agenda and ldeals are the best antidote to the C02 producing Capitalist monster, and yet most people I speak to in our movement seem to think it’s all a hoax and side with those whose globalist policies are destroying everything we hold dear.
Anyway, great article, John. I agree wholeheartedly that true diversity is what we had before these clowns went on a mission to destroy everything in a few decades that evolved naturally over many millions of years.
John Salisbury
- Edit
Hi John, thanks for your comment praising my article. I agree that our failure to take back environmentalism is one of the greatest missed opportunities in nationalism; people in the cause tend to prefer pushing the untenable position that climate change is a hoax, rather than spinning it around and fighting the much more downhill battle, asking the liberal proponents of climate action how their globalist policies are affecting carbon emissions. The obvious solution to the problem is, as you point out, localism and an end to mass immigration. I intend to put my distilled thoughts on this issue into writing at some time in the near future.
RichardJames
- Edit
Brazilian and Argentinian beef is of a much higher quality than any grown in the UK I am sorry to say.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Hello Richard, there is no reason whatsoever why our farmers, given political will could not go back to producing excellent beef. We still have some of the best cattle breeds albeit many are now classed as rare breeds. Commercial pressures on the farmer and butcher are generally to blame for this present day state of affairs.
Agriculture is a complicated industry which few folk fully understand.
It is of extreme sadness to me that we have lost, far too many, caring family run farms (over the last century particularly) since the Warburg/Kalegi plan was first implemented.
My heart was broken and left behind when I had to leave the cattle breeding industry a few years back.
I live in a county that has moved away from traditional mixed farming and permanent pastureland to a mainly arable farming, chemical based system, from which droplets of toxins constantly drift around, throughout, wherever one might be, except maybe in a sealed air-conditioned cab on the tractor or sprayer with filters; to be breathed in or to settle on the skin with dire consequences to ones person.
RichardJames
- Edit
Hello Walter,
I agree with your description of how the dismantling of the British agricultural industry has brought about a lowering of produce quality and at the time introduced harmfull practices and chemicals not to mention the impact, economic, cultural or otherwise, wrought upon small family farms, as you said, factors not included or at least not as intensively implemented with the same amount government (EU) beaurocratic meddling in Brazil and Argentina.
John Salisbury
- Edit
While I have no expertise on this matter and so as far as I’m concerned it may well be the case, I would much rather have a stronger British agricultural industry and a slightly poorer quality of meat with a smaller environmental impact. I also have no doubt that British farmers would be capable of producing beef of excellent quality given the right motivations and circumstances.
Andy_Patton
- Edit
Well said Caucasian Brother! I’ve been embracing the true Diversity theme for years, particularly from the Biblical-Christian angle, which I believe is the only explanation for our current deadly predicament. (I fell-out with, and quit the Judaized church after the 9/11 nuclear demolitions.) Sadly, my little audiences don’t seem to get it, yet.
Race-mixing (biblical fornication) was actually the ORIGINAL DEADLY SIN–when Adam (to show blood in the face; White) let Eve out of his protection and she was seduced by a Fallen Angel, resulting in mongrel Cain and in turn all the modern Anti-Christ peoples, led by the perfidious Serpentine Joo.
Kind-after-kind (race) was the FIRST Divine Law, repeated 6 times!!! in Genesis ch1.
Since the 1960s or even the 1850s, the Christian Faith has been infiltrated, corrupted, and turned upside-down: Good is Bad; Bad is Good. Race-mixing type diversity is NOT OUR STRENGTH and disasterous for us Kelto-Saxon-Nordics, all originally of pure Mesopotamian Adamic stock.
https://christogenea.org/essays/immigration-problem-and-biblical-prophecy