By Max Musson:
As the mid-point of the year passes, it seems a good time to take stock of where we are now in the struggle for the survival of our nation and the self-determination of our people. In taking stock I will examine the condition of we British, we aboriginal peoples of the British Isles, of the UK mainland and Ireland, both north and south of the border.
The first thing to recognise is that our islands have been divided politically since the passing of the Irish Free State Constitution Act 1922 and could well be divided further should a majority of Scots vote for independence later this year.
It is understandable that the people of Ireland should have campaigned and fought for independence from Westminster, as within living memory all of the people of these islands have suffered grievously at the hands of the Westminster traitors, but we would do well, the Scots particularly, to reflect upon the benefits or otherwise that have been enjoyed post independence, when government by one gang of shysters has merely been exchanged for government by another such gang. The key question that those advocating separatism need to ask themselves is: are the Irish appreciably better off now than they would have been if they had remained part of the United Kingdom, or are they now in very much the same boat?
Anyone conducting an objective assessment will be forced to acknowledge that both Ireland and the rest of Britain have been railroaded into the European Union, an undemocratic, supra-national, totalitarian superstate, in which the vast bulk of our legislation derives directly from Brussels. Therefore, irrespective of what establishment politicians might like to pretend, neither the Irish nor the rest of the British people enjoy self-rule, and the sacrifices and heroism of the martyrs of the ‘war of independence’, would appear to have been in vain.
Had the ongoing government of Ireland been truly nationalist, then post independence they would have steadfastly maintained the freedom and self-determination of their people. Clearly however, the so-called ‘nationalist’ governments of Ireland have been similar in character to that proposed by Alex Salmond – internationalist and driven by shameless career politicians who have aroused patriotic feeling merely as a means to gain personal advancement – with no genuine desire for national self-determination.
Let us be clear about this, any movement that campaigns for independence from Westminster while intending to remain part of the EU, is merely exchanging totalitarian rule from Brussels as part of the UK, for isolated subjugation to totalitarian rule from Brussels, and the only thing that will result from a granting of that ‘independence’, is that the ability of the resultant smaller component statelets to withdraw from the EU will be greatly diminished. Indeed as a result of the diminution of the UK that will result from the faux independence of Scotland, the entire population of the UK should have a say in the forthcoming referendum, as the UK’s ability to withdraw from the EU will be significantly weakened.
United, the British people have a very real prospect of being able to free ourselves from the death-grip of Brussels, but divided, that prospect becomes much more fraught with danger. There are obvious economic considerations, but there are also military considerations that are less obvious.
Should the UK minus Scotland opt for unilateral withdrawal from the EU at some future date, the armed forces of the EU will have a massive ready made ‘beach-head’ in the north from which to roll their troops south to re-occupy us by force, and vice versa.
Similarly, should a genuinely nationalist Ireland seek to withdraw unilaterally from the EU, then the counties of Ulster provide another ready made beach-head, and there will be no need for the planned European Army to stage perilous ‘D-Day’ style landings in order to re-impose the will of Brussels upon any maverick government on these isles.
These are the military implications of current meddling in state-craft that no one else has as yet begun to consider. Divided, we British cease to be an ‘island nation’ and militarily we become as vulnerable to European hegemony as Belgium or Luxemberg.
My reason for focusing so much on these military implications results from an appreciation of the fact that the EU does not exist for the benefit of its citizens, but as a stepping-stone along a path that leads to eventual world government under the auspices of a plutocratic global elite who will stop at nothing in order to establish and consolidate their tyrannical global hegemony.
The EU has evolved through a number of stages in its development: from the Council of Europe established by Jean Monet in 1949, through to the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon in 2009, which by the ‘back-door’ effectively implemented a constitution declaring the EU to be a supra-national state with a President, a Foreign Minister, a Ministry of Defence and the power to abolish and usurp the powers of the governments of the member states.
The Treaty of Lisbon was ratified by Westminster without any real appreciation by the majority of MPs as to what they were approving. The reason for this is that the Treaty itself reads like legalistic ‘mumbo-jumbo’. It is composed of hundreds of textual modifications to the wording of the ‘consolidated treaty’, i.e. the Treaty of Rome as modified by the four subsequent EU treaties, and the Treaty of Lisbon cannot therefore be made sense of, unless it is read it in conjunction with that consolidated treaty.
Very few Westminster MPs had bothered to read the Treaty of Lisbon when the vote came to ratify it, they simply relied upon advice from government lawyers, that the impact of the treaty would be ‘beneficial’. But beneficial to whom? That was the all-important question they all failed to ask.
With Britain being widely regarded as the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ one would suppose that the constitution of the EU would have been modelled on the British system. Alternatively, with the USA being the dominant superpower in the West and having a constitutional democracy of world renown, one might expect that the EU constitution might have been modelled on the American system. It comes as a great surprise to most people however, to learn that an entirely different and unexpected constitution was employed as the model for the EU, the constitution of the Soviet Union!
The old Soviet constitution established: a Council of Ministers in the Kremlin that initiated all legislation; the Politburo, an executive arm of government that drafted all legislation; and the Grand Soviet, a toothless parliament that existed merely to ‘rubber-stamp’ legislation.
If we now compare this to the EU, we find that the EU constitution establishes a council of ministers, now known as the Council of Europe, that initiates all legislation; the European Commission, an executive arm that drafts all legislation; and the European Parliament, a toothless parliament that merely ‘rubber-stamps’ legislation. Furthermore, whereas the Council of Europe has hitherto been composed of the heads of state and the foreign secretaries of the member states, the Treaty of Lisbon provides for this to be phased out, so that eventually, the Council of Europe will be composed of ‘good Europeans’ nominated by the European Commission, while the European Commission will be composed of ‘good Europeans’ proposed by the Council of Europe!
In this way the initiation and drafting of EU legislation will be conducted by a self-serving, self-perpetuating bureaucracy and the only ‘democratic’ element of the whole arrangement being the election of MEPs whose only role will be to approve legislation drafted and placed before them by the two self-appointed upper chambers.
As we can see, this is not democracy, this is dictatorship by a thinly disguised oligarchy.
Under the principles of ‘subsidiarity’ enshrined within the new consolidated European Treaty, the EU has the power to devolve down from the national governments of the member states responsibility for all matters that can best be dealt with at a regional level, to the regional assemblies that have been set up. There are twelve such regional assemblies with the UK and two in Ireland. Many of the members of these assemblies are currently appointed by the office of the Deputy Prime Minister in the UK, but they are intended to eventually be elected assemblies. Elected, but with such limited jurisdiction that they are not expected to ever be strong enough to rival the authority of Brussels.
Under the Treaty of Lisbon, all other powers currently enjoyed by the national governments of the member states are able to be usurped by Brussels now that ‘qualified majority voting’ has been adopted by the European Council, an example of which we saw recently when David Cameron was humiliated over the appointment of the new President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker.
Under article 49(a) of the Treaty of Lisbon, a constitutional means by which a member state might withdraw from the EU was introduced for the first time, however the treaty specifies that withdrawal must be negotiated by the national government of the member state concerned.
Once powers hitherto exercised by the national governments of the member states have been devolved down to the regional assemblies and/or usurped by the Council of Europe, there will be no role for the national governments and one does not have to be a rocket scientist to deduce therefore that the national governments will over time be progressively moth-balled and abolished. When this has been achieved there will therefore, no longer be a national government capable of negotiating a members state’s withdrawal from the EU and this constitutional means of withdrawal will therefore no longer exist and withdrawal will only be possible by a unilateral declaration of independence.
The significance of the military impact of the dismemberment of the UK therefore becomes immediately apparent, because it is highly unlikely that Brussels will sit idly by should the Border, Midlands and Western Region of Ireland decide to withdraw from the EU. No, the armed forces of the EU will be dispatched to Ulster and the Southern and Eastern Region of Ireland and they will re-assert the authority of Brussels by force of arms. Similarly, if the East of England seek to withdraw and even if the whole of what is now England should seek to withdraw, EU forces deployed in Wales and Scotland will be used to quell any such rebellion.
The constitutional powers already exist under the Treaty of Lisbon for the EU Ministry of Defence to usurp control of the Armed forces of all of the EU member states and for Europol to usurp control of the police forces of the member states, and so it is easy to see that we are in danger of becoming trapped in a European superstate and oppressed by a self-appointed, self-serving, self-perpetuating tyranny in Brussels.
How long it will be before government at Westminster and Leinster are abolished is at present anyone’s guess, but the above makes clear the urgency with which we must organise if we are to prevent being permanently engulfed within the EU and subsequently obliterated as a nation by Brussels’ policy of open borders and race replacement by the populations of the Third world.
Finally, while many may have envisaged a time when we may need to fight to restore order and our control of a Britain that has declined into chaos and corruption, the European dimension adds a significant additional element into the equation and one that may have far reaching consequences.
By Max Musson © 2014
# # # #
Shaun
- Edit
Thanks for the article: I learnt a little bit more about the EU — others nationalists did too, that is very important! We need to get our facts straight about these rats. I can’t believe what they are doing — what type of human beings would model a supra-national political body on the Kremlin? Insane! N
I know it may sound a little selfish, but the thing I don’t like about the EU is the wages these people get. When you tally up all their ‘expenses’, you’re looking at £1 million a year. Why should these traitors get that amount of money when honest, noble people such as my father had to break his back on building sites for a twentieth of the money. It’s just wrong….
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Quiet right Shaun. I was in Southend recently on holiday and seeing how run down the town has become since my childhood outings really brought home to me the decay our nation has suffered at the hands of these traitors. The safe seaside haven of my childhood memories has long gone but with a little determination and using the six prerequisites wisely nationalist can and will get our country back for the children of the future.
Max Musson
- Edit
Southend? Now there’s a coincidence! 😉
Walter Greenway
- Edit
It was quite a quiet holiday Max. Met some interesting folk though.
Shaun
- Edit
Yes, I’ve been in the EU Parliment and just looking at these excuses for human beings makes you realise we need a nationalist government! It’s funny: the so-called left make out they are for the working classes, but they have shown by their actions that they are against them….
The working classes have built our country and now they have been sold out to the cheap, expendable labour of the Third World. Only nationalists are concerned about the interests of our people and we are the ONLY political movement that doesn’t care if you went to Eton or Enfield High (if there is an Enfield High?) — each person does their best for the nation according to their abilty. That’s an alien concept to the tratiors in government — well, what would you expect from such a bunch of lowlife rats!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I know exactly what you mean!
frederick dixon
- Edit
I entirely agree with you Max, although I must say that I think that the Irish are “better off” for having their own country under their own control rather than being a province of the UK. By “better off” I don’t mean financially but simply that all nations should rule themselves as a matter of pride and identity. I wish it were true of England.
In saying that, I have shifted my own position – I was once an Empire Loyalist, and Ireland (like Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Rhodesia) should have been part of a “Greater Britain”, the Empire brought to its natural and satisfactory completion. But that is now so far out of reach that I will settle just for an England restored to freedom and to her own folk.
As for the EU dimension, yes it is a dreadful trap which will use migration to destroy all of the nations which it has ensnared. It must be destroyed and replaced by a much looser “Europe of Nations” which will embrace all white countries whether within the geographical area of Europe or in the New World.
Steven
- Edit
Ireland was once an independent nation but the Irish government gave that away in 1973 when they joined the Common Market along with us and any semblance of real independence they once had has truely vanished since as they have adopted what Le Pen Senior once called “the currency of occupation” ie the Euro. The Republic of Ireland also doesn’t exercise any real national sovereignty in the vital area of immigration controls as they are part of the ‘Common Travel Area’ along with us so to gain the advantage of having no controls between Britain and Ireland they have had to align their immigration policies with us. This is what Mr Salmond and his SNP party will have to do also if they become ‘independent’ otherwise the rump ‘UK’ will have no option but to impose our own border controls and have physical controls at Berwick-Upon-Tweed.
Ireland’s history is a really tragic story. It is a real shame that Irish Home Rule which was granted eventually in September of 1914 never came into effect because the Liberal government in Britain decided to intervene in what became the bloodbath of WW1. If devolution had come about perhaps Ireland and Britain would have had a better history.
John Mccaffrey
- Edit
How far into the future Max, do you think it is likely that the EU would authorise the use of force to prevent Britain, or parts of Britain from leaving the EU?
Given that there well maybe a referendum on EU membership as soon as 2016/17, and if the referendum goes against EU membership.
Do you think it likely with such a result, military force will be used against Britain.
Which I am guessing would be mainly made up of German and French troops.
Would The German and French governments in just a couple of years time really order their forces to attack Britain?
Max Musson
- Edit
No, I don’t think the EU would try to use force as early as the next two or three years, but in perhaps ten years time or more, when British armed forces have been fully absorbed into the armed forces of the European Union, when Westminster has been largely or perhaps completely moth-balled, should we attempt a unilateral declaration of independence at that time, then I think military force would probably be employed and with the blessings and assistance of many pro-EU Britons.
.
The troops used would almost certainly be from Eastern Europe, the Balkan states and possibly Turkey, if Turkey has been admitted to the EU by then. Such troops would have the least affinity with our people and could therefore be trusted to shoot us if required.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Please bear in mind the possibility that Ireland was used in a divide-and-rule sense by the ZOG alliances. Viewing it coolly, you see the ‘Easter Rebellion’ of 1916 coinciding with Balfour; the first Irish President (or whatever) de Valera, not even Irish; atrocities and bombings which it is impossible to believe could not have been prevented; and moves now to flood Ireland with immigrants. https://www.big-lies.org/ireland-and-scotland is my incomplete attempt to probe this issue. Similar guesswork applies to ETA in Spain, ‘red brigades’ in Italy and I think Germany, possibly Olof Palme’s murder.
Stephane
- Edit
Max, great article which makes two essential points which alas are not said often enough, if at all. First, the kind of Scottish “independence” that Alex Salmond is seeking is entirely bogus, since it amounts to separation from England only to subjugate Scotland into the EU Empire. Second, the EU has copied many things from the USSR, contempt for democracy above all else. Vladimir Bukosvky, a Soviet dissident who spent 12 years in Soviet prisons and psychiatric detention emphatically draws the link between the EU and the USSR in this video, youtu.be/m41Tdl5mvdg. Please share this video, it should help convince those who are not already convinced. I make the same points about Scottish “independence” and the link between the EU and the USSR in my book Modern Britain, see https://www.modern-britain.com.
Bill Baillie
- Edit
Your vision of a EU army rolling over the border from Scotland is fanciful but the 50,000 American servicemen stationed in Germany, together with 9,660 in Italy and 9,015 in the UK represent an army of occupation that is real. All we would achieve by leaving the EU would be a pretence of independence. We abandoned national independence when we obeyed American orders to withdraw from Suez in 1956. I am not defending the invasion of Egypt – Britain and France were acting more in defence of Israel than in their own interests – but our withdrawal marked the end of Empire. Your nightmare of Europe is not shared by the majority of Brits. If we ever get Dave Cameron’s in/out referendum I predict that there will be a majority for staying in Europe. The EU does not force us to take in millions of Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Nigerians. We have been enthusiastically importing them since 1948 and we would probably go on doing so if we quit the EU. We would be able to restrict the entry of Poles and other Europeans but until we train an entire generation of British workers we will need the skills they bring.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Bill, Any consideration of a future hypothetical situation is by definition ‘fanciful’, but in the event of a future UDI by say the English regions of the British Isles, those 9,015 US troops you say are stationed in the UK will need to be reinforced if they are to be able to occupy the whole of our country against opposition from a say 100,000 strong citizens militia in addition to those units of the British Army that choose to pledge their loyalty to the new nationalist government. Obviously reinforcements could be airlifted across the Channel, or they could stage an amphibious landing on the south coast, but the option that would present the least risk to the incoming reinforcements would be for them to be delivered via those regions of the British Isles that still remain loyal to the EU.
.
If David Cameron, or UKIP were to ever take Britain out of the EU then you are right, all that would be achieved would be a pretence of independence, because we would still be hog-tied by subservience to all manner of international treaties that keep us subservient to the globalist agenda. Furthermore, you are right, that in such an event the Tories and UKIP would continue to permit uncontrolled immigration from the Third World. However the scenarios that I have been considering in the above article envisage an independence declared by a government composed of British nationalists and none of the issues you have raised following from the abandonment of national independence by the Tories in 1956 would then come into play.
.
Furthermore, the emergence of a British nationalist government would not necessarily require the repatriation of the Polish and other European workers that have settled here, as immigrants of compatible European racial/ethnic stock would be welcome to stay if they provide skills and labour that are advantageous to our nation.
Shaun
- Edit
Quite right, Max. There are a lot of good people from the Eastern Bloc, and our nation, in its truest sense, could do with their often hardy genetics entering into the center of our collective DNA. Also, a lot of the Eastern Europeans are racially conscious. In essence, a lot of them could be our allies….
I can’t understand nationalists who consider these people ”foriegners” — they are often culturally, intellectually, and racially identical to the mainstream of our race. Actually, they are often better. Only because the hardiest, most industrious Slavs leave their country; but I’m quite glad they did — 4 million extra White people (many of them young) should be looked at with rational, calculating eyes….
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Although this report concerning Poland is slightly dated, it does show how determined East Europeans can be when faced with the injustices of a despotic regime. https://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/55628,Landmark-freedomfighting-group-remembered
PharmaPhil
- Edit
A lot of Polish women have a habit of mating with blacks though.
Nimble
- Edit
Quote: “There are a lot of good people from the Eastern Bloc, and our nation, in its truest sense, could do with their often hardy genetics entering into the center of our collective DNA. Also, a lot of the Eastern Europeans are racially conscious. In essence, a lot of them could be our allies….
.
“I can’t understand nationalists who consider these people ”foriegners” — they are often culturally, intellectually, and racially identical to the mainstream of our race. Actually, they are often better. Only because the hardiest, most industrious Slavs leave their country; but I’m quite glad they did — 4 million extra White people (many of them young) should be looked at with rational, calculating eyes….”
.
Hardy genetics? They are often better? The hardiest, most industrious of them leave to come here?
.
How hardy and industrious is picking fruit from a tree? The majority of Eastern Europeans of any variety who use the EU as a means to spread into our ancestral homeland are unskilled, menial workers, and while that is often useful, and while I would not cast censure on them due to their form of work, I would prefer that those jobs go as often as they can to our own British population if possible.
.
I’m not sure why you can’t understand the idea of them being foreigners, because that’s simply what they are…foreigners, as in people who come from another land, speak a different language, and have a different history to us.
.
This myth of the superior nationalist Eastern European, doing the jobs that our decrepit and decaying people are unable to do, has been perpetuated by the media for so long that even nationalists are buying it and altering it to triumph the idea of Slavic supermen coming to free Britain from the problems our politicians have inflicted on us, like the tale of Prester John for the 21st century, to do the jobs we slovenly Anglo-Saxons and Celts are incapable of doing, and breeding with our Anglo-Saxon and Celtic women to inject some new life into our dying gene pool…
.
…replace “Eastern European” or “Poles” with any given non-white ethnic group and you’ve got the exact same argument that the anti-white media makes with them.
.
Would you be okay with the Nordic countries being host to waves and waves of Mediterranean or Slavic peoples I wonder? Although that’s already happened to a degree with Sweden hosting refugees from the Balkan conflicts. I’ve noticed attitudes tend to change when Scandinavia is brought up, that oh whiter than white land in so many people’s eyes, I’ve seen people do complete 180’s to the idea of throwing ethnicity to the wind when the idea of a flood of Portuguese immigrants to Norway is suggested, funny that.
Cry Havoc!
- Edit
I dislike Poles. I consider them “enrichers” just like the others. I have found Poles rude, arrogant and sneering of the British. In my ideal Britain they would be shown the door along with the rest.
.
I would like to add that I would however welcome any Scandinavians into Britain. And as many as would like to come! Linguistically and genetically we are the same, and we share a lot of history. It would also be good to see links made to Swedish nationalists to discuss our common problems and possible solutions.
Max Musson
- Edit
I imagine there will be some Poles who sneer at us English, after all, who would not sneer at a nation that does not defend its living space? However there are also many good Poles who sympathise with us and who intensely dislike the Third World invaders.
Steven
- Edit
If there were a choice over which Europeans were to settle here, I would choose Scandinavians, Dutch and Germans. All of these nationalities have more in common with us than Eastern Europeans but, of course, they wouldn’t be liable to come here seeing as they are all richer than we are so we get the opportunistic Easterners instead.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
US troops I wouldn’t worry about. Poor discipline, badly led, morale broken if so much as a vending machine breaks down.
British Army would break them no bother, not to mention a unit of modern day Waffen SS or NS guerillas. It is likely they would run before we got to engage them, and even their special forces have poor infantry skills.
A Mayer
- Edit
One paragraph in this fine article drew my attention and that was the reference to the Soviet Union’s constitution being the blueprint for the EU constitution. I was hoping someone would refer to Vladimir Bukovsky’s contribution to our understanding of this behemoth which intends to end all nations and national identities.I was glad to see Stephane’s reference to Bukovsky, who I recall on his reading the organisation of the EU, said ‘It is our old Soviet Union precisely’..This EU version of the SU might however be successful, it has already abolished most national borders and is now promoting massive immigration into Europe from the third world. In this respect plans are in place to facilitate migration from outside the EU with special regular deliveries of migrants by steamer into Holland and Germany. The latter country’s Green party has called for immigration fast highways to be introduced from Africa and Asia into Europe. The nationalism which helped to bring down communism is being fast destroyed here. One major player in this country’s state apparatus is the BBC, against which Mr Bukovsky ran a campaign. Surely that corporation is a glaring example of state control, which thinking people will see as no more reliable as Pravda which was shunned by thinking Russians.And people are compelled to pay for it (I never watch TV) even the elderly and the poor, it is another injustice.
Tony L
- Edit
Clearly the EU has been modelled on the old Soviet Union and they have plans in place to weaken us by breaking England down into regions. However that has been put on the back burner ever since the North East gave them the bum’s rush under Blair.
If we get our in-out referendum and vote out, then there is no prospect of an EU military response. All this negotiating stuff can be made short work of.
However, I suspect that by one means or another we won’t get our referendum – principally because Ed will win next year.
Steven
- Edit
All of the various opinion polls do indeed predict a majority Labour government (though not of landslide proportions). I expect at the very least the Labour Party will have the largest number of seats in the House of Commons in May of next year and so will either govern alone as a minority government or form a full coalition or working agreement with a reduced Lib Dem party. One thing is for sure and that is David Cameron is a complete loser and won’t win on his own. God only knows what your average Tory Party member was thinking of when they elected that gormless cretin to be their ‘leader’.
Highlander
- Edit
Excellent, thought provoking article.
I was particularly delighted that 2 people mentioned Vladimir Bukovsky. Twelve years ago I attended a talk he gave at the House of Lords where he outlined the exact similarities between the structure of the EU and that of the old Soviet Union. He ended his talk with the words “I have lived your future and you won’t like it!” In the ensuing 12 years I have seen little reference to his talk or views – and of course, no mention on the BBC. Bukovsky’s lecture was well attended by some senior (tory) politicians. I can only endorse the suggestion that everyone circulates Bukovsk’s excellent articles as widely as possible.
The problem is that although people like ‘us’ know full well what is going on and have joined all the dots, the ‘man in the street’ certainly has not even begun to understand most of this (when mentioning the EU to a neighbour recently, she asked “What’s that?”) and therein lies the problem. How many Scots know that their ‘independence’ referendum has the finger prints of the EU all over it? I suspect very few.
Although not given to conspiracy theories, my mind keeps returning to a newspaper article I read (over the shoulder of a fellow commuter and couldn’t, later, locate the paper but I think it was the Telegraph) some 25 years ago; in it, there was a map of Europe with symbols on each country depicting their future use; baskets of food and wheat on France, washing machines/household goods on Italy and so on. Symbols on England were a skull and crossbones on a barrel of toxic chemicals and groups of alien people dressed in their traditional costumes. The clear implication being that the long term function of the UK (or perhaps only England) would be a dumping ground for toxins and refugees/the worlds poor who couldn’t/wouldn/t fit into a new European society.
I dismissed the article at the time but sometimes wonder……….