Muhammad Ali Tells Baffled White Liberal about Race

Muhammad Ali is more famous for being a heavyweight boxer than a racially conscious black man—but thanks to the wonders of the (white-invented) internet, his remarkable 1971 discussion on race on the BBC has now resurfaced for the world to see.

In the video, Ali put down the blubbering liberal Michael Parkinson with a series of well-put, articulate and devastating accurate comebacks against all the usual leftist platitudes about race.

10 thoughts on “Muhammad Ali Tells Baffled White Liberal about Race

  1. Watched the vid on the tube around a year ago brilliant, he made Parkinson look like a spineless politically correct buffoon. The interview is a classic and exposes the lies of progressive liberal ideology and the self interested cowards who promote it.

  2. Anglo-Australain Alliance

    - Edit

    I forgot about this video and I’m glad to see its re-emergence.
    .
    This video should be at the top of all Nationalist websites; for to my mind miscegenation is, bar none, the greatest threat to our folk.
    .
    Familial division is the result of introducing a half-caste into the family, and the ramifications are far-reaching. It essentially severs the bloodline of an immediate family with only one child –not to mention the confusion and lack of identity in the unfortunate half-caste child.
    .
    It is often said by our detractors that race-mixing is natural. If so, why is there not a natural balance of those engaging in it? Why is it predominantly the undertaking, the unholy alliance, of Black men and White women? This they cannot explain –like so many other things, it is beyond their intellectual capacity.
    .
    This issue should be paramount in Nationalist action. Look around you: race-mixing is pervasive, considered ‘hip’ and ‘modern’, and the more it ensues the more acceptable it becomes and ‘natural’ it is considered. It needs to be tackled head on and at every opportunity.
    .
    I don’t as yet have any ideas in this regard other than producing material, stickers, with a simple question –not a gratuitously offensive comment– that might compel those in mixed-race relationship to think before the jump:
    .
    “Race-mixing? Why have a kid that looks nothing like you?”

    1. Franklin Ryckaert

      - Edit

      Yes, and why create a child with an identity problem that it never can solve and will make it unhappy for the rest of its life? This argument should appeal especially to women.
      Muhammad Ali’s remark is brief and to the point : in nature like attracts like. Humans of the same race and culture like to associate with each other, marry and have children with each other. That is natural and leads to happiness. But that foolish white liberal calls that “regrettable”.

      1. That foolish white liberal knows only too well he wouldn’t have that well-paid job of his and matching lifestyle if he refused to follow the Ashkenazi agenda.

        He’s simply one of the thousands of willing White traitor pawns taking orders from their Ashkenazi overlords.

    2. frederickdixon

      - Edit

      I agree that miscegenation is the greatest threat to our folk, and anything that promotes the arguments against – all too seldom heard – is helpful, especially when those arguments are in the mouth of a much loved figure such as Ali.

      We are now in an age when race-mixing is relentlessly promoted in the media, and creatures such as Eddie Izzard are given repeated opportunities and prime media time to promote lies (or, perhaps I should say, extremely partial viewpoints) such as “the British are a mongrel race”, “everything good about Britain came from immigrants”, “we are all Africans”.

      To oppose this media onslaught we have ..well, one or two old books by the likes of Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddart, the more recent “Of British Blood and British Earth” by J.R.Bell (all of which, I believe, are available from or through Ostara Publications), and, hearteningly, this rapidly increasing on-line presence.

      The problem with an on-line presence is that people have to find their own way to it, and therefore to be both aware of its existence and to want to see what it has to offer (contrast the all pervasive traditional media of television and newspapers).

      Getting people to want to find their own way to our media – especially and crucially younger people – is the problem. Maybe part of the answer is to make ourselves “hip” – please don’t laugh – by being revolutionaries against the old ways of thought which came out of the sixties, now fifty years ago for heavens sake, and that old sixties establishment which rules our lives and our thoughts. Revolt against the OLD!!

      In the end, what it boils down to is what Jared Taylor said on his visit to London a few weeks ago – we have a right to a place where we can be sure that our grandchildren will look like our grandparents.

      1. Anglo-Australian Alliance

        - Edit

        I share Frederick’s ideas regarding an appeal to the youth by using ‘hip’ mechanisms.

        The counter-culture of the Sixties can easily be used just as well by us to deconstruct the deconstructed. We Nationalists are the new revolutionaries and the Liberal the new reactionaries. Their ideas are boring, effete, mundane and lifeless. They lack the spark so often often sought by the youth.

        Nietzsche rightly said that everything is cyclical. Like the seasons, what comes also goes; each epoch has its time and is then replaced in the fullness of time. Our time is now –and we must brush aside outdated dogma and sentimental yearning and look to a future we have yet to create.

        I, and I’m sure many others, have ideas in this regard, which are best expressed in a private capacity. Lest to say we pick up the System’s own weapons to use against it.

        1. I must admit to being wary of trying to be “hip”, I’m more hip replacement.
          Even the term “Hip” is very dated now.
          As someone said “Nothing goes out of fashion as fast as fashion”.
          I think racism will become acceptable again as a reaction to the suffocating PC norms.
          Not that I want to yell abuse in the street unless it’s to drown out a hate preacher or something like that.

  3. I don’t really need to take a lecture from this man, who declared himself the greatest but isn’t so great now.
    I don’t suppose the liberals learnt anything from this either.

Comments are closed.