Most of us are familliar with the kind of ‘mind games’ that were played by our pro-multiracialist mass media during the Olympics, in which for politically correct reasons, disproportionately prominent coverage was given to non-White competitors. Few however will be aware of the equally sinister manoeuvrings that take place in order to suppress coverage of competitive games requiring high intelligence and strategic thinking skills.
Not since the contests in 1972 and 1992 for the World Chess Championship between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky has there been anything more than sporadic and/or muted media coverage of chess competitions and the World Mind Sports Association (WMSA) has for some time been unsuccessful in lobbying the International Olympic Committee for recognition and for the inclusion of their games in the official Olympics.
Organised by the WMSA, the World Mind Sports Games (WMSG), are in effect an ‘Olympics’ in which the athletes concerned compete in intellectual challenges, involving traditional competitive games requiring strategic planning and intelligence in order to win. The first such games was held in Beijing in 2008 at about the same time as the Beijing Olympics and this year the second WMSG were held in Lille, in France, with some 140 nations entering competitors to find the world’s best Chess, Draughts, Bridge, Go and Xiang Qi (Chinese Chess) players.
The WMSA had lobbied for permission for their games to be staged in London alongside the 2012 Olympics but their efforts were frustrated. Jose Domiani, a former French international Bridge player, and a spokesman for the WMSA, has complained about their reception, “We should have been in London”, he said, “I tell you the biggest problem. Most of the countries were okay but the British did not want us. They told us they had too many sports already”.
While some might argue that mind sports are not really sports, this is illogical since the human brain is one of the largest organs of the human body and the one that most distinguishes humans from other life forms. Therefore, competitions designed to celebrate intellectual prowess should be ranked as of at least equal importance to physical sports, as mind sports must surely be the most ‘human’ form of competition.
When one considers the propaganda importance of the Olympics in providing our mass media and our globalist political establishment with an ideal opportunity to give disproportionately prominent and favourable coverage to non-White athletes, and to thereby inflate the prestige of non-White peoples in the minds of the Western public, it becomes obvious why they would not want to provide coverage of sports at which African peoples do not excel. Evolutionary psychologists such as Professors Richard Lynn and the late J Philippe Rushton have shown that there are significant intellectual differences between the races and that people of African descent have on average significantly lower IQs than Europeans, Orientals and Asian peoples.
Chess and similar competitive board and table games are known to require high intelligence for success in play and it should come as no surprise to find that success at the WMSG was achieved overwhelmingly by European, Asian and Oriental competitors.
Obviously, our political establishment would not want to recognise mind sports and our media masters would not want to publicise such sports, as to do so would be counter productive to their efforts to convince us all that all humans are ‘equal’ and that ‘racial differences are of no significance[sic]’.
Se: https://www.imsaworld.com/wp/events-calendar/world-mind-sports-games-2012/list-of-medallists/
Max Musson
- Edit
Not so, Revisionist. If what you say is true then how did one time World Chess Champion Jose Capablanca beat his own father (himself a chess player of long standing) at just four years of age?
Furthemore, how did Magnus Carlson become the FIDE highest ranked chess player in the world at the age of 19?
The truth is that it takes intellect to learn the tactics involved in chess and intellect to retain knowledge of past play sequences and use this knowledge to one’s advantage. Otherwise all chess champions would be elderly men and women in their 80’s and 90’s, whereas they tend to be c. 50 – 60 years younger than this.