By Barry Crockett:
I have heard that some young English people alarmed by the deteriorating state of affairs in their own country, have so far avoided taking action in the believe that when things become intolerable in their native land they will be able to “up sticks” and pop over to my country, Australia, and start with a fresh slate in a land of warmth and sunshine amongst people of their own kind. This is a fairly unrealistic for reasons that I will explain. And by the way, it can sometimes get a bit too bloody warm and sunny as well.
Without doubt, our Australian politicians are dedicated to what we call a “Big Australia”, that is an Australia with a much larger population than the current 24 million. In fact forecasts to 2050 anticipate the population rising to 40 million, even if we scale back our current immigration rate to a fraction of what it is now.
Both sides of the political divide in Australia want this increased population because it is a way to keep increasing demand for goods and services. It makes the economy look good, when it isn’t really. It is also heaven for real estate agents and developers who have managed to keep our house prices amongst the highest in the world — and they keep on increasing. The younger generation must now pay more than double for a home in real terms, compared to those like myself who bought a house to start family life in the 1970’s. Renters are also ripped off unmercifully, all aided and abetted by a tax system that works against them, but in favour of landlords.
While this is happening our real productivity is declining. We are now an export economy that is based mainly on mining, agriculture and tourism, all of which suffer periodic and dramatic slumps. Almost our whole mining industry is dedicated to serving the Chinese economy. A slight decrease in Chinese demand for coal or iron ore reverberates through our entire economy causing immense loss of government revenue and rapid increases in unemployment. We will do nothing to offend the Chinese. As the saying goes, when China sneezes…
Just as in Europe and America our Federal government and most State budgets are deeply in the red.
However my main point is that whilst we are said to want a larger population, whites are given no advantages at all when it comes to immigration. We are a country dedicated to the principles of multiculturalism. Along with Switzerland, we have the highest proportion of our population born overseas. There are more than 200 languages spoken here and whole suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne have become ghettos, occupied by a single ethnic population or alien religious group. In some places Somali and Pacific Islander gangs roam the streets at night looking for trouble. Criminals among the more cunning races such as the Lebanese, Vietnamese and Chinese prefer organised crime.
Although British people have been the most common immigrants settling in Australia, constituting around 20% of the total until recently, based on government statistics they are now only 11% of the current intake. The vast majority of immigrants are now from Asia, Africa and New Zealand (and many Asians have learnt to come to Australia via New Zealand). In other words every Briton who wants to immigrate to Australia has to compete with nine others. Not a good ratio.
Australia is now a fully paid up (but only associate) member of the UN-EU-USA cultural Marxist brotherhood and our government are determined to plunge us headlong into any ‘social experiment’ in order to prove their ‘bone fides’ with that small group of schemers that manipulate government policy throughout the developed world. The transformation of Australia into a multiracial society through a policy of mass non-White immigration is just one of them and we are no better off than you are in the UK or Europe. The future battle for our existence must also take place here, in the antipodes, and it may prove to be even more traumatic here than it is likely to be in the UK.
My advice then, is that while we White Australians would love to steal you, our real ‘blood brothers’ from our ancestral isles, the forces at play creating a “New World Order” in the UK are also at work here and you would be ‘jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire’.
Stay where you are, in a land that is familiar to you, and fight for what you have, after all, it’s yours, isn’t it?
By Barry Crockett © 2015
# # # #
Max Musson
- Edit
An excellent and timely message from our new Antipodean correspondent Barry Crockett.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
This is so frightening. I was in Australia in 1993, to get away from the violence in SA, in Melbourne, Geelong, then traveled through Victoria into NSW to Canberra, visited the War museum. All white, clean and friendliest people. Then arrived in Sydney, still clean, fabulous city. My family both Hamilton and Dumaresq have old ties with Australia, so I did some family research in Sydney. The Hamilton’s opened the first hospital in that lovely city and they had lived in Parramatta, so I went there!!! Well what a shock, there were hundred of Chinese, viatnamese and mosques all over. I was invited to dinner by a family I had known for sometime and when dinner was served, their 17 year old son started attacking me verbally about being a South African, basically abusing me about the apartheid system and called me a criminal for killing off blacks. Well after travelling through the aforementioned towns and states, I never saw one abo, and asked him why, I told him they were all killed and then told him, to wait 20 years and his country would be in the same position as we were. In South Africa our population is approximately 3, 9 million ( a lot of whites immigrated to Aussie, new Zealand, Britain etc, but our black population is 58 million! So we carried out a bloody “genocide” against these people!
Karma is a terrible thing, the wheel turns slowy but surely. I truly feel so sorry for those patriotic Australians I met, but already then the majority of their population was demanding multi-culturism. So they got what they wanted! I am so sorry to read this. I loved Australia and the patriotic people I met there.
pint
- Edit
Helena. You should have told that kid, that SA was originally populated by San people.
San people is NOT black people. In fact they’re genetically more related with the ancestors of euroasians races, “brothers” of the people who left africa 60.000 years ago, our ancestors.
Black and white people were both invaders in SA.
The Blacks, got into SA as part of the bantu expansion, almost at the same time as whites’.
It is something hidden from the public opinion, because the big companies behind the black puppet government, want to legitimate that controlable “goverment”, and they sell worldwide that SA is an originally black country, and the whites, the invaders.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Pint, Some of what you say is correct, but some of it is not.
.
Negroes did not exist in South Africa originally. They evolved in the region of Ivory Coast, Ghana, Nigeria and Equatorial Guinea and then once they were introduced to iron weapons by Arab traders they began an expansion which resulted in them colonising central Africa where they encountered the San people.
.
The San are not more closely related to Eurasians, they are simply physically distinct from Negroes having evolved separately on the southern part of the African continent. As a result of numerous encounters between San and Negroes, the San where pushed back into a progressively smaller area and many of their people were conquered by the physically larger, more aggressive and numerous Negroes, who race mixed with them producing the Bantu peoples (part Negro, part San).
.
The Bantu tribes continued to expand eventually pushing the San into their last refuge, the Kalahari Desert where they now exist as ‘the Bushmen of the Kalahari’. Everywhere else they have been racially obliterated by absorption into the conquering Bantu tribes. The Bantus arrived in the Southern Cape area around the same time that White settlers were beginning to arrive also and the Whites having superior technology, took land from the Bantu.
.
There is nothing wrong with taking land from a weaker race if it is needed for our survival. That is the way of nature — the Bantus took the land of the San and White settlers took some of that land for themselves. The same kind of thing happened in North America and Australasia. When White settlers arrived they found warring tribes of alien race fighting over possession of the land and the White settlers joined in. The White settlers were better armed and better organised and were far more successful at that game of territorial expansion than their rivals and this is how the originally White nation states of USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand came to be. Morally, do we have to apologise for being successful? … I think not!
Enlightened Patriot
- Edit
Thank you for your telling insight into the realism of dreaming of a life Down Under as things get more unbearable here. Too late to move now at nearly 70, I think my choice would have been NZ (no offence, I think the climate would suit better) but that probably has the same outlook.
As for this being our land, I am no longer sure of that. “A land belongs to those that occupy it” and the rate at we are being replaced means that we are close to loosing it – if not already lost, due to the uncaring numbers (although still a majority) who seem happy for that to happen.
As someone repeatedly comments on YouTube-
Black countries for Blacks.
Asian countries for Asians.
White countries for everyone.
– or words to that effect.
I sometimes think “But wouldn’t it be great if we could wait until they have ALL flooded into the West then we can move to their vacated lands to start again to create a new, peaceful and successful nation, leaving them all the inevitable mess they will create/are creating?”
Nonsense, for sure, and we all know exactly what would happen then – a parasitical reversal.
MsBridgit
- Edit
Enlightened Patriot….my advice to you is don’t. Maybe the South Island of New Zealand they are keeping it a secret but definitely NOT the North Island….. it is already fully enriched.
Enlightened Patriot
- Edit
Thank you MsBridgit but, no, I have no such intention now anyway. However, it is the future of my 3 grandchildren, all under 10, that I really worry about. For very many centuries, parents have generally been assured that their offspring will have a better general quality of life than they have experienced. I think that for the first time, that expectation has been turned on it’s head and, sadly, now they don’t. It seems there is no hiding place and even if the setting up of a White-based enclave in a `quiet’ corner of the UK (if there is such a thing) came about, with all the difficulties that entails (or, say, in the USA NW as sometimes suggested over The Pond), that leaves our race still very vulnerable. I hate to be defeatist but there seems to be no viable solution. The worst thing is, it is our own people who are enabling this genocide, not those (understandably) who flood into Western countries for a better life, as I would in their place.
Max Musson
- Edit
There is a solution EP, as I have outlined on a number of occasions. The fact that mass immigration is taking place in every White country does not mean we are all doomed, just that we should not entertain the idea that we can at a later date flee to some safe haven. We won’t be able to do that, but we can take steps to reverse the situation if we can get enough people to follow the plans that we at Western Spring have outlined.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
A couple of my good school friends have gone to Australia and New Zealand. I have to say that I have known for a while that it offers no escape from the demographic genocide being perpetrated against us here in the old world. I worry strongly for our white kin who have fled mother Europe, especially those of northern European blood to whom I feel a strong kinship for. I only hope that those particular branches of the Aryan family tree do not go the way of the Persians, the Tocharians or the Vedic Hindus.
I would hope that if ever we have our England back, that there would be an open offer for all those of Aryan blood to settle here, under the proviso that all able males join in the effort to reclaim our European homelands until such time as our place in the world is secured.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
SSerpent Slayer, what an incredible reply. A true Aryan/Atlantean.
.
Australia, New Zealand, Britain, Europe, America and Canada are all being flooded with non-White immigrants.
.
I have travelled to South America, Peru and Brazil are already predominantly non-White; Argentina was white, but I believe that is now changing. Bolivia is predominantly Amerindian but blacks are also growing in number there also, same with Paraguay and Uruguay.
.
This is part of the plan, for a mongrel world, and with non-White genes predominating. No one will remember their history, greatness, and the world will disintegrate. We have seen this here in Africa and so we must fight to resist it wherever and however we can.
frederickdixon
- Edit
As late as the 1950s an opinion poll found that the majority of Australians did not want a separate Australian identity but were content with their “British Race Patriotism” buttressed by the White Australia Policy.
It seems that in all white English speaking countries power has fallen into the hands of a clique which despises the traditional identity of their countries and peoples, and is determined to transform them into something hateful to ordinary people. As this clique controls all mainstream political parties there is nowhere to turn.
How has this happened?
Max Musson
- Edit
I think that’s a rhetorical question coming from you Mr Dixon!
MsBridgit
- Edit
As the United nations are wreaking havoc in the West, they doing the same to Australia and New Zealand. Australia initially took many English families after the war. When they ran out they then started taking Europeans. That was when the United nations and others accused Australia of having a White Australia policy and the UN put pressure on the Australian Government to Asianise the place and with the end of the Vietnamese war they obliged then later blackened the population.
There are now areas in Sydney which are only Somali. Cabramatta is the drug centre with a high Vietnamese population, Lakemba is Moslem and so it goes. Parts of Brisbane are totally Asian. Perth is pretty enriched as well. Look at any news footage of Australian capital cities and you would be flat out seeing an Australian.
Personally I would consider moving to Iceland. It is smaller than the UK and any real increase in the population in a very short space of time is really going to cause concern among the locals.
Max Musson
- Edit
However the recommendation from our Aussie friend is that we should remain in the land with which we are familiar and fight for the survival of our people here.
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
Mass immigration must be the most disruptive thing to have happened to Britain since ed-industrialization in the 1980s, yet neither establishment politicians or media can offer an explanation for why it happened. Occasionally clues are provided like the Channel 4 news item about Syrian ‘asylum seekers’ in Scotland. We were told that Scotland needs 24.000 immigrants a year to ‘survive’, and that without tax revenues from the immigrants government funding of welfare would collapse due to the aging population. The reality is that far from the immigrants paying for our pensions the reverse is true – we are paying for their pensions. Migration Watch estimate that immigration since 1995 has imposed a burden of between 105 to 160 billion pounds on public finances.
.
Like many others I have been looking for answers in alternative web sites like Western Spring, and I think that with this excellent article by Barry Crockett I have found the definitive explanation for what is really going on. According to Barry and other commentators both mainstream political parties in Australia agree that population increase is needed for economic growth, yet this growth is not contributing to a reduction in the trade deficit, or increasing per capita income. The only beneficiaries appear to be the immigrants, their employers and property developers. Having read Barry’s article I have concluded that there must have been a decision at an international level to promote economic growth by immigration in all the developed countries, yet the decision was taken in secret and the public were not consulted. There may be other motives such as undermining the national sovereignty of white countries to facilitate their integration into the EU, the North American Union, and the Pacific Rim Union.
.
It seem that the ruling class are clutching at straws since low levels of investment mean that the only option for economic growth before the system collapses is increasing the population by immigration. One can only marvel at the cynicism of those who are prepared to impose profound and irreversible changes on our societies for short term economic expediency.
Max Musson
- Edit
Most people look for simple answers and while there are some perfectly valid simple answers, some answers are less simple or obvious and this is a more complex issue than some would suggest.
.
The simplest reason for mass non-White immigration into European countries (and I include North America and Australasia in this category), is that the world’s population is expanding at a rate that cannot be supported in the Third World and so their surplus populations are forced to find additional living space elsewhere. The pressures upon these surplus populations driving them out of their native lands are greater than the pressures within European countries pushing them back, and so this endless tide of non-White immigrants arrives on our shores seeking somewhere to live and some means of sustenance, be it work or benefits. And this seemingly endless tide of immigrants will only stop when the pressures within European countries holding them back are greater than the pressures created by their bourgeoning numbers in their native lands. Of course if we Whites do nothing to deter them, that point will only be reached when so many immigrants live in Europe and our gross national product is so thinly spread that the standard of living is reduced to Third World levels, and long before this point is reached, we Whites will have been driven to the point of extinction.
.
Another simple reason is economic. As Barry Crockett has explained, if one increases the number of people living and working in a country, then in numerical terms, then gross national product will be deemed to have increased and brainless politicians can congratulate themselves on having ‘grown the economy’. The fact that the increase in gross national product is not proportionately as great as the population increase and this means that the gross national product per capita has gone down making everyone slightly poorer on average, seems to elude them, just as long as their ‘Bullingdon Boy’ buddies, various key multinational corporations, the banks and their favourite oligarchs are making more money, that is.
.
Anyone wanting to learn more about this should read one of our past articles, entitled ‘The Root Of All Evil’: https://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-root-of-all-evil/
.
Some of the reasons are political. Various organisations established for messianic religious, social or ideological reasons believe that national boundaries and cultural and racial differences are impediments to the spread of their chosen faith. They believe that in order to spread their faith to the entire world requires the elimination of these differences and this can only be done by promoting the ‘World as a melting pot’ idea and encouraging as many people as possible to migrate back and forth so that they become ‘atomised’ individuals with no inconvenient loyalties or affiliations. Marxists, humanists, Muslims and the mainstream Christian churches all fall into this category, to name but a few.
.
Some of the reasons are conspiratorial or masonic, and while there are many quite harmless masonic groups, there also exist masonic organisations that have ambitions to rule the world and who also have a desire to break down all social, national or racial barriers for reasons already explained.
.
Most masonic organisations have no membership qualifications other than a penchant for ritualised social interaction, a love of dressing up, and a desire to feel ‘special’, but there are others, membership of which is exclusive, dynastic, hereditary, racially or religiously based., and these are the ones primarily involved in conspiracies to accumulate money and acquire political power and influence in the furtherance of their aims. These are the ‘Secret Societies and Subversive Organisations’ that authoress Nesta Webster wrote about in the early 1900s and that people refer to as the ‘Illuminati’, or the ‘Bilderbergers’, or the ‘Learned Elders of Zion’, etc.
.
Lastly, one reason is psychiatric. We are all familiar with examples from history of men primarily, who are described as megalomaniac personalities. Such people do exist and while we tend to find out about the ones that hale from lowly beginnings, because they tend to fail as a result of their lowly starting point, some megalomaniacs are born into the richest of families and they suffer no such disadvantages. These are often the kind of people who are found at the helm of organisations of the types described above and they are often famous for their ‘workaholic tendencies’ despite having more wealth than they could realistically hope to spend in a thousand lifetimes.
katana
- Edit
Max, you spent a whole lot of words there giving all sorts of incidental reasons for mass third world immigration, legal or otherwise, into White countries, yet you fail to name the proverbial organized jewish elephants in the room. Why?
.
It was and is organized jewry that opened, and continues to open the flood gates of mass third world immigration to White countries, ending what was effectively a Whites only immigration policy.
.
Organized jewry runs our governments and immigration policies against the true interests and will of the ordinary people. That is THE reason we have non-Whites flooding our countries.
.
And you can call this fact simplistic all you like, but that is the “complicated truth” of the matter that a lot of otherwise smart people have difficulty getting their heads around.
.
I’m sure you understand this, yet we have you commenting here, all sort of coy like.
.
——————
.
For my latest blog post, Onward Christian Soldiers (by Donald Day) – Part 3, click here >>> KATANA
.
[https://katana17.wordpress.com]
Max Musson
- Edit
You are wrong Katana, I covered the machinations of organised Jewry under the heading of masonic groups promoting immigration. If the threat we face is viewed from that perspective, as coming from a ‘hereditary masonic community’, which is what organised Jewry actually are, in common with certain other hereditary masonic communities, that threat can be assessed far more accurately and the threat can be addressed far more openly and effectively, without contravening ‘hate speech’ legislation.
.
Lots of nationalist websites exist today and a large proportion of them boast about their defiant attitude towards the draconian ‘hate speech’ legislation that exists in this country. They can do that because they are currently so insignificant that they are not worth the bother of prosecuting, and they never will be. We at Western Spring however intend that one day we will present a mortal threat to our enemies and when we reach a size such that we are recognised as such, our enemies will if we have not been smart, deluge us with ‘hate speech’ prosecutions and use police state methods to close us down. We don’t intend to make that easy for them and we will not be ‘handing them our heads on a silver platter’ by indulging in crude language or by making statements that in legal terms are undeniably ‘incitements to racial hatred’.
.
This is a thinking person’s website designed for people who can think and we expect our readers to be able to look at what we write and say to themselves, ‘now where do organised Jewry fit into this equation? … Ah yes, I see,… I remember Max referring to them on numerous occasions as ‘an hereditary masonic community’ and I see he has referred here to the Learned Elders of Zion’. Clues don’t come much more obvious than that!
.
Sometimes ‘less’ is ‘more’, and we don’t always have to convey our message in fifty-feet high neon signs.
.
Smart people often have difficulty getting their heads around the ‘Jewish question’ because of cognitive dissonance, the fact that what they see does not tally with the simplistic messages that nationalists often convey. This is why the ‘message’ has to be technically accurate.
.
The fact of the matter is that Jewry are not strictly speaking a religious community. There is a religious aspect to Jewishness, but there are many Jews, many of them famous, who do not observe the Jewish religion. Many of them have converted to Christianity or some other religion or are atheists, but in many cases this does not stop them acting in the interests of what I call organised Jewry. They continue to act in the interests of organised Jewry because it is an implicitly masonic community.
.
It is also a fact that Jews are not strictly speaking a race as some maintain. There is a racial element to Jewishness, because Halachically Jewishness is passed on by hereditary means, from mother to child. But many Jews, many of them famous, are not racially Semitic, Turkic or Hamatic. Some Jews come from blood-lines so intermixed with European blood-lines that they look more ‘Nordic’ than most Europeans. They however, often continue to act in the interests of organised Jewry because it is an implicitly masonic community.
.
Smart people will oftentimes have encountered a nominally Jewish family or individual living remotely from any Jewish community and they will rightly perceive that these Jewish people are not part of an insidious conspiracy to do down the White race and the same goes for isolated individuals or families from any of the ethnic minorities in this country, and they will be deterred from supporting us because of cognitive dissonance, that the people they see do not correlate with what some nationalists will describe as ‘the Jooooz’ in their rants.
.
We should not want ethnic minorities living among us irrespective of whether or not they pose a clear and present danger, for obvious reasons, but our opposition to them must be made rational by an explanation that ethnic minorities, once they are present in such numbers that they can begin to organise as a separate community, will always do so and they will always then adopt an in-group/out-group mentality and begin to act in the same way as a masonic organisation, profiting as a result of their practice of in-group preference at the expense of the host community.
.
When organised minority groups become wealthy and powerful we must expect that they will want to so order our society and implement legislation and engineer events (like wars) so that these all play to their advantage, and we must get away from this belief that Jews are a uniquely evil people. Organised Jewry have been acting as a masonic community for a very long time and they are so much more practised at it than other ethnic minorities, but they are doing no more and no less than other ethnic minorities would do, if we give them the chance.
.
Our task must therefore be to remove all minority groups from within our midst.
TiglathUK
- Edit
Hereditary masonic community?? Family and “Heritage” is good; “masons” are hard-working, creative, skilled craftsmen; The lodge down the street on a Saturday night is full of ordinary, decent, small businessmen and professionals, who just like to get away from the wife for a few hours, meet up with a few blokes for a few beers, swop their business cards, dress up and recite a few para-religious oaths, boarding-school their late pal’s son; “community” is caring and sharing neighbourly kinsmen. —cognitive dissonance +++
Its is primarily the high concentration of bad genes (chains of darkness in the New Testament) in mongrelized phenotypes, which causes them to infiltrate, corrupt, subvert, hi-jack and impersonate old British and French Masonry (and ancient Judahite-Judean society) and produce the hateful Talmudic behaviour. They worship THEIR father (not Adam) and themselves and wealth, and have no hope of an afterlife, but a deep religious urge and chutzpah to buy up everything, luxuriate, dominate and enslave Christendom and the planet –and they have nearly achieved this while we mumble on about Bilderbergers and Masons.
Katana’s message is much clearer and accurate.
She could have mentioned their unique 7500 year mastery of usury, counterfeiting, inflating, stealing, bribing, foreclosing, taxing, defrauding, extorting, blackmailing, pimping, bootlegging, trafficking, assassinating, infiltrating to the top of all modern Christian governments, fomenting bloody wars and revolution, and from Napoleon onwards, increasing POWER! Sorry Max, no other ethnics are, nor ever were, in their league.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi TiglathUK, let us continue this discussion on the page subsequently set up to discuss this issue: https://www.westernspring.co.uk/mass-immigration-its-causes-and-the-jewish-question/
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
I want to reply to Katana about the influence of organized Jewry in government’s immigration policies. It is true that Jewish advocacy groups are lobbying for so called ‘immigration reform’ in the United States and they are quite open about it. For instance the Jewish website https://www.forward.com published an article titled ‘Jews Behind Push For Immigration Reform’ listing all the Jewish groups involved in this lobbying. Also, the website of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency published an article titled ‘Jewish groups call on Obama to ‘welcome the stranger’, which lists all the Jewish groups lobbying for the government to open the door to unaccompanied child migrants from Central America illegally crossing the border. Kevin Macdonald explains Jewish support for liberal immigration policies thus
.
“ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interests because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism”
.
However, Jews are only one interest group lobbying for liberal immigration laws, and they may not be the most important. Amongst other groups that share the same objective are Catholics, bleeding heart liberals, and most important of all the countless lobby groups and think thanks that represent business interests. Therefore to claim that Jews totally control our governments and dictate their immigration policies is an exaggeration. To hold such an unbalanced view on the subject does betray anti-Semitic prejudice in my opinion, although it should not be regarded as hate speech.
Albert
- Edit
In 1910 The White Race was 29% of the World population…..in 2015 it is 9% and falling.
Steed
- Edit
We’re very nearly at a point where the most hopeful recourse will be to create new reserves of ethnically and ideologically similar people. I am a proud Englishman, but I’m under no illusions that current state borders will withstand the next century. Many have called me defeatist for saying this, but I see no hope in deluding ourselves. European man will survive, but only a tenth or so of us. The other 90% shall wilfully dissolve into the new raceless (I prefer to say identity-less) global society. For now our goal should be to procreate and instill ancestral values and self-sufficiency in our children – to detach as much as possible from the poisonous new society around us.
Hessler
- Edit
Maybe Elgin.
Neo-Nazi group target Elgin as they look to create UK’s first fascist town dubbed ‘Citadel 1’
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/neo-nazi-group-target-elgin-look-5241506
Max Musson
- Edit
Unfortunately, the NBU have made their task infinitely more difficult than it might have been by publicly announcing their plans for Elgin.
.
One key tactic must be to build a support base in any target location quietly and without attracting attention, and therefore without having to contend with organised resistance from the local political establishment.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Is there not a problem here? If you keep it quiet then, by definition, no-one will hear of it and no-one will go there. But in reality, as soon as you start to put the word around in nationalist circles it will become known generally, articles will appear in the press (as here) and all hell will break loose. So, since that is going to happen anyway, would it not be better to be upfront about our intentions from the start?
Max Musson
- Edit
If we employ stealth there is the prospect of achieving a certain level of strength and support, such that we can withstand the counter measures employed by our opponents.
.
Of course there is always the danger that knowledge of our plans will leak out prematurely, but it is stupid to announce in a press release that we are to attempt to take over a town before we have even got our organisation established there in any numbers.
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
Not only is it stupid of them to advertise their intentions, but it is stupid of them to present themselves in such a way that they can be labelled ‘neo-Nazis’. Surely the whole point of the exercise is to create a ‘consciously white community’, as Max puts it, without it having to be overtly political. The Afrikaner-only town in South Africa called Orania ought to be a template for any community building in Britain. It’s appeal is that it offers a safe, wholesome environment for raising children where people are bound together by common heritage, language, and race, but without any kind of militancy or political purpose. Simply being with your own people should be reward enough, without requiring everyone to adhere to a particular political outlook.
.
Perhaps we can learn from the ethnic minorities in England that have demonstrated successful community building. For example the Muslim ghettos in the North of England do not depend on a hard core of Muslim Fundamentalists for their existence. Instead they evolved organically through family and religious ties rather as a tribe does.
Max Musson
- Edit
I think you are right regarding the tactics employed by the BNU regarding Elgin, but you would be naïve to assume that ethnic minority (primarily Muslim) ghettos have been created without the presence of a hard core of Muslim fundamentalists within their midst.
Stefan
- Edit
My understanding is that immigration policy in Australia was biased in favour of “Asians” some while back, so as to make the place less White, more multicultural.
So things have been made more difficult for Whites to settle there.
Does anyone know who was the driving force of that decision?
The same thing happened in America in the 1960’s too.
Blue Rose
- Edit
Oddly enough Stefan, the responsibility for ending the so called White Australia Policy rests firmly with our Australian Liberal Party (which, despite the name, is considered a “conservative” force by most Australians, but of course it is not).
Let that be our main lesson about “conservatives”.
The one who really abolished it was Prime Minister Sir Robert Menzies, aided and abetted later by two other Prime Ministers later on, Harold Holt and Malcolm Fraser. The Fabian Socialist Prime Minister Gough Whitlam was delighted to put the finish it forever after his 1972 election win for Labor.
The previous system called for the wonderful “Dictation Test”, where any prospective immigrant could be given a language test in any language at all. So for example a multilingual educated Chinese could be tested in, say, Maori, to get the desired effect.
Stefan
- Edit
Thanks for that info, Blue Rose.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
It seems unlikely to me that white countries with more than (say) 75% immigrants will survive, or that the inhabitants will ‘possess’ the territories. As far as I know, ever since civilisations emerged, they’ve had a small proportion of administrators/ aristocrats living off entire countries, but tolerated if their net contribution was positive, and disliked and unstable if they were too parasitic. The costs, incompetences, decay and failure of utilities, will increase. Immigrant populations are often illiterate and unskilled; many aren’t even competent in their own language. How can (e.g.) advanced medical services, transport, housing maintenance, airports, technically difficult agriculture continue? There will be concentrations of ‘communities’ and situations as in Indian slums will increase. Established groups of e.g. Chinese have some record in e.g. restaurants, but imho remain uncreative. There cannot be unlimited numbers of jobs as immigrant spokespersons, teachers in remedial education, political hacks, therapists, radio and TV hacks, junk food suppliers, researchers who do nothing, and all the rest. The article also is careful not to mention the influence of Jews.
.
I hope there are human geography departments somewhere which study these things and can produce better forecasts than simple straight-line projections.
heechee
- Edit
NO! We are British, this is our homeland, even if we only save a part of these islands for ourselves, and future generations, that it what we must do!
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Heechee, all of those Islands belong to the British people, to even allow a handful of others to live on them, will in the future become a problem for your descendants. They must all be thrown out! If you read Rushton’s book on race, you will see that these people when under threat, breed more, their gestation period becomes less than 9 months!