By Max Musson:
As the dust begins to settle around the offices of Parisian satirical magazine ‘Charlie Hebdo’, on Rue Nicholas Appert, and the French police continue their search for the perpetrators of yesterday’s blood-bath, it seems as though the whole media have gone into overdrive in an effort to convince us of two things:
That we should mourn those slaughtered as ‘champions of free speech’ and all values quintessentially French; and that we should not in any way associate the presence of the gunmen in France with the suicidal policies of the French and other EU establishment leaders, of facilitating the growth of frequently hostile alien communities within our nations’ borders.
The truth is that ‘Charlie Hebdo’ is a liberal/left-wing magazine whose late editor Stéphane Charbonnier, one of those murdered yesterday, was a life-long supporter of the French Communist Party. It is a weekly magazine which has relentlessly satirised and ridiculed not just Islam, but traditional French values, the Christian Church and in particular Jean-Marie Le Pen and the Front National.
It is ironic that the pluralistic, multi-cultural, pro-Gay rights society that ‘Charlie Hebdo’ has striven for so many years to champion has proven to be both the source of the antagonism that exists between the magazine and the Muslim community, and the conduit through which the Arab gunmen that slaughtered their staff came to be in France.
As a weekly magazine, ‘Charlie Hebdo’ will have struggled to find new material far more than any less frequently published periodical and this may have been the reason why they chose to court controversy with Islam by so often publishing material that Muslims will have regarded as highly inflammatory.
To support the liberal/left-wing political tradition which has encouraged and facilitated the settlement in France of so many Muslims, it was then the height of stupidity to have relentlessly baited the Muslim community in a way they would obviously find intolerable. If you go out of your way to continually enrage a certain volatile group of people, you must expect that sooner or later they will strike out at you, and given the record of extreme violence by Islamic groups elsewhere, it was wholly predictable that extreme violence would eventually be visited upon ‘Charlie Hebdo’.
Perhaps Georges Wolinski, the Jewish cartoonist who so mercilessly caricatured Jean-Marie Le Pen; Jean Cabut, the father of AIDS ridden Gay punk rock icon, Mano Solo; and lifelong Communist Charbonnier, would have made different choices in their lives, had they the benefit of foresight? Certainly however, we who have witnessed their deaths must now not fall into the trap of compounding their folly by perpetuating and worsening the conditions that have brought about this tragic situation.
Liberal commentators in the media have been busily lionising the work of those murdered yesterday and today’s newspapers are full of images of people foolishly asserting ‘Je suis Charlie’, proclaiming their solidarity with these men who have spent their lives undermining everything that sane people hold dear and who have now become literally the authors of their own misfortune. In a tragic irony, Charbonnier’s last cartoon predicted his own death. The latest edition of the weekly magazine shows a gun-toting Islamic terrorist saying: “Still no attacks in France? Wait – we’ve still got until the end of January to present our best wishes.”
The liberal press attempt to fool us into thinking that there are only two alternatives open to us: that we must maintain the decadent, liberal-left, multicultural status quo as an act of defiance demonstrating that ‘the pen is mightier than the sword’ and as a tribute to these supposedly ‘heroic’ souls who ‘gave their lives’ for freedom of speech; or that we will be forced to subject ourselves to even greater and even more draconian police state measures in the hope of preventing further terrorist atrocities. Their argument is that no-one should want to live in a police state and therefore a stoic continuation of the status quo is our only viable option.
What they ignore quite deliberately is the third alternative, which represents a marked divergence from the liberalism that has been responsible for our current malaise, and this is why they refuse to contemplate it. They would sooner live their entire lives with the threat of terrorism and risk death than abandon the folly of their liberal beliefs.
It is undeniable that the overwhelming majority of terrorist outrages committed both in Western countries and throughout the world over the last twenty years have been committed by so called ‘Islamic extremists’. Barely a week goes by now, without news of a bombing outrage, or a beheading or a massacre, or of hostages being taken or of a fatwah being declared, so much so, that far from signifying ‘religion of peace’, the word ‘Islam’ has almost become synonymous in most Western people’s minds with the word ‘terrorism’.
The term ‘Islamic extremist’ is bandied about as if to suggest that within Muslim communities there are significant numbers of ‘moderate’ Muslims who do not either support the motives of, or at least sympathise with the terrorists within our midst and while such people must exist in sizeable numbers, their numbers and/or influence within their communities are both woefully lacking.
When there is scarcely a single Muslim country in the world that is not racked by Jihad, terrorism or some form of sectarian insurgency it should be obvious to any objective observer that Islam as a religious teaching is so intolerant of dissent that it is incompatible with democracy, freedom of beliefs and freedom of speech. I say this not with the intention of denigrating Islam, but merely as a statement of fact.
While some individual Muslims may be more tolerant, Islam and Islamic communities as a whole do not tolerate dissent and if we want peace to prevail, we must ensure that Islamic communities are not situated within the same political jurisdictions as communities that wish to exercise freedom of belief and freedom of speech, who wish to express scepticism and/or dissent where religious matters are concerned, or who simply reject Islam. Anything else is simply asking for trouble. Anything else is like sitting on a ticking time-bomb, for as their numbers grow, Muslim groups in the West become more insistent upon having their way — Sharia Law — and their more militant elements become more audacious in their acts of terrorist violence.
The security services are already reporting that the magnitude of their task in preventing Islamic terrorism is such that they are almost overwhelmed and further terrorist atrocities are inevitable.
As the size of the Muslim population in the West grows, it is logical to assume that so too will the number of extremists among them plotting terrorism, and based on current trends a point will inevitably therefore be reached, beyond which the police, the army and the security services will be unable to maintain law and order. Paris and London, Sydney, Boston and Berlin will have become the ‘European’ equivalents of Bagdad and Damascus.
Western governments must ‘grasp the nettle’ now, before it is too late and take concerted action to persuade Muslim minorities to relocate to countries that are Islamic by tradition and whose mode of government and whose social mores are in keeping with their beliefs. If not, we can look forward to many more days like yesterday in which deluded liberals reap the fruits of their foolishness, especially those who think it funny and clever to relentlessly denigrate and ridicule the passionately held beliefs of others.
By Max Musson © 2015
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Although not an immutable law it’s fairly evident that most societies gravitate towards those values which come closer to reflecting the inner nature of their folk. So for example the free thinking peoples of North West Europe were at the forefront of the Protestant revolution whilst those in Southern Europe, of a more herd like nature, tended to seek reassurance in the continuing traditions of the Roman Catholic Church.
Of course, “the West Indian in the woodpile” here is that the Jews have used our Aryan love of freedom to undermine our society. “Je suis Charlie Hebdo” is no more than a sickening slogan concocted to beguile the very best of us into supporting the obscene agenda of those who hate us and wish for our destruction.
Shaun
- Edit
Couldn’t agree more. Watching the French grovel together in a huge, peaceful crowd while aliens blow them to bits is rather awful. It made me feel sick.
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, we have today witnessed 1.5m people march in France ‘in defiance’ of the terrorists, but in reality, the French and many people in this country have been conned into calling for a maintenance of the multicultural status quo instead of demanding the dismantling of multiculturalism. In six months their march will be forgotten and mass immigration from Third World, primarily Muslim countries will continue unopposed.
.
The correct response to the terrorist outrages should be to declare, ‘Je ne suis pas Charlie, stop immigration, start repatriation’!
Brin jenkins
- Edit
Difficult to argue otherwise.
On the towers I rely on the fall time of 8.4 seconds, this is free fall time and could not have occurred without explosive assistance. This is a law of gravity apparently breached.
Albert
- Edit
Great article Max, Charlie Hebdo..and like them in other Countries… like Private Eye here….They hate everything that made the West Great….and they have helped cause the diminish of The West.
This time they really have come unstuck with their disrespect and smugness, One of them said a couple of weeks he would rather die standing up than on his knees …well he got his wish.
In saying that RIP to the victims.
Jack Mite
- Edit
Spot on Max. When we first saw this news in Australia, I expected the French to come out with vigorous demonstrations against Moslem immigration. But instead we got the pathetic “Je suis Charlie” slogan repeated ad nauseam.
This French response is that of an already defeated people. Psychologically defeated, and impotent.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Let’s wait and see how the Front National due in the next set of elections, then we’ll see how defeated and impotent the French are. Media lefties are worried sick that the FN are likely to profit from this tragedy, let’s hope that they’re right!
TiglathUK
- Edit
Non! Non! Je suis Charlie……Martel! (Tours 732)
Brin jenkins
- Edit
Well, well, what a plot! Hoist by their own petard seems to fit this situation very well.
Unfortunately this is not going to end well for any of us, and is just an acceleration of the diabolic social dynamics set in motion by Blair and others like him.
TiglathUK
- Edit
The Europeans most to blame for the Paris murders–apart from the gunmen–are the British Forces-for-hire warmongers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron–who wildly cheered Bomber-Blair’s farewell speech in Parliament, and continued interfering with and bombing Muslim countries and attracting in these alien hoards to Christendom. I hope, one day, these evil men will get justice.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Bring back the Beano!
Enfin je me rappelai le pis-aller d’une grande princesse à qui l’on disait que les paysans n’avaient pas de pain, et qui répondit : Qu’ils mangent de la brioche.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Or to quote the editor and dandy of Bi-centennial Magazine the Scarlet Pimpernel :
‘They seek them here they seek them there, look out the door, they are every where!’
katana
- Edit
Max Musson on 2015/01/08
It is undeniable that the overwhelming majority of terrorist outrages committed both in Western countries and throughout the world over the last twenty years have been committed by so called ‘Islamic extremists’. Barely a week goes by now, without news of a bombing outrage, or a beheading or a massacre, or of hostages being taken or of a fatwah being declared, so much so, that far from signifying ‘religion of peace’, the word ‘Islam’ has almost become synonymous in most Western people’s minds with the word ‘terrorism’.
————————-
Of all the terrorist outrages over the last twenty years, I’d say that many have Mossad, Western intelligence agency fingerprints all over them.
.
The history changing one of them all, blamed on Arabs, is of course 9/11.
.
The 2,200 plus qualified engineers and architects from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth conclude the obvious: that the WTC buildings were brought down by explosives. This leads, if you follow the trail, to an equally obvious conclusion that 9/11 was an “inside job”.
.
Perpetrated by those that control the USA, UK and other Western governments, namely the, Neo-cons, Zionists and ultimately Organized Jewry at the center.
.
A purpose of 9/11 is to justify the War OF Terror not only on Arabs, the so-called, ‘clash of civilizations’, but to also justify the ever tightening police state and tyranny against us.
.
The importation of 50 million plus Muslims and blacks, and much more to follow, into Europe is also part and parcel of the plan by these psychopaths, with the end result of a ‘clash of civilizations’, including genuine Muslim terrorist acts and false flag terrorist acts attributed to them, that only benefits the psychopaths and our dispossession.
.
————-
.
For my latest blog post, Jews Must Live – Part 4, click here >>> KATANA
.
[https://katana17.wordpress.com]
ChrisN
- Edit
Je ne suis pais Charlie mais nous sommes right Charlies! It is sound military advice never to fight a battle on more than one front but this is exactly the effect of multiculturalism. Not only must we contend with the Islamic ‘front’ but also we must also counter, inter alia, the greater threat presented by miscegenation.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
I am not Charlie either as it’s just about continuing the status quo that got us into this mess in the first place.
PharmaPhil
- Edit
It has to be asked why, if France is so keen on being secular, did it invite so many religious extremists into the country?
What did it think would happen?
What do they think will change now?