Immigration, Religion

In Praise Of The White Racist Gene

142 Views 13

By H. Millard:

EvolutionThe so-called White racist gene or the claim that Whites are born racist and thus are an evil on this dark planet is something that we hear fairly often from non-White haters of Whites and even from weak seed, self hating Whites.

Too many Whites seem to want to run away from this racist characterization and from the notion that we have a racist gene or inborn characteristic.  I say we should not run away from such a gene or characteristic but embrace it and cultivate it and try to breed more Whites with this gene or this characteristic.

Being a White racist is not something to be overcome. At its most basic, such a gene or characteristic is a survival mechanism to help us fulfill our highest possible destiny and it gives those with it a reproductive advantage for their DNA code because it tends to keep them from miscegenation.  Thus, if they breed only White, their genotype will be just as pure in the next generation.

Now, in this regard, one must understand that the goal of the life force as manifested first in DNA and then in the total organisms engineered by the DNA is to expand always and contract never.  It is this life force which is within DNA which in turn makes us as we are, that “wants” to survive and expand to fill all of existence with itself.  Why?  It requires no more reason than to understand  that existence as a mass of living, sensing, experiencing minerals is better than being so-called non-living, non-sensing, non-experiencing minerals.  Life is its own reward and its own reason for being.  It needs no more explanation than that.

Back to “that” boogey man word that so many timid Whites are afraid of: racism.  What is racism, really?   My definition is that it is the rational and intelligent belief and recognition that humans, due to evolution, have evolved into different subspecies, races and subraces and that the different types of humans are on different evolutionary tracks so long as they don’t have gene flow from one type to another.  I also say that this is a good thing for Whites and that our evolutionary track  toward more Whiteness is the best one for us.  Yes, my taxonomy is a little different than what you may have been taught elsewhere, because I believe the major races of humans are actually subspecies and that the subspecies can then be further divided into races and subraces.  So, under this taxonomic scheme we Whites are a subspecies.  I’m not much concerned about the races and subraces of Whites who fall under this subspecies label and they mostly conform to our ancient nation states.  We must define ourselves as we are, which is different from non-White humans, but we must be careful to not define ourselves too much or we end up fragmenting our subspecies–Whites.  We are a White people. That is what is important.

Now, those who hate Whites use various other definitions of racism  to brow beat and cow Whites into submission.  I say screw them.  Personally, I just don’t care what non-Whites think about anything and I’m not one who feels it is necessary to be loved by everyone. I believe we Whites must separate as best we can from all non-Whites.  If we are not able to physically separate, because of our jobs or other factors, we can still separate by avoiding non-Whites in our everyday lives as much as possible.  No, we don’t have to shout it from the rooftops or wear it on our sleeves.  We can be polite and just stay away from them and their businesses and avoid social situations as much as possible.  No one has a right to know what we’re thinking unless we want to tell them.  For some of us our Whiteness and our beliefs are religious in nature or fill the spot that other religious beliefs fill in the lives of others. And, just as most people simply don’t discuss their religious beliefs with others, so too is this the case with many of us.  If we wish to discuss them, we do.  If we do not wish to discuss them, we don’t.

Now, back on that so-called racist gene.  I accept the hypothesis that there is a genetic component to White  racism and that it is a survival mechanism as it tends to make those with it not want to mate with non-Whites, and by not mating with them, those with the White racist gene keep their White family lines pure by avoiding gene flow that would corrupt the White genotype and cause a devolution from White to non-White.

It has been said that the only proof that is needed to prove that there is a gene for anything, say, the ability to read, is to find a gene that keeps one from having the ability to read.  If there is the latter, then there is the former.

And, is there a non-racist gene that might indicate that there is a racist gene?  Yes. It is actually the deletion of around 25 genes from Chromosome 7.  Those who are missing these genes are born with what is called  Williams Syndrome–which affects about 1 in 7,500 to 20,000 people.  Those with Williams syndrome are often easy victims because they are unable to pick up danger signs in social situations and have no racial bias.  They are, in a sense, easy victims who will walk right into danger.  They are genetic non-racists and they lack the survival genes that those with the so-called “White racist gene” have.

Be White, Think White, Live White, Breed White.  Stay pure.

By H. Millard © 2014

# # # #

13 thoughts on “In Praise Of The White Racist Gene”

  1. Shaun

    - Edit

    As always, h. Millard offers the reader a great perspcetive on our people’s position on this planet. A racist gene? I’ve read that ethnocentrcism has a genetic basis (through twin studies), so it is tautological that some people are more ethnocentric than others. Just as some people are more prone to agression.

    Fundementally, H Millard bases his anaysis of our current world-crisis on his understanding oif evolution. There are many weak-seed Whites who lack a strong sense of racial identity — there does need to be a seperation from these people. We need to, as a movement, see the White masses as genetic potential, but understand that the pressures of globalism will mean that many of our folk will not survive.

    If anybody is reading this, please join Western Spring and let’s take the Road Less Travelled into a life-path where we can at least offer the chance of survival at the section of the White race (about 30% in my opinion) who have the instincts to do so.

  2. SigBrit

    - Edit

    Some time ago I wrote this to put to students considering ‘racism’.
    “Racism, what is it?
    ‘Racism’ is a natural love of that which is closer genetically to you. As such, racism is a good thing and has kept us alive for millions of years. It is an integral part of the group survival instinct in all humans. It is part of nature. To punish racism is to punish nature. When we are made to feel guilt for being ‘racist’ we are being made to feel guilt for being human.
    Any doctrine, such as PC ’anti-racism’, which seeks to punish nature and humanity as a whole is abhorrent. PC culture sets out to destroy our natural instincts and our love of our own, whilst at the same time making it seem righteous to deny ourselves that which is common to all other races.
    The ‘Anti-Racist’ culture is indeed pure hatred manifest. It is a perverse culture based on the denial of nature and the pretence of righteousness used to cloak the most vile intolerance of the purest human love: the love of one’s own. It strikes at the heart of the community and is designed to destroy the basic building block of that community.
    The organic society is self-sufficient, it is built of extended families with common bonds and a common identity. As such, it is not the full servant of the state. It can even rise and threaten the power of the state. Thus any totalitarian state must destroy the basic building block, the family. The loving family is the enemy of the new state. I choose my words carefully, ‘The loving family’. To destroy the family the state must destroy the will to love. It must make love seem evil. Love, that natural love of that which is closer genetically to you, has been re-named ‘racism’. Racism is carried out by ‘racists, and racists are EVIL. The state says so.
    It is ‘racism’ that causes us to love our children above all others, then our family, then our extended family and community. To tell us to ‘love’ strangers in the same way and to the same extent as we would love our own sounds good and righteous, but when analyzed is perverse. The logical extension of this ‘equal love’ doctrine would make us extinct in a few generations.
    We would be prevented from showing any special care for our children. We would have to neglect them and look after others. To fail to show that extra love for our family and community would break the bonds of that community. It would cease to be a community and would collapse. ’Racism’ binds us together as a family and a community. It is not hate. It is passionate duty. It is selfless commitment to those we care for. It is love without lust. It is indeed the purest form of love. It is what makes life worth living.
    Without love we are nothing. Without love we are simply fodder for the tyrants, able to be manipulated and distracted by the trivia in an ever unfulfilled search to fill that hole in our souls which can only be filled by love of our own. Racism is love. ‘Anti racism’ is hate.”

  6. GEORGE

    - Edit

    We are all the same under the skin. I wonder if anyone who would say that would bet on a white man to win the next Olympic 100 metres sprint? Would the same person back a black man to win the 100 metres in the swimming pool?
    I must admit to watching a lot of TV. One thing I have noticed is the number of black faces on University Challenge. To be exact, the number is none. The same for another ‘high brow’ quiz Only Connect. Recently I watched a documentary on the CERN project. The noticeable thing about the researchers was how white they were. Tonight I’ve watched the team of scientists who have landed a rocket on a comet. Again, not one black face.
    The liberals will tell us that intelligence is nurture not race. All of these projects involve people mainly under fifty. How much longer must we wait for ‘nurture’ to produce black scientists that actually produce something useful? Again the liberals will tell you about the numbers of black Graduates and Professors but how many are actually doing something that benefits all and not just blacks? How many are attending University because of ‘diversity’ placing?

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      You are quite right George and for the same reasons Mensa become very embarrassed if you ask them how many Negro members they have. Negro members of Mensa are as rare as hen’s teeth!

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      Firstly, the KKK is an anachronism. It is a part terrorist, part masonic, religious sectarian, rights for Whites organisation that had a place in the early post-Civil War period but which is outmoded in the modern day. For the KKK to admit non-White members simply adds another incongruous dimension to the organisation’s bizarre composition.
      .
      The social dynamics within a multicultural society are such that ethnic groups are driven to organise in their own self-interest and to operate in-group preference in their dealings with others. Those individuals that do not cleave to their own specific ethnic or racial in-group find themselves the losers in all manner of social interactions because of those fundamental social dynamics. A KKK with non-White members would become a multicultural society in microcosm as those same social dynamics drive the individuals involved to compete along ethnic lines for the soul of that organisation, and the infighting that would result would render it impotent.

  8. Helena Hamilton

    - Edit

    If the races were not different, beneath the skin, how is it possible for Forensic anthropologists,to differentiate between the races, by examining skeletal remains? To those who say that everyone is the same beneath the skin, please explain this to me. I am an anthroplogist and I can tell you that we are not the same, just one example: the skull of the white man differs from that of a black man. Also one just has to use their eyesight to see the many differences. Those who believe that all races are the same under the skin, have no understanding of anthropology! Its better for them to refrain from writing rubbish than exposing their ignorance on the subject. There are not only obvious physical differences but there are also vast cultural, spiritual, mental and emotional differences.

Comments are closed.