By Max Musson:
I have spoken at a variety of nationalist meetings during the course of this year, to individuals, to groups and sometimes to the leaders of other nationalist organisations that have formed, either as campaign groups or as political parties, and while Western Spring continues to grow and attract new members, I am sometimes left wondering at the mentality of certain people.
These are the people who loudly proclaim that they are prepared to do ‘anything’, ‘absolutely anything’ — ‘whatever it takes’ — to save Britain or to save the White race, and yet they steadfastly refuse to do THE ONE THING that is required, THE ONE THING that will save us.
They state emphatically that they will ‘go to the ends of the earth’, they will ‘face any demon’, ‘endure any danger’, but when asked to do THE ONE THING that will bring success, they come up with all manner of excuses to avoid doing THAT ONE THING.
What is THAT ONE THING? It is to provide the leaders of our movement with the money needed to achieve success. MONEY is POWER in our capitalist society and if a movement doesn’t have MONEY, then it won’t have the POWER to do anything effective. It’s as simple as that.
Some people criticise me for asserting this truth, they accuse me of being fixated on money, but they miss the point. I am not fixated on attracting ‘money’ per se — money for money’s sake. I am fixated on attracting money because of the POWER it will provide for our movement. Everything we hope to achieve for the salvation of our people relies on us gaining the money and therefore the POWER to turn our dreams into reality.
So, what are we to make of these individuals who claim to be so desperate and so willing to save our nation by whatever means are necessary, but who as the leaders of various nationalist organisations refuse to ask their members to donate the money essential for success, or who as members of those organisations, refuse to donate that money.
Often such people will claim that they or their members cannot afford to contribute the £30 per month that I suggest, but that is rarely the real reason for their objections. I have always stated that if £30 really is too much, as it is for some people, they should pitch their contributions at a level they can afford. We have many members who contribute less than £30 per month, but they are balanced by many more who can afford to and who very generously do contribute larger amounts.
Very often the people who refuse to contemplate contribution levels that will give us a realistic chance of achieving success, demonstrate by their behaviour that they clearly can afford them. I can recall on a number of occasions individuals storming out of meetings at which I have been speaking, only to be later found after the meeting has finished, in a bar downing their third or fourth pint of beer of the evening. Or they will at a later date post on Facebook, photographs of their foreign holidays etc.
I have come to the conclusion that such people are what others have previously labelled ‘hobbyists’, i.e. people for whom nationalist activity is a ‘hobby’, a form of social activity which ranks in importance among their other hobbies and clearly ranks lower than certain of life’s luxuries that they are unwilling to sacrifice in order to secure salvation for our race.
Hobbyists don’t want to belong to a movement that seriously aspires to succeed, if the price of that success involves them sacrificing one of life’s luxuries, and the leaders of the hobbyist groups don’t want to belong to a movement that seriously aspires to succeed, because that would mean becoming involved in a real life or death struggle in which they fear they wouldn’t measure up.
Hobbyist leaders don’t make a conscious decision to become hobbyists, they simply undergo a kind of subconscious reasoning process in which, over time, they unconsciously adopt a mode of behaviour that ensures they are never truly exposed to the danger of actually being EXPECTED TO SUCCEED. If no-one really expects them to succeed, and they don’t really expect to succeed either, then no-one need be too disappointed or feel too bad when they don’t. And so, there exists a kind of un-written, subliminal pact between the members of nationalist groups who are hobbyists and the hobbyist leaders of those groups. The leaders have learned never ask the members for enough money such that they will then feel OBLIGED TO DELIVER RESULTS, and the members have learned never agree to contribute amounts of money, such that they will then feel OBLIGED TO DEMAND RESULTS.
Hobbyists instead, spend much of their time participating in an electioneering process that they know they will never be allowed to win and cannot win without massive amounts of money behind them. They may of course manage on isolated occasions and temporarily, to get the odd councillor elected here or there — or at best, one or two MEPs — but they will never have the assets necessary for a real electoral breakthrough, or the chance to acquire real political power and in the vast majority of cases, they will never win more than a derisory share of the vote.
Hobbyists also spend much of their time: mounting completely ineffective demonstrations that inevitably become counterproductive demonstrations of weakness rather than demonstrations of strength; or collecting petitions that no-one will ever take notice of; or writing letters to their MP, that their MP will never read; or trudging the streets posting leaflets through peoples’ letterboxes, the overwhelming majority of which will never be read by the recipients. Hobbyists are also to be found spending hours creating new blogs or websites, or micro-parties that will say the same things that dozens of other blogs, websites and micro-parties already say, without stopping to think whether what they are writing is actually original or whether it actually adds anything of value to the body of nationalist opinion or endeavour that already exists. However, we must all eventually realise that we don’t need more ‘clones’ of blogs or websites that already exist; we don’t need more clones of nationalist micro-parties that actually exist; we don’t need more ineffective, poorly attended street demonstrations; we don’t need more nationalist candidates contesting elections we cannot win; OUR MOVEMENT NEEDS MORE MONEY!
More money means that we will become more professional, that we will be able to employ full time activists, that we will be able to purchase the plant and equipment and build the support infrastructure that a power-winning movement needs if we are to succeed and which we will never succeed without. We will be able to acquire the Six Prerequisites and through them the capacity to wage and sustain a campaign for political power, long enough and intense enough, for us to have a chance of winning.
So instead of spending hours performing all of the ineffective activities listed above, spend the time saved doing overtime at work and when you receive the additional money earned, donate it to whichever nationalist group you support.
Then once you have begun donating money in this way on a regular basis, you will be justified and what is more feel justified in demanding credible results and the leaders of the organisation you support will have no hiding place. They must deliver results or be exposed as failures!
They will not have the excuse that they failed for lack of money, because they will have more money at their disposal than they will ever have had before, and if they can’t or won’t deliver, then join another organisation that has a credible plan and that is doing more and getting better results than the one you are in at the moment.
Some cynics and others who resent having their ineffective ‘hobbying’ exposed will of course say ‘Ha!’ but what have Max Musson and the other leaders of Western Spring achieved and in the material sense we do not yet have much to show for our efforts, but we have done much in terms of providing leadership at a time when there is a critical leadership vacuum in British nationalism.
Without our leadership and financial assistance to other groups with whom we have found common cause, some of it overt and much of it covert, there would be no new ideas or initiatives emerging to give us and our people hope for the future. It would be true to say that virtually no new nationalist initiative to emerge during the last two or three years has not had our support or involvement in some way or another.
Part of our approach is that we do not intend to do everything ourselves. We of Western Spring cannot be expected to fulfil all of the functions of the greater movement we hope to fashion. We have adopted a ‘modular’ approach in rebuilding the nationalist movement and this involves us bringing disparate groups together and encouraging everyone to begin ‘rowing’ in the same direction.
As we have indicated many times, the nationalist movement needs to take a new direction and although the nationalist movement in this country is relatively small by comparison with the establishment political parties, turning that ‘ship’ is like turning the Queen Mary and it will still be some time before our efforts begin to show real tangible dividends, but if all nationalists have faith and take heed of our massage and align themselves with us, we will have both the money and the power to make our dream of salvation a reality.
By Max Musson © 2014
# # # #
If you are more than just a hobbyist and wish to join us in our struggle to secure the salvation of our people, then email: [email protected].
# # # #
AAA
- Edit
In addition to Max’s comments on those who donate less than £30 to Western Spring, it should also be noted that some of these people make up for their ‘shortfall’ in other ways. They write articles, formulate ideas and prospective projects, network, organise events, put petrol in the tank… ultimately they spend much time working for the Cause which, in view of hourly pay, is a considerable donation of money. This undertaking differs from the ‘hobbyists’ and their semi-religious adherence to the ballot box in that this work is extra-parliamentary and directed towards a plan B, a new and refreshing vision and direction primarily exemplified by Western Spring’s Six Prerequisites and White Independent Nation’s revision and adaptation of the Pioneer Little Europe initiative.
.
If you too are unable to contribute £30 but can do any or all of the above tasks, then perhaps this could be your additional contribution.
.
We are in a struggle and therefore sacrifice is needed. £30 a month breaks down to 2-3 pints (depending where you live) per week. Surely the Cause is worth 2-3 less pints consumed each week?
.
I’ll wager Imams and Rabbis don’t have to write such articles every now and then to compel their brethren to put their hand in their pocket.
John Beattie
- Edit
The Rabbi(ts) has / have scarier propaganda to shake down their tribe , than we do. Perhaps we can learn from the good author of the ” Turner Diaries ” ,wherein Dr. Pierce states something to the effect that ….. if our people can’t love us, then let them damn well FEAR US ! About time says I . !!
Max Musson
- Edit
You’re a scary man, John Beattie! :), But seriously, there will be no need to go down a ‘Turner Diaries’ route if we all simply follow the game plan that I have outlined on here, creating Consciously White Communities and acquiring the Six Prerequisites. This plan will enable us to advance assertively until the state no longer exists in any credible form. Then even the most reluctant of our people will love us because we will be the only civilised authority in the land.
Shaun
- Edit
My friend, White people will be forced to defend themselves over the next couple of decades so there’s no real need to get ourselves arrested by sparking anything off. The scum that rule over us would love it if we where all in prison! The 6 pre-requisites does include the possibility that Whites will have to defend themselves, but Turner Diaries, leaderless resistance-type tactics, won’t work because you need to have one thing if you intend to take over: infrastructure.
It’s better that we build our resources, develop our minds and bodies, and let the System make all the mistakes. This isn’t a cop out; I don’t, however, think we need to go down that route. Let’s build our enclaves….
Chris
- Edit
(I don’t mind if you moderate this comment as I wanted to get some things across.)
As a general point while you see your ‘market’ as ex Nationalist Party Members I believe the ones who can be the most useful are the ones who do not have a history of activism. My reason is the following:
–
I would advise that for any members who move to any of these start up areas to think about taking measures not to have their details appear on publicly accessible records like the electoral roll and land registry. I would expect the CST and other non-government groups are taking names from their own databases and going through them with easily available commercial public databases to automatically identify the start up areas and who is involved.
–
For example ex BNP members from Leicester, London, Peterborough, Bristol, Essex etc appear on the land registry/electoral roll to have moved to one area then that area is both identified as a start up area and the people in it. In turn any commercial enterprises can be identified. Also, if someone is not on their existing database, moves to the area then a month or two later joins the local Labour/Conservative party then they will mark that person down as suspicious.
–
If the CST have suspicions that an individual is ‘undercover’ then they can potentially pass that information on. They are certainly not ‘sporting’. The data, resources and commitment are easily available to them. Normal White lefties do not have the commitment or zeal to do that while there are more than enough White hating Jews who will gladly volunteer to go through database records to ‘identify’ individuals.
–
Also, if one of the publicly known people in your organisation moves to a start up area and not take steps to have their information not on publicly accessible records then that pinpoints the area early on. So if you have anyone in these start up areas already I would advise they all take action to get their information removed from publicly held records or perhaps even not to sign up on the electoral register.
–
I would advise not to concentrate on one area but to branch out to a few places. When media interest does come, whether in the form of some ‘Alt-Media’ VICE investigation or mainstream then their propaganda is less effective if you are split over multiple places. You could even play cat & mouse with them by having a few people registered at an address in one area while the people actually live 5-10 miles away and only use the address for post.
Max Musson
- Edit
Some very good points made there Chris. I have already resigned myself to the fact that I will sadly not be able to live in an enclave until it has achieved such a size that it can withstand the attention I would attract.
Charles
- Edit
April Gaede moved to Kalispell and encouraged others to move there. From what I’ve heard, she was able to overcome the leftist opposition. Kalispell did get media attention, it doesn’t seem to have changed much, though the twins may have been affected by being pushed into the limelight.
On the other hand, the PLE prospectus advocates that a PLE avoids the spotlight until it is set up.
Shaun
- Edit
You make some good points, but some paranoid lunatic working for the CST doesn’t exactly fill me with dread.
Chris
- Edit
It’s not ‘dread’, it’s deciding not to hand yourselves on a plate to your enemies. The less they know the better.
Investing years in say infiltrating a local political party and then getting ‘ousted’ because they left a paper trail of evidence for some eager beavers is a sure fire way to get to know where.
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
The problem you have is that for people to trust you with their money, you have to deliver results without money. Just like the NSDAP, which was always short of funds, until it reached the point where it had plenty of money coming in, because it had plenty of support and therefore plenty of donors. It seems we are plagued with such problems but as Herr Hitler’s revolutionaries proved, will overrides all material obstacles so long as it is strong enough.
I am sure that, so long as all those on your side want success, fate will bend around your will. Whether it will provide money, mass supports favourable circumstances that lead to our heading a national revolution, who knows. But our time is coming and soon.
Max Musson
- Edit
This is true to a considerable extent SS, and this is why I warn people that progress may be painfully slow initially, until we reach a certain critical mass.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Personally I have been longing to hand the reigns over to well qualified and well funded professionals for many years now.
It is essential that some of the youngsters in our movement are given all the help we can give them. Their task is going to be even harder without this help forthcoming.
Future generations will be out numbered more than we are today, therefore, this financial support is going to a crucial factor in the survival of our race.
Crazy Englishman
- Edit
What I have asked before and still have no answer for is why have you not got a donate button on Western Spring? I can understand that a regular standing order can help undertake pre planned objectives with more certainty. There has been many a time when I would have been able to donate, although probably wouldn’t of met the entire yearly donation needed but it would have been over half. This would of been done when I knew that the cash was spare instead of committing to regular outgoing that may of been put in question when money is tight.
The unavoidable covert nature of this plan unfortunately will have impact on new financial contributors until there is a visible benchmark for all to see. I think this would be the major obstacle to overcome in ways of exposure to achieve full financial support from the nationalist community..
AAA
- Edit
I and others involved with Western Spring have spoken about these points raised here and by Frederick below, and we’re in agreement with them. Here’s what we discussed:
.
Unfortunately the word ‘donate’ has now become sullied and this perhaps explains people’s reluctance to use it. However, there are other words to use instead: ‘contribute’, ‘pledge’, ‘chip in’, and my favourite, ‘Help Us to Help You’. Rather than a donation button why not consider a funding page, perhaps offering six projects (each relating to the Six Prerequisites?). This could be presented by six fundraising thermometers** with (non-jeopardising) details on what you aim to achieve and purchase.
.
We are in agreement that the funding thermometer is a positive tool. It is satisfying to see it rise and assures people that they are not alone in contributing. This shared effort instills more sense of brotherhood as many people chip in to attain the goal.
.
As is mentioned above, we monthly donators often find ourselves with a little ‘cash on the hip’, or else are sometimes moved by a splendid article or goodwill gesture to ‘buy the Cause a pint’ by offering an additional few quid. At the moment such philanthropy is thwarted by the absence of online contribution.
.
These ideas are not to replace the monthly subscription, merely to add to it. Monthly funding can still be relied upon as well as a few extra pounds coming in online. Some people have played safe by contributing each month an amount they are certain to possess. But this amount often increases and decreases throughout the year. It is therefore not wise to increase the standing order lest one should fall foul of being out of pocket for a short while.
,
Finally, if these six funding thermometers are employed then this venture will be original. Other groups, namely the BNP, have previously used the thermometer as an appeal for funds. However, to my mind the goal of the appeal has always been dictated by the Leadership and there has never been other options that people might want instead to contribute to. How refreshing then would it be for Western Spring to let its membership and supporters dictate where the funds go? Of the six prospective thermometers some will attract less, others more. Ultimately the contributors dictate where their money goes and I feel this will be gratifying and motivating insofar as they are being included and not left feeling distant or isolated. They will also see where their money is going, and Western Spring will have a good indicator of the sentiment and desire of it members.
.
Perhaps this could be the “visible benchmark” mentioned above? An all-round winner?
.
.
** https://thermometer.fund-raising-ideas-center.com/
Crazy Englishman
- Edit
Definitely would be a good move and I do like the proposal concerning choice of contribution destination, I personally would trust Western Spring to decide where the money is best spent but others with queries regarding any of the six prerequisites have that option. Maybe they could be positioned in order of importance on page.
Contribute is a positive word that will make people feel they are actively helping (contributions pledged for the future of white children).Hand written notes added to personalise the requests apparently have higher success rates.
When I have seen target thermometers on other sites and they are not doing too good it can be off putting, we are all aware how people like to be seen as following the herd. A lot of thought will have to be given to the target system.
Hopefully it wont be too long before I can make contributions to Western Spring.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Very true about the money. I wonder if it would help to get it coming in if Western Spring were to identify an ambitious, but practical, project which would be imaginative enough to catch people’s attention and which could be realised in a reasonable time if enough money were available – and then launch an appeal for funds. Some of those who contribute could be turned into regular donors.
I’m a member of several countryside and wildlife organisations and that is how they all operate; one-off appeals for special projects, and there may be several in any one year, bring them in huge sums.
Wayne
- Edit
‘The sinews of war are infinite money’ said Cicero, or some such notable man of wisdom. The same it seems can be applied to the political arena and many others. Although history is also littered with examples of those with less defeating those with more due to clinical planning and organisation, although I do agree with Max completely.
My personal situation is that I have a child on the way and would like to be married and out of our 1 bedroom flat before the arrival. There certainly wont be any fancy honeymoons are racking up of debt or big ceremonies, but I feel having children and strong traditional family units is vital for Europeans currently as our culture, communities and traditions are being eroded so viciously.
Having said that, I will be meeting some of the guys after Christmas and will arrange to contribute what I can as I see such movements as priceless at this pivotal time in our history. Also, it may be worth considering fundraising events (not necessarily based around nationalism) or a ‘safety net’ fund for ordinary British families to pay into to protect the most vulnerable of us through the tough economic times ahead. This could be used to pay a struggling families mortgage for a couple of months or make interest free loans and leave plenty to be diverted towards the cause, even if a hundred thousand families paid only 10-20 pounds a year.
On the note of economics I think this 40 min video is a must see – ‘All wars are banker wars’ please watch it for an excellent overview of the last 150 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-0BPMwgKNA
And then read this for a good insight into right now (the fact that the Ruble plummeted 20pc this week just goes to prove how close we are to the brink financially, and ‘when all else fails, they take you to war’
https://www.gold-eagle.com/article/grandmaster-putins-golden-trap
Sorry for such a long post and my best to all!
Gallienus
- Edit
Congratulations Wayne on the little one! I have just one little one and we’re anxious about having more as my wife is getting a bit older. I think your point about “having children and strong traditional family units is vital for Europeans..” is “spot on” as far sighted thinking.
.
I’m a US citizen, not UK, so I don’t know if things over there are different in raising kids. However, everybody told us how much a chore having a child was. When he came it was very different: he was/is such a blessing. Possibly being very bright (sorry for bragging) is part of it but he (John-III) is really such a character. Sometimes I tell people that he’s partly named after Good King John of England. Raising a little son is such an interesting journey that I have pity for people who were never Dads or Moms.
.
Of course at this time my own country [ex-country?], the USA, is being overrun by multitudes of those who breed on the Government dole, and then don’t even care to hang around to raise their children. Also despite our fleet of nine 12 billion dollar nuclear powered aircraft carriers (cost apiece without any aircraft or equipment), our territorial homelands are being overrun by invaders from Mexico. People are saying that at least 3 states: Texas, part of California, and New Mexico, are going to be returned to Mexico. Still we do what we can. I think having kids and the financial bit Max wrote about are very important. I’m going to scrounge around and see if I can find a groat or perhaps a quarter-farthing I can send him…
JP
- Edit
Your base is hardly making ends meet as it is. Your base lives in neighborhoods and communities that are being flooded with immigrants. Your base is not the middle class and upper middle class that live in suburbs and safe white neighborhoods that have expendable cash.
Plus, begging for money makes people suspicious. It’s just how it is.
Max Musson
- Edit
I’m not quite sure what you are trying to say, JP, but you appear to be saying that our target audience is too poor to donate money and made suspicious by the sight of us ‘begging for money’.
.
While some of our target audience are indeed unable to afford to make regular contributions, they constitute only a very small percentage. Others can afford to contribute modest amounts and the vast majority can afford at least the £30 per month that we propose. Whether people choose to afford to contribute towards the goal of securing the freedom and self-determination of our people is another matter.
.
Lastly, while in the above article I address this issue of the ‘hobbyists’ no one should assume from this that we are ‘begging’ for money or need to ‘beg’ for money. Our contributor base continues to grow and as time passes more and more people are beginning to realise that our approach is the only one that has a chance of success.
JP
- Edit
How do you know what they can afford?
Max Musson
- Edit
I was a professional financial adviser for 33 years and believe it or not with that much experience of dealing with clients money, you get a good idea of what people can or cannot afford to do.
ChrisN
- Edit
I’m not being funny but what are you going to do with the £30 per month? What sort of sums do you need to save the White race? Have you costed it? Can you provide a breakdown of the figures? Rather than see my money disappear into a black hole I’d like to see some evidence of where it’s going.
Max Musson
- Edit
What are we going to do with the £30 per month?
.
Broadly speaking it will be used to acquire the Six Prerequisites. It will go into a fund, some of which will be used to fund the activity of our movement, but the bulk of which will be accumulated to buy property.
.
What sort of sums do we need to save the White race?
.
If you have read my articles you will know that I have indicated somewhere in the region of £100m per annum over a five to ten year period. I’m sorry that I can’t be more accurate than that, but precisely how much money it will take very much depends upon people like you and how long it takes before you realise you have no other option but to support our plans. Unless of course, eventual White racial extinction is something that appeals to you, that is?
.
Have you costed it? Can you provide a breakdown of the figures?
.
We considered various scenarios all of which produce different costings dependent upon the assumptions made. In truth we must acknowledge that so many nebulous factors are involved that any such calculations will in practice prove wildly inaccurate, so instead of looking at the problem from the perspective of how much we will need in order to have a chance of succeeding, we have looked at it from the point of view of how much money would we need in order that we could not possibly fail?
.
There is a realistic potential for us to raise £100m per annum, based upon 300,000 people contribution £30 per month, and with such sums available to us, my belief is that we could not possibly fail.
.
Rather than see your money disappear into a black hole, you’d like to see some evidence of where it’s going?
.
I can understand why some people think this way, but what you need to realise is that you can only realistically expect to get that kind of reassuring information by joining and then actively taking part.
.
The nature of our struggle is such that there is no way that we are going to publish verifiable details of our activities to any random enquirer who happens to show a vague interest in what we do. If we are going to do that, then we might as well send detailed monthly reports on our activities to Searchlight, Antifa, the CIA, Mossad and MI5.
.
If you currently earn an average salary, you will at present be donating c. £450 every month to an organisation, our government, that likewise fails to give you any meaningful breakdown of where that money is spent or how it’s accounted for, and that organisation is currently using an undisclosed amount of the £450 per month you pay to impose a totalitarian regime upon us and engineer the extinction of our entire race. If that is not enough to motivate you to place a little faith in the good intentions and heroic efforts of those who place themselves at considerable risk in order to fight against all the odds to save our people, then you need to seriously re-think your system of values.
.
What do you stand to lose if you help fund our movement to the tune of £30 per month?
.
Over five years this would amount to £1,530, the price of an old banger or a one week, off-peak continental holiday in a three or four star hotel. This is not the kind of sacrifice that is going to make or break many people. It’s not a ‘life changing’ amount of money, the loss of which many people will grieve over.
.
On the other hand, what do you stand to lose if you choose not to fund our movement and the machinations of our treacherous establishment parties continues unopposed?
.
The writing is on the wall as far as an answer to that question is concerned, is it not?
odins eye
- Edit
well said max,
I will be donating soon if I get an extra shift iv asked for at work.
as other people have said I have disposable income some weeks and not others, so if you go down the rout of donating to projects ill be able to give more on certain weeks.
a good project might be a small boxing gym? it covers a lot of bases.
.makes money and is self sustaining (might even make a profit)
.will help people stay fit and learn how to defend them selves
.can be used as a regular meeting place for like minded people and draw more people to our cause
. can be used as a “safe place” to hold meetings and other functions in the area
i’m sure people can come up with more examples and ideas
CarlaWesty
- Edit
Max, I acknowledge your honesty and integrity. Nationalists have seen donation monies misused and squandered in recent years. It has made them cautious. Also we live in difficult economic times. Can I suggest a property project to be used as a nationalist social centre. A house or warehouse for example. Form a committee and legal documents and set up a Trust Management system. I think that would enthuse and energise many of us to support it.
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you for your advice Carla, that’s almost exactly what we’ve done. Merry Christmas!
PharmaPhil
- Edit
My prediction is for a block of whites who want to be white & promote that will emerge as lobby group with slightly fuzzier ones on the edge who just want immigration limited & that sort of things.
I think there will be a white political force of some sort who just concentrate on that & are not necessarily negative about anyone else, apart from pointing out the failings of the present system & encouraging whites to be happy with themselves, shed the guilt complex & reject the anti white propaganda.