If People Are Not Valued By Blood, They Are Valued By Money

By Jane Everdene

Nationalism is all about blood.  And soil.

We care about the soil because of the blood. The remains of generations of our ancestors lived their lives and died here and it is this fact that makes our country – our land – our soil – sacred to us.

“Blood” refers to the closeness of our relatedness to others.

We all know the saying “Blood is thicker than water”, and that it means we will do more to love and care for our kin, our relatives, than we will for strangers.

In common with a number of universalist religions, the modern ethos of liberal democracy, and the so-called Far Left ideology of Communism, urge us to love and care for all of humanity as if they were all our brothers.

This, of course, goes opposite to the Eternal Laws of Nature.

Not only does indiscriminate love, equally for everyone, contradict the laws of Nature and our natural impulses, but it actually devalues love itself.

In the Disney cartoon “The Incredibles”, the villain, Syndrome, declares “When Everyone is Super, no one will be!”

It is like that with love as well. If we would love everyone equally, then we would in fact love no one. Love would have no value.

To have love, to really care about people for themselves rather than for what they do for you, takes something special. Normally that special thing is a blood bond.

People will fight for and protect their relatives even when there is no obvious gain for them selves in doing so. And yet this urge to help our kindred is the love that we all hope to give and to receive.

Science has found out how we evolved these feelings of kin-bonds, love and the willingness to help our own child more than that of a stranger.

Understanding the scientific basis for this is vital if we are to understand also how these traits are being lost and may be lost completely if we don’t find the quick and direct way to protect them, and to protect our folk and civilisation itself.

I know that sounds a bit over-dramatic a statement to some, but bear with me and I shall try to simplify the explanation the best that I can.

Our blood relations share more genetic material with us than strangers do.

Scientists have noted that populations of both humans and various animal species that are more homogeneous are more inclined to look after each other, go out of their way and self-sacrifice or show generosity to one another and exhibit other social behaviours that allow a happy cooperative social grouping.

In the past it has been assumed that this had more to do with how closely brought up the individuals are to one another and their familiarity.

Evidence shows there is more to it than that however, because in various groups where there is known to be more genetic diversity, it is not enough that they are familiar with one another and how closely they live together.

Consistently there is less love in communities where there is more diversity.

Although racial/ethnic diversity is an obvious example of this diversity, the important new understanding is that of genetic diversity.

Our genes have been able to survive over generations because the way they make us behave has helped copies of those genes to multiply and to continue into the next generation.

The same strategies do not work in every evolved ethnicity.

The genes eventually settle into what is called an “Evolutionary Stable Strategy” or ESS.

Essentially this defines our national and racial temperament and defines why our cultures differ in the way they do. It explains why, if you would replace Europeans with Africans, the Africans would continue to exhibit their own culture, the ESS, that works best for their genes and which has not been the ESS developed by Europeans.

There is the most genetic diversity in the world in Africa. An African will enjoy far less common genetic interest with those around them than a European does with other White Europeans.

As the gap widens in terms of common genes, the less helpful it is to have genes that make you sacrifice your own chance to reproduce and spread your own genes.

So personality traits that make people take a chance on others will pay off when they are carrying copies of that helper’s genes but will be taken out completely by natural selection if the helper is assisting someone who has genes for exploiting rather than helping. At any rate, this result happens over time as a general trend.

Civilisation and a smooth running society depends upon cooperation and the natural urge to trust other members of the community, help each other, and pass on genes for continuing like that.

This is what real natural socialism is all about. Quite the opposite to the strategy of unnatural socialism that advocates those with the genetic traits for being kind and good should throw themselves in with others who have a very conflicting ESS as a group.

In mathematical models it is known that a cheat will beat an individual that attempts to cooperate with him. However, due to their mutual mistrust, a group of cheats cannot cooperate enough with each other in order to defeat a group that can work organically as a team.

‘Team Britain’ is being turned into self-serving cheats who are losing the very instincts to trust one another and to be the strong force we once were.

This is what is happening with the increasing genetic diversity. Once the mutual trust that derives from homogeneity is lost, there may well be no chance of fixing the tragedy and as all the world falls into this darkness, the light may be lost forever.

As our mentality changes and we become more genetically diverse, the “right-wing” materialistic attitude emerges, that people have to be giving something of worth or else they are considered worthless.

In Africa it translates into the attitude that if you can get something out of someone else, then you should. Everyone should.

There is a culture that everyone should aspire to be the biggest bully, and where those who cheat or force their way into higher status positions and greater riches are to be admired and emulated.

In the west, this mentality is often found in successful businessmen and entrepreneurs who, along with politicians of the Conservative ilk, like to justify this mean and destructive behaviour as “Social Darwinism”.

They think they are the fittest because they can treat others like dirt and personally, as an individual (having only contempt for society) enrich themselves at the expense of others.

Psychologists think of the Westerners who behave like this as having the traits of psychopaths, as they have no sense of guilt or concern for the suffering they cause. Here thankfully, it is still considered unusual and freakish to be so callous.

As the genetic diversity within our society increases, we will increasingly find that those of us who are disgusted by selfish individualistic behaviour are the ones sidelined, ridiculed and regarded as weak and strange.

With less and less blood in common with those around us, the ESS, evolutionary stable strategy, that makes most sense from a genetic point of view will be one in which there is a tendency to exploit others or be exploited yourself.

This is exemplified in the false notion that “socialism” is the equivalent of scrounging. No one with such a mentality wants to give of themselves to the less fortunate, because – and it becomes true with the genetic diversity – the ‘less fortunate’ will be seen as trying to exploit and ‘sucker’ those helping them.

What a dismal future this looks to be.

Ideally a society should care for its unfortunates – the disabled, the unlucky, orphans, the elderly and those whose talents are in skills such as art or philosophy that cannot produce material wealth for the elite. But this ideal is being left in the dust.

Instead we are heading for a time when a person must be either one of the elite or making some kind of material profit.Together with breakdown of the extended family, family ties of blood which have hitherto protected us to some extent from exploitation, we will increasingly become isolated individuals living in the cold, uncaring world where we must live by tooth and claw amongst hostile groups. We are progressively witnessing the end of everything we, as a people have held dear since the earliest of times.

The first steps to take to avert such a catastrophe, are for each of us to take a look at our own lives and how we are helping to keep to our kin and protect the folk. It is time to take individual responsibility and be prepared to give and to love – not just to take.

### ###