As told by: H. Millard
You know, man, most of my early years, I just drifted. I had no idea about the big picture of existence and my place in it. I didn’t see the patterns that start with invisible vibrations, frequencies, waves and then sub-atomic particles, atoms and molecules and right up to our everyday reality and the magnificent beauty of existence and how it all fits together. Then, I stumbled upon Arman’s Teachings and it all made sense. I was awe struck and I never again even looked at water draining from my bathroom sink without seeing spinning galaxies and hurricanes and all the rest of existence. To say that I am in a state of constant joyous wonder at just being alive and having a direction, a purpose and a meaning is an understatement. I don’t even like to go to sleep at night, because I’m so overjoyed at life as I now see it and want to experience everything and keep doing the Lord’s work.
Everything in existence is spinning, turning, spiraling. Even in rocks, the atoms and subatomic particles are doing this. The constant spinning, turning, spiraling are essential to existence and there is no existence without it. And, because of the spinning, turning, spiraling, there is constant change; and change is the definition of evolution.
In the bigger sphere, we see cosmic evolution and here on Earth we see organic evolution. They are part of the same thing. We are part of cosmic evolution, man, and it will continue on whether we know it or not. But, here’s the thing: Arman says that we Whites–due to the way we have evolved–and the particular DNA code that we have acquired through our evolution, are now at the point in our evolution that we must consciously work to evolve in the best direction for ourselves. To not do this is to throw the dice and risk going extinct. No other people are at this point, man. The evolutionary elevator has put us at the point where we must now consciously act–where we must burn calories and use our brains and our bodies–to go higher. And, we must do this alone as the distinct people we are and leave the other kinds on the floors below where they must face their own destinies which are different from ours. We cannot help them. If we try, we will share their fate and become as them and we will die off. We must be indifferent to them and not interfere in their fates. We are on our own. We Whites are alone. We are a different kind and we are on our way to becoming an even more different kind if we follow the right path. If we follow the wrong path, we will blend back in with the darker masses of humans from whom we evolved, and then we will become extinct. Here’s something else, man, our White skin and our other racial characteristics are absolutely essential to our evolution along the right path. Yup, our evolution is not only spiritual, it’s also physical.
Arman’s Teachings take up hundreds, maybe thousands of pages, and not everyone wants to read that much. Besides, many of the Teachings just expand on and clarify a few basic concepts, so here, off the top of my head, and as best as I understand them, are the very basic ideas of this religious philosophy and system in a much abbreviated fashion. Any of our kind are welcome to follow our beliefs. There’s nothing to join. You don’t send money to anyone. No one tells you what to do. You just believe and live as we live. We put much stock in the individual –in the One–and in individual responsibility, individual freedom and individual initiative, and all who believe are equal to all others who believe. We are peaceful, non-violent and law abiding and treat all others as we want to be treated. We love and have great joy in life, and it is death that we hate. Life is existence. Death is non-existence. Again, we are indifferent to other peoples and do not interfere in their business or fates and we demand the same courtesy.
Many of the things in the Teachings may already be believed by others of our kind, because most of the Teachings are just common sense to those with a higher level of White consciousness. However, even in those common sense things, the Teachings scratch the surface more and go deeper into explaining why we believe them. For example, the Teachings go into detail about the science of how and why we have evolved and why we must remain separate and isolated. In doing so, the Teachings mostly give solid, scientifically valid, answers that do not require blind belief. Using our reason and our intelligence are important to us.
Anyway, man, I’m already talking too much. Here are some of the things I believe and the way I live and these are based on Arman’s Teachings.
GOD–We usually use the term First Cause. The First Cause was what brought existence into being and maintains it. He/It is ineffable and beyond our comprehension. We often use the terms “nature,” or “ways of existence” as synonyms. We use spinning, spiraling symbols–primarily the 6-armed fylfot in different forms, but also representations of DNA and spirals– to represent the First Cause and His/Its attributes, and we believe we must have at least one of these symbols on or next to our skin at all times. We say that our God is the God your god would worship if your god were real. We say that the First Cause is ever expanding and is filling the nothingness with His/Its somethingness and we are part of that. In addition to the symbols we use, we also use a fire, a candle or even a light bulb burning all the time to represent the First Cause putting forth effort to exist and defeat the darkness of non-existence. We see the spinning forms as the engines of creation, maintenance, and destruction.
THE GROUND OF EXISTENCE–All the usually unseen things that build the framework and which underlie our everyday world. Vibrations, frequencies, waves, subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, etc.
EVOLUTION–A reality. It is inherent in existence. Existence requires movement. Movement means change. Change is evolution. Cosmic and organic evolution are essential to the Teachings.
HUMANS–An organism that evolved as a result of the basic forces of evolution starting with the first molecule of DNA that made the leap from so-called non-living minerals to the living minerals that make up life.
WHITE PEOPLE–A race or subspecies of humans that has branched off from other humans and which has the potential to evolve into a new species no longer capable of bearing children with the rest of humanity if certain conditions are met–most importantly, avoiding all gene flow. It is our purpose and our religious duty to so evolve. We believe we must stay as separate and isolated as possible from those who are not our kind. We often refer to White people as “our kind,” and we define this to mean one who is born of two White parents. This is essential to our system, because one must be born with the same “parts” as us to be us. One of our sayings is: “Blood, Belief, Action.” And, without Blood the other two are as meaningless and useless as a radio that is missing the right parts. We encourage our kind to embrace their true genetic identity as they were born to be and to connect with like minded people of our kind whether they exactly follow our ways or some other ways that will help with the survival and expansion of White people worldwide. We believe we must live long, happy lives and not put ourselves in danger for false causes.
CHILDREN–The most important thing that any individual of our kind can do is to have as many children of our kind as possible. This is an individual responsibility as we are not born as couples. We are born as individuals. Another of our sayings is: “Nature screams out to every type of organism: Make More Like Yourself; Expand always, contract never.” We believe nature has put a clock in our DNA that is there for our long term survival and evolution that tells us when to start having children and when to stop. We don’t even have to think about these things as nature automatically starts and stops us in this. We believe we live on in the children we produce, so long as those children are our kind, and that our survival, our expansion and our evolution requires that we have as many children of our kind as possible. Anything that keeps us from having as many children as possible is evil.
DNA CODE–A deeper understanding of our belief in having as many children as possible in our image is found in our belief in the DNA code. We call the code to make White people, CODE A, to distinguish it from other DNA codes. This is the “Blood,” in our saying “Blood, Belief, Action.” The most essential part of any living organism is the DNA code, and it is different in different organisms and even in different individuals within a group. It is even different in identical twins. We believe it is the individual responsibility of each of our kind, both male and female to expand their DNA code by having as many of our kind of children as possible. We often say that like snowflakes, each one of us is different, but we are all snowflakes if we are our kind.
HOW WE LIVE–We live like everyone else, but we try to mind our own business and not interfere in the destinies of people unlike us, and we prefer plain, form follows function, comfortable, loose, dark clothes usually of cotton or some cloth that can be washed with soap and water, and relatively simple living styles while not denying our senses, our personal freedoms and our happiness. We try to do good and avoid evil. We try to speak softly and we try to be respectful of all life. We just quietly believe and live our lives and don’t bother anyone or force our beliefs on anyone else. Our main form or worship is living right, having children, and bearing the symbols. The most orthodox among us often cover their heads–sometimes with a brimless sort of black skull cap or even a cloth that often covers the whole head almost to the top of the ears (don’t confuse this with skullcaps of other religions). We live with great joy at the very wonderfulness of life itself and we sometimes describe ourselves (no matter how old or how young we are) as the people of spring or as the new people. It is said that we live our beliefs each and every day as our primary form of worship. Many of us do not wear our faith on our arms or act stridently in its expansion, but simply live the Teachings quietly. What we believe is no one’s business unless we want to share our beliefs.
RITES AND SUCH–We say a simple “Thank you for letting me live another day,” or something similar, morning and night and focus on the sacred symbols including the fylfot, spirals and representations of DNA. Believers may join together for studying the Teachings and for more formal rites. Some of us believe in having a candle or a fire or even a light bulb lit all the time as a representation of the First Cause “eating” the darkness and non-existence.
SENSE OF AWE AND WONDER–The more we learn from science about the cosmos, evolution and nature, the more in awe and the greater the sense of wonder that we have for existence and the more thankful we are in being part of the process and for knowing our purpose and our direction and for being able to compete and struggle to get to the top of the pile of life. Our beliefs and true science are never in conflict.
OUR PURPOSE AND DIRECTION–To evolve ever higher along a White only path and to never stop evolving so that we may fill all of existence with ourselves and our DNA code.
NATION–We carry our nation in our DNA code. This is where our loyalty lies. We have a dream that one day we will be able to have our exclusive landed nations–or entire worlds–where only our kind can live and that such nations will be the hubs of our future expansion, as the new kind, and places where we can live in peace and not be victimized by those who hate us and who want to harm us.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ‘WHITE’ RELIGIONS–We wish them well and we see them as our brothers and sisters. At the very core of those we know about, we see similar beliefs as ours, i.e. they believe that White people must survive as White people. One difference we have from some of them is our concept of God (as the First Cause), which we believe is, among other things, important psychologically and as the ender of all arguments. We know that some other conscious Whites reject the idea of God and dismiss the concept as a fairy tale, but in our belief system we accept the idea that there was a First Cause of existence–a One. You can call it God or you can call it the natural workings of nature. It doesn’t matter to us. And, we also accept that there was a first DNA molecule of life–a One. This idea of a One is important to our belief system and we believe that each believing individual is a One–a person who is spreading his or her particular version of Code A by having children. Everything begins with a One that takes some action and which is a cause that brings about some effect. We sometimes use the example of the Hass Avocado as a way to explain the importance of One. As you may know, all the millions of Hass Avocado trees now alive all came from One mutant tree found in California in 1926. Each One of us is a potential new Adam or a new Eve that may have the evolutionary changes that will ensure our survival, our expansion and our evolution.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER WHITES WITH A WHITE SENSE OF CONSCIOUSNESS–We also think of them as our brothers and sisters and will never publicly criticize such Whites, who may not share all of our beliefs but who do share our most foundational beliefs that Whites need to survive, Whites need to expand our kind by having many more White children, and Whites need to evolve. There is an obvious and desirous overlap between our religious views and the views of Whites who have reached a higher level of consciousness but who channel their activities into political and social avenues. They are our kind, because at the heart of their and our Teachings is the unshakeable belief that it is our DNA code that is most important; and if these other high consciousness Whites don’t use our terms, they are still essentially saying the same things as we Teach.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PEOPLES–We are indifferent to them. We do not interfere with them. We treat them with respect when they treat us with respect, but we do not mix or mingle with them when we can avoid doing so. We mind our own business and we expect them to mind theirs. They have their ways and we have ours. They have their identities and we have ours. We do not impose our will, our values or our ways on them, and we do not want them to impose their will, their values or their ways on us. We are a different kind, and we must remain so for all times. We sometimes use the terms Noster Genus (Our Kind), Novum Genus (New kind), or Alia Genus (Different kind) to describe ourselves and our belief system. We do not want to rule over them or have them be as us. We want to go our own way and we want they to go their own way. To repeat: Indifference and non-interference.
By H. Millard © 2013
# # # #
Max Musson
- Edit
We apologise for the glitch that has so far prevented comments from being appended to this article. The glitch has now been resolved.
Arcturus
- Edit
Maybe I’ve missed the point entirely but I’m not quite sure why this article has been published here.
.
It makes a mockery of scientific terminology by pretending that there is something sacred or spiritual about molecules and particles with circular motion, whereas this pseudo-spirituality in reality has nothing to do with science. However, hijack enough scientific words and a fraction of people will be misled into thinking you know what you’re talking about. David Icke does the same thing with ‘frequencies’ and ‘energy’ and millions eagerly lap it up, putting them beyond the bounds of actual truth.
.
From other writings on the web it seems like the author of this piece supports polygamy based purely on the argument that anything producing more white people is good, and anything not producing more white people is bad. This is demonstrably stupid – our current white population is large enough to be perfectly viable in this world, and it would be possible to conceive of circumstances i.e. massive overpopulation in which adding more white people would be detrimental to the race.
.
Moreover, enterprises such as theatre, music and literature don’t directly (or perhaps even indirectly) produce more white people. If you’re going to use the argument that not producing white people makes a thing bad in order to rail against homosexuality, then you must also dismiss all of our cultural pursuits because they are not indispensable to procreation.
.
Science and evolution genuinely offer no moral message. They don’t tell us what we should do or shouldn’t do, as this article heavily implies. They just tell us what is, and what makes it go. Conflating proper science with spirituality and morality in this manner is wrong in my view – wrong because it’s unsound factually and wrong because it degrades real science and promotes a confused understanding of what spirituality really is, doing damage to both fields.
Max Musson
- Edit
I think you may have indeed missed the point entirely, Arcturus.
.
The measure of effective communication is not what one says, but what the listener hears, or rather, what the listener understands. Therefore the key to the effective communication of complex concepts is to present those concepts in a somewhat simplified format that most people can appreciate. This is what Millard does.
.
If one wants to be pedantic about scientific principles, then it is easy to criticise detailed aspects of some of his arguments, but in the round, they convey fundamental truths about the plight of our race and the religious principles that we must adopt if we are to maximise our potential to survive.
.
If we take your criticism of Millard’s assertion that we should maximise our procreation, such a policy would create evolutionary pressures that would force us to perfect interplanetary travel and thereby facilitate our colonisation of other planets, just as it forced us to perfect our seafaring abilities in centuries past, facilitating the colonisation of distant continents.
.
While I personally do not share Millard’s relentlessly negative view of homosexuality, theatre, music and literature can all motivate people and inspire us to strive harder in our endeavours, including the development of our scientific capabilities, the colonisation of new ‘living space’ and the expansion of our numbers, whereas gay rights activism in particular and the indiscriminate celebration of homosexuality in all its most lurid, promiscuous and self-indulgent forms does not.
.
While science and evolution do not provide a moral message in universal humanistic terms, they do provide a moral message in racial particularist terms and therefore the basis of a natural science-based spirituality in place of a super-natural, superstition-based spirituality dependent upon ‘faith’ in an anthropomorphic deity. Millard’s writings only appear problematic if one has difficulty seeing beyond the intellectual straight-jacket imposed by adherence to intellectual parameters prescribed by the Abrahamic (Semitic) religions and I am sure that if you indulge Millard further, a man of your calibre will be able to overcome any such limitations.
Arcturus
- Edit
There is a huge difference between presenting ideas in a simplified format that people can appreciate and what has been done here. The article makes direct references to physical properties of matter and conflates them with some form of spirituality. There is no wiggle room – it is an Icke-esque maneuver clearly designed to mislead gullible readers into thinking that the author’s ideas have something to do with science and the legitimacy that goes with it.
.
I have no problem with these ideas being promulgated but we should never deliberately confuse them with actual knowledge about the universe.
.
I accept your point that cultural pursuits such as theatre probably do in fact have an indirect impact on the reproductive rate of our people, but it is not a direct relationship and not one which can be demonstrated, and therefore it seems that by Millard’s argument those pursuits are bad. Not everything that produces more white babies is necessarily good. Not everything which does not do so is necessarily bad. We can do without this poor excuse for reasoning.
.
Interplanetary travel is perfectly possible to undertake without an overpopulated country and almost certainly easier to undertake in the absence of the hardships which that would bring. I do not believe that selective pressures would emerge from such a society pushing us in that direction. Other planets are going to be immensely difficult, dangerous, expensive and time consuming to build even village-sized colonies on, so the idea of using them at least in the next few centuries for the purpose of Lebensraum is ridiculous.
.
Not to mention that with a steady rate of population growth, even the most fertile new offworld territory would be completely full in the short order. A growth rate of 2% per year, for instance, will cause a population to double in 35 years. Upon filling up the whole of the Earth and making one more Earth-sized planet available for full colonization, we grant ourselves an additional 35 years but that is all. Two more planets would give us 70 years.
.
Bear in mind that we don’t even know of one suitable planet, let alone two or three. Mars is probably the most Earth-like planet we could hope to colonize in the near future. It has an unbreathable atmosphere which is too low in pressure to support humans without pressure suits, a poor magnetic field which lets through plenty of cancer and cataract-inducing radiation, soil which is too poor for use in agriculture, no liquid surface water, temperatures low enough to cause instant death if exposed to the elements, a lack readily available fuel sources and massive quantities of microscopic dust carried by hurricane-speed winds. And this is the best example of the candidate worlds for a colony – the others present far more severe challenges.
.
The prospects for interstellar travel for even a small human crew are at present extremely poor. The ability to move millions let alone billions of people offworld only exists in the remote future if at all. It would be far more prudent to find a reasonable population for our country to have and aim to increase the standard of living of that population, instead of wasting precious resources in a futile and destructive drive for endless reproduction.
.
Incidentally, selective pressures don’t guarantee that a solution will be found to the problem creating the pressure. It’s perfectly allowed for a group to fail to adapt to them (it may even be impossible to do so) and simply perish as no doubt millions of species have done before. Selective pressure is useless, deleterious and in fact potentially fatal in the absence of an appropriate method of relief – and in this case it seems very unlikely that one exists.
Charlie
- Edit
I think it would be legitimate to argue that our race is too small and so we should be maximising our birth-rate right now, and that in the future a different birth-rate would be useful.
“just as it [evolutionary pressures created by a maximisation of the procreation rate] forced us to perfect our seafaring abilities in centuries past, facilitating the colonisation of distant continents”.
In the main, I would have to argue against this point. While it is possible that it holds for colonising Siberia it doesn’t hold for the New World. Of course, India and China had huge populations that were near enough useless for them over this time period. China’s population tripled with the introduction of the New World crops, but it didn’t make them reach for the stars.
The Black Death hit about 1348 in England, and England’s population didn’t recover until maybe the 17th century. I think we can assume that the story was broadly similar in Portugal.
The New World was rediscovered in 1492, the main ship in the expedition was the Santa Maria, which was decades old when it made its voyage. Caravels and Carracks were developed in 15th century Portugal. I don’t believe there was any population pressure in Portugal at this time, and if there were it could easily have been eased up with war rather than invention.
Of course, colonisation didn’t really start until the 1830s. The Newcomen and Watt engines were only developed due to the quantity of coal mined, which would not have been mined at that time had the population not been what it was. Though an inventive society could have invented them as needed.
I think that inventions do require inventors, but that inventors per capita is a more important statistic than total population. This is just as much a cultural attribute as a genetic one and so perhaps things like theatre would be useful.
Arcturus
- Edit
I agree that in some situations it would be legitimate to argue that the population of our race ought to be increased. I actually don’t think we’re in such a situation at present. If for example the British Isles were to be populated exclusively with people of our race, there would be in excess of fifty million people living here – far higher than the number recommended by some experts for ideal living conditions.
.
If you mean to say that the disparity between indigenous birth rates and foreign birth rates in our country ought to be corrected, then I can agree to that. Again though, it wouldn’t be a problem if this country had an exclusively indigenous population. In fact if we aim to have a population of perhaps thirty million, then a birth rate below replacement rate would actually be a good thing at present.
.
You make a good point about inventors per capita being the important quantity. A smaller but brighter and healthier population can match a larger, less healthy, less bright population – and even outmatch it.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
It’s all down to Mother Nature herself – as my grandmother used to say. Any child that accepts such a simple statement will go off to play happily.
To believe in one God is pointless when infinity is brought into any equation.
In my opinion we have regressed as a race since abandoning our many Heathen Gods like Ul, Eatha, Eastra, Tir, and Thunor.
Any new religion must embrace nature or the planet will be laid bare long before take off.