By H. Millard:
The Jewish holiday of Hanukkah offers some interesting lessons for non-Jewish white people if one but understands what this holiday is really about.
Many uninformed people think Hanukkah is simply a Jewish version of Christmas. And it has taken on some of the aspects of that holiday. Still, Hanukkah is far different.
In fact, one suspects if non-Jewish white people celebrated a similar holiday they would find the usual serial name calling white haters both in government and out, screaming and yelling about racism, hate, bigotry, insensitivity (yawn) prejudice, white-supremacy and white separatism.
Then you’d hear them promoting “wonderful diversity,” “multi-culturalism,” the invasion of white lands by non-whites as a positive thing, and the “joys” of miscegenation to blend away that horrible white skin.
What is Hanukkah really about? It’s a celebration of Jewish racism, Jewish supremacy and Jewish separatism. In other words, it’s a celebration of and a renewal of a group think attitude for the preservation of Jews. Of course, few people do understand what Hanukkah really celebrates. This is partly because history tends to sanitize events in the past and some who write of these events sugar coat the reality.
With a little understanding, however, we may realize that non-Jewish white people are today facing a very similar situation to the one which the ancient Hebrews faced, which gave rise to Hanukkah.
In brief, Antiochus IV Epiphanes of Syria, a ruler who sought to end conflict among people, tried to make his empire a peaceful place by eradicating differences among the diverse groups in his empire (sound familiar?).
This well-intentioned or evil ruler, depending on your point of view, wanted all people to have one religion (his religion) so that there would be no religious disputes. He also wanted all people to have one culture (his) so there would be no cultural disputes, and he wanted all people to be of one race (his) so there would be no racial disputes. His solution was to create a great melting pot (familiar concept, isn’t it?) where various minority peoples–and especially the Jews–and religions would be assimilated into his brave new world.
A few “extremist” Jews (i.e., those who didn’t agree) said “No thanks, we like ourselves just as we are.” These grassroots “extremists,” led by Judah Maccabee, a peasant, resisted blending in, and they were hated and reviled as what we would now call “racists,” “bigots,” “extremists,” “separatists,” supremacists,” etc., and, to coin a term, “judeocentric.”
Not all Jews helped Maccabee. In fact, the elites of Jewish society favored the assimilation of the Jews and they helped the tyrant in his attempt at assimilation.
The “extremist” Maccabees, therefore, fought against both the Syrian tyrant and their own Jewish elites. In time, the Maccabees won, and Jews celebrated their victory over the forces of assimilation with Hanukkah.
Today, many liberal Jews honor these “extremists” from their past and bemoan any assimilation of Jews through marriage with non-Jews while at the same time calmly telling non-Jewish whites that they must accept our own age’s tyrants, who are once again trying to homogenize all humanity into a lumpen one-size-fits-all one race, one religion, one world, of conformity.
One of the twists of the present situation is that since whites are still the majority group in the U.S. and Europe, many whites who accept this notion of assimilation or blending together, think — if they think about it at all — that what will climb out of the melting pot will be a white person — that other peoples will be blended into a white genotype and disappear. However, given the demographics of the world (around 90% of all people are non-white), and the speed with which modern transportation can bring huge numbers of people from the Third World to the First World, the reality of such assimilation may be the genocide of whites. Call it what it is: extinction.
There is a fork in the road of future history that we, as did the ancient Hebrews, now face. Which fork shall we take? As was the case with the ancient Hebrew, most white people today seem to favor assimilation. Could it be that those whites who are talking against the assimilation and extinction of white people will one day be honored as the saviors of their people as Judah Maccabee is honored by those who are Jews today? And, what of the ancient Hebrews who counseled for assimilation? They have, in fact, been assimilated. They’re gone. Some of their blood now courses through the present day Syrians who fight against the present day Jews in Israel.
Will future generations of white people have a new holiday to honor a yet-to-emerge non-Jewish version of Judah Maccabee–some non-Jewish white peasant who fought against the genocide and destruction of whites through assimilation and “multiculturalism”? Will any white people still existing a thousand years from now be the descendants of our present day “white racists,” “white separatists,” and “white supremacists”? Will all other whites have slipped into the genetic oblivion of the gene pool of the 90% of humanity that is non-white?
Or, will the people of a completely non-white future world have myths that once, a long time ago, there were white people on the Earth, but that they went the way of the Dodos? And, will the scientists of this new one size fits all new Tan Everyman humanity wonder how it was that an entire race became extinct? Will they find literature, films and other records of our present existence and see the propaganda that caused white people to falsely believe that all people are the same and that it is evil to want to remain white? Will they wonder at the mass delusion that caused white people to breed their way to extinction?
One thing is certain. If whites don’t realize that they’re a distinct people and if they don’t try to exist as a distinct people, they will go the way of the Hebrews who assimilated in ancient Syria. Only those whites who are “racist,” as was Judah Maccabee and his followers, will survive.
By H. Millard © 2013
# # # #
Steve
- Edit
I think we need a “Hanukkah” of our own but again this story shows the hypocrisy we’re up against, what is ok for them is not ok for us.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
We don’t need their permission Steve. My concern is that we use some sort of pathetic foreign word like Hanukka when we have such a rich language of our own.
Steve
- Edit
Yes the English language is supposed to contain about a million words, half of which are technical, so I guess we can find a word to celebrate deliverance when it comes?
Shaun
- Edit
This article is crazy! I was today walking around London and I, being the type of person I am, started talking to some American rabbis who were visiting to celebrate Hanukka! I totally agree with the concept. Keep your people alive — I respect the Jews for doing this!
Now, I am going to impart another aspect of my day in London. Another guy, a guy working in a shop, told one of my co-workers that ”his people” are here to stay when my friend said that London has been overtaken. Most white people’s reactions to this person’s statement would be anti-Hanukkah.
Mine wasn’t; I don’t agree with assimilation.
I should imagine the early Jews faced the same peril as our people face today. We have a lot to learn from them; even Zionism, the ”Bogeyman of the Left”, is a testament to the pure blood ”racism” of a loyal people.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of the Jews because, as far as I’m concerned, they should stay in Israel. I think, though, us Whites should adopt some of their ways. H Milliard is right.
BritishActivism
- Edit
I was “treated” to a recent Radio Four ‘Thought for the day’ slot on the way to work the other week, which echoes the double standards and the festival featured in this article.
.
To hear the chutzpah in full flow, why not head off to https://[www].bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01mb7lj (remove the brackets)?.
.
Not being the slightest bit interested in Judaism as a religion but somewhat familiar with the issues going on from that particular ethnic grouping, the story and the disconnect within it obviously pricked my ears. (The text of the ‘thought for the day’ is also at the link).
.
Here we have somebody proudly stating that they [the Jews] have done well as a group by being distinct – “I think, Jewish resistance to a universal ‘sameness’ has been a blessing for humanity”…..whilst the same speaker, for a living, apparently tries to create “understanding” and unity between faiths and communities.
.
The end result of such “interfaith” “coming together” is of course the eradication of differences that make them what they are and a lesser fight to be had between different factions of society. That they are all together in the same society/country in the first place and needing ‘dialogue’ is another aspect that goes without saying as being a force for a new form of “oneness” and blending into ‘one people’.
.
However, all of this is of course claimed by this person to be a proud statement of “diversity” and encouraging “diversity” – whilst it is actually working for the opposite, particularly when “more diversity” and assimilation in a declining host population means less of us and replacement of us with something else.
.
That we know how Eid is calculated on the lunar calendar, or what types of food are eaten for Jewish festivals or Christian festivals, or what elements of the three faiths are shared or not shared is here nor there in the long run. We can “understand” ourselves into the graveyard of history. It does not make it right or acceptable!
.
I just found there to be the usual narrative going on, particularly on Radio Four, which is unbelievably “left wing” in their themes, memes, topics, positions and so on. Even their slots like ‘A good read’ (where panellists discuss each other’s choice of fictional work) often has themes of feminism, slavery, colonialism, racism, or whatever in them somewhere.
.
I don’t know why I torture myself now and again on the 25 minute journey, but I suppose it is sometimes good to listen to what the opposition are up to!
Steve
- Edit
To be honest I think they know it’s all BS & the idea is to have us all at each others throats while they carry on with what they’re doing.
But anybody with sense listening to that would hear the hypocrisy inherent in it.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Well said Thomas! we don’t need anyone’s permission to assert ourselves. Only we can do that.
Steve
- Edit
To be honest I wasn’t asking for permission, I agree only we can do this for ourselves.
Shaun
- Edit
Well said British Activism,
It is obvious that the concepts expounded by these ardent Zionists are filled with double standards! Of course — these people work as a group and do not play by the same rules as ”we” do. Big deal.
I remember reading a wonderful book a few years back called Homo 44 and 99/Non-Sapien by a Jew called Gerald Lorenz. This book taught me a lot about human nature, and gave me the tools needed to interpret the modern age.
Basically, to Gerald Lorenz, the human animal is a predator and he can’t change. Therefore, from Lorenz’s viewpoint, we should always interpret political language as a means to an end. It is no surprise that other, non-white ethnic groups lie about their intentions. White people do it too. We are all predators.
The problem we face as a people isn’t the double standards of other peoples, but how our message is defined by our enemies: all non-white people! If the mass media was in the hands of sensible White nationalists (not guys like me) we could create our own double standards and get them to be believed.
Anyway, at this stage, we must understand that our enemies aren’t as powerful as they seem. They can’t shut down the Internet (they really want to), they can’t break down non-compliant countries, and their message is losing mass appeal everyday.
Unfortunately, man’s predatory nature will mean that this insane attempt for a New World Order will end in violence. This sad reality makes me wish I lived on a planet filled with a better ”dominant” species; I am still, however, optimistic that our people will find a way to survive.
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t entirely agree with Lorenz’s hypothesis, as if what he says is true, that all races and ethnic groups lie in their dealings with others, then his book – written by a Jew for Gentile consumption – would be full of disinformation.
.
Human beings have a natural inclination to identify with others who are like them and who share a close genetic bond, regarding those with whom they identify – their family, their tribe, their nation – as their ‘in-group’ and showing preference for this in-group in all things. Therefore, if ethnic group ‘A’ allows substantial numbers of people from ethnic group ‘B’ – particularly if ethnic group ‘B’ is hyper ethnocentric – to occupy positions of great influence within their mass media, then ethnic group ‘A’ should not be surprised if their mass media feeds them disinformation that is distorted in favour of the interests of ethnic group ‘B’.
.
Indeed, ethnic group ‘A’ in the above analogy will find themselves disoriented and ineffective as an in-group, and will find their group interests continually violated, until they realise the source of their malady and rectify it.
BritishActivism
- Edit
I do not really feel able to comment insightfully on this as I am not familiar with the referenced work.
.
However, I do think that there is a certain drive within people and a society that, for want of a better expression, ‘knows which side its bread is buttered on’ and which they consciously and subconsciously fight for as a vague picture in their minds eye, or in our cases, with a more determined drive than the rest (as part of our human nature).
.
Of course, when you look at it rationally, what has been done to our societies and our people is nothing other than wicked.
.
It has become beyond the point of some mental illness where – according to an article I saw last week on the BBC (via Amren) – tests are being done for “racism” and “compassion” on white test subjects, by plugging them into virtual reality simulations as black characters and also having a prosthetic black hand stroked which they have been made to see as being their own. What kind of sick lunacy is this?
.
Regarding ‘they cannot shut down the internet’ – well, without wanting to sound like some “loon”, something I read earlier this week has made me reconsider that assertion. It is not a matter of shutting it down, or even closing websites or blocking websites.
.
You will have to read the following article to get to the full implications of the very real possibilities which are already here and already being employed. ( 3w.tomdispatch.com/post/175779/tomgram%3A_peter_van_buren%2C_1984_was_an_instruction_manual_/ ).
.
Seeing as I do not know how wise it is to direct link here, you will need to change ‘3w’ to ‘www’ to get the link to work. I tried to put the BBC one in brackets yesterday but it seemed to have ignored those and provided a direct hot-link.
.
I found food for thought anyway, regarding the implications for getting messages out and providing evidence and research for our assertions. It seems to be a serious and considered article.
.
The news today in the Daily Mail about “hate material” and new powers to “remove sites” only serves to bolster this threat.
.
Of course, they are using the horrific case of Lee Rigby and his Islamic killers to try and press this stuff through parliament – but if anyone thinks it will stop at Islamic sites they are severely deluded. ( 3w.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2517825/Camerons-new-bid-silence-hate-preachers.html ).
.
How soon before Western Spring is suddenly “disappeared” (as described in the first article link) ? Maybe not now, or even in five years time, or ever….but the possibility is being made a reality.
.
The net is closing in, so to speak. The latter one Cameron is planning is a blunt instrument, but the former one is much more sophisticated. Together, they can only point to one conclusion as to where things are heading.
.
I suppose the only positive spin to all of this is that they are in real fear of losing control – and that the whole corrupt, stinking house of cards is going to come crashing down unless they take these kinds of measures.
.
What is going on is hardly healthy for a society – and the results are obvious to us. They must obviously think things are getting at risk of being volatile in the future if the right combination of dissenting torches are ever lit simultaneously, or if the natural dislocations and separations increase and get more potent in their differences.
.
Steed
- Edit
This is a great article, and really does paint a plausible picture of the future and the paths open to us. It cannot be stated highly enough that, yes, we will be considered ‘racists’ and ‘outsiders’ now but that in 1000 years we ‘racists’ will be the ONLY reason that a white race still exists. That’s cosmic, eternal stuff, and to be called a ‘racist’ now is a very small price to pay for that. We should embrace it.
Steve
- Edit
Anyway continuing with this theme, I was watching “Who do you think you are?” featuring Marianne Faithfull & it contained the usual story of Holocaust survival but there was an added twist in that two female members of the family were raped by the Red Army at the end of the war & that coloured her attitude towards men & sex.
But the bit that interested me was the description of how the Nazi regime slowly ratcheted up the pressure on the Jews with new laws & categories.
Some of these documents were in English, so not original & I have heard some of this before.
The bit about adding Sara to female names & Israel to male names was new to me.
But the main point is about these stories is that this ratchet effect is exactly what is being done to us, though probably more subtly & some of the Nazi horror stories & rhetoric is exactly the same as some of the stuff the Israelis do & say about Palestinians.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
Meanwhile ‘Feminists Laughing at White Genocide’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgrxuxaBEOE
Steve
- Edit
Hopefully these stupid people will enjoy living in the mess they’re creating.
Other countries that have those majorities don’t look so appealing do they?
She talks about Latinos becoming a majority but a lot of them hate blacks & don’t share the guilt that whites apparently have, so owe them nothing.
Why are the Mexicans leaving Mexico, won’t the southern states just become Mexico MK2?
Joe Y
- Edit
Keep in mind that the resistance only started when the Jews were pushed to the limit. Judah only acted when the Greeks came to his village and started forcing people to worship Greek gods. In fact, the first person he killed was a Jewish collaborator, not a Greek Syrian. People have to be pushed very hard, usually, to resist actively.
Steve
- Edit
I think that is probably true of us too.
frederickdixon
- Edit
In his very philosemitic “History of the Jews” Paul Johnson makes the interesting point that throughout Jewish history it is the “extremists” who always win. This is certainly exemplified by the Maccabees, but it can seen many times in earlier Jewish history when race-mixers are massacred or true believers separate themselves from those who lapse into paganism. It can be seen again in later times when it was the presence of large numbers of Jews in all the great cities of the Roman Empire which gave Christianity its original lift-off, the later conversion of gentiles meant that those early Jewish Christians were swamped and lost, while the faithful survived.
It can be seen again today. The Jewish authorities in the UK have forecast that on present trends more than half of Jewish marriages will ultra-orthodox in ten years time, while the 15% of the Jewish population which is ultra-orthodox has more the 40% of the children. These ultra-orthodox “haradrim” marry young, have many children and never,never marry out – in direct contrast to all other types of Jew who are in rapid decline through very low birth rates and mixed marriages. So the “extremists will yet again define what it is to be a Jew.
There are many lessons here for us.