By Max Musson:
Just when we might have hoped the immigration situation could not get any worse, it has today been announced that our government will offer an undisclosed number of Afghan interpreters who have been assisting British troops in Afghanistan, the right to come and live in Britain, with free travel to the UK and their first three months accommodation provided rent free.
Press reports state that “up to 600 Afghans” who have risked their lives to act as interpreters for British troops and officials are to be given the right to move to Britain. However the reports then go on to state that there are as many as 1,200 such interpreters, that 94% have received threats from the Taliban, and that fewer than 3% have stated that they will feel safe once Coalition forces are withdrawn.
This means that at least 97% of the interpreters will apply to take up the British government offer on purely safety grounds, that’s 1,164 of the 1,200, and the other 3% can be expected to apply also on economic grounds. After all, who would want to continue to scratch a living in a poverty stricken central Asian dust bowl, when they can come and live at tax-payers expense in Britain?
The plan then provides for the ‘immediate dependents’ of the interpreters to come to Britain also, and that means that with just one wife (Muslims are allowed to have up to four) and an average of say, four children, that makes potentially 7,200 people.
Initially the interpreters and their families will be issued with visas for just five years, but we all know that none of them will ever go back voluntarily.
Whitehall have projected that this package will cost the British tax-payer £40 million based upon an expectation that 600 interpreters will take it up, but obviously, based upon my more realistic assumptions above, it will cost a whole lot more.
The plan has been approved by David Cameron and officials in the Foreign Office and the Ministry of Defence after meetings of the National Security Council. The details of the plans have now been passed to other ministers across Whitehall for approval.
A No10 source stated: “The Prime Minister has been very clear that we should not turn our backs on those who have trod the same path as our soldiers in Helmand, consistently putting their lives at risk to help our troops achieve their mission.
“We should recognise the service given by those who have regularly put themselves in real danger while working for us.”
However, my understanding, and certainly what we have been led to believe is that the whole purpose of our prolonged involvement in Afghanistan was to make the country safe and stable for the newly democratically elected government. It would seem that our military involvement in Afghanistan has been a costly waste of time, both in terms of money spent, lives lost and soldiers crippled.
Furthermore, I understood that in this prolonged military mission, beyond the initial military routing of Al Qaida, was a matter of us helping the Afghans, and not the other way around.
Far from us offering financial provision for the few Afghans who did attempt to help themselves, perhaps the Afghan people should be paying us, to compensate the British tax-payer and the thousands of soldiers and their families who have sacrificed much to prop up the unsteady regime of Hamid Karzai?
By Max Musson © 2013
# # # #
Steve
- Edit
So yet another thing becomes an immigration conduit into this country along with the NHS, London Transport, curry houses & so on.
Maybe that was the whole point of getting involved over there, so as to get more non white immigrants here, then there is Libya & Iraq, how many there will be claiming asylum here?
Max Musson
- Edit
A similar ‘aid package’ was provided for Iraqis when we pulled out of Iraq and we can expect that this kind of thing will become a feature of any further overseas military engagements. They will all be used as a pretext to boost non-White immigration into Britain.
.
Firstly, when hostilities begin and during the time that we prop-up whichever faction we want to keep in power, we accept as asylum seekers, anyone from either side who claims that their safety is threatened by returning to the country concerned, and certainly anyone who can demonstrate that they have been driven from their homes by the hostilities (they have after all been ‘ethnically cleansed’ don’t cha’ know old boy?). Then when we pull out, we invite a whole lot more to come and live in Britain as well.
.
I can recall a serving British soldier who told me that when he returned home on leave, he met in the street in his home town, in a chance encounter, an Iraqi ‘asylum seeker’, who he had arrested as an insurgent near Bagdad just a few weeks earlier. Apparently the man had been released from custody and immediately applied for asylum to come and live in Britain on the basis that it was no longer safe for him to live in Iraq.
.
We must have tens of thousands of ‘ex-terrorists’ living in Britain among the ethnic minority communities. Men who are effectively, military veterans with battlefield experience. Can we even begin to calculate just how much of a threat these people will pose to us here in the UK in the years to come?
Steve
- Edit
Well I guess all I can say is look at the example provided by the IRA who at their height probably a few hundred hard-core active members that caused a lot of destruction but not as much death as they could have done
Contrast that with possibly thousands of imported fighting age men & what they could do.
The government has no excuse for what they have done, the evidence is impossible to deny.
You can only draw the conclusion that we’re to be destroyed from within.
Steve
- Edit
What about the ethnic cleansing of whole areas of London & other cities?
The government is relaxed about that, with warm fuzzy terms like “Multiculturalism” or “Diversity”!
frederickdixon
- Edit
I was puzzled by the resettlement of Iraqi interpreters in Britain. Surely it would have better for everyone if they had been resettled in one of the countries in the region which are friendly to Britain – Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, UAE. There, handsomely compensated and pensioned by the British taxpayer, they would have been able to remain in a familiar climate and a familiar culture. I wonder if this even occurred to our masters, or were they too obsessed by the “benefits” of yet more diversity?
Steve
- Edit
I think anything & everything is used as an immigration portal & that it is meant to destroy this country or change it into something unrecognisable.
Steve
- Edit
It’ll be interesting to see the history of the 2 scumbags who beheaded the man in Woolwich, asylum seekers no doubt.
Steve
- Edit
OK so they’re not asylum seekers but in no way British either, unless you go by the very elastic term the establishment uses.
But once again we hear they were known to the authorities for all the good that does.
Boris the political opportunist pushes yet more snooping despite the fact it probably wouldn’t work on men from the middle ages.
But then it isn’t meant to!
Jack
- Edit
https://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2013/05/the-great-innocence-robbery-the-awful-abuse-of-girls-in-oxford-is-just-the-latest-consequence.html
“Now former Young Communist Baron Mandelson tells us that ‘we were not only welcoming people to come into this country to work, we were sending out search parties for people and encouraging them, in some cases, to take up work in this country’.”
Uniformed search parties it would seem.
Steve
- Edit
& now beheadings in the street are the latest consequence.
Steve
- Edit
Since he’s so kindly given away work I & others could be doing, I’d like to give his job away as well & him too.
Franklin Ryckaert
- Edit
In the US Steve Sailer calls this policy “Invade the world, invite the world”. Western politicians are the first to be blamed for that, third worlders simply are attracted by our security and prosperity.
Steve
- Edit
Great phrase I will use that!
ConnalOakesHolt
- Edit
Following the news that the two assailants who murdered Lee Rigby, the serving British soldier, in Woolwich earlier this week, were known to the security sevices, the head of MI6 this morning announced that there are thousands of potential Islamic terrorists residing in the UK and it is impossible to have them all under servailance all the time.
The notion that somebody who’s life is at risk in the Middle East, is made safe by relocating to Britain is no longer a logical point in the argument for asylum.
The murder of Lee Rigby and the story of the soldier meeting an insurgent , upon returning home to the UK, is definately a point in the argument against.
A distinction must be made between The Gurkhas, who are members of the British Army and those foreign nationals who assist our forces on operations.
Steve
- Edit
They’ll just think of another invalid reason to import violent scumbags here for the purposes of our destruction.
Steve
- Edit
To be honest I think the Gurkhas should get the same pensions but not come here & especially not their extended families who have not served us or have any other connection.
From reports I heard that even though Joanna Lumley was successful in her campaign, these people were largely dumped here without much support.
Helping neither them or us.