By Frederick Dixon:
In his excellent article on this website “Tory Toffs, Cosmopolitanism and Greed” Max Musson said of Boris Johnson’s 28th November speech “Deprived of racial, religious or national identity, the truly cosmopolitan individual has no real sense of community with any of the population groups among whom they live”.
Boris’ speech was a vindication of Thatcherism delivered in his very own inimitable style; rousing, spirited, amusing, persuasive, and in his remarks about immigration he begins well :- “it is time to sort out the immigration system so that we end the madness. At the moment we are claiming to have capped immigration by having a 60% reduction in New Zealanders when we can do nothing to stop the entire population of Transylvania…from trying to pitch camp at Marble Arch.” Well, quite so, it is indeed madness that our own kin from New Zealand and Australia, Canada, South Africa and the US – the only people who should have a right to settle permanently in the UK – are kept out, while anyone from the EU can settle here, and that includes anyone on whom any EU country chooses to confer its citizenship; Portugal on Brazilians, Spain on Latin Americans, Sweden on Iraqis and so on and so forth.
So what is Boris proposing to do to “end the madness”? Well, he seems to think that Mrs. T would have sorted it by handbagging Johnny foreigner, and maybe she would have done, but what would Boris do? We are not told. He does hint though that leaving the EU wouldn’t necessarily be a disaster “the EU has shrunk to only 19% of the global economy, compared with 29% when Mrs. Thatcher was in power” (and the EU then had far fewer member countries) “the big growth markets lie elsewhere”.
But Boris then sets out his vision of what Britain could become over the next decades and in so doing he entirely justifies Max Musson’s words above:- “by 2050 Britain will be the second biggest country in the EU and by 2060 we will have more people than Germany. And no, I don’t know where they will all go either, nor can I easily tell you what it will be like for us suddenly to be the biggest and most economically powerful country in Europe – but I will chance my arm and make some prophecies – by the middle of this century …we will have a dynamic, diverse, globalised economy and we will have dealt with the recent period of mass immigration so that our cities are not just proudly British but also boast a vast mongrel energy”.
So there we are, that is what Boris hopes for – a massive increase (derived entirely from immigrant stock as the white British element is already falling) in a heavily “mongrelised” population. Imagine what such a grossly overcrowded country would be like:- its countryside eroded and degraded, its infrastructure stretched beyond breaking point, its economy entirely dependant on the giant Ponzi scheme of globalisation never faltering, a fractured population of competing ethnic groups none of which could be expected to have any but the slightest connection with what England has always been. All accomplished, in the words of the great Enoch “against the will and without the consent of the British people” – carry those words of Enoch in your hearts for a healthy dose of cynicism whenever you hear a politician praise our “democratic values”!
What are the chances that Boris’ nightmare vision might come to pass? Pretty good if you extrapolate present population trends. In reality such extrapolations rarely work out over the long term, but there is no room for complacency – if we do nothing this is one extrapolation that very well might come to pass. Fortunately, to oppose Boris’ nightmare we have our own vision of a beautiful, peaceful, largely self-sufficient country with a smaller, all white, all British population.
As for Boris, will he become Prime Minister? Quite possibly; it is more likely than not that the Conservative Party will be looking for a new leader after the next general election. That new leader ought logically to come from the Eurosceptic right since that is the direction in which public opinion seems to be heading at the moment, and there is no shortage of suitable candidates with Cabinet experience – Hammond, Grayling, Patterson, possibly May. But what the Tories value above all else is power – power above principle – and Boris is a charismatic election winner. In his ambition, Boris is quite capable of doing a deal with the politician who most closely resembles him, Nigel Farage. Then things will get interesting.
By Frederick Dixon © 2013
# # # #
Graham
- Edit
Immigration does provide a very short term lift to an economy but quickly ebbs away as the immigrants find other ways of working that do not involve endless hours of low paid labour.
As far as can be seen the idea is to turn Britain into a tax haven like a vast Cayman Islands. All the dodgy money in the world would be laundered through the UK and the city of London. That is the conservative idea of a diverse economy. The Boris Johnson class would ‘pick up the crumbs’. What was that book called ‘ The Bonfire of the vanities’, something along those lines? The rest of the immigrants and us natives would service the new ‘Masters of the Universe’ i.e. Boris Johnson and the wealthy establishment.
The world may have different ideas though, and we may end up with a huge uncontrollable population and no benefits. It is not up to us anyway. It is all down to the US dollar, which is staggering along through sheer willpower and must expire sooner or later. Never mind what happens in the US, it is what happens here, which will interest us. One cannot see a bunch of bankers hanging around in a dangerous crowded place like London when Frankfurt with its nice law abiding German population is close by.
I think we may all become very hungry. Tubby Boris Johnson would alone provide some of the diverse mongrel inhabitants of the new London with a few take aways.
Nimble
- Edit
“…but also boast a vast mongrel energy”.
To be honest, if the British people don’t call him out on this genocidal statement, if parties like UKIP don’t call him out on it, then the British people deserve what they get. Many like to claim ‘we didn’t vote for this’, but yes they did, yes they did, they continuously remained stalwart in their conviction to spend 70 years of constant immigration voting for Labour or the Conservatives at every general election, if that’s not voting for it, then what is?
I’m young enough not to have had the chance to vote yet, but I can’t help but scoff when those of an older generation make the claim that immigration happened under their noses and without their consent.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
I don’t think many people understood or understand the extent and magnitude of the corruption involved to bring us to this point. Unfortunately the penny still hasn’t dropped in most cases.
Graham
- Edit
So true, the good electorate of Britain and particular England has consistently voted for immigration insomuch as they have not voted against immigration. It is a very clear fact that many candidates for the job of MP are against immigration but it is political suicide to speak out. Any party will reject an MP who speaks out against immigration and what will follow is that the electorate will reject the MP. The Result is end of that MPs career.
A lot of this attitude comes one thinks from the fantasy that the UK is a global nation. The reality is otherwise, but the whole British establishment is designed to foster this impression.
The seeming permanency of British institutions defies the warnings of Nationalists against Globalism. Why the British and English electorates still support institutions like the monarchy and parliament when these institutions in their present form are openly and defiantly in favour of immigration is a mystery.
Let those who support the establishment show one single occasion on which the monarchy has spoken out against the multiracial society in England. The monarchy could have been a major stop line against immigration by simply having a quiet word with political leaders.
If the monarchy is so strongly based in the soil of England any politician no matter what their political creed would have been very foolish to ignore such a warning. But the monarchy did not; has not and as far as one can see, will not.
Nationalists are missing out an opportunity to communicate with young people by shilly-shallying about support for these august institutions.
Many young British and English people are intuitively hostile to the establishment and know instinctively that the Establishment is not to be trusted.
Of course apologies to all the Nationalists who know this and are miles down the road.
Max Musson
- Edit
That’s ok Graham, these truths can never be repeated too often.
Gerry
- Edit
“It is a very clear fact that many candidates for the job of MP are against immigration but it is political suicide to speak out. Any party will reject an MP who speaks out against immigration and what will follow is that the electorate will reject the MP. The Result is end of that MPs career.”
The pre 1997 MP’s would have that view but the modern ones will not have. Each person LabLibCon put forward for an MP position have been of their party apparatus for over 10 years and they would make sure they would get those pro-immigration so they do not have members being critical of the ‘enrichers’.
“Well, quite so, it is indeed madness that our own kin from New Zealand and Australia, Canada, South Africa and the US – the only people who should have a right to settle permanently in the UK”
The guy is a pack of lies as he also says he’s pro-immigration. The lies these politicians pull are astronomical. As pointed out in your article about the media Max on the 5th January people only take in a few sources so most will not know about the big lies because the media will not attack them.
Graham
- Edit
Boris or ‘Bojo’ as some bloggers name him is very attractive to many English voters. The English ‘John Bull’ looks upon Bojo as richer version of themselves.
Sooner or later the English will have to recognise that the long party is over and that England is a small European maritime, country, and not a global player. This is not such a bad situation to be in, but the English recoil from it.
One feels that the English way is to ‘go large’ and play the big shot; regardless of circumstances spending money on tick. It is all a bit pathetic really. Most of the ethnic groups are far more realistic (in my experience) and they know that the party is over.
To be fair to the English, it is difficult to be grounded and sensible when England has inherited an establishment of worn out tawdry institutions that are designed to show the world that Britain and England is still a great imperial power.
A lot of Nationalists are deeply attached to this old imperial nonsense nationalist are not happy about pointing the accusatory finger at the old establishment. Immigration is not an accident; it is an approved nostrum of economic growth that has developed in the highly refined Oxbridge educated intellects of government advisors.
Lots of low paid labour is their solution to any economic problem. That is how the Pakistanis came to England in the fifties. To work the cotton mills because the English would not work in those filthy nineteenth century mills with their antique looms. The idea of constant reinvestment in the newest machinery and buildings and a highly trained workforce makes no sense to a Whitehall economic advisor educated at Oxford in Classics and Liberal Arts subjects. Why invest in new equipment when the old equipment can still be worked. It is the attitude of the aristocrat inheriting an old house full of heirlooms from the past. All you need are lots of servants.
One final thing, the English are petulant people, as well as anything else, and when things start to hurt, then it likely they will lash out at anyone including Nationalists but this is a problem that will have to be faced.
Steve
- Edit
Boris has one thing in common with most mainstream politicians & that is he will never work in our interests, he oversees a city that is now majority non British.