News, Politics

Forum or Against’em?

582 Views 37

By Max Musson:

It was with a certain amount of surprise and intrigue that I heard the words “Hello, I’m Russell Jenkins, from the Mail on Sunday …” I was on the telephone at the time, speaking to one of my closest friends, Mike Woodbridge, and during the course of our conversation Mike had noticed someone coming down his garden path and had opened his front door to find out what they wanted. It was then that I overheard the reporter introduce himself and Mike rang off in order to deal with the situation, promising to call me back later, to let me know what had happened.

When we spoke again, Mike told me that the reporter had been enquiring about a recent meeting of the London Forum that both Mike and I had attended, and Mike told me that an article in the form of an exposé was likely to feature in the next issue of the Mail on Sunday.

Mike informed me that the reporter who had visited him, Russell Jenkins, was a local man and that he was simply collecting information for a regular Mail on Sunday journalist by the name of Nick Craven. Russell Jenkins had apparently conducted himself in a very polite and gentlemanly way according to Mike and had appreciated the fact that Mike had received him hospitably. Russell Jenkins said he felt rather embarrassed as a result of Mike’s good natured reception and apologised in advance, forewarning Mike that Nick Craven’s article was never-the-less almost certain to be hostile in nature.

I was not too surprised therefore as I opened a copy of last weekend’s Mail on Sunday, at the tone of the article that had been published, in which the London Forum meeting – a very civilised event at which the international line-up of speakers expressed themselves in very restrained and measured terms, was portrayed as a “Nazi invasion of London” and a “secret race hate rally”.

The article was as Mike was forewarned, primarily the work of Nick Craven, but a subordinate named Paul Cahalan was also involved and also promising ‘cub-reporter’, Simon Murphy, who has won a number of ‘newcomer to journalism’ awards but who until recently had struggled to command payment by way fees for any of his writing.

Until about eight years ago, Nick Craven had been employed by the Daily Mail, but he decided to develop his career as a freelance journalist, setting up Craven Hubbard Media Ltd and moving with his wife, Frances, and their three children to Norfolk. It would seem that despite his apparent ‘professional’ antipathy towards people who dislike the growth of multiculturalism and multiracialism in Britain, Nick Craven prefers to raise his children in one of the least multiculturally ‘enriched’ parts of these British Isles.

Assisting the trio named above was the éminence grise of gutter journalism, Gerry Gable, and just as with David Irving’s flat in 1963, Gable’s ‘fingerprints’ were all over this article, dragging the standard of journalism down to a level that must have been an embarrassment to a ‘high-powered’ freelancer like Nick Craven and the multi-award winning, Simon Murphy.

Referring to the London Forum, the Mail reporters set the tone for the remainder of their article early on, stating: “Nazi sympathisers, Holocaust deniers and their supporters from across the world have held a sickening secret rally in Britain at which speakers unleashed anti-Semitic rants, referring to Jews as ‘the enemy’ and ‘children of darkness’.”

Laughably, the trio referred to themselves as ‘a Mail on Sunday undercover team’, and instead of using Simon Murphy’s Politics degree in order to deliver a withering point-by-point dissection and refutation of the arguments and assertions of the speakers at the London Forum meeting, they confined their reporting to ad hominem attacks upon both speakers and attendees.

Apparently, the three reporters found it “shocking” that political dissidents in the UK should be allowed to hold private meetings and enjoy freedom of speech. They described a perfectly orderly and civilised meeting as a “vile event”.

They described criticism of Zionism (Jewish nationalism) by White nationalists as “sick anti-Semitic rants” and evidence of “incitement to racial hatred”, and yet found criticism of White nationalism by Jewish spokespeople, perfectly acceptable.

Furthermore, there was within the article the almost obligatory identification of several of the individuals who attended the meeting, together with the inference that these are ‘sinister’, quaisi-criminal individuals, when in reality they are simply individuals who in-so-far-as they have criminal convictions, have received these simply through their efforts to exercise their right to freedom of speech.

The Mail on Sunday article stated, “As the 113-strong audience filed out from the hotel, their true extremist credentials became clearer …” and the article then listed several people, together with details of their past political activism and couched in terms intended to suggest that despite the pensioner status of many of them, they are dangerous political extremists. All this while at the same time the Mail on Sunday reporters ignored the fact that according to Wikipedia, their informant Gerry Gable; had been a member of the Communist Party, standing as a Communist candidate in an election in 1962; has a conviction for a politically motivated burglary; and was associated during the 1960s with the violently extremist Zionist ’62 Group’.

Lastly, there was the repeated assertion that conveniently undisclosed members of the audience, “laughed at [the] Charlie Hebdo massacre”, but it did not occur to the reporters that their exposé, pregnant with inferences that meetings such as those hosted by the London Forum should not be allowed, and that the organisers should be pursued by the police, was an absolute travesty of the sentiments of freedom of expression that symbolised the Charlie Hebdo affair. So much for ‘Je suis Charlie Hebdo’ — more like ‘Je suis Lavrenti Beria’!

By Max Musson © 2015

# # # #

37 thoughts on “Forum or Against’em?”

  1. Bob

    - Edit

    Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail supported Sir Oswald Mosley’s British Union during 1934…how times have changed for the worse!

    Gerry Gable is a friend of Labour’s Lord Greville Janner formerly of the Jewish Board of Deputies, who is not going to be prosecuted for paedophile crimes because he has dementia, yet he demanded that ‘Nazi war criminals’ with dementia be prosecuted!

        1. diane granger

          - Edit

          I think it worth remembering that Labour 25 remains the name of the site but the numbers of Labour sexual deviants and paedophiles has risen exponentially!

        1. Davy

          - Edit

          Here are some more links regarding these establishment parties and their perverts.

          List of MP’s Convicted of Sex Offences:

          https://conspiracytruths.co.uk/…

          Labour25 + 27:

          https://labour25.com/labour25/

          Revealed: British Premier Gordon Brown Is A Pedophile:

          https://www.thetruthseeker.co.u…

          Gordon Brown yet another pedophile:

          https://beforeitsnews.com/eu/20…

          Tony Blair as ‘Mirand’:

          https://thetruthnews.info/Tony_…

          Tony Blair’s Dirty little Secrets:

          https://thecolemanexperience.w…

          The rotten establishment is full of these fellow travelers. This is why they are so hostile to racial nationalism, because they know we will expose their corrupt system and their lies and betrayal.

          1. Max Musson

            - Edit

            Hi Davy, You should be aware that last four links you provided do not work any longer, however do not be overly concerned by that. I would not be too concerned with expounding upon the many levels of corruption that exist within our political establishment, I think we are all well aware of these, and focusing too much on the vast extent of the problem can be counter productive in that some people can become paralysed be the apparent hopelessness of our situation.
            .
            Our situation is not hopeless however and we need to focus more on what needs to be done to rectify matters and that means occupying our minds with the positive steps towards that goal that we can all take. Only by taking action, i.e. by contacting me and becoming involved in the work of our movement will matters be put right.

          2. Davy

            - Edit

            Hi Max, If the four links are put into the browser in the following format, then you will find that they work perfectly.

            Revealed: British Premier Gordon Brown Is A Pedophile:
            https://www.thetruthseeker.co.u…

            Gordon Brown yet another pedophile:
            https://beforeitsnews.com/eu/20…

            Tony Blair as ‘Mirand’:
            https://thetruthnews.info/Tony_…

            Tony Blair’s Dirty little Secrets:
            https://thecolemanexperience.w…

            I take on board what you have stated, but i believe the more this is put out there, the more the corrupt/rotten establishment is undermined in the eyes of the general public.

    2. TiglathUK

      - Edit

      I used to dread getting dementia—and losing my keys every 5 minutes and my total personality, but no longer! The causal agent has just mutated.

      Even if severely affected, I’ll still be able continue doing things like complex public speaking around the world, fronting charities, be a voting member of parliament, c£aim and enjoy 6 figure expen$e$, chat away at dinner parties with political leaders, fool around with top civil servants and maintain my scouting activities—although I don’t get my old woggle out as much nowadays.

  4. AAA

    - Edit

    A tremendous article, Max, wherein you’ve done splendid research. Top marks –pay attention slavish journalists (whores of the Establishment pimp), this is how true journalism is conducted. However, I must take umbrage with your assertion that Zionism is “Jewish nationalism”.
    .
    Zionism is not just founded in nationhood and a desire for a homeland (as a nationalist I of course agree with this), it is also a political, internationalist, supremacist position; a global fifth column controlling Western governments, an entryist and expansionist parasite.

    1. TiglathUK

      - Edit

      They don’t want a homeland to live in, but they want a safe refuge to flee to if caught for crimes in the West. And they want a secure base, out-of-bounds to international inspectors and regulators, for R&D and manufacturing conventional arms and WMDs –to make money and intimidate everybody else with.

  5. heechee

    - Edit

    Just another mail reporter playing to the gallery. If we are vilified or demonized then we must be having some impact that doesn’t suit their twisted agenda.
    God bless you gentleman, keep up the good work

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      Yes, the old RAF adage, that ‘you don’t start getting flak until you’re over the target’ is most apt.

  6. jackdaw

    - Edit

    Which newspaper man said ” the news is something that
    someone somewhere doesn’t want you to know,
    everything else is advertising.”
    So, a free bit of exposure . . .
    even if their perception is a bit wonkey.

  7. Shaun

    - Edit

    I’ve developed quite a bit of bitterness towards the mass media. The reason: when I reached my mid twenties, I tried to become a mainstream journalist and I was edged out of the industry because I refused, in an induction test, to display an anti-White world view. I wrote an article about a race attack (as part of the test) and I included the context of the attack; you know, they might have been provoked; that type of thing.

    Strangely, I didn’t receive funding and I received a rather nasty letter from the NUJ that said ”my views” weren’t compatible with modern journalism. Too right they’re not!

    I don’t understand how a human being can sit through an event like the London Forum, and then, out of self-interest, lie about the nature of what they saw — just to impress rats who own the paper. It’s pure treachery.

    1. Rerevisionist

      - Edit

      The NUJ seems to have rewritten its ‘code of conduct’, probably under the influence of British people. (www.nuj. org.uk /about/ nuj-code/ has the new version). I haven’t attempted to waste time following the ‘General Secretaries’ of the NUJ but it’s certain they are Jewish-run, as of course the media is in general, including the BBC. The NUS, NUT, Equity and so on all have the same wearying behind-the-scenes controls to remove truth. let’s hope they get what they deserve.

      1. TiglathUK

        - Edit

        Don’t forget the disgusting, giant (Bolshevik) UNITE and UNISON Unions –I’m on their fekkin secret, public-sector Blacklist!

        1. TiglathUK

          - Edit

          I have accumulated strong evidence these big unions have basically-decent but morally weak public-sector managers in the palm of their hand! As with the USSR, they are the ultimate gatekeepers for high-end state jobs and careers. Their current champion, ‘Red Ed’ will probably be British PM in a few weeks!

    2. Stefan

      - Edit

      I think it might have been you, that I told my story to about the fury unleashed on my local paper when they dared to print a fair report on a BNP meeting I went to, that wasn’t portrayed as being full of Seig Heiling Nazis or anything other than peaceful.
      It surprised me that even something innocuous as that could be targeted for abuse, it shows that they will go to any lengths to stop our viewpoint getting out.
      So the attack on the London Forum is par for the course at the present time.

  8. Richard Edmonds

    - Edit

    Not so much ‘Je suis Charlie Hebdo’ — more like ‘Je suis Lavrenti Beria’!

    Very good, Max.

  9. SerpentSlayer

    - Edit

    Many Mail journalists have boasted about how many writers and editors identify as Jewish, they did this in response to some allegation or other some time last year I think it was.
    Should we be surprised that people who identify as Jewish and supporters of the Zionist state print an attack piece about British Nationalists?
    I think Max is correct with his RAF quote, Adolf Hitler himself took pride in the fact that the media, wholly owned by the very people whose conspiracy he wished to expose, would go to such lengths to try and vilify him. 70 years after the Capitalist/Communist world order cemented it’s power over Europe, this newspaper more than any other goes to extreme lengths to still vilify the man and any who stand for a Europe that isn’t a deracinated slave to usury.
    To all those who spoke at this meeting, I say take courage in the knowledge that in a world where all the power is in the hands of our enemies, you have the courage to speak against the established order and fight for a future for your people, you come from a long line of similar heroes that stretches back into the mists of time and the entire history of our people.

  10. Stefan

    - Edit

    TBH Max, is it any surprise they should be so hostile?
    They are terrified that these ideas should gain any traction with the wider public & put them out of a well paid living.
    I think the use of Gerry Gable shows how desperate & out of ideas these ghastly people are, the fact that they use smears & not logic.
    The truth won’t be suppressed in the long term.
    At the present we live under enemy occupation & we have to bear that constantly in mind.
    Once the balance changes it will be a different story, places like Northampton University can have a good clear out & get back to what they should be doing, providing education.

    1. Stefan

      - Edit

      Anyhoo… the idea that the Daily Mail is a Right wing publication is laughable as they subscribe to PC orthodoxy, employ NUJ journalists.
      A real Right wing publication wouldn’t have entertained this for a moment but for that you would probably need to read a NF journal or some such thing.

      Meanwhile on Twitter…
      https://twitter.com/Nigel_Farage/status/591671341172002818?t=1&cn=cmVjb3NfbmV0d29ya19kaWdlc3RfYWI%3D&sig=ec7848fda529e07bb90a6e90b196aa6b68b0c548&al=1&refsrc=email&iid=d6b6f4550fe24756982c46e96fc09f60&autoactions=1429933190&uid=1424909360&nid=244+42+20150422
      I wonder if this is connected to the Forum story in anyway?

  13. Stefan

    - Edit

    Mind you it’s a little worrying if younger people aren’t interested in this sort of thing.
    I guess some of them were attracted to something more physical like the EDL or BNP?

  14. JOHNNY LEECH

    - Edit

    The London Forum goes from strength to strength. I find the ‘Mail on Sunday’ so called expose comical. The enemies of the truth would not wish the content of pure fact to get out into the mainstream public. The modern age has seen a meeting of 113 turn into a meeting of over 5,000(and rising), if one takes note of the Hits on ‘You Tube’ of the speech given by Professor Kevin MacDonald.
    Our victories come in all shapes and sizes. I think the despicable Greville Janner case will be still mainstream long after the General Election.

    1. Stefan

      - Edit

      We await the public enquiry that should examine this & many other cases including Cyril Smith, it’s about time the enablers were exposed & prosecuted.

  15. heechee

    - Edit

    Quote:”Stefan
    2015/04/26 at 3:52 pm

    We await the public enquiry that should examine this & many other cases including Cyril Smith, it’s about time the enablers were exposed & prosecuted then exiled.”

    A minor edit but one I believe very moderate but justified. Any one who has physically abused a child should have the death penalty option in sentencing for the jury to decide by secret ballot. But some might find that unpalatable.

Comments are closed.