The mask of Europe’s fake “democrats”—who pretend to want “freedom” but who are actually extreme anti-white dictators—has slipped one more degree with the news that criminal charges are being prepared against France’s Front National leader Marine le Pen.
The development dates back to 2011, when the leftist-controlled French government laid charges against Ms le Pen for daring to say that the sight of Muslims praying in the streets of her country was “like the Nazi occupation of France.”
Apparently that perfectly innocuous comparison is some type of “racist crime” in “democratic” France, and the denizens of the far left fully intended to see her imprisoned for this comment.
However, as a Member of the European Parliament member (MEP), Ms le Pen enjoyed immunity from prosecution—until now.
This week, her protection was removed by a European parliamentary committee in a secret vote this week.
The move clears the way for the French government to pursue the case against the FN leader, who polled 18 percent of the vote in the 2012 presidential election.
The exact quote which has so incensed the “democrats” was made by Ms Le Pen at a party rally in 2010 in the southern French town of Lyon.
She said that Muslims using the streets to pray because mosques were overflowing was an “occupation” of French territory.
Ironically, praying in the streets was banned in Paris in 2011, and in 2013, France became the first EU state to ban the wearing of the Islamic veil in public.
The latter move is of course no solution to the problem of the Third World colonization of Europe, as all it does is force the invaders to dress a bit more like Westerners, lowering the barrier to integration a little bit more.
Steve
- Edit
There was talk of trying to shut Golden Dawn up as well but even people who might not be fans of Marine Le Pen might start to worry about such clamping down on an observation.
They might think it a bit Nazi like.
Mind you the Nazi’s weren’t known for blocking the streets to pray every Friday, just the occasional victory parade.
I think the more our politicians put the lid on this the more resentment that will build up & the more support we get for our point of view.
Because our logic becomes harder to fault.
Steve
- Edit
To be honest the moslems in western dress who appear integrated are probably the most dangerous of the lot!
Steven
- Edit
Indeed. I have no doubt that the reason why UKIP (its former policy) wanted to see the headscarf banned in Britain was to make Muslims seem more Western and like us thus making them seem less obviously ‘foreign’ and to encourage them to marry us ect. It is a very Tory viewpoint and UKIP IS a Tory Party so it should come as no surprise they share the same viewpoint.
BritishActivism
- Edit
They like to change the rules when it suits them.
For example, just off the top of my head I can vaguely remember these other examples: https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7963109.stm …and…. https://www.dw.de/far-right-wing-group-sidelined-in-european-parliament/a-2335201 .
.
I also agree that such things as “banning the veil” (which to my knowledge is not really all that enforced in France) and “not praying in the street” or “banning minarets” all the rest of it is just a window dressing con-trick that allows the ‘real situation’ to quietly continue its development on the ground.
Steve
- Edit
The sound of goalposts being rapidly shifted to wrong foot any opposition.
There is no excuse for not expecting this to happen, so any new Nationalist party that emerges, would also have to face the rules constantly being changed to favour TPTB & to keep power where it already is.
ConnalOakesHolt
- Edit
At some point and with increasing regularity, those liberal/leftists who have supported the multicultural agenda along with its ideological laws, which prohibit the expression of mere verbal disagreement with the displacement and replacement of the indigenous peoples of the European Nations, will fall foul of the monster which they have helped create.
Perhaps in view of this punitive decision, the result of an unhealthy secret vote, we are required to further adapt to the situation, to circumnavigate these laws. For example, would the same action have been taken, had Marine le Pen likened the overflow of muslims to the Israeli occupied territories in Palestine or the soviet overtake of Hungary? Perhaps, who knows. What is known is the power holders intend to remove all opposition to their insidious scheme.
The collapse of communism happened through the constant pointing out of its inherent contradictions.
The ban on the wearing of the veil some months following M Le Pens comment, highlights the contradiction of allowing the growth of Islam, which brooks no integration into a tolerant liberal system and third world immigration generally and the persecution of somebody who dares to point this out with an innocuous comparison.
Steve
- Edit
I do get a lot of pleasure when some liberal idiot falls foul of the monster they support & created.
I would agree that comparisons have to be carefully chosen because of the traps laid by our enemies.
People are getting quite good at pointing out the inherent contradictions of the liberal elite.
Franklin Ryckaert
- Edit
When injustice becomes the law, opposition to the law becomes justice.