Sick of the “Royal” wedding? Yes, so am I. In fact I was sick of it even before I penned the earlier piece which appeared here on the 18th May. Nevertheless, I thought it worth looking at the aftermath. Very much as I expected, the press went completely gaga over the fact that she’s a half-caste. Here’s a couple of very different but still fairly typical journalistic reactions:-
Bonnie Greer in the Daily Telegraph, 21.5.2018 – “The wedding was moving because (the Queen and the Prince of Wales) allowed it. This allowance does not create “change” as an overexcited American anchor gushed on US television. It acknowledges change because Meghan and Harry are what Britain looks like today. African Americans and the Black British community have always known this. We smile because this knowledge is officially out and accepted. What it will actually come to is another matter”.
Leo McKinstrey in the Express, 21.5.2018 – “As they embark on their new life, the marriage of Harry and Meghan can serve as an emblem, not only of the monarchy, but also of the changing nature of Britain. They are in tune with today’s demographics, where one in ten British couples is biracial and people of mixed race are the fastest growing group in the population….as the marriage shows, racial enmities are evaporating in modern Britain.”
There were many others, all – in so far as I could bring myself to read them – making the same point. I was particularly disappointed in the usually excellent McKinstrey. His statistic that one in ten couples in this country is biracial is presumably drawn from the census of 2011 which found that 9% of “relationships” – marriages and co-habitations – are “interethnic”. Predictably the press went into meltdown when this figure came out two or three years ago; “Racial barriers melt away as interethnic relationships blossom” gushed the Independent. I wrote a piece at the time for Western Spring pointing out that when you dig into the actual figures you find that the reality is very different. Most of these interethnic relationships are invisible – Black African/Black Caribbean; Indian/ Pakistani; White British/ White Irish. Most tellingly of all, the proportion of relationships which involved a White British partner with a non-White partner was just under 1.4%. So actually Harry and Meghan are not “in tune with today’s demographics”; they are a statistical rarity.
But you know the old saying – never let the truth get in the way of a good story. The “good story” which the press is determined to sell us is that race mixing is so general and so widespread that, to borrow a phrase, resistance is futile. Well, we shall see; resist we must because we can do no other.
Greer’s remark “what it will actually come to is another matter” is interesting. Is she hinting that the marriage is built on sand? If so, she is not the only one to think so; Anne Widdecombe has said as much. Meghan’s statement on the Palace blog that she is “a proud woman” and a “feminist” bodes ill for the Royal Family’s relationship with the rest of us. We have to wish the young couple well, especially the decent, genial and easily manipulated Harry, but I am uneasy about the future.
Finally, I promise never to write about the “Royal” marriage again (unless I really have to!)
By Frederick Dixon © 2018
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
# # # #
Albert
- Edit
The Jews and the White Liberal middle class who encourage inter racial relationships, and we are talking about African and West Indians, are the last people to get involved with Black men, in fact they are the last people to even allow their children to go to school with anyone out side there race and class.
I agree with Fredrick, and I see it in London, very few white woman these days have relationships with Black men, for all the obvious reasons.
Folkvar
- Edit
You must be visiting a different London to me as a white woman with a non-white man are all I ever see today. The white genocide policy pushed by the Jews and the left wing is working. Also I’ve noticed more white men with non-white women in the last couple of years than I’ve seen over all the preceding years of my life. It turns my stomach. In one generation these people have completely obliterated their beautiful bloodlines and they don’t care, they think it’s normal, even ‘cool’. They have no pride and no shame. They disgust me.
rerevisionist
- Edit
I think I’ve seen women with mixed race children in tow – but I think they may have been put out there as fakes – there seemed little friendship between the supposed parents and children. I think it’s partly faked, something Jews are of course habituated to.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
I’ve just spent a couple of days on the south coast, and as you would expect on a bank holiday weekend it was packed. And as I always do, I keep an eye on the “ethnicities” on display. I saw thousands of white children with their parents, quite a few Asians, and a handful – only a handful – of mixed race youngsters. Mixed couples were unusual, but it seemed to me that the commonest type was the middle aged to elderly white man with a Thai/Philippine/Oriental woman.
I draw no conclusions from this, but for once I was heartened by the numbers of white families and children and the scarcity of mixed types.
Keith Thomas
- Edit
If you go further out – on a Lake District ferry, for example – you will see that the patrons are very largely white with rare well-assimilated Indians or West Indians.
Go yet further out – a walk up Snowden (not the train), or along a leg of the Pennine Way – you will meet only Europeans.
I suspect the same profiles can be found on bird-watching walks and nature rambles.
Surprisingly, I see a good number of non-British visiting our large cathedrals, but I notice that they behave differently from the British visitors. That is, they appear to be visiting quickly out of curiosity, looking at the architecture. British visitors generally take their time, pause to read inscriptions, stand still reflectively in regimental chapels and chat with the cathedral volunteers.
Max Musson
- Edit
That is right. Certain activities are what can be termed ‘implicitly White’, which means that although there are no legal or other constraints upon participation by non-Whites, in practice non-Whites choose not to participate.
.
Competitive swimming for example is something that is mainly partaken in by Whites and sometimes Orientals. Similarly, equestrianism in all its forms, cycling, rowing, sailing, snow-boarding, skiing, mountain biking. These are all implicitly White.
.
It is interesting to note also that while Western African Negros are superior at sprinting, and while Eastern African Nilotids are superior at distance running, these racial groups are rarely able to participate competitively in Iron Man competitions and the like, where prowess in a combination of disciplines is required, and this also explains why non-Whites rarely if ever qualify for service in the SAS and SBS.
.
Daley Thompson and Jessica Ennis could be regarded as exceptions to the above, however they are both of mixed race and of predominantly White ancestry, as is Lewis Hamilton, with the exception of one or two Japanese driver/riders, the sole non-White to achieve significant success in any form of motor racing.
LJP
- Edit
Where I live there are many cycle paths and quite frequently mass participation cycle ‘races.’ Quite often I’ve stood and watched them pass by. I don’t recall ever seeing ‘a person of colour’ cycling. It’s like England in 1950s and in old ‘Rank’ movies.
Julie Lake
- Edit
As far as i am concerned, this is the end of any support that i had for the Royal Family.
I’ve noted over the years, that the minor Royals have featured less and less in the tabloids, and since the passing of Diana, a new socialite was desperately needed, given the cheerless nature of William and Kate.
Several Royals were denied their first love, when their chosen partners were deemed unsuitable, over the years. The rhetoric now, appears to be, that the Royals have moved with the times, bringing the family up to date, within a multicultural society. I do not believe that for one moment.
The Left seem to believe that this one mixed race addition, will force the Right to accept, that Britain has embraced .multiculturalism.
The Royals may indeed have moved with the times, when it comes to her mixed race, but i do not believe, that centuries of tradition, and the standards inherently embedded in their existence, have come up to date, also. If they had, the appalling treatment of the Duchess of York, and her banishment from the family, which see’s not one iota of forgiveness or compassion to the Mother of the Queen’s grandchildren. If such moving with the times, and the Royals gaining this new found tolerance and acceptance, were ever to be believed, then it begs the question Ma’am, why do you not show the same tolerance and acceptance, to your son’s former wife and Mother of your grandchildren? Her misdemeanors, hardly warranting exile continue to this day, and yet, the Duchess of York, has to watch, while a twice divorced, ( one annulled), non national, with what appears to be, a family of freeloading trailer trash, is fawned upon in such an obviously stage managed, circus show. Thus, if the very Royal standards that exile the Duchess of York, to this day, remain in tact, then surely these standards would have been applied, the moment Harry introduced her.
This is stage managed, and Markle will be the one to inject some scandal back into the family, for constant headlines, that the Royals continually need, to keep them relevant.
Until only this week, the pair would not reveal who the matchmaker was, that fixed up the blind date for them, Given Markle was already a celebrity in the USA, she moved with others in the public eye, why remain tight lipped for two years, as to who arranged their coupling? It seemed to be the case, that the matchmaker was not going to be revealed until that ring was firmly on her finger, and she was fully embedded into the House of Windsor. Once done, the tabloids rush to report the identity of the matchmaker. It appears, that person was a Misha Nono, a Jewish American-based fashion designer, who Markle shared the same celebrity circles with.
LJP
- Edit
What I find annoying, no nauseating, is the constant promotion of miscegenation in almost every advert that appears on the television. Quite often it is through sublimation, a photograph on the sideboard of a mixed race couple as the camera pans around, or a similar inter-racial couple holding hands in the background. And as for the choice of couples. Well, how many white/oriental combinations do you see in these adverts? I recall an article in the ‘Occidental Observer’ regarding one such advert in Germany (quite disgusting but I won’t go into detail) and how it came to be shown. I leave you to guess who the creators of that advert were. Perhaps it should be shown to one or two Learned Judges as they seem completely ignorant of the world around them.
Keith Thomas
- Edit
Queen Elizabeth and, especially, her daughter princess Anne, are feminists, assertive and also have the maturity, intellectual ability and moral fortitude to live their feminism confidently – not in the insecure way that needs regular displays of virtue signalling.
rerevisionist
- Edit
The queen has intellectual ability???
tony l
- Edit
Wish them well?
Really?
Personally, I wish them to FOAD.
The latest multi-racial bliss marriage will be interesting to watch. The last two involving Lenny Henry and Frank Bruno didn’t end well. Lol.
Folkvar
- Edit
With Frank Bruno it ended with children. His white partner permanently destroyed her bloodline, job done. Nothing to laugh about there.
Folkvar
- Edit
This creature he married is all about herself. She is a publicity hound who once said she wants to be loved like Diana. I don’t believe she really cares for Harry, he is too needy and childish; very easy to take advantage of. It’s clear she has him completely under her thumb. If she could bin Harry and go with William, I believe she would in a heartbeat. I agree with another poster, this union was no chance happening, it appears to be a set up, Harry probably didn’t even know. They don’t call him Tim nice but dim for nothing.
John Stephens
- Edit
The ugly face of Journalism, is seen in full hate-filled mode, for all to see. The so-called experts are no more than traitors, who know full well the marriage is illegal under the “Act of Settlement”, the “English Bill of Rights”, and the 1215
“Magna Carta”.
I no longer recognise the Royal family, nor the post 1945, multiples of institutions, known as Great Britain. In fact, I support the building of a “system within a system”, which trades, educates, and keeps healthy, physical and racial elements known to pre-war generations.
Lloyd Miller
- Edit
Odd that few people would suspect the bride to be anything but White except from the coverage. Large wide set eyes seem to be the only hint.
panadechi
- Edit
races must be mixed except the Jews, and the one who opposes is racist, except the Jews. The races do not exist, except the Jews.
Conclusion:
Ethnic lineage is Power. Only the Jews.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Whether the coming together of Prince Harry and Megan Markle was by a happy or otherwise coincidence or through collusion, the relationship was not opposed and prevented by the Queen. The Royal Family are concerned with their own survival and they would not take action which could hasten their demise.Thus the acceptance of a multicultural and a multiracial society has become official policy, encouraged through an all pervading propaganda through education, entertainment, official institutions and the mass media.
Had Her Majesty opposed the relationship, the Left would have released its poisonous vitriol, accusing the Institution of the Monarchy and the Royal Family as inherently “racist” and elitist.Calls for the abolition of the Monarchy would have then gathered considerable impetus.
We can lament the lack of fortitude and resolve in the Royal Family as it has seemed to have placed its own survival above the long term welfare of the country.
Nationalism and republicanism are not mutually exclusive, and calling for the abolition of the Monarchy is not a betrayal if the institution is no longer relevant today.However the Institution of the Monarchy provides some protection against the pernicious doctrine of Egalitarianism, as it upholds the principles of elitism and difference. Retaining the monarchy is also important as a means of safeguarding our heritage and traditions, which the Left endeavour to change.
Frederick Dixon
- Edit
There does seem to be a debate going on about whether or not nationalists need to be monarchists, and if we do, do we have to have the Windsors? So here’s a thought for you – if you go to Sherborne Abbey in Dorset you will see that the stone flags at the end of one of the nave aisles has been replaced by a glass plate (or it had when I last visited many years ago).If you peer through the glass you will see, many feet below, a couple of skulls and a scatter of bones. These are the remains of two Kings of Wessex, elder brothers and predecessors of Alfred the Great.
If we can extract DNA from the 9,000 year old bones of Cheddar man, perhaps we could extract it from these very much more recent remains? If so, then we will have recovered the genome of the first and real Royal House of England. I suspect that there will be many men in the south of England, particularly in and around Hampshire, who will have the Royal Y chromosome. Who knows, it might be you – or me!
Max Musson
- Edit
Many nationalists still cling to the hope that our nation can be saved through electoral politics and I really hope they are right. I fear however that we will experience several decades yet of further decline into the chaos and corruption that is the inevitable end state of all multiracial and multicultural societies.
.
I believe that the salvation of our people will require men and women of our race to prepare for that future age of anarchy when the power of the British state will collapse, and the coming of a time when our national and racial consciousness will be able to re-assert itself under determined and uncompromising leadership.
.
The leaders concerned will prove their worth through daring feats of brinkmanship, through the inspiration they provide, through the persuasiveness of their arguments and through unyielding courage. Our new monarch and the founder of a new Royal family for a rejuvenated British people will be the individual who plays the most critical role in vanquishing our enemies and in delivering the salvation for which we all yearn.
Richard Edmonds
- Edit
correction: not the ” pursuasiveness of their arguments “, but the persuasive power of their arguments.
Max Musson
- Edit
I accept your correction of my spelling mistake. I originally spelled it correctly, but the spell checker on my phone highlighted it as incorrect and so after puzzling about it for a few seconds I changed it and my spell checker accepted the incorrect spelling.
.
Such is the wonder of modern technology and our readiness to accept it as ‘infallable’.☺
Alec Suchi
- Edit
I would suggest that it is acceptable to write ” The persuasiveness of their arguments ” as well as “The persuasive powers of their arguments”.
Let not issues of spelling and grammar preoccupy us, for though they are important, we must not be distracted from making clear and coherent arguments to further the cause.
Keep up the good work, Max , you provide a first class forum which allows us to express our concerns and ambitions, suitable for all strands of nationalism and identitarianism.
Richard Edmonds
- Edit
The final paragraph of Max’s brief comment (above), “The leaders concerned will prove their worth…” is a fine statement of how we are going to win. I wanted to remove the slight typo-error.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Nothing will improve for us, the White/Aryan people, until we care, protect and project our bloodline with the same religious zeal as do the Jewish people. Although biology might not give us the whole picture, John Tyndall once remarked that “my race is my religion”.
John Stephens
- Edit
Max hit the nail full on. Having spent a decade in the British Army, I can testify that “Minorities” can only produce the required longevity in physical fitness, by either being mixed race, or having certain criteria, several degrees lower to become “equal” to White counterparts.
The latest insanity, is that Women should be allowed in the S A.S. etc, in the name of equality. This “equality” of course, which could sadly stretch to minority entrants, will be via lessening the weight required to do the hardest part of the selection process.
George Orwell said it best: “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others”.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
It is possible to respect the Institution of the Monarchy without being attached to a particular royal family, and in our case the House of Windsor. There are those who maintain a fawning attitude towards the Royal family, and are intrigued by the antics of its members. These people would describe themselves as royalists and would not necessarily appreciate the constitutional significance of a monarchy.
It is possible to be free from a sycophantic attitude towards royalty and instead value the institution of the monarchy for providing constitutional stability and helping to conserve and protect our heritage , customs and traditions.
John Wrawe
- Edit
Royalty is a supposedly elitist and patriotic institution yet has now completely merged into the liberal bourgeoisie, it’s time for nationalists to oppose this sham.
Fyrdman
- Edit
The Queen, ever since she was a child, has always been interested in horses and racing. Royal Ascot, of course, is a highlight. She knows that breeding from the stocks of great bloodlines may determine the birth of a future champion winner. No doubt she knows that if this is ignored, one ends up with not a fine sturdy animal, but some nag fit only to pull a cart.