History, Immigration

D-Day!

115 Views 30

By Max Musson:

As events to commemorate the 70th Anniversary of the D-Day take place over the next few days, our news media will be full of personal stories retelling tales of the heroism of those who took part in the Normandy landings, unfortunately without making any connection between the outcome of World War Two and the dire situation we find ourselves in as a nation today.

Undoubtedly those who took part in the Normandy landings and the associated operations in support of them were courageous and we should quite rightly salute them for their bravery and for their military prowess. It was estimated by those responsible for planning the landings that as many as 70% of the soldiers comprising the first wave of Allied troops to hit the beaches would die that day and one only has to hear old soldiers recount their experiences or watch realistic war films like ‘Saving Private Ryan’ to appreciate the dangers faced by our servicemen and the horrors many of them endured.

I would not want to take anything away from those old soldiers because they fought in the belief that victory over the Germans was essential to the future security and well-being of our people. They were not to know that an Allied victory would usher in an era of consummate betrayal, in which mendacious liberal and Marxist politicians would emerge with unfettered power and conspire to destroy everything those brave servicemen thought they were fighting to protect.

Prior to World War Two, Britain was a world power with a massive empire and commonwealth stretching right around the globe. We were a nation with great confidence and belief in our civilising mission and with a vigorous population growth that enabled us to export our surplus populations to colonise our dominions in Africa and Asia and to swell the British populations of Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

The World War Two generation are in the media often referred to nowadays as the generation that fought to rid us of the ‘menace’ and ‘evil’ of Nazism, but in fact they were led to believe that German hegemony in Europe was a threat to British interests and that in fighting the Germans they were fighting to secure British pre-eminence and to honour our commitment to defend the territorial integrity of our ally, Poland.

In fact there were no British interests served by an alliance with Poland and the territorial guarantees given to Poland were designed to serve Jewish interests and intended to contrive a situation in which we would be drawn into a war with Germany.

Emboldened by British and French guarantees, the Poles became intransigent in the treatment of their ethnic German minority and in their dealings with Hitler’s Germany and on 1st September 1939 the Wehrmacht invaded Poland from the west, while sixteen days later, on the 17th September, the Soviet Union invaded from the east to conclude their division of Poland as agreed under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

On 3rd September, following the German invasion of Poland, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared war on Germany, however there was no subsequent declaration of war on the Soviet Union for their pre-meditated seizure and occupation of Polish territory. This provides proof if it was needed that the territorial guarantees given to Poland were simply a pretext with which to engineer war with Germany, as even after the war when the Soviet Union occupied all of Poland, this continued violation of Polish territorial integrity was conveniently ignored by all of the other Allied powers.

Following the destruction and conquest of Nazi Germany, all opposition to the machinations of organised Jewry in Europe was eliminated and all concepts of nationhood among the European peoples based upon racial principles were likened to Nazism and discredited at a stroke.

Almost immediately pressure began to mount, emanating from Jewish and Marxist sources, for mass non-White immigration from the former European colonies to be commenced under the pretext that as a consequence of the great loss of life during the war there was now a shortage of manpower. This of course was nonsense, as during the war, when most men were away, fighting and therefore doing nothing productive, output was able to be maintained by drafting in women to do jobs that had previously always been done by men. With the return of our menfolk from the front, just a fraction of the women employed during the war would have been enough to maintain production at adequate levels.

In June of 1948 the passenger liner ‘Empire Windrush’ docked at Tilbury and discharged the first cargo of non-White immigrants onto England’s shores and so began the trickle that soon became a steady flow, then a torrent and eventually a tidal wave of immigration into Britain, such that now almost one in six of the population of this country are of immigrant stock.

Such has been the impact of uncontrolled non-White immigration into this country, that large parts of every town or city, from one end of the British Isles to the other, have now been colonised and almost every facet of our culture has been changed or altered in some way to accommodate the newcomers and make them feel at home. So large in fact is the immigrant population of Britain today that it dwarfs any feared occupation by Germans that might have happened if the Nazis had won the war.

Furthermore, so similar are the Germans to we British, that had they conquered Britain and imposed their way of life upon us, virtually all that would have changed, beyond that which has changed since World War Two, is that we would be speaking German and making our purchases in Deutschmarks instead of decimalised Pounds Sterling. It is ironic that in almost every other respect, our former way of life and culture would have remained unchanged, yet our parents generation fought with bullets, bombs and bayonets to prevent a German invasion of Britain, only to role over and submit when a graver danger presented itself in the form of invasion from the Third World.

Worse still, we are now in the dire situation that there is the very real prospect that we will be rendered a racial minority in our own land with our nation obliterated by the middle of this century if nothing is done to halt and reverse the flow of non-White migration.

While it would be so nice therefore to give full vent to our admiration of, and gratitude for, the martial qualities and the heroic sacrifices of our wartime generation, the fact is that with each passing year it becomes harder and harder to view the course of World War Two as anything other than a national disaster with truly tragic consequences.

It is a cause of great sorrow to me that the men of my father’s generation did not foresee the consequences of the war, and by the time those consequences had become apparent had lost the stomach for another fight.

It is also a source of great shame for me that my generation have meekly accepted the occupation of our land by foreign peoples with hardly so much as a whimper. It is therefore incumbent upon those of us who are alert to the looming dangers and who are aware of the tragic consequences that will befall us if nothing is done, to organise and employ every ounce of energy at our disposal to rally our people and inspire them to emulate our forebears of seventy years ago, and once more perform great feats of courage in the defence of our homeland, so that our nation can live on and our children have a future!

By  Max Musson © 2014

# # # #

30 thoughts on “D-Day!”

  1. Albert

    - Edit

    The biggest catastrophe in the history of Britain was being on the winning side in WW2.
    If Germany had won our culture which is the same as our German cousins would have been unchanged.
    And as you say Max….our culture because of uninvited Mass Immigration..is on its way to being obliterated.

  2. Brin of the family Jenkins

    - Edit

    My Dad landed with Canadian Troops on Juno Nan White, He was in the first boats out of Shoreham where he later kept a public house. He never once told me of his Shoreham connection but one day in conversation, he told me that many thought we fought on the wrong side. This seemed shocking having had German bombs dropped on me but like so many others I didn’t know the details, since then other old timers told me similar tales. What would he have made of todays political leaders all internationalist New Worlders.

    1. Walter Greenway

      - Edit

      My father likewise came to the conclusion that he had fought on the wrong side some years before he died.
      He was lucky to survive many of the major battles during the Normandy campaigns but sad at the loss of so many friends and good people.
      Very few of those young men and ladies would have fought had they known of the betrayal planned against them, our folk and our Nation.

    2. Fionn Westron

      - Edit

      This is the sort of information that should be put out to the public.

      A list of the British men and women who fought in WW2 and who then thought they fought on the wrong side. It would present such a mis-match with the public’s programming and the media’s version which has such a hold over them, that it would present much thought provocation.

    3. DF4920

      - Edit

      My grandfather, from the part of the UK without conscription, volunteered to join the the Navy and ended up in the Mediterranean and almost met death several times. He never spoke about the war. I asked him about it before his natural death, and I was taken back at how negative his reaction was and how he felt it was not worth it.

      It is only in the past few years since that I have come to understand what he meant. He was a good-humoured, noble, straight-talking no-nonsense non-PC sort of man (as that generation overwhelmingly were) and the attitudes of the following culturally-Marxist brainwashed generations are the complete opposite to that of the generations who actually did go out to fight.

  3. PharmaPhil

    - Edit

    I find it very sad the pointless loss of so many of our people on both sides & by 1948 the so called victory was already being betrayed & has been ever since.
    But at least we realise this.

    1. Brin of the family Jenkins

      - Edit

      Stalin played a cool hand ensuring that we would declare War on Germany, had we also included Russia as the other invader of Poland, what might have happened?

      Perhaps we should have noted Peace News of the day, and their reasons for saying don’t fight. Its ironic but both Nationalists and Peace News held sound ideas for staying out of the conflict, I have read archived old copies. Peace News are now firmly on the side of Internationalism.

      It’s too easy condemning our people for fighting WW2, it took many months and a lot of propaganda to bring it about, posters of the “HUN” bayoneting babies eventually swayed opinion.

      I was born in 1936 and have memories of the Battle of Britain, having been bombed on several occasions I hated Hitler and Jerry, In the early 1960’s I saw a photo of my Dad sharing time in Austria with a retired E Boat commander, and I was shocked. I have learned much since that time.

  4. Shaun

    - Edit

    I’m sorry, I have little respect for the so-called Greatest Generation! These people were forced to fight! And, let’s face it, they fought an enemy that they should have known had their best interests at heart — the NS would have released us from the bondage of international usury for start. Isn’t that enough?

    Secondly, the diversification of our homeland vis-a-vis the Empire Windrush wouldn’t have happened.

    The generation coming after did more to defend our homeland! At least some of them fought to maintain our racial intertrgrity in the Notting Hill Riots of 1955… The generation after that? Well, what can I say? They took drugs….

    1. Fionn Westron

      - Edit

      Good, this type of point is more of what we need to put out there.

      Use is made by the allies, Jewish supremacists and marxists of how they were on the winning side, how they are the knights in shining armour and slayed the “Nazi” monster. They make use of this, the holocaust fairytale to try to garner support today. The allies in the form of the Tories and their Dailymail, the Jewish supremacists in the form of international jewry their banksters and saintly globalist criminals, who are untouchable because of the fairytale holocaust, the marxists in the form of Labour, UAF, various immigration industry NGO’s, fake feminist groups, and their media hacks like the Guardian etc.

      All these people make capital (das Kapital) from the image of being the good guys and demon slayers.

      Yet here we have from the only people who actually put their own skins on the line a real profession that they did not fight for the Britain that these allies and Jewish supremacists have pushed to bring in.

      Instead these self sacrificing people, (not all of them grant you) fought for a Britain that the Germans were fighting for. Yes I have no doubt that had the Germans won, a few things might have changed in Britain culturally, the Germans would have promoted the Britishness, as being another example of a White society, different but White. And would have encouraged a Britain for the British. So in fact you may even have had a more British Britain. It is the leaders of the allied nations backed, mastered and controlled by banksters, zionists and White freemasons to a large extent, who pushed wartime policies that went against the interests of the ethnic peoples of their own allied nations.

      The above article is good to get out there, it shows the fighters values were more aligned with German NSDAP thinking at the time. The ideas the allied leaders under zionist influence, wanted smothered at all costs.

      So in every general sense, it is true, the Germans were indeed fighting for the Britain the British were fighting for.

  6. Nimble

    - Edit

    ‘On 3rd September, following the German invasion of Poland, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain declared war on Germany, however there was no subsequent declaration of war on the Soviet Union for their pre-meditated seizure and occupation of Polish territory. This provides proof if it was needed that the territorial guarantees given to Poland were simply a pretext with which to engineer war with Germany, as even after the war when the Soviet Union occupied all of Poland, this continued violation of Polish territorial integrity was conveniently ignored by all of the other Allied powers.’

    .

    To be fair, the Anglo-Polish military alliance specified Britain was to come to Poland with military aid in case of attack by Germany specifically, not just an attack in general by any country, this seems to be forgotten by many and it appears this was shrewd planning by those who entered into the alliance to ensure there was no obligation to declare war on any country who should attack Poland, such as the Soviet Union, which of course Britain would likely not have stood much of a chance against when also fighting against Germany at the start of the war, least of all after the war when we we had already had the toll of six years fighting on us.

    .

    Really, another point to be made is how utterly pointless it was having that alliance, Britain gained nothing from it other than being obligated to enter a war against the only racial nationalist country Europe has ever seen, and probably will ever see, and in the majority of comments I see from Poles online, whenever the Second World War is the topic of discussion, they display nothing short of utter contempt and loathing towards Britain for ‘betraying’ them, which I can only deduce is the mainstream narrative taught in Poland, that being that Britain acted dishonourably and cowardly in, I suppose, failing to somehow defeat the military might of Germany within one week of declaring war on them.

    .

    In fact, the impression seems to be that many simply don’t believe that we even honoured the alliance, despite the fact that Britain clearly did, the alliance was written that Britain would aid Poland militarily if Germany took military action against them, which is what happened, the alliance did not state Britain was to declare war against any other power that did the same to Poland and so, as was the only realistic cause of action, and in keeping with the terms of the treaty, Britain did not suicidally declare war on the USSR, which, again, it was under the obligation to do.

    .

    Of course, many of these same people have no qualms over coming to our island en mass, to the point where I swear every other voice I hear some days is speaking a Slavic tongue.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      Technically, what you say regarding the territorial guarantees made to Poland may be correct, however, when Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland it was in accordance with terms agreed by them under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the two countries were operating in concert. From any moral standpoint therefore, it made a mockery of the territorial guarantees given, and it made the consequent declaration of war against Germany nonsensical, that we subsequently entered into an alliance with the Soviet Union, the country that was jointly culpable in violating Poland’s territorial integrity.
      .
      As agreed, we British gained nothing from the guarantee given to Poland, but instead were thereby induced against our national interests to declare war on Germany. These facts alone demonstrate that our entry into World War II was in reality to serve interests other than our own, i.e. Jewish interests, given that world Jewry had already declared war on Germany.

  7. Charlie Wax

    - Edit

    Excellent article Max, really makes you think.

    I was wondering if you know of any research/sources into the Jewish role in encouraging Commonwealth immigration or whether you could write a future article on the subject? I think Britain needs a Kevin McDonald style analysis of our situation, from the immediate post-war period up to ‘Neathergate’. Many thanks.

        1. rerevisionist

          - Edit

          Ah well, thanks. I do my best. (NB I’m somewhat under the radar, not using google as a hit counter; Alexa understates my hit rate).

          One of the most censored items is the cui bono of wars. A balance sheet of the situation before a war, and after. There’s an occasionally-quoted comment of Britain after the First World War, speaking of ‘hard faced men who seem to have done very well out of the war”. And a US ‘Daddy Warbucks’ character; but that’s about it. I’d say the Vietnam War had no military purpose at all: if just made money for Jews, both by adding to inflation and paper money, and through the costs of things like gunships and bombs. It’s tragic to see people proud of pratting about in uniform with medals without the faintest idea of the actual effects of the war. Jenkins here says I’m ‘simplistic’ but as you can see, obviously is not so.

  8. Rerevisionist

    - Edit

    Don’t forget the airmen who died; 30,000 is an often-quoted figure. Or their victims – considerably more than 30,000. Both had horrific deaths. Like Shaun, I have little respect for these people: by not even discussing the Jewish issue, they caused the whole period to be misunderstood by most people. And of course it applies to the post-war generation: despite the expansion of ‘education’ the same subject has been censored just as much, possibly more. It is agonising to chat to smug old people who did (say) economics or politics or history who simply have absolutely no idea of the effects of Jewish control of banking. And it applies to the period around the ‘Great War’; imho Jewish control of information about central Europe and Russia slowly built up the ideas about Germans and Russians that still largely rule today, and caused large numbers of people to unthinkingly support the ‘Great War’.

    However, I’m not sure how many people still believe the D Day mythology. I was interested to see the BNP website has little or nothing on the subject, although there have been a few facebook comments on traditional lines. Just a few years ago they were using Churchillian iconography in their campaigns.

    Another aspect is the attitude of Germany to Britain. If the EU ever becomes a genuine attempt to consider Europe as a unity, many Germans may well hate the British. Jews of course are obsessed with themselves, and unlikely to know or care about long-term hate, except their own. I think probably the Chinese attitude to the USA is still influenced by the Vietnam War, for example; they are unlikely to take ‘civilisation’ in the USA very seriously. I think part of our duty is to point out these things, even to the rather sad people with their tinpot medals and carefully modified memories.

    1. Brin of the family Jenkins

      - Edit

      Having lived through WW2 and experienced both the propaganda and bombing, I do respect the bravery of those concerned on all sides. The Russian people at Stalingrad, and our populations in the big cities. At the end of the day I have understanding of the Germans who were also killed in our bombing raids, but by then it was a war and was going to be fought. I have also read diaries of British POW’s, and the help they had from Italian civilians after Italy capitulated, there are many emotional tales of great kindness shown by ordinary people.

      To say that you have no respect concerns me. The War was a terrible thing, we were misled into it, and matters are now in a dire state. I hold a great deal of respect for those involved and feel you have a simplistic view of a very complicated mess.

      I have some respect for Churchill too, I know he was a war monger, not a prime mover though any more than Hitler. The International Bankers and people of the shadows are the ones I hate. We don’t even know who many of them are or were. These criminals still pull the strings.

      1. Max Musson

        - Edit

        I believe your attitude is right Brin. It is a source of great frustration that our father’s generation were not more alert to what was going on and did not react sooner and with more determination once the scale of their betrayal became apparent, but in the main we are talking about ordinary people who had been through an horrendous ordeal, the emotions thus generated making it difficult for them to respond rationally. We can interpret events more accurately and with keener insights because we have a large measure of emotional detachment, but a young man recently returned from a war in which he had seen many of his best friends shot and bayonetted to death would find it very difficult emotionally to conduct a re-appraisal of events and draw different conclusion from those he had previously held.
        .
        It is right therefore that we do honour the bravery and courage of our father’s generation, even though we reject the righteousness of the cause for which they fought.

      2. Steven

        - Edit

        Do we even know that Hitler was not a Jew or partially jewish himself? I studied German at school and visited Germany as a school exchange student and when I was there I never saw any native German man looking remotely like Adolf Hitler. I have also been to Austria (Hitler’s birthplace) and again never came across a person looking like Hitler.

        It is surely a possibility that the Zionists were involved in the Nazi Party? These people are remarkably cunning and normally manage to control both sides of a situation to their advantage. Infact, modern-day Israel could be said to be modelled on the racial philosophy of German national socialism.

        1. Max Musson

          - Edit

          There have been rumours spread by Jewish and anti-Nazi sources both before and since WW2 that Hitler was partly Jewish and that Eva Braun was partly Jewish, but these stories are simply not credible and no substantial evidence has ever been produced. These rumours are simply disinformation designed to thoroughly discredit Hitler and National Socialism, but they are so varied and numerous that they inevitably contradict each other. I have seen stories claiming that Hitler was a secret homosexual, that he was a secret paedophile, that he was into bestiality with his dogs, that he was a compulsive womaniser, that he had an insatiable sexual appetite, that he was impotent, that he had only one testicle, that he was a compulsive farter in public, that he was a health food fanatic, that he was a drug addict that he was tee-total, that he had a fear of women, that he had a Jewish lover, that his best friend when he was at school was a Jew with whom he had a homosexual crush, etc., etc. None of these stories are true in my opinion, they are simply propaganda.

          1. Steven

            - Edit

            I take what you say about this matter on board but I have often wondered if Zionist groups didn’t fund the Nazis. Zionists are so ruthless in pursuit of their own interests that it wouldn’t be beyond them to fund ‘anti-semites’ in order to advance themselves in the longterm. They don’t mind sacrificing their fellow Jews to do this.

            Also, it is surely a remarkable co-incidence that the state of Israel has similar policies on who constitutes Jewry with the way the Nazis defined ‘true’ Germans. You could say Zionism equals a Jewish version of German national socialism.

            1. Max Musson

              - Edit

              Zionism is indeed the Jewish version of National Socialism, but that does not mean that the Nazis and the Zionists were one and the same.

  9. R.E.

    - Edit

    Max writes :It is right therefore that we do honour the bravery and courage of those who fought in the World Wars. ” Absolutely correct: those men who charged enemy machine- gun posts, those men who flew their planes into enemy skies, those men who sailed their ships across dark and dangerous seas, and who expected to meet Death any second.: we bow our heads before such Courage.

    However – and there is a definite However – what those who campaign for our Cause of Race and Nation need to comprehend is that :

    The clique of LibLabCon politicians, who are inflicting racial genocide onto us through never ending mass-immigration, are exactly the same ones whose predecessors inflicted the suicidal, fratricidal world wars onto us. It was the Liberal party in government which declared war on Germany in 1914. It was the Conservative party in government, and soon to be joined and supported in coalition by Labour and the Liberals, which just twenty five years later in 1939 , again declared war on Germany,

    Two World Wars and Mass-immigration, and the clearly approaching extinction of our kind: Curse the political class, needs to be our daily exhortation. .

    1. Brin of the family Jenkins

      - Edit

      How do we progress next? I understand that England is no longer on the map. After the devolution, regional assemblies under orders from the EU will take over the administration of the horrid regional areas, and our UK parliament is redundant.

      1. Max Musson

        - Edit

        Hi Brin, Most people do not realise that under the Treaty of Lisbon, the powers of the national governments of the member nations were either usurped by the governing institutions of the European Union or devolved down to the regional assemblies as soon as they are ready to exercise them. This process when complete will therefore obviously leave the national governments with no powers and no purpose and we don’t have to be rocket scientists to work out what will happen next – they will be declared a pointless extravagance and a relic of a bygone era and progressively abolished.
        .
        The prospect of UKIP acquiring representation at Westminster is only of concern to our political establishment in-so-far as it might be possible for UKIP to win a majority at the next general election or possibly the one after. My expectation is that at sometime within the next 10 to 20 years, if nothing changes, Westminster will cease to be a seat of national parliament and will exist only as a kind of museum exhibit that history and politics students will visit as part of their studies of how things used to be.
        .
        As long as UKIP can be prevented within the next 10 years or so from acquiring a parliamentary majority or securing enough MPs to become the dominant force in a future coalition government, then Westminster will no longer exist and with the demise of Westminster, so the potential for a national government to negotiate our way out of the EU disappears.
        .
        Prior to the Treaty of Lisbon there was no constitutional process by which a member state could leave the EU. The Treaty of Lisbon introduced such a constitutional process however, requiring exit from the EU to be negotiated by the national governments of the member states concerned. It is ironic therefore and obviously deliberate that in eventually introducing this facility, the Treaty also set in motion a process that would lead to the abolition of the national governments, thereby providing an impossibly short window of opportunity for constitutional withdrawal from the EU, beyond which withdrawal by constitutional means will no longer be permitted.
        .
        The way forward is for nationalists to realise that electioneering is a strategic dead-end for nationalist political parties UNLESS we have acquired the Six Prerequisites. Anyone who wishes to do something productive and of lasting value for our people must email me [email protected] and must help us in our campaign to achieve those vital resources, without which victory is impossible.
        .
        As the next general election approaches, the mass media will manage the threat to their plans posed by UKIP, by allowing UKIP to remain strong enough to act as a ‘road block’ preventing the emergence of a militant truly nationalist political party, while at the same time, too weak to actually force British withdrawal from the EU.
        .
        Should the window of opportunity be shut before we nationalists have acquired the wherewithal necessary to win, the Six Prerequisites will then be employed to enable us to grow ‘organically’ through enclaves within the 12 EU regions of the British Isles, to eventually dominate these regions and to announce a Unilateral Declaration of Independence once we are strong enough to resist repression by Interpol and the European Rapid Reaction Force. We live at the beginning of the ‘Third Great European War’, the war in which we will eventually secure victory over the forces of evil, but we are still in the period of ‘phoney war’ at present during which we must work hard to acquire the Six Prerequisites.
        .
        So, now is the time to enlist!

  11. Rerevisionist

    - Edit

    As a footnote, there’s a ‘conspiracy theory’, very likely true, that the hazardous Normandy Landing was deliberately chosen *because* it was dangerous. A dangerous invasion with many casualties slowed down the British and Americans, giving time for the Jewish army in the USSR to get to Berlin. A large amount of Jewish activity revolved around keeping people out of the USSR so that little information about Jewish death camps could be definitely established.

    In my opinion (this is controversial) nuclear bombs were faked by Jews in the USA, and Jewish ‘atom spies’ faked in the USSR, so Jews could pretend the USSR had ‘nuclear weapons’, which of course if true would have made them invulnerable. The nuclear weapon myth allowed the Jews there to mop up, consolidate, steal factories from Germany, get and copy western technology, go along with Jewish post-war financial scams, and of course kill ever more goyim.

    1. Max Musson

      - Edit

      I would say that both of the conspiracy theories you outline here are difficult to believe.
      Firstly, virtually anywhere the Allies landed along the northern coast of France would have been perilous for the troops involved.
      Secondly, if the existence of nuclear weapons has been faked by Jews, why are the Israelis so concerned about the prospect of Iran acquiring these weapons that don’t exist?

Comments are closed.