By Br. Darby, a young and active proponent of Western revival.
As foreign aid rises to £12bn, our own vital services are being cut and mismanaged, in an attempt to prop up the ‘developing nations’. Fictitious justification is given to the masses to bleed Britain dry financially, and carry out this illogical policy.
Britons are said to be amongst the most charitable people on earth, with billions given away through choice every year to private charities. However, our political masters give us no choice in sending a figure approaching £12bn of tax collections overseas. A truly democratic society would be given an opportunity to vote on the transfer of huge amounts of wealth away from our shores.
With there being numerous charitable organisations catering for all causes and satisfying personal emotional needs, as will be pointed out below, the policy of taxpayer funded foreign aid is a pointless, imperialist attempt to change perfectly natural, native lifestyles in the third world to Western industrial societies.
The reasoning behind this insane idea is, in reality, driven by achieving the pluralistic, globalist wet-dream of ‘free-market Marxism’. All deceitfully advertised, as a combination of permanent reparations, for centuries-old ‘wrongs’ by our colonialist ancestors, and the almost universally accepted false duty to help the world’s disadvantaged.
Western history has been demoted to stories of genocide and the displacement of native, peaceful peoples. Our achievements are put down to theft, chance, and the re-writing of history on our part. We are erroneously told the South has had glorious empires and technology, in which the Europeans came to destroy and subjugate the people under spiteful, Western colonialism.
In reality, slaves were auctioned off to Europeans by African tribal leaders from ports set up on the coast. Europeans never stepped foot in the heartland, until the ‘Scramble for Africa’, from 1885. European colonialists made use of the vast natural wealth of the land and, by the 1960’s, had established enormous dominions consisting of electricity, roads, bridges, railways, commerce, sanitation systems, medical equipment and legal practices. Since the Europeans pulled out of Africa, leaving these treasures to the behest of the natives, those societies have reversed, into a state of incompetence and degradation.
This downfall has been seen before. On numerous occasions, Haiti has regressed to its African ways, following a period of Western intervention. Egypt’s greatness diminished, and the civilisation was finally consigned to the history books through the miscegenation of its European founders.
But who is to say the degree of complex social practises, and technological capacity, determines superiority?
All races and life-forms have a different sense of being, different outlooks on life and existence. Some are less conscious than others, while our people currently have the highest level of conception. Look around you, and appreciate everything we take for granted in our lives; all the tools and systems in place which provide us with comfort, have come at a cost to our ancestors.
All that’s available on the free market is entirely the product of our ingenuity, our spirit, our culture.
The modern world is the product of our Western soul, and sending aid to prop up these countries is nothing more than patronising, neo imperialism, which should be rejected by both them and us.
The fact is, these populations lack our creativeness and work ethic. But it is precisely creativity, and our forward-thinking work ethic, which makes us who we are. We cannot expect, nor wish for others to follow in our footsteps, because ultimately, they are different to us. That should be respected.
Surrendering aid, scientific knowledge, and systems of government, refined over millennia, and proclaiming the Marxist gospel, of the ‘right’ to education, is a disservice to the centuries of hard work and discovery, OUR people, made for US. If Africa, and the rest of the world, wish to emulate our perpetually-advancing social model, it must work for it. They must start from the bottom, attempting to independently discover the ‘six simple machines’ and resume from there.
So, our political masters are contradicting themselves. On one hand, the world’s people are equals, we are led to believe, capable of achieving the same things with equally valued culture. Whilst on the other, they’re illogically coordinating the foundations for a mono-ethnic world, based entirely upon Western methods and advancements, but without the genius of Westerners themselves, to sustain the continued development; as our masters, attempt to dilute us, to the point of extinction.
There is no justification for foreign aid. Its patronising, treasonous, and detrimental to our environment. Let them dwell in the untapped forests, and rich lands, while we reach for the stars! But while most of you reading will agree, many of our crooked liberal leaders, aside from organised Jewry, can’t even see the correlation closer to home. At the centre of the expanding colon of decadent England, that is London, there are some of the highest rates of unemployment and bone idleness in Europe, where politically correct policies are enforced to keep afloat the infrastructure, left behind by the long-gone ‘white-flighters’ and non resident workers.
All cultures are responsible for their own destiny.
Steve
- Edit
I at last got round to watching “Dispatches” about the Conservatives & their obsession with Rwanda, there seemed to be some suggestion that the reason they give so much money to this country is so that they’re not seen as the nasty party!
Do people vote Conservative because they prop up a dictator?
Seems unlikely, so what’s the real reason they send our money there?
Will it turn out that connected people have won lucrative contracts there, to build things or extract minerals or is it something else?
Obviously there’s the additional benefit of helping to bankrupt the UK.
BritishActivism
- Edit
I have been in the process of ‘de-populating’ my blog recently as I have decided to remove many articles in the preparation for winding it up and shelving it.
.
One of those which has now gone from view was a (somewhat pithy) little something on the differences between civilisations.
.
It was based on two news articles which were in the mainstream press at roughly the time. I will simply post the two articles and let any readers fill in the blanks themselves as to the point I was making.
.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2166697/African-village-family-gets-7-000-British-taxpayer.html and https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/broadband/9226314/The-villagers-digging-for-victory.html
.
I suppose the first article does need to be read to get the full grasp of the lunacy, but for those not inclined to read it all, of particular note are the seventh, eighth, and thirteenth pictures in the first story.
.
Here is a picture from the event in the second story, from another source: https://i50.tinypic.com/2nhke34.jpg
.
Although I try not to be too cruel and callous over those in circumstances less fortunate than I, or too sneering and simplistic as to their problems, if there is one thing that Africa is not short of, it is man-power.
.
So why the folded arms, the abandoned equipment and ceased up heavy machinery that is now probably orange with rust?….
.
I can only suspect that through decades of this western imperialism and liberalism, it has become so “expected” that the white-man or the “west and the rest” will do everything, the thought may never have occurred to them that they could make use of the materials and equipment themselves, if given instruction.
.
It looks like a reliance on aid and other help could therefore have further hindered their capacity to look after themselves and take responsibility for their own actions. Such a situation is not good for anybody.
.
This is probably why nothing seems to have changed much and has even got so much worse in terms of demographics (and the potential for greater disaster) since the time when Bob Geldoff told us all to “give him the f*#c#ing money” for Band Aid in 1984.
.
That we are also about to see the 14th instalment of the bi-annual Comic Relief next month, is perhaps a testament to the fundamental problem of the current thinking too. Why is there a need for a 14th? Has any significant dent been made at all, or has demographic expansion and other matters simply rendered the existing funds sent to be null and void as soon as it is raised?
.
They often claim to be in dire need, and that is no doubt true in many cases, yet those ‘older’ British villagers pictured in the above link seem to get to work with those shovels and spades quickly enough – just in order to get themselves a better service, from what is, in comparison, a luxury item.
.
In my mind, the difference between the two ends of the spectrum spoke a thousand words. I am sure there are going to be various shades in between, but it is high time the cord was cut, in conjunction with the establishment of a secure border to Europe. (One without the other could lead to a further “Camp of the Saints” situation than we are already seeing).
.
Africa alone received over £140Billion from international aid between 1990 and 2005. This is the same figure, incidentally, that had been spent on internal wars in Africa during the same period.
.
It has also been estimated that somewhere around 95% of the future population growth up to 2050 will be from the third world and ‘developing world’.
.
Given that in combination to this, the white race is in terminal decline and that all their nations, no matter where they are in the world, are being deluged and utterly transformed by third worlders (and third world-like myriads of problems that drag nations down), the way things are going, they will have no option but to make do without us!
.
Who will be the golden goose when we are gone? It will be the same within our nations too, as can be seen in almost all situations around the world where the white demographic has been transplanted by non-white demographics.
.
(I also found it somewhat ridiculous that India also sends £3.5Billion out in aid to Africa, whilst we are sending £Millions to India. There are so many scandals and issues with foreign aid I could be here all day).
.
However, as this article at Western Spring suggests, the real issue is that of fundamentals: race-realism, civilisation differences, the imposition of ‘liberalism’ for ‘free market Marxism, liberal chauvinism (using white-western societies as the yardstick measure of what they need to develop into and what sort of attitudes and practices they should have), and the general need for people to start to re-think about what is going on. It is a good start to frame our arguments on accepting the reality.
Arguing against charity to “starving Africans” and against “buying just one mosquito net for £4 which could save a family’s life” is obviously going to be very difficult given the nature of our society as it currently stands though.
.
“Pathological Altruism” is still rife, along with the accompanied smug-liberalism that gives people the “high” of being seen as virtuous and compassionate. To be seen as being against these things is seen as being virtually inhuman. That is the trouble I think we face. Many people just do not tend to like the sober truth of what we are suggesting.
.
But by denying the truth, I think we condemn continents like Africa to never make their own way and to never learn from their mistakes or be truly responsible for themselves. Only Africans can “save” Africa, it is not for others to do it. The same goes for other nations.
.
It is surely humiliating for them and prone to give envious resentment towards the hand that currently provides for them, especially when they are often being fed on a diet of anti-white propaganda and watching globalists meddle in their affairs, which they may wrongly attribute to ‘white westerners’ and our governments acting at our behest, when they are doing nothing of the kind.
.
The moral high ground needs to be ours, for both our sakes. Also, if we cannot prevent our own white nations from going down the pan, then how could we ever provide for anybody else anyway, even if it was decided we wanted to so in the future?
.
The idea of restricting Aid money to that of ‘natural disasters’ only – such as floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc – has been floated in recent years by a veteran nationalist. This was seen as a pragmatic compromise in the intermediary state between what happens now and what we may ultimately want to see.
.
What would Western Springs’ position be on this? To opt for the ideological and social position of full redundancy of aid money and to be adamant about it from the outset, backed up with our logic and reasons – or to push for the compromise first in hopes that it may attract those who may not agree with a full removal of all aid?
.
I realise that Western Spring is definitely not a political party, and that we are not really here to secure votes (and thus may have not as much need to “cut our cloth” to those aims of being “electable”) – and that we do not need to have “positions” or “policies” on anything in that regard – but at the same time we do need to transform the attitudes of society as it currently stands and work with the nation of people as they currently are.
.
In that context, should we suggest that natural disasters to be treated differently from what are disasters and living conditions of their own making and own responsibility? – Myself, I am not too much of a stickler either way. I was just curious and posing the question!
Steve
- Edit
I have come to the conclusion that Africans generally are an evolutionary dead end unable or unwilling to help themselves & they will always require aid.
I posed the question would the industrial revolution have happened if Africans had inhabited that area in Britain or moslems for that matter?
I think aid should only be considered once we have sorted out our country & then we will wealthy enough to consider it on its merits.
Obviously individuals can send money if they wish.
If you insist on living in an area prone to drought or earthquakes, then whose fault is that?
Isn’t that self inflicted?
But are white people infected with a suicide gene or is there something in the water turning them into sheeple colluding in their own destruction?
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
In reply to BritishActivism, I would suggest that we take the same interest in repairing the damage caused by natural disasters as we would in any other form of nature conservation. This has nothing to do with humanitarianism or any other false, universalist creed. It does have a lot to do with the pride we take in the real world.
We can’t shut ourselves off from the rest of the world because the resultng chaos would eventually overwhelm and destroy us. What we must do is to harness the Aryan people into a new consciousness and succeed morally and religiously from the other races.
I particularly liked the reference to pathological altruism. Altruism has evolved as a means of self-preservation for our race because it’s only collectively that we continue to exist. To take altruism as Christianity does and apply it to the whole of humanity is indeed pathological because it’s self-defeating. In fact as the original article suggests the coloured races of mankind have become parasitical and the only way out, as I see it, is for our folk to plough our own furrow cultually and ethically while remaining in control. To “take up the Whiteman’s burden” doesn’t mean becoming a crutch for the coloured races of the world but rather reaching out to a new imperium by being true to ourselves.
Steve
- Edit
Daily Mail 16 Feb 2013
Iordan Rupa of Romania.
“His first stop, after disembarking at Victoria Coach Station, will be a distribution centre for The Big Issue. He plans to register as one of the homeless magazine’s sellers, before finding a pitch on the streets of the capital.
Under a loophole in EU immigration rules, Big Issue sellers can claim “self employed status”, thereby gaining a National Insurance number and, with it, an instant legal foothold in the British labour market.
Last year, it emerged that an astonishing one in three of all the title’s street sellers in Britain come from Romania.”
Most of them are Roma gypsies.
In my experience I’d say the proportion is higher.
So why has the Big Issue allowed themselves to be so corrupted from their original mission?
Like so many things it must be part of an agenda to import as many immigrants as possible in the shortest possible time.
The government colludes in this.
Steve
- Edit
“The Big Issue” is actually a good metaphor for what is going wrong.
You have a charity supposedly helping our own people but actually is ending up doing the exact opposite, it has become an immigration portal like the NHS & LT did, which then harms British citizens by making it more likely they’ll be unemployed & homeless.
Steve
- Edit
David Cameron definitely doesn’t believe in charity beginning at home, what with his generosity with our money in Rwanda & elsewhere, giving our jobs to Indians & swearing allegiance to Israel.
frederickdixon
- Edit
Excellent article; passionate, articulate and informed, just as we are coming to expect from this web site. My only quibble is that I don’t think we can just let Africans sink back into primitive simplicity, we opened up the continent and then pulled out, leaving behind a power vacuum and we all know what happens to vacuums. China is at this very moment energetically filling the vacuum in Africa, while we pump in billions to prop up a rackety infrastructure which will help to ease the way for the Chinese. I don’t know what the solution is, I certainly don’t want to see the continent with all its resources fall into Chinese hands but I also agree that continuing to pump in billions in overseas aid is just wrong. Answers to this quandary on a post card please.
Steve
- Edit
I say cut off the aid & see what happens, I doubt it’ll be any worse than it is.
If we pay, we get a say, otherwise forget it.
We can’t compete with China, they seem determined to repeat the mistakes of empires & we need to counter that as best we can.
My guess the Chinese will asset strip Africa & leave little behind, we can’t pick up that bill.
The latest nonsense is the the “No (African) child born to die” campaign that is naive at best & genocide at worst.
There’s talk of curing AIDS but not of the behaviours & the problems associated with that.
If you ensure that all African children survive but the breeding behaviour doesn’t alter what have you achieved?
More adults that will die of starvation or some other disaster or who will flood the West.
We can’t satisfy the demand, there aren’t enough white people!
Heather
- Edit
I really think this amazing blog , “Western Spring