By Frederick Dixon:
The other day my son was watching one of those American cartoon shows – I don’t know whether it was “American Dad” or “Family Guy”, and it doesn’t matter. I was in the room, but reading and not paying attention until the words “you don’t want your daughter marrying a black man” made me prick up my ears. On the screen were three white people in a car – the elderly grey haired driver, who had just spoken, and a good looking teenage couple; “why not? what’s wrong with that?” replied the youth; the old boy realised he’d made a dreadful faux pas and stuttered “well, er, nothing I guess, a black man invented peanut butter”; the girl said “I don’t think we want to know you anymore.”
There is so much to take-in in that little scene:- first there is the obvious propaganda – only ugly and stupid old people object to race mixing, young and attractive people not only have no problem with it but regard with disgust anyone who does have a problem; these programmes, it should be noted, are designed for young people who lap them up so the propaganda goes straight to its mark. A second aspect is the stupidity and inarticulacy of the old man – he simply didn’t know why he believed what he believed and had no arguments to defend his opinions.
It may only be a cartoon, but its propaganda effect is no less powerful for that. We do not, yet, have such propaganda tools at our disposal but in the meantime there is much that we should to do to clarify what it is that we believe and why we believe it. I would be very disappointed if any racial nationalist reading this article (should such there be) resembled the old man in his crass imbecility, but his inability to defend his beliefs rings true. It seems to me that in the wider patriotic population there are very many who broadly share our position but lack the words, or the confidence in their beliefs, to explain or defend their position.
It is in part to supply that lack that I believe it is urgently necessary to formulate a clear, concise and complete statement of racial nationalist principles together with the reasoning which supports those principles. All should be in language which is so clear and so compelling that any nationalist could take those ideas straight to heart and never again be troubled either by doubts about the rightness of nationalist principles or by an inability to defend them. At the same time the statement would form a core ideology around which all racial nationalists could unite. An attempt to develop such a core ideology began on this website a few months ago with an article on the two fundamental principles of racial nationalism (i.e. that we must maintain our racial identity free from non-European contamination and that our countries are for ourselves alone) but much work remains to expand those principles into a fully fledged ideology of racialism.
There already exists, of course, a vast body of racialist literature of varying degrees of accessibility to the ordinary reader, from Arthur Kemp’s highly accessible “March of the Titans” to the dense works of Continental intellectuals such as Evola, but the role of these works is to support and buttress a core ideology – which does not yet exist! To borrow a metaphor from the Church, I see the core ideology as a creed, and the existing body of racialist literature as the theological library which can be consulted by believers keen to explore their beliefs in greater depth.
Extending the religious metaphor, a creed needs a Church to support and propagate it. We need a structure which will propagate and defend our racialist ideology and those who believe in it. As we become ever more a beleaguered minority, it is essential that we draw together in an organisation which can provide our people with the physical and moral means to lead a common life within which our racial and cultural identity will be secure and protected.
So there we have the two indispensable parts of our survival mechanism – the core ideology and the supporting organisation, the creed and the church. We have seen already how the core ideology exists in embryo, so too does the organisation in the shape of the Movement of National Salvation. In time, our survival mechanism with its powerful ideology and its united, disciplined, organisation could become about much more than mere survival – it will become the means by which we recover our country.
By Frederick Dixon © 2013
# # # #
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
Mein Kampf should be read by all, perhaps if someone were to make a more readable version of its teachings?
Max Musson
- Edit
Mein Kampf is however a document of its time and largely an autobiographical account of the formulation of Hitler’s political beliefs, it is not a religious book. Some of our members are working on a religious doctrine, but in the meantime Ben Klassen’s ‘Natures Eternal Religion’ makes a thought provoking read.
ConnalOakesHolt
- Edit
A cartoons propaganda effects may be more powerfull. Usually watched by younger minds without the necassary life experience in order to discriminate between harmfull and helpfull messages of advice. And the subtle messages slip into a mind off gaurd due to watching a ‘harmless’ cartoon.
If I might suggest, that the nucleus of the core beliefs is the ongoing preservation of our race of people upon our ancestral and therefor natural homelands which are exclusively ours.
Around that nucleus, orbit the twin principles of racial nationalism. Or branch from it. Therefor it matters not to which religion a nationalist belongs, if the twin priciples are held.
Over time, generations perhaps, the phrase or belief, ‘my race is my religion’ could become to be the dominant view held by the majority of nationalist.
This would bind the destiny of the white race with a divine mission.
frederickdixon
- Edit
I completely agree.
BritishActivism
- Edit
“It seems to me that in the wider patriotic population there are very many who broadly share our position but lack the words, or the confidence in their beliefs, to explain or defend their position.
.
It is in part to supply that lack that I believe it is urgently necessary to formulate a clear, concise and complete statement of racial nationalist principles together with the reasoning which supports those principles.
.
All should be in language which is so clear and so compelling that any nationalist could take those ideas straight to heart and never again be troubled either by doubts about the rightness of nationalist principles or by an inability to defend them.”
.
For me, this is the take away message in this article. It is an echo of what I have previously written about over the last few years, but in a much more concise snippet.
.
When it comes to cartoons like American Dad, Family Guy, South Park or even films like Borat and Four Lions, you would not believe the amount of people I have met who believe they are somehow edgy and ‘a bit right wing’ – in terms of them not being “politically correct” and thus saying some of the perceived unsay-able.
.
To the more astute, they are of course nothing but another reinforcement of liberalism and their values, whilst often subtly mocking all those who are daft enough to support them as being “un-Pc” or as being some kind of rebellion against the stifling culture around us.
The “left” have been doing this for 50 years in one guise or another in ‘comedy’ – whether it was the BBC satirical sketch show “That was the week that was”, the various manifestations of Alf Garnet, Spitting Image or a whole raft of others probably too long to mention. They have it down to an art form.
.
MsBridgit
- Edit
I can remember a BBC series called Absolutely Fabulous. The young daughter Saffy a prudish, narrow minded and very conservative young girl finds herself pregnant by her first boy friend a Negro, who I think turns out to be a homosexual . It is what the BBC do best. I have heard of stupid story lines but this one would have to take the cake. I do realise it is all part of the Multicultural Propaganda.
Steve
- Edit
Interesting that you mention Alf Garnett, along with “Love your neighbour” I think this was the start of a propaganda process to show that having racist views was stupid & that such people should be laughed at & not be taken seriously.
This has continued with “Family Guy” etc.
I think it has to be seen as connected & part of an agenda.
I watched the “United States of Television” series & in that it was pointed out that a black sitcom was saying things that a white one couldn’t & again I think that is a deliberate thing to transfer power & to condition people into a certain mind set.
When you trace it back, you find the usual suspects are involved.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Delighted to see that Western Spring, through Frederick Dixon’s excellent article is taking an unashamedly RACIALIST position. Some years ago I suggested to a well known National Front leader (it wasn’t John Tyndall) that the Front should publicise its opposition to mixed race liaisons. This was with David Frost’s current, at the time, dalliance with a Negress in mind. I was told that such things were private and it would be too intrusive for the Front to make any public criticism. However, race-mixing of this kind goes straight to the heart of our raison d’etre. Unless we grasp this particular nettle all else is lost.
I was criticising a distant relative by marriage to my eldest daughter the other day, for allowing his own daughter to marry an Indian. I know my daughter concurred with my view when I said I just wouldn’t allow it. How would I stop it? Whatever it takes is the answer.
Too many White middle-class English people just throw in the towel when confronted with such a situation and try to console themselves with, ‘so long as they’re happy’..!However, collective happiness is more important, and we have to remember that our short time on the Earth is only lent to us in trust as part of a much longer evolutionary purpose.
Max Musson
- Edit
Here, here!
frederickdixon
- Edit
Presumably the NF had to be circumspect because it was in the business of trying to get elected. We’re in the happy position of being able to define our beliefs to attract racial nationalists and only racial nationalists.
Steve
- Edit
& fat lot of use it did the NF or the BNP come to that.
I think their present position is probably more honest but they don’t reach out, they seem to think people will come to them.
But if people realise that the democratic vote is a farce, then I guess they won’t.
katana
- Edit
It is in part to supply that lack that I believe it is urgently necessary to formulate a clear, concise and complete statement of racial nationalist principles together with the reasoning which supports those principles. All should be in language which is so clear and so compelling that any nationalist could take those ideas straight to heart and never again be troubled either by doubts about the rightness of nationalist principles or by an inability to defend them.
——————
Yes, we do need a sort of ‘White Nationalism for Dummies’ series of articles and FAQs that’s geared to the average person with ready made answers to common reactions to our position.
Of course it is all there on the net in all sorts of places by it’s not really compiled into a sort of curriculum that’s suitable for beginners to advanced.
Perhaps this site could start the ball rolling by posting a Sticky post that is a FAQ on White Nationalism. Readers could contribute their suggestions and it could build up from there. Everything starts from the first step, however small, as they say.
FAQ
Q: Why don’t you want your daughter to marry a black man?
A1: Because my daughter will have inferior children. Inferior in that on average they will be less intelligent and more violent. Also they will not look like White or act like Whites, and if her children marry blacks and so on, their society will resemble Africa today, a black basket case.
A2: Because my wife is black and I deeply regret what I inflicted on my daughter and want to stop the madness.
A3: Because I simply don’t like blacks, and it should be my right to hold that opinion. If I’m to be punished for that shouldn’t those who punish me also be punished for their opinion?
A4: I don’t believe in beastiali….
Q: Why does my daughter want to marry a black man?
A1: Because your daughter honestly believes that is helping to save the world by …
A2: Because your daughter has been brainwashed by a lifetime of propaganda via the media to marry blacks.
A3: Because your daughter has been brainwashed by a lifetime of jewish inspired and pushed propaganda via the jewish run media to destroy us, by getting our daughters to reproduce with blacks, believe it or not. …
A4: Because …
These are not abstract questions but everyday questions that the budding WN is likely to encounter.
As Frederick says we need to systematically educate our fellow Whites as to what, who, why and how our societies across the White world are being deliberately destroyed and how to fight back and destroy our would be destroyers.
frederickdixon
- Edit
I agree with a lot of this, but it’s not a “white nationalism for dummies” that I have in mind. I hope that we will be able to create something which is accessible enough to be completely understood by a labourer on a building site yet rich enough to satisfy the most intellectual. That is a pretty demanding specification, yet it has been achieved before, not least by the translators of the Authorised Version of the Bible – (there’s nothing quite like aiming high!).
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
The Jews persecuted both Jesus and Adolf.
Steve
- Edit
Yes I think this a good idea but it won’t break through to a lot of the middle class types I have spoken to, the conditioning is too strong & a harsh dose of reality is the only thing that will break through that.
Either they need to lose their cushy well paid jobs to non whites or see their well educated kids not stand a hope in hell of getting a decent job.
Steve
- Edit
I think for people who advocate this sort of thing, they can be asked have you ever lived in a black or moslem area, was it really better than a white area?
I have, it wasn’t!
Pip
- Edit
Q:Why does my daughter want to marry a black man?
A:Because her parents failed in their duty as parents.
Anglo-Australian Alliance
- Edit
The power of cartoons ought not to be underestimated. Our enemies have leaned that people’s responses are on simplistic and emotional levels (see advertising, for instance, with their short, snappy soundbites). Cartoons resonate especially with children and therefore those within the population who have become infantilised.
.
And so we in the Movement could do with cartoonists to elucidate our position.
.
Are there any out there who can step forward?
Max Musson
- Edit
Yes, if we have any followers who have ability as cartoonists or video animators, then I would be interested to hear from them.
.
Email: [email protected]
Steve
- Edit
There is that one you showed early with the Hitler as an anti racist & they also did one about American Indians too.
Also one about the Woolwich atrocity?
Maybe you don’t need people with that ability as I think there are software programmes that can do that for you, you just need good content & ideas to feed into it.
Steve
- Edit
I think we have all been subjected to a lifetime of propaganda trying to condition us into accepting a certain agenda but it doesn’t work on everyone & as reality intrudes into real life, then some of us join the dots & begin to understand what’s going on.
In the programme “Repo Man” there was a bit where he was beginning to twig something was off but repeated the mantra that if immigrants work hard, fair enough, I don’t like the scroungers…..
Personally speaking I think plenty of black people are nice enough, along with Asians etc but I still want a country of my own to live in, a predominantly white European one.
They have their own countries & long may they flourish & celebrate their cultures in the correct place.
I don’t want to live in Las Vegas that is everywhere & nowhere at the same time.
A unique fake.
Max Musson
- Edit
Whether immigrants work hard or not is irrelevant, Steve. At a time of high unemployment, housing shortages and dwindling natural resources, they occupy jobs and houses and consume resources that should go to our people.
.
Plenty of people work with individual immigrants who are ‘nice enough’ when they exists as individuals in a predominantly White setting, this is because immigrants conform to White behavioural norms when they are in a very small minority, but once their numbers grow as a proportion of tour society as a whole, they then start to behave in accordance with the behavioural norms of their ethnic/racial homeland, and this is the problem.
Steve
- Edit
It was the Repo man who spoke about immigrants working hard & not liking scroungers.
Most of the jobs I have done are jobs immigrants do, that whites supposedly shy away from.
I now suffer from underemployment & see immigrants doing the jobs I want to do.
That & the en masse cultural implications is why I said I want a country of my own to live in, a predominantly white European one.
Steve
- Edit
On the subject of housing my Mother pointed out that housing in the Olympic Park is being advertised for sale in Malaysia!
We are repeatedly told that we need more housing built for the people here, not to sell abroad.
It may well be that the Malaysian purchasers have no intention of living here but will “Buy to let” but why should that be allowed to happen in any great volume, as the profits from this go abroad & help push up prices here.
frederickdixon
- Edit
“Why should that be allowed to happen in any great volume?” Why indeed. Large scale sales of London property abroad is already causing a house price bubble in the capital with damaging consequences for our own young people. Sixty per cent of new builds in Greater London now go to “overseas buyers”, and London property is an international trade commodity.
We are told that this is all part of London being a “global city”, within an “open society” . Quite so, globalisation again. Yet this is our capital city, taken from us without our permission. I believe that it should be unlawful to sell, let or mortgage real estate in Britain to anyone who does not have a right of residence, and rights of residence – in my ideal society – would be limited to white people of British descent.
BritishActivism
- Edit
When it comes to all this “doing the jobs we don’t want to do” excuse that the “left-wing” often like to use, I live in a mill town that is now at least 32% Pakistani.
.
Not once in the last 20 years have I seen a Pakistani road-sweeper or litter picker. I know most of them will have been born here, but they are obviously still coming via family arrangements and marriages etc. The original influx will have come on the same premise.
.
With the exception of one black man, all those I have seen doing these jobs have been native British locals, just like they will have been for the last hundred years or more. We managed before, and we should manage again. They do an important job, and they are right to be valued and have a sense of self worth.
.
If people are said to be unwilling or not educated/skilled enough in this country, or that they just have some sort of attitude problem, or are just too strung out on drugs or whatever the case may be, then it is down to an abject failure of the liberalism and various governments for the last 70 years, which has rotted this country down in quality of society.
.
The blame is on their shoulders whatever the excuse is they come up with, not our shoulders. We have not presided over the direction of this country.
.
Also, I sometimes like to suggest to those who come out with the “they do the jobs you don’t want to do” line, that they are rather immoral and imperialist, and ought to be ashamed of themselves for essentially expecting those “foreigners” to come over here and wipe their backsides and clean our streets……
.
Furthermore, if there is nothing done about the problem of these so-called “work shy” people, and these ‘gaps’ are plugged by foreigners all the time, how do they expect things to change?
.
People do not like to be challenged, especially when they can be shamed or shown up.
.
There used to be some ONS figures for the unemployment ratios of different ethnic groups. The White British group was by far the most in employment. Yes, you do get a section who take pride in not working and don’t work, and things might have changed since the “crash” – but as a people we are historically by far the most productive. I think the Indians came second.
.
Given these unemployment ratios, it seems to me that the ones who “do not want to do the jobs” are the previous waves of immigrants and their offspring. We are importing immigrants to do the work that second and third generation immigrants will not do!
.
If we carry on on this basis, the entire country would need a never ending stream of immigrants to do the work that sons and daughters of previous immigrants will not do.
.
The same is for the “pensions” argument, where if we carried on with the basis of it propping up the pension ratio’s, we would probably have to import half the planet before the middle of the next century.
.
To me, the whole argument these people have, no matter what direction they tackle it, is nonsense on stilts. There is a better way. The hard part is breaking the chain.
Steve
- Edit
Watching a programme about Taliban kids, they echo a feeling most of us have, though we’re not as extreme as them.
They resent foreigners coming in & destroying & killing their people & interfering in their culture & way of life.
Their culture tells them it’s perfectly ok to kill the invaders, that it’s mandatory in fact.
Their situation is more extreme as the invaders are generally soldiers, whereas we have a soft invasion, the use of demographics against us to cleanse us from an area.
A vast propaganda mechanism has been put in place to try & stop us seeing this happening & crush dissent.
I think one day people will look back & wonder on how a soft dictatorship was imposed by stealth without being noticed for many years.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
‘Presumably the NF had to be circumspect because it was in the business of trying to get elected. We’re in the happy position of being able to define our beliefs to attract racial nationalists and only racial nationalists’.
This is exactly it Frederick! It’s so important that Racialists have a Movement where free speech is paramount. Through ‘Western Spring’ and its associations we provide the ideological backbone for a future organisation that will take power. The British National Party was forever compromising, even taking on the mantel of Churchill. Yes, we can understand that in the minds of the broad masses of the British people Churchill was without doubt a super patriot but if we’re to succeed we can’t afford to pretend to believe the lies which have played such a key part in confusing public opinion and sowing the seeds of our own destruction.
Steve
- Edit
Was Churchill a super patriot?
He seemed keen on the forerunner of the UN & the European Common Market.
Dykeward
- Edit
It may not be concise, but this man’s book is very clear and as near complete as it is possible to be with the shifting and developing understanding of such things.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kslga1MfT1gC&pg=PA23&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false
Mike
- Edit
Although I’m fully aware that society is being overwhelmed by miscegenation propaganda, and that it is having an effect, mostly on white women, it should be noted that white woman have been throwing themselves at black men long before all the propaganda got going, they’ve been throwing themselves at blacks for decades. It’s not the left that are causing this genocide, despite everything they’re doing, it’s white women that are doing it, white women without standards that are seemingly happy to demean themselves in this way and to knowingly and irreversibly destroy their culture and people. All the propaganda is doing is normalising behaviour that was already endemic in our society anyway.
Max Musson
- Edit
While it is true to say that significantly more White/non-White interracial couples involve a White woman with a non-White man, I don’t think one can say that White women have been “throwing themselves” at black men “for decades”.
.
There is greater sexual diamorphism within the White race than within other races, i.e. there are more pronounced physical differences between males and females, with females exhibiting markedly feminine features. Among blacks, the degree of sexual diamorphism is muted, with black females far more closely resembling their male counterparts. It is very noticeable just how masculine black women’s physiques are if one watches athletics or sporting events. Think Maria Sharapova verses Serena Williams!
.
Therefore while black men find White women attractive because of their femininity, and some White women may find black men attractive because of their masculinity, and while black women may find White men similarly attractive, White men do not generally find black women attractive at all. In fact, it is well known that black men don’t find black women attractive either and this is why they have a tendency to seek White women.
.
It is well recognised in the USA where the numbers are greater, that there is a specific problem affecting black American women who simply find it almost impossible to find a male partner. They do not sufficiently attract men of their own race and they don’t attract men of other races either.
Mike
- Edit
Max not a day goes by when I leave my home that I’m not overwhelmed by the sea of white woman I see with black men, I’m sorry but my description of white woman throwing themselves at black men is an accurate one based on a lifetime of daily observation, and although not yet widespread in middle and upper class areas this is only down to a much smaller black population within those areas. I suspect a similar story within areas with a large number of Asian men.
The only question is why white women are like this. I can only conclude a few reasons. Firstly women are ruled by the heart not the head. Most women are insecure, a well placed compliment is often all it takes to set the beginnings of a relationship. I also believe there’s less pressure in a women dating non-whites, largely due to lower expectations from their partner, little pressure to be an achiever. Equally I suspect our education system was dumbed down as a method to encourage miscegnation – like attracts like. I can’t fathom any other reasons. Yet I can see no benefits. Non-white males are typically poorly educated (the bell curve places the IQ of blacks at a pitiful 80) and unable to achieve a decent position in life. Their homelands are toilet nations as they’re seemingly incapable of development and progress. Black males, in particular, aren’t good looking and yet white woman clearly see something in these men. Mixed race offspring tend to adopt destructive black culture, I suspect a low IQ is the issue, as well as being without a natural identity they gravitate to the closest match.
So why permanently destroy a bloodline in a single generation for no gain? Of course analysing this is pointless as whatever the reasons are it will not change the final outcome i.e. white genocide willingly perpetrated by white women. The fact is, and it saddens me to say this, our greatest enemy is our own kind.
Max Musson
- Edit
What part of the country do you live in Mike?
Mike
- Edit
The awful hell hole that is South London. Yeah I know I’ve been there too long.
frederickdixon
- Edit
There were not a few illegitimate half-castes born in England during and just after WW2 wherever there was a nearby US base with black servicemen, and that was despite the overwhelming hostility to inter-racial relationships which are supposed to have existed at that time. Maybe it was because we were all fighting against “racism and fascism”? In fact, too many of our people have always been soppy about such things – I recall reading about a wartime case where a black serviceman was sentenced to death for raping an English village girl he had “befriended”, but the villagers raised such a stink about the impending execution of this “nice young man” that the US authorities commuted the sentence.
Anyway, its not just women. India was littered with hundreds of thousands of Eurasians fathered by Brits, and in any High Street now you will see the white man with his Asian or Oriental wife – even more I think than the black man/white woman version.
MsBridgit
- Edit
Nothing much changes decades earlier these types of Females followed the Roman Legions and Hannibals armies over the Pyrenees. They used to call them Camp Followers, Colour did not enter into it, for them their bodies were their survival. They followed the armies of both sides in WW1 and WW2. God Knows what excuse they have today,
You will have noted it is extremely rare and I personally have never witnessed it, to see JAPANESE people cross-breeding outside of their race,There might be the odd exception. There is nothing as bizarre as a Negro sexually co-habiting with a Japanese woman, and I do not mean to be racist although it might appear that way, IT IS FACT. If it is not politically correct to point that out then HARD LUCK it is your problem! I have a theory for this.
Steve
- Edit
In the theme song to “American Dad” it sings of a “salute to the American race”.
Who would that be, the American Indian tribes?
I can’t think of any other American race.