By Max Musson:
Since the days of the British Brothers League in the late 1800s, British nationalism seems to have now reached its lowest ebb following the collapse of the British National Party at a time when there is no clear successor organisation to follow and seemingly, no clear ideological path forward either.
This is not to say that there is no choice of organisations to join or choice of ideological trajectories to follow however, because there has never been a greater choice. The problem is that none of the plethora of aspirant successor organisations appears to be organisationally or ideologically ahead of the rest and both organisationally and ideologically many nationalists therefore find themselves standing at a crossroads.
Nationalism has traditionally been a popular force emanating from among the most patriotic elements within a nation, who perceive a specific threat to the well-being and integrity of their nation and who react defensively to that threat. In this sense, nationalism has often tended to be ‘reactionary’ in character.
Furthermore, as there have historically been only limited population movements, nationalism has until recently not needed to be concerned with matters of race or even culture, and the patriotisms that have flourished in the past have been expressions of loyalty to tribal groups and the bloodlines of noble dynastic families or monarchs or to Christian religious denominations. Herein lie the roots of local or regional rivalries that have historically existed even within our ‘United’ Kingdom, between Yorkshireman and Lancastrian, between the Welsh and the English, between the Scots and the English and between Orangemen and Republicans in Ireland.
In recent times however, the arrival of millions of non-White immigrants from the Third World has rendered these old rivalries to a position of virtual insignificance in the minds of most nationalists and nationalism in the eyes of most is now seen as meaningless without a strong racial or at least cultural basis.
Nationalism has often been a force emanating from the most patriotic elements of an embryonic or putative nation who have temporarily or hitherto been deprived of any formal recognition of their nationhood and who strive to assert that nationhood through the establishment of a nation-state within which they can enjoy primacy of place and exercise self-determination. In this sense, nationalism can been regarded as ‘radical’ in character and nationalism can also be regarded as a radical in nature if it effects a social transformation in which there are extensive and fundamental changes to the structure and functioning of the state in terms of the manner in which it serves the future needs and development of the nation.
In this way National Socialism as it manifest in Germany during the inter-war period began as a reactionary force calling for the defence of Germany against the forces of Marxist revolution, and became radical in terms of the social transformation of Germany from a condition of corruption and decadence under the influence of global capitalism during the Weimar period to that of an orderly, racial state under the Third Reich.
Throughout much of the 20th Century, Britain has been a nation in decline, but a nation that probably until the 1980s still retained core values and at least some semblance of real nationhood, despite the increasingly obvious signs of decay and the vigorous undermining of that nationhood by anti-national forces. Throughout that period, nationalism could still credibly make patriotic appeals to the remaining traditionalist elements of our nation and attempt to save our nation and the historic nation-state that had served us so well over the centuries. Up until that point it was not too late to effect ‘repairs’ to the ‘good ship Britannia’ and restore her to her former glory.
Increasingly, since the 1980s however, and particularly over the last two decades, decay resulting from globalisation, multiculturalism and multiracialism has advanced to a point at which the ‘main structural timbers’ of our nation state are now rotten to their very core and have been rendered beyond repair. So bad is the rot in fact that our nation, the indigenous British, are now in a state of shock and confusion such that the many have now almost completely lost any sense of spiritual, moral or social compass and are well on the way to becoming a seething mass of atomised individuals, devoid of traditional values and driven by materialism — ripe for exploitation and vulnerable to eventual racial and cultural obliteration.
Clearly, if we are to successfully bring about the eventual salvation of our people, the brand of nationalism that we must expound cannot be of the reactionary variety, because the rot is now too extensive and has now taken too great a hold.
Appeals for ‘Queen and Country’ patriotism have been rendered redundant, as have notions of fighting to preserve ‘Christendom’, because all of the great institutions of state have been permeated by decay. They are no longer bulwarks against decadence and corruption and are now totally immersed in it. The ‘United Kingdom’ is now almost fully integrated into the European Union and barely exists as a separate political entity. In this respect, the campaigns of organisations like Britain First are exposed as appeals to loyalties that are now meaningless anachronisms.
The main ‘structural timbers’ of our nation now need to be cut out and replaced. In fact, worse than this, the ‘body’ of our nation is more like that of a dying man riddled with a cancer that has metastasised and spread to every organ and every limb and if we are to have a healthy ‘body’ again, if we are to have a healthy nation, we must rebuild it almost in its entirety.
Furthermore, during the period from now until we have been able to build that new nation, we must adopt the mindset that we are the few remaining White corpuscles of a body in an advanced state of decay and our mission must be to create new healthy ‘cells’ within which to preserve and multiply our DNA thereby creating new healthy ‘tissue’, a new healthy ‘body’ — a new healthy nation that will one day have the strength to burst free from and sweep away, the putrid remnants of the old.
This is radical nationalism par exellence! It is a self-regenerating, bottom-up, revolutionary, racial nationalism of a vigorous people who will fashion and command the loyalty of new elites that will issue organically from us and will initiate for our race a new epoch of health and vigour, of glory and achievement as yet undreamed of.
Until that time however, we as a people must survive and proliferate in an environment of cultural and political putrifaction, an environment that is corrosive and hostile to our very existence, and we must focus our minds and our energies not upon the ‘macrocosm’ of the current dying edifice within which we barely survive, but upon the ‘microcosm’ of our local communities, the ‘cells’ from which our new nation will be built, the racially conscious White enclaves within which we will thrive.
In short, we must begin rebuilding our nation starting with units that are the smallest constituent building blocks of a nation. We must begin with clusters of racially conscious White individuals and White families and find ways to attract more White families and more racially conscious White individuals who can swell our ranks and in turn produce lots of racially conscious White children. Our racially awakened members must live in localised communities where we will exist in such dense concentrations that we can dominate and thereby determine the character of those communities, and so that we can insulate ourselves against the corrosive effect of the decadent society that surrounds us.
For the foreseeable future we must not allow ourselves to be over-concerned by the continued decline and deterioration of the ‘old nation’, that nation is dying and nothing we can do at present will prevent it. We must instead focus our attention on the creation of a new nation and as our forebears did hundreds of years ago, we must begin with family groups, then extended family groups and then larger tribal groups, until we have the numbers and occupy sufficiently large territories, such that we can merge them to establish our new nation, the new vigorous, healthy, racially conscious White nation that we all long for.
During this period of rebuilding, we White racial nationalists will be living as a minority, in our ancestral homeland. Not a racial minority of course because we will be of the same race as the wider White population and our ethnicity in terms of cultural traditions will be the same also, but we White nationalists are and will continue to be for some time, a ‘minority group’ like any other and if we are to survive and proliferate, then we must adopt a different mind-set to that of the wider White population.
While we will continue to draw newly racially awakened members from the wider White community, those of us who are already awake must regard ourselves as a different and better sub-set of the White race — a different and better sub-set of the British people compared with those who remain wilfully ignorant. To use the terminology of WIN (White Independent Nation) we must regard ourselves as a ‘New Tribe’ — still White, still British, but members of a new racially conscious ethnicity, practicing a new racially conscious culture which must if we are to succeed in bringing about the salvation of our people, eventually prevail over the old.
This must not be seen however as a negation of the common bond that links us to the wider White-British community, nor as a turning away from nationalism, because the ‘Tribal’ mentality should not be regarded as an end in itself. It should only be envisioned as a temporary survival strategy, necessary for the period of rebuilding, during which we will be competing head on with other ethnic/racial minorities and if we are to maximise our effectiveness, like them, we too must organise ourselves and adopt an in-group/out-group approach so necessary if we are to compete successfully and enjoy the benefits of Organised Minority Advantage (OMA).
This process of rebuilding may turn out to be a long process and take longer than many of us would like, possibly much longer, but it is the only way that we will be able to achieve our goal without falling into the trap of making our progress dependent upon the capricious support of a largely disillusioned and disoriented electorate under the sway and influence of a hostile and decadent media and a corrupt and malign political establishment.
I am sure I don’t need to explain that the longer it takes until we nationalists are able to achieve power, the less likely it is that we will succeed. The demographic window of opportunity currently available within which we might achieve a straightforward electoral victory at a future general election is very short indeed and while this has in the past served as a spur to those nationalist parties who have so far employed a strategy based solely around electioneering, so much time has been wasted and so near is the point at which that window of opportunity will close, that all but a very small minority of nationalists have now given up hope of ever achieving a solely electoral based victory. By the same token however, there are similar dangers inherent within our strategy of establishing White enclaves.
For the same demographic reasons, the longer it takes before we begin establishing White enclaves, the greater is the probability that we will fail and the slimmer are our chances of success. Furthermore, the longer it takes from when community building begins until we achieve sufficient land and people to challenge for sovereign political power in Britain, then so too is the probability that we will fail, greater and the probability that we will succeed, smaller. Ideally, we need to be in a position to challenge for sovereign political power within the next ten years, and within the next twenty years at the very most.
We need to press on with the building of our enclaves, but we also need to have a means of accelerating their development and this can only be achieved and we can only hope to be in a position to challenge for political power at a point early enough to succeed if we simultaneously set about acquiring all six of the Six Prerequisites and most importantly, implement the ‘funding programme’ needed to accumulate a massive ‘war-chest’. It is for this reason that while we broadly commend the strategies pursued by WIN, we note that they fall short in terms of providing a financially leveraged acceleration of those strategies so necessary if we are to challenge for sovereign political power within the lifetime of anyone alive today.
From the foregoing, it should be unnecessary for me to explain why electioneering is currently a futile endeavour as far as we nationalists are concerned and why we should desist in our efforts to get openly nationalist candidates elected to public office. Electioneering of any sort must be ‘put on the back-burner’ until we have established our first enclaves to such an extent that our numbers in those locations are such that we can get people elected, and even then, they should not stand as candidates for nationalist political parties, but as candidates of the establishment parties.
Our candidates if elected will of course only pay lip-service to the policies of the establishment parties they nominally represent, and they will conduct themselves in such a way as benefits our enclaves and the wider White community. From within the establishment parties they will have the opportunity to exercise political power that will greatly benefit our enclave populations; that will facilitate the expansion of the enclaves; and undermine the ability of any hostile or potentially hostile groups in their attempts to impede our progress.
Not until we are in a position where we have extensive tracts of the British Isles under our control and membership running to several millions, and have acquired the other five of the Six Prerequisites should we attempt to flaunt our electoral potential by openly standing our candidates as nationalist candidates in future elections.
In summary therefore, the way forward for nationalism in Britain in the 21st Century is by acting as ‘nation-builders’ and pioneers rather than politicians. Ours must be an organic and social movement for the foreseeable future and not a primarily political movement. Nationalist electioneers, political campaigners and street demonstrators must turn instead to community activism, and direct their efforts towards the establishment and building of enclaves; towards bringing racially conscious White families together to form racially conscious communities ; and eventually mould these into the new nation that is the object of all our dreams.
By Max Musson © 2015
# # # #
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Why have the White/Aryan folk succumbed to the degeneracy and decadence which is destroying them? Why have the Jewish people attained such a privileged position in Western Society despite numbering less than thirty million world wide?The answer, put bluntly is that the Jews have a tribal religion which champions their racial aspirations whilst the Aryans have a Christian, universalist creed which has come to undermine their moral identity. Not only do we need White/Aryan enclaves as a strategy for survival, we also need a racial religion which will give direction and purpose for our individual lives.
Max Musson
- Edit
I agree entirely!
SerpentSlayer
- Edit
We had a racial religion once, where blood was sacred and the unity of our tribes held as sacred. As Celtic and Germanic peoples, we are the descendents of the gods. We are the highest expression of mankind. Once we understood such things instinctively, not since the religion of the blood was replaced by the religion of the blind.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Max Musson, this is one of the saddest but most brilliant articles I have read on the demise of the white race in Britain.
.
It is sad too, that this stage of deterioration had to be reached for certain individuals to realise that their race is in serious trouble. That they have to resort to pockets of racially aware people to rebuild their country.
.
I agree fully with Michael Woodbridge’s comment. If you have read ‘The Rising Tide of Colour’ by Lothrop Stoddard and ‘Man and Technics’ by Oswald Spengler, you will see how on one hand immigration has engulfed the white world and after reading Spengler’s book, will see how every land invaded will return to a jungle state, after they have learnt everything from us – they have no need for our technology except to further their interests.
.
Groups of whites who have turned traitor have brought this about, many believing that people of [non-white] race have suffered the same abuses at the hands of the British. They have not only brought about the destruction of their own countries but have destroyed those who have tried to maintain their white integrity, such as South Africa.
.
Destroy one segment of the white race and the rest will fall, its like the domino effect. And there are still whites within so-called nationalist groups who despise white South Africans. I have been named a CI, whatever that is and have been publicly humiliated by Americans who claim to know it all.
.
Not one country in the white world offered us a place of refuge! Not one white group stood for us as we have been blungeoned to death in Africa. Not one group, has stood up and made a plea to their government to stop the white genocide in South Africa, and by genocide I mean: over 70,000 whites brutally murdered and whites excluded from all job opportunities, and therefore cannot work to feed, educate, clothe or shelter their children! That is genocide!
.
People in the West do not care, as some blacks on the internet have jeered at us. Their very words: “your brothers and sisters in Europe and America don’t care whether you live or die, and we are going to kill every white in South Africa!
.
What you sow, so shall you reap!”. You have allowed one part of the body to die and now the whole body is staring to rot. We are a good example of what racial treachery is all about. Yet!!!! We still care about Britain, Europe and even those people who have done the most damage to the white world, the Americans. So mote it be.
.
You with all the numbers in the world allowed this state of decay, by being so absorbed in soccer, sport, entertainment and popular political quests to take place. Now its a matter of reverting to plan B or plan C, to ensure survival. A people without foresight are doomed!
.
Could people not see that London was becoming black. Could people not see that more babies of colour were being born in their hospitals than white?
.
My own son whose father is lincolnshire born, was treated like an imposter in Britain, yet those same people who despised him, welcomed Africans, muslims etc.
.
My son had gone to Germany to visit family before going to Britain and was treated very kindly by the Germans. When he went to Britain and landed at Heathrow he thought that the plane had been diverted to the Congo, as almost everyone at the airport was black.
.
Another thing he noticed there was the British people’s abnormal hatred for East Europeans; Polish, Russians etc., but had no problem at all with being infested with those from 3rd world countries. It was Polish people in Britain who helped my son. For gods sake man, Eastern Europeans should be welcome, they are of the same genetic stock as you.
.
My British great grandmother married a German, and they left Britain before the 1st World War, because of the persecution they lived under because he was German. That’s how we came to be in South Africa! White persecuting white!
.
The white race has always destroyed itself with wars between them. Yet I have never seen the white collectively go to war against any Asian or African countries. Is it because there is no challenge there?
.
The 2WW killed about 60 million whites!!! We have brought about our own demise! We never stop!
.
Now America led by a coloured wants to kill off the white Russians, which will in fact drag Europe into the conflict and thereby ensure the complete destruction of the white race.
.
There will be no one, except maybe the Aussies, New Zealanders and us to represent the white race in the world. And we cannot count too much on the aforementioned as they too fought tooth and nail to bring whites in SA down. I feel a deep compassion for the white race and sincerely hoep that your strategy for its survival in Britain succeeds.
Max Musson
- Edit
Thank you Helena, much of what you write is undoubtedly true, but you must learn to draw a distinction between White people in common and our political elites.
.
The people of Britain, Europe, Australasia and America cannot be blamed in the way you suggest for the parlous state of Whites in South Africa, because many of us did campaign in the hope that our governments would support the Whites in South Africa, but we were ignored and demonised just as the Apartheid government in South Africa was demonised.
.
Furthermore, when we appealed directly to the White South African government we were completely ignored by them. They did not want people they saw as White racists to provide support for the South Africa’s Whites and they did not want us to travel or emigrate to South Africa.
.
The Whites of South Africa were betrayed by your own corrupt political elite, just as we in Britain and elsewhere are still being betrayed by our corrupt political elites. As the end of Apartheid was being negotiated by Botha and De Klerk I can remember shouting at my TV set for more South Africans to join the AWB of Eugène Terre’Blanche, but as early as the mid-1980s the rot had already reached the highest levels of government in South Africa and as history shows, the AWB and other similar groups could not garner enough support among South Africa’s Whites.
.
Your son may have encountered some of the people here in Britain who have been thoroughly brain-washed by our left/liberal media and who consequently harbour antipathy to White South Africans (who were all portrayed as nasty, racists and neo-Nazis by the media over here), but the vast majority of White British have no antipathy towards you.
.
What you say about attitudes towards Eastern Europeans is true to some extent, again the media are largely responsible for the antipathy they experience from White Britons, but in White nationalist circles we have already realised that while Eastern European immigration does exacerbate the already difficult employment situation here in Britain, immigrants from Europe are predominantly White and are our potential allies in the struggle that lies ahead.
.
Some of the inspiration for what we are trying to achieve here in Britain comes from what we have learned about the Orania project in South Africa. You don’t say where you are living at present, but if you are resident in the UK you should join us, alternatively if you still live in South Africa I would suggest making contact with the people of Orania and joining them.
.
Good luck!
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Mr. Musson, I forgot to include a few things. We were betrayed by our white government under De Klerk.
.
Also, this I know is what will benefit our people:
.
I taught whites exclusively from home about anthropology and other subjects. I taught drug addicts, drop outs who did not complete their schooling and young people caught up in all kinds of unusual things. The first thing I taught them was what integrity, nobility of spirit and mind are, what courage is, and after two years of teaching, many went on to complete their schooling, went to university (UNISA which is affiliated or was, to Cambridge univ. In the UK).
.
Some are in the UK working in their specific fields and would like to exort you to get people who would encourage the youth to excellence. The people of our race have no idea who they are, where they come from originally and don’t have a clue about excellence.
.
To try and revert to past religious practices such as the Norse and Celtic ones are somewhat dangerous, as not every bit of information about them is known. Some practised human sacrifice, others slaughtered men, women, children and even the animals of their (other white tribe) enemies. I actually taught these religions to some of my students and some started practicing voodoo! Because they thought it had more power, and this they used against each other.
.
Our race needs to develop a new understanding of belief, to expand into something new which would be our very own, based on spirituality and science. We need to develop a new culture, mores, laws and practices from child rearing – maybe introduce an old practice of betrothing children from young to mates from similar minded people of ours.
.
Maybe you will think I am crazy, but if others can do it, why can’t we? It will eliminate others outside our group from trying to date members of ours. I would be interested in your ideas on the subject. I have many other ideas but will not push the issue.
.
Also I would like to thank you and the group you belong to, for being mindful of us in SA, for extending a caring hand to us, for we did not know about this. Thank you.
Max Musson
- Edit
Helena, thank you for your further comments, which I greatly appreciate.
.
With regard to religion, I believe you are correct and your thoughts tend to coincide with mine, so don’t worry, I don’t think you’re crazy.
.
We are developing a new approach to religion and spirituality which should feature in some articles later this year, but in the meantime, you may be interested in the articles written by H. Millard that we publish periodically.
.
Best wishes, Max.
English girl
- Edit
Max Musson, I don’t hate East Europeans, but them being here is a huge problem. Firstly, bringing Poles here has exposed them to third-worlders that are rare back home. Now, 23% of babies born to Polish women in the UK have black or brown fathers. Secondly, the mass exodus of Poles will give their government an excuse to say “ooh look, all our young working class people are heading west, we MUST bring in immigrants to do the jobs they have abandoned!!”… And then they will proceed to bring in boat loads of blacks and browns who will leech off welfare, commit crimes and never work, and everyone will have to pretend it’s good for the Polish economy.
Steed
- Edit
I agree. Not all of our people will survive this.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
I would like to thank Helena for sharing her insight and experience with us. I hope we hear much more from her in ‘Western Spring’.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Michael Woodbridge, thank you for your comment. I will keep on commenting on Western Spring, on those subjects that I have some knowledge on. Kindest wishes Helena
heechee
- Edit
Wouldn’t these enclaves need to be fairly rural in the first instance though Mr Musson? I cannot see any other way they would survive the onslaught of economic and political discrimination that would be employed against them.
And I too hope Helena posts more often but i totally reject with her idea of “betrothing”. A weak seed should be allowed to remove itself from the community. and would be best if it did.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Heechee, I agree with your comment on rural areas etc. What I meant by betrothing within the “chosen” groups, is that it eliminates, having to be humiliated by others, who accuse young girls who do not want to mix with them of racism. In this way, it becomes a cultural imperative, within a sound group,( which should never include those who do not belong to it). Children should be raised to understand why parents do this.
The white race, and by that I mean, those who desire the survival of the West, have to create a new world view, for those who will belong to it. As we are now, we don’t have one, or if there is one (which I have never heard of) it is a clearly ill- defined one. Does anyone know it we still have a weltaanshaaung or world view?
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
Yes Helena, no one would question a young Jewess if she refused to date a gentile because of her race. If we had a racial religion it would enable us to claim exclusivity without obviously offending anyone.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Michael you’re rght there, not only do the Jewish people protect their children from being disadvantaged genetically, but so do the gypseys, hutterites, Amish etc. Cohesiveness is something the Aryan race does not have, and I believe it is because of Christianity. Christians have never fought one war to preserve their race, only their religion. Islam is the same as Christianity, which is universal. A white muslim can marry a variety of women from different racial backgrounds, as long as they are all adherents to that religion, even then it doesn’t matter, as women are regarded as not having a spirit or soul.. Islam and Christianity are dangerous religions to our racial integrity.
Most white people don’t know their history, their achievements in the sciences ( who invented what etc). Many young people think that because everything is made in China, that the Chinese, Koreans etc invented everything. They do not realise that it is our brilliant men that initiated every invention, which benefits everyone globally. A total re-education is necessary, as well a definite World view, based on an exclusive religion, which will bring about an exclusive culture, of which they may be proud of.
heechee
- Edit
I understand you point Helena but I would hope that our children know enough when the time comes, to choose their partners with care. Nationalism, unlike the perverse philosophies now holding sway, is not one based on a trial and error basis. And I still feel it would not be right to obligate any child in such a way that the duty they may feel towards these “arranged” marriages might deprive them of real love and happiness.
Such “arranged” marriages belong in the past for our culture though they remain in many foreign societies. Islam and Judaism being two I believe it still to be fairly common in.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Heechee, I understand your point, about children being deprived of love and happiness, but it we look at statistics on divorce, most marriages fail today and children are caught up between parents who fight over them. What we most certainly do not need in a new culture are mind and heart scarred children. The West is full of them. I do know that the ancient Europeans also arranged marriages for their children. Dante was one and even thought he loved Beatrix, he obeyed his parents decision and married the woman they chose for him. The ancient Greeks and Romans also practised arranged marriages, well the aristocracy and patricians did. So did the ancient Germanics. Have you studied Tacitus’ Germania and Agricola? Not his Histories, which is a dull explanation of the Romans, infighting, assasination etc. If not a copy may be obtained from Gutenberg press, and the best is the Oxford translation, which gives a more in-depth explanation of it. Gordon’s translation is also good but not as comprehensive. It is a book that I believe could help the white race establish,
A new way of life based on an ancient culture of our people. Each tribe contributed towards the army, people lived in cantons etc.
heechee
- Edit
I still favour education over obligation Helena. A truly happy and loving couple are more likely to have a larger family, especially if the community facilitates it with financial,material and social support.
Our communities would also grow that much faster.
heechee
- Edit
That being said should both children, when reaching a certain age, wish to enter into a mutual arrangement where each may be used as a shield for the other then no problem exists.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
I can’t help adding just how refreshing it is to know that there are people such as Helena who propose a root and branch re-assessment of our society. Too many genuine racial patriots are still fighting the ‘Cold War’. Their thinking is stuck in the last century. They assume that by being stuck in the mud they’re fighting all the more fiercely against the evil of Communism. Situations change and if we’re to champion all that’s best in nature we have to move on and be open to new social strategies.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
Michael, thank you and your commen and it is so beautifully written. I always taught my students that Midgard, is part of the tree of Ygdrassil,which includes the lower as well as the higher reals, therefore we are not in some seperate dimension but are part of the Spirit dimension. Its just a more physical dimension, with some of the most difficult obstacles to overcome. Each race has its role in testing our resolve. If we stoop to hatred and focus all our energy on them, we are defeated. We are children of the earth but our race is from the Stars. We have to evolve past these things pitted against us, and if it means having to find a new way of thinking, living and viewing our world then let’s do it, even if there are just 1000 of the very best, we will live on. I hate the word survive, cockroaches, mosquitos, fleas, flies and ants survive. We must live, .
Aryan means noble, and as we are now, the majority of what we perceive to be our race are mostly anAryan – ignoble.
Helena D'Maresq Hamilton
- Edit
I receive this information from a friend of mine who works in one of the major banks in SA! It has serious implications for us as whites. I know that this information may be off the subject, but please read it. And please overlook the language used.
Hi hel, no south africa economy is sinking so rapidly at the moment. We have depreciated with more then 55%. Very bad situation. Hel I will go as far as saying its truly just a matter of time now. We entering the brazil faze where soon the crime rate will be so verocios the people sitting on the city steps openly doing drugs will be the last worry on police forces mind. The method of survival in africa will be based purely on corrupt systems. This will lead us to the realist divide of wealth and poverty. Then we enter the mix of zim,somalia,congo and so on wich will create a unique state of affairs in south africa. It is foreign investment keeping it together right now. And I mean chinese, Russian, american and ottoman money. The Russians are pulling out. The Americans want resources only. And the Chinese want to own it all. Now with foreign laws on property and the land restitution in full swing. Removing the farmers ability to own more than 12000 hectares. After they have divided and given the land back to the people. South Africa money maker is farming. Its the last critical point to be lost for tje old regime. And it will start the landgrabber conflicts. This economy is fucked… The impending threats around eskom is also very serious. You and I know what these people will do once let loose for real. When the machines cleaning our water shuts off, when no food can be brought in to the city’s and we begin to starve. It has the potential impact of an armegedon. The time had arrived in which we need to consider leaving here hel. With very real seriousness behind it. There is no future here. I would rather be impoverished in a white government than this animal waiting for the rusted lock to break on its cage.
Eskom is the supplier of electricity, and every day we have load shedding. They plunder the electricity we have bought to distribute it to those who vote for them. We are in deep trouble. He writes that we must consider leaving?!! Where to? No one will take us in, maybe Paraguay will. Does anyone have any comments on this? We are ruled by brotherhoods, the muslim brotherhood, BnaiBrith, Afrikaner brotherhood and the African brotherhood. Islam is pushing here for converts, and we will have civil war here eventually. Time to go.