The government of Britain for several decades now, since at least the end of World War II, has been a process of almost uninterrupted decline. Much of this decline has been planned as part of the process of managed decline that is part and parcel of the deliberate transfer of wealth and influence from Western nations to the Third World in accordance with the New World Order global agenda. A major component in this process of continual decline however has been the result of corruption, incompetence and ineptitude on the part of the self-serving spivs and clueless nincompoops that comprise the majority of government appointees.
Nothing demonstrates this more clearly than the orchestrated clamour among Remainers within parliament and the media for MPs to be allowed a vote on the negotiating strategy to be used by our government in negotiating our way out of the European Union.
Initially Theresa May of ‘Brexit means Brexit’ fame, insisted that the government’s negotiating strategy should be confidential and could not be debated prior to an agreement being reached with the EU. It is after all fairly self-evident that success in high level negotiations of the sort proposed will require skilled bluffing and brinkmanship, and this means that it will be impossible for our negotiators to get the best deal for Britain if their European counterparts know our negotiating strategy in advance.
For the government to be transparent in a Parliamentary debate on Brexit strategy prior to the negotiations with the EU, would be the equivalent of a high-stakes poker player entering a card game in which his opponents will be allowed to see what cards he holds.
Sadly Theresa May has now agreed to allow MPs to debate our negotiation strategy and there will as a consequence be no surprises for the EU negotiators once the negotiations begin. It will be impossible for our negotiators to employ any bluff or brinkmanship, as the EU negotiators will, and whatever deal is eventually negotiated will now be less advantageous than it might have been otherwise. The EU negotiators will be able to play their cards very close to their chests, while all the time knowing what concessions our negotiators will be likely to make, while all the time knowing where our red lines will be drawn, and while all the time knowing that our negotiators will be under tremendous time pressure to arrive at an agreement that is acceptable to the EU.
It now looks likely that whatever deal is agreed, it will almost certainly be dictated to us by Brussels, and almost entirely on their terms. It will be akin to David Cameron’s ‘New Deal in Europe’, which we all know was devoid of any substance and it will be ‘BINO’, Brexit in name only.
The Remainers clamouring for this parliamentary debate claim that their concerns are to ensure that our government opts for or achieves a ‘soft Brexit’ rather than a ‘hard Brexit. That is, they want us to have a deal that causes the least disruption to industry and commerce and to the economic life of our nation, and these are sentiments that sound laudable. However the effect that their undermining of our negotiating position will have will be to eliminate any chance of our negotiators being able to negotiate advantageous terms for our withdrawal from the EU.
Our negotiators will therefore be left with a choice between just two options: either ‘hard Brexit’, that is a unilateral withdrawal with no agreement reached; or BINO, a situation in which we will have none of the advantages of self-government, and in which we will be required to conform with EU rules and directives just as if we were still part of the EU, but with no say in how the EU is run.
In short, the Remainers have sought to deny the democratic will of our people, calling for another referendum, and having lost that argument, now seek to sabotage the exit negotiations such that we will effectively be forced to remain under the hegemony of the EU or else opt for ‘hard Brexit’, something they know the government will be most reluctant to do. Their hope is that Theresa May’s government will baulk at the prospect of ‘hard Brexit’ and will at the 11th hour decide to abandon Brexit — allowing MPs a vote in Parliament — enabling them to overrule the democratic mandate of the people. Possibly, after months of further scare stories on the part of the media; after months of further fluctuations engineered on the currency markets by plutocratic speculators attempting to manipulate public opinion by creating panic; and after much hand-wringing on the part of parliament, the government will stage a second referendum in the hope that our people can be cowed into accepting the ‘safety’ of subservience to the EU in preference to the ‘unknown’ impact of ‘hard Brexit’.
All this at a time when there is no effective opposition to the machinations of our corrupt political elite; no UKIP following what has been a disastrous three months for them; and no united nationalist movement as the last line of our nation’s defence.
The window of opportunity during which it will be possible to hold our government to their word over Brexit will only exist for a few months more. Now is the time for nationalist organisations in Britain to unite in a Movement of National Salvation. We must prepare ourselves now, for whatever it takes to ensure that Brexit is delivered.
By Max Musson © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
Nationalist4UK
- Edit
I’ve got one question.
If Donald Trump gets elected as the next US president, will it help us with the Brexit because Nigel Farage is working closely with Donald Trump?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj4K9fr_WgY
Max Musson
- Edit
An excellent speech from Nigel and yes, I think Trump getting elected as US President would indeed swing the balance back in favour of a successful Brexit.
Nationalist4UK
- Edit
That’s why the female leader of UKIP stepped down as an excuse for ‘family reasons’. But many people believe this is all planned in order for Nigel Farage to take a break.
Davey Russell believes it’s all planned because the UK government is messing up with the Brexit.
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1342212385789669
Anything can happen now, 26 days till the presidential election in America, many people are hoping for Donald Trump to win.
drquartz
- Edit
Did we ever truly have a say in how the EU is run? I don’t think so. The trouble is that being British our sense of ‘fair play’ came to the fore, but the other nations involved had no compunction about bending, breaking or ignoring the rules – particularly France, as we saw many times. If Germany didn’t like one of the rules they simply changed it, because the German mind is logical and finds it difficult to be surreptitiously underhand, so they are more blatant about it.
There were many occasions when Britain put forward something which was common sense and could have benefitted all, but more often than not it was disregarded simply because it was British. They view us as ‘trouble makers’ because we do at least try to think things through and offer solutions instead of following on blindly with what Brussels dictates, whether it is good or bad for that nation. Hence, Europe is over-run with migrants, Greece is a financial basket-case with Italy, Spain and Portugal very close behind. France is heading towards a Far Right Wing Government – and other countries will copy that, including Germany. In fact the only countries benefitting are the old Eastern Bloc, mainly because they were so poor to start off with and no ‘refugee’ wants to settle there. Anything they get from Brussels is more than they have paid in. Obviously there are insufficient benefits to be had in that part of the world. So when you come to weigh it all up we never did have ‘a voice’ in Brussels, and neither do most other countries. The EU is simply run by the dictators for the dictators.
John Murray
- Edit
Another fine article, Max, even though the contents fill me with dred.
We are looking at two different worlds over the coming weeks and months. The first one would be where The Donald becomes POTUS, Merkel loses the next general elction and we obtain what the British people voted for, a hard Brexit. The second is where Hillary and Merkel both win and Brexit becomes BINO. The second outcome will be a nightmare because even then, in that scenario, I fear certain Nationalists in this country will still be eager to throw good money, time and effort down the toilet by standing in a pointless election, while continuing to argue that their particular pond is the best one., instead of engaging their brains and realising that the Western Spring approach is the only answer to our racial survival.
In America, if Trump loses, I think we will see far more anger from his supporters and rebellion to what any sane person would correctly see as the end of the USA as we know it. We are all drinking in the last chance saloon and if the second scenario I spoke of above comes to fruition then as a far as I’m concerned, at that point, the gloves are off.
The question remains though, will our people rise to that challenge or continue to behave like Lemmings?
NEWS Reporter
- Edit
Daily Stormer – No Time for Cowardice: A Look at the State Britain’s In https://www.dailystormer.com/no-time-for-cowardice-a-look-at-the-state-britains-in/
Steve100
- Edit
“They” want Parliamentary Procedure to be upheld … “they” want Parliamentary Debate with regard to Brexit.
Well, I have a question for “them”:
When in the Liebour Blair – Brown Administrations, did Parliament Debate and Vote on Open Borders Mass Immigration [to change the face of Britain forever, and rub the right’s noses in diversity]?
Surely the transcripts of all such debates — and record of votes — would be in Hansard.
Fact is, since the Commons succeeded in more-or-less removing the Lords Veto, and in doing so more-or-less removed the whole Checks & Balances mechanism, leaving the Commons with a more-or-less free-hand — we have had Absolutist Government, which some call Electoral Dictatorship — and what henceforth was/is termed “Democracy”, is actually nothing more than Smoke & Mirrors Pseudo-Democracy.
Just yet more examples as to why most Racial Nationalists are Anti Democratic, and have no confidence in “our” Electoral System.
If we are to break the EU shackles, and re-gain our sovereignty, we’ll have to fight further I’m afraid — and Farage thought it was “job done” just because we got a Leave victory in the referendum.
As our American kin say: “Go Figure”.
IRONKRAFT
- Edit
Both Britain, and America, are in the sights of old-school Jewish/Marxist/Banker eyes. Brexit,/UKIP, Trump, and to a lesser degree, Putin, are set for engineered socio-economic, and cultural conflicts. They are already using product withdrawals in the UK, as a primer.
Steve McQueen
- Edit
As I’ve been commenting for sometime on various sites, whether Brexit happens or not depends to a large degree on who wins the U.S. presidential election. Hillary — no way. Donald — quite possible.
The May Government needs a powerful ally to get a deal from the EU good enough to justify going ahead with Brexit. An anti-globalist president could be that ally. A Davos Man president (even though she’s a woman) will not be.