Boris’ Biggest Joke

So the inevitable has happened and Boris is Prime Minister. How long he lasts is another matter – it’s probably safe to say that on the 1st November we will either be out of the EU or Boris will be out of office. It’s going to be a fascinating three months; our new PM’s patriotic, Churchillian ebullience is both entertaining and infectious – but there is nothing good in it for our vision of Britain.

Much has been made of the new Cabinet’s “diversity”; here’s a typical headline (this one is from the Telegraph) “This diverse Cabinet exemplifies the global-minded spirit which drove Britain to vote Leave”. Here’s another “The best thing about Boris Johnson’s ‘diverse’ Cabinet is that its diversity is irrelevant” (in which case, one might wonder, why waste an article writing about it?). And another: “Britain’s Trump? Boris Johnson will prove himself to be a cosmopolitan liberal”.

And indeed Boris has wasted no time in proving himself to be just that – a cosmopolitan liberal. In his two and a half hour address to Parliament on Thursday he extolled the benefits (as he sees them) of immigration, removed the cap on skilled migration, revoked the pledge to reduce immigration to below 100,000 (which, as George Osborne has reminded us, the Tories never really believed in),  and pledged to amnesty the million or so illegals thought to be currently in the country. This proposed amnesty will empower the newly legitimised illegals to import their families under Human Rights Laws, and you can no doubt imagine the baby boom which will follow the joyful reunions. Such is the charm and magnetism of Boris that I have little doubt that many – particularly Conservative supporters – who were previously anti-immigration will be persuaded to change their minds, at least until his star fades.

The first headline quoted above, the one which claims that it was our “global minded spirit which drove Britain to vote Leave” exemplifies a new narrative about the Brexit vote. Until recently it was assumed that uncontrolled mass immigration gave rise to UKIP, which panicked Cameron into offering a referendum, and the rest is history. The new version now emerging is that it was NOT about reducing immigration, it was rather the reverse; it was about making Britain “outward looking”, “open”, “internationalist”, “welcoming”, “global”. You will have heard these words, or variants of them, repeatedly in the mouths of Tory politicians over the last few months and they all mean the same thing – open and welcoming to more immigration.

This new narrative thus plays perfectly into Boris’ great liberalisation of our borders. His alternative to our existing leaky controls is to hand over control to the immigrants themselves! That is what his proposed “Australian style points system” (also proposed by the Brexit Party) actually does – if you have enough points you can come in; it’s in your own hands not the hands of our government or any immigration officer. It’s worth noting that the Australian system was designed to increase immigration, and that is what happened when the Labour government tried such a system in the UK early this century.

So there is Boris’ biggest joke – we voted for Brexit to reduce immigration and we end up with a Prime Minister eager to increase it! I often wonder why a party, the Conservative, which likes to portray itself as the party of the nation, is permanently dominated by liberal internationalists who are distinctly immigration friendly. No doubt it’s mainly about money – those who fund the Tory party like immigration because it provides them with cheap labour. Neither those money men, nor those who rise to the top in the Conservative party, appear to have any understanding of a country as the homeland of a particular people, to them it is merely an economy.

Mention of the “homeland of a particular people” reminds me of a piece by Greg Johnson which I read recently on his Counter Currents site.  Describing himself as a “National Populist” he said that the object of the populist movement must be create a homeland for White people in North America, particularly for people like the sixty million Whites who voted for Trump. He is hardly alone in wanting an all-White homeland in North America, and in the limitless spaces of the continent there would be room for such an entity (although how to get from here to there is another matter!). For we here in Britain, there is no country-sized territory to be hived off for ourselves alone; and why should we? Every square inch of our land is ours. Until such time as we can recover our country, we must inhabit an “internal” homeland, a Racial Nationalist organisation of the like-minded supporting each other in the manner of an organised ethnic minority, because that is what we may well become.

By Frederick Dixon © 2019

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]

# # # #

10 thoughts on “Boris’ Biggest Joke

  1. This is why some feel that Boris will call an election by September & if not, then within a year to try & get the numbers to work for him, though he probably would have to do a deal with the Brexit Party.

    If we stay in the EU, I would then prefer the Houses of Parliament to be closed & turned into a Museum of Democracy.
    What would be the point of MPs & the Lords anymore?
    It’s a failed system that has made itself completely redundant with its illusion of democracy.

    If we then left the EU, a new National Assembly should then be set up, with NA members elected by PR & the use of PR referendums too on important matters.
    It would be mainly an English one as the other countries of the UK already have assembly buildings.
    But some UK things could be decided there.
    It could be more slim line & efficient than the present system.
    Also no old members of Parliament need apply, new broom & all that.

    1. I like the positivity of Boris, it makes a nice change but I don’t believe what he says.
      Theresa May promised a lot & didn’t deliver.
      I don’t think Boris will either.

      The nightmare could be that a majority of voters could vote for Brexit but Parliament still ends up Remain & cancels Brexit.
      There were complaints that Boris became PM on a few Conservative members votes but one estimate says that in a General Election only around 15,000 votes actually count for anything.
      Many votes like mine aren’t actually worth one vote, mine is around the value of 0.01, I think, as I am in a safe seat.
      So we need PR.

  2. Mr Dixon is absolutely right about us Australians. We have been methodically increasing the dark hued immigrant population now for decades, and it really shows now.

    We would be the worst possible example to follow if one were looking for a white national homeland and systems to ensure it.

    Our “conservatives” deserve a special mention in this regard as they are every bit as responsible for for asianizing and africanizing the country as the Marxist Labor Party.

    We have a party called the Liberal Party here. The media, the party itself, and almost all the sheep in the electorate known as voters, refer to the LP as “the conservatives”. Their actual name “Liberal” seems to make no impression whatsoever on these dullards. In other words, they hide “in plain sight” as the saying goes. I am convinced that liberalism will destroy all Whites in Australia long before Marxism.

    Then there are the Liberals’ coalition partners, the “Nationals”. They are anything BUT nationalist. These people would turn the rural areas of Australia into The Dry Aussie Congo for a cheaper labour supply to pick vegetables, or sell their own grandmothers to white slavers to secure a better wheat export contract.

    Just thought you migjt like to compare conservatives, a very dirty thirteen letter word.

  3. The Conservative party in the UK has been complicit in mass immigration since the 1950’s and it is only by degrees that Labour is considered much worse. Labour has become a party wholly committed to furthering the interests of non Europeans and has effectively abandoned its traditional white working class voters who remain stubbornly loyal to it. The Conservative Party has abandoned being a patriotic organisation devoted to promoting and maintaining traditional values, and has embraced the false gods of diversity and multiculturalism in addition to supporting same sex marriages and transgenderism.

    Conservatives like Johnson and Res-Mogg emphasise the trading opportunities which would arise with the rest of the world if we were to leave the EU, and do not consider immigration controls from outside Europe as important. Facilitating trading deals from outside the EU may require a freedom of movement which would accelerate non European immigration.It is ironic that nationalist’s interests may be better served within the EU as immigration from Europe would not transform our racial identity as opposed to that of Africa or the Indian sub continent. The “Roma” whose origins are non European are the only arrivals from Europe which has proved detrimental.

    Organisations such as the EU and UN are supra-national organisations which circumscribe the autonomy of independent countries and are vehicles to promulgate the progressive agenda.If the EU was a genuine economic bloc and whose remit did not stray to the political,then some advantages could arise from such an arrangement, providing the borders were closed to non Europeans Johnson and Rees-Mogg are obsessed with “free trade” to the virtual exclusion of everything else, and such lop-sided considerations would prove ruinous to our cause.

    No doubt Boris provides entertainment, is unorthodox and his methods may prove successful in leaving the EU, but his stated pride in our diversity gives cause for concern.It is noticeable that since England won the Cricket World Cup, commentators and presenters such as the absurd Piers Morgan has been extolling the supposed racial diversity of the team. Other than a bowler from the West Indies who nearly cost England the game, and two Muslims, the other 12 members of the squad are all of British ancestry, including one whose parents were originally from New Zealand and therefore from Britain in an even earlier period.The captain is said to be Irish, and thus from the British Isles.Thus the England team is 80% of British stock whilst commentators are anxious to present it as being a microcosm of our rich diverse society and overstate its alien composition.

  4. Boris is essentially a “Globalist”. There will be no pro-British, and certainly, no racial pride whatsoever. We are on our own again.

  5. As expected ‘The Greatest Showman’ has been elected by the Tory faithful to the highest office in the land. Not that there was really much of a choice on offer. All pretence by the Conservative Party and their flag-bearers that they actually conserve anything disappeared long ago, although this self-evident fact and unpleasant reality seems to be emotionally suppressed by the blue-rinse brigade.

    As eloquenty articulated in the article and in the comments, the Brexit vote has been hijacked and re-interpreted as vote for free trade and freedom of movement. Immigration controls, which to most Brexiteers took preference over all other matters once out of the EU, seems to have disappeared completely from the agenda of priorities.

    I stated in a previous article, after the EU elections, my dismay at the voting public refusal to see populist/nationalist parties as a realistic alternative to the current political hucksters and that I would prefer to place my trust in Victor Orban, Matteo Salvini and others of the same persuasion rather than Johnson, Rees-Mogg, and even Farage.

    Johnson’s election, his cabinet, and his comments since, confirm my view that leaving under his stewardship is merely swappping one multi-cultural globalist horse for another. Should there actually be a second referendum, I would have to think carefully on the merits of voting out again. I note in conversations, others are begin to think the same.

  6. I think the Conservatives will become enthusiastic supporters of PR after the election along with the Brexit Party maybe adopting that as their second policy.
    Other parties may also be more keen on the idea too.

  7. Boris like most politicians are Liberals, people in this Country have had some form of Cultural Marxists brainwashing education, that started in the mid 60s,
    On top of that the only way to control a Multicultural cultural society is by extreme State intervention , Britain has some of the most draconian race relation laws in the world to stop.people speaking out and stepping out of line, The people of Britian today live in a climate of fear, who would have thought this could have happened for all this Country has gone through these last Two Thousand years.

  8. The mainstream politician, including Boris, will acknowledge “progressive” values such as the supposed benefits arising from non European immigration and diversity.Both the Labour and Conservative parties have failed to halt and then reverse non European immigration, and the cumulative effects will irreparably damage our country and the other “White Homelands” in terms of their national, cultural and racial identities.Leaving the EU will not address the above, but it is still important to achieve this objective as such an outcome will hinder and inconvenience vested interests.

    The new leader of the not so liberal Democrats, Jo Swinson is unequivocally opposed to the UK leaving the EU. The sole Green Party MP, Caroline Lucas, advocates a “People’s vote” to decide whether we leave, and of her own admission states she wouldn’t accept the results of a second referendum if the majority voted to leave.Such contempt for the democratic process is regularly revealed by representatives of the political establishment.

Comments are closed.