Following the catastrophic decision by no less than five different patriotic or nationalist organisations to stand against each other in the Batley & Spen by-election yesterday, the election result has been declared and all five organisations have been left battered by experience, with their energies spent, in what was from the very start a forlorn endeavour.
As can be seen from the table below, despite a very low voter turnout of just 25.8%, the Labour Party candidate romped home with the overwhelming majority of the vote, leaving the five patriotic/nationalist candidates and the unofficial Asian UKIP candidate with just over two-thousand votes between them.
Poor Richard Edmonds, a man who is ‘Royalty’ in the eyes most nationalists, was unceremoniously stepped over by the other patriotic candidates in their clamour for their four seconds of fame, and came second from last behind the aforementioned unofficial Asian UKIP candidate. So can we now agree that as a movement we cannot continue to accept humiliation on this scale and can we now agree to begin looking seriously at alternative ways of winning influence and of subsequently acquiring political power?
The total number of votes attracted by the patriotic/nationalist and unofficial UKIP candidates was just 2,183, little more than a fifth of the votes received by UKIP alone in the last general election. Little more than one in five of the people who previously voted UKIP were motivated to turn out to support one of the patriotic/nationalist candidates and this is because none of the parties involved have a ‘constituency’ in Batley & Spen. None of them has put in the effort to build a community powerbase, composed of members of the public militantly supporting our cause.
In electoral politics, a candidate can, when the circumstances are right, generate a ‘band-wagon’ effect in which their election campaign gains the support of large numbers of otherwise uncommitted voters because of the perceived power and impetus of that campaign, but for this to happen the circumstances must be right and they are at present light years away from being right in Batley & Spen. For a ‘band-wagon’ effect to manifest, a candidate needs to have the support of a large section of the mass media; they need to have fabulous wealth at their disposal so that they can buy the positive media exposure that is needed; and/or they need to have large numbers of local people militantly campaigning for them with fanatical devotion. None of the patriotic/nationalist candidates in yesterday’s election had even one of these things.
We nationalists must accept that we are never going to enjoy the support of the mass media, owned and/or controlled as it is either by organised Jewry or by other globalist entities that are implacably opposed to our cause. We are also unlikely to attract the support of wealthy individuals who will be willing or able to make the multi-million-pound donations that will be needed to buy positive media exposure. Even UKIP have only been moderately successful in this regard and their three main donors have, as we have seen recently, proved capricious in their support.
Without the multi-million-pound backing of the party, the unofficial Asian UKIP candidate saw the UKIP share of the vote fall from 9,080 in 2015, to just 118 in this latest election. Conversely, during the 2010 general election, we saw Jack Sen, the official (Anglo-Asian) UKIP candidate, parachuted into the West Lancashire constituency for the purposes of that election, but with the benefit of that party’s multi-million-pound general election campaign, obtain a vote of 6,058 — more than three times the vote that party had attracted in the past in that constituency.
We are unlikely to attract the support of wealthy individuals who will be willing to make the multi-million-pound donations that will be needed to buy positive media exposure, because donations of that size require us to win the support of billionaires. For obvious reasons, only billionaires are able to afford to make multi-million-pound political donations and unfortunately, current billionaires are in the main, people who have made their billions in the current socio-economic climate and they are unlikely to want to risk ‘upsetting the apple-cart’ by bringing about radical political change that may have adverse unintended consequences for them. It will take a special kind of billionaire if we are to ever attract multi-million-pound donations. It is not impossible for us to win the support of such a person, but they will be very special people indeed.
In practice therefore, we must learn to stand on our own two feet and not waste our lives waiting for some white knight to arrive on his silver charger, battle standard held aloft, and showering money in our direction. We must find another way to acquire the many, many, millions of pounds needed to buy us positive media exposure. Furthermore, we must invest time, money and effort in creating militant intentionally White communities all over this country that will serve as organisational, electoral, and revolutionary power bases in the years to come.
This means that we may need to allow a number of elections to pass us by without us bothering to contest them – without us wasting our currently meagre resources in a forlorn endeavour that is doomed to failure and humiliation. We must follow the advice that Mark Collett gave in his recent London Forum speech and more than that, we must invest years of our time to the task of building militant intentionally White communities before we attempt to get our people elected in future. This is the only way that we will ever win electorally.
Shortly, I will start publishing a series of articles that will be a guide to the ‘guerrilla politics’ that we must practice in future, and a guide to the building of militant intentionally White communities. It will then be up to you my brothers and sisters to take up this blue-print and make it come alive!
By Max Musson © 2016
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
Robert
- Edit
In my opinion, the British Democratic Party and the British Movement were vindicated in their decision not to contest the Batley and Spen by-election debacle.
https://britishdemocraticparty.org/
https://bmsunwheel.blogspot.co.uk/
Liberty GB leader, Paul Weston attended meetings with Jewish JDL terrorists in 2012:
https://efp.org.uk/nationalist-division-at-batley-spen-by-election/
https://www.heritageanddestiny.com/british-freedom-party-hosted-by-terrorist-group/
The official UKIP candidate in the Witney by-election only polled 3.5%, UKIP is in disarray with no leader which may open up the field for British Nationalists IF they can unite as one strong Movement, and agree to only put up one Unity candidate in selected elections.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witney_by-election,_2016
Max Musson
- Edit
No Robert, despite the current floundering of UKIP, there is not currently an opening for any party that has not yet acquired the six prerequisites. Nationalist candidates cannot simply step into the vacant shoes of UKIP, we need to build a movement first, and electoral success will follow from that.
Eddy
- Edit
The BM don’t contest elections so don’t really feature in this discussion as there was never any chance of them standing. The BDP is just a web site, they are not an active organisation.
Robert
- Edit
Yes, your right Eddy, the BM used to contest local and parliamentary elections during the 1960’s and 1970’s – their best result was the Birmingham Ladywood parliamentary by-election in 1969, scoring 3%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham_Ladywood_by-election,_1969
They are not currently registered with the Electoral Commission and in any case, currently eschew elections, which they regard as a rigged game.
The BDP have polled some good results of 9%+ in local elections but less well in parliamentary elections in the last 3 years since being founded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Democratic_Party_(2013)
John Murray
- Edit
I really don’t know what is worse, the pitiful results which we all expected, or the fact the the very same people and parties will repeat the process when the next by-election comes around.
Julie Lake
- Edit
This is part of the reason that i resigned from the BNP. Unless co-operation is achieved with all parties and they begin to accept this, the same formula will just be repeated time and time again. On one hand, it was admiral for the parties to contest Batley as it was wholly undemocratic, yet the ego’s would not allow each one to get behind just one candidate. It leaves the voter utterly confused also. Part of the dramatic rise of UKIP in such a short time, was simply because, there was only one UKIP. Will lessons be learned? I doubt it.
Tom Rogers
- Edit
I accept there were arguments for standing, but the fact that UKIP chose not to contest the by-election officially (they did contest it unofficially via a local Asian who stood as an independent) should have been the first clue that this wasn’t a good idea.
If they were going to contest this by-election at all, then they should have held their noses and got behind Buckby, on the basis that he was the first candidate to declare (albeit LibertyGB is a crank Zionist party), and advised and supported him as much as possible – in effect, treating it as a training exercise, a means for testing the nationalist vote and an opportunity for establishing goodwill with another national-minded party.
Instead, they all jumped in, turning what should have been a minor by-election into another entry in the annals of nationalist failure, and giving the Labour candidate – a shallow air-headed soap actress, if you please – an enviable mandate with 85% of the turnout.
What a disaster.
The National Front must be finished now, surely? It’s like one of those movie monsters that just won’t die.
Eddy
- Edit
One thing this election has proved and that is the NF is toxic and not fit for purpose, five minutes ago one of their leading lights was telling us we must all come back and join the NF, well them standing in this election shows why nobody took any notice. Unity, co-operation just isn’t going to happen, certainly not with the likes of the ED and BNP, and outside of them what else is left but a few tiny group lets.
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t think terms like ‘toxic’ are helpful, as such terms imply that the NF is is some way poisoning the nationalist movement, which is not so. The problem the NF have is the same problem as all other nationalist parties, that they lack the wherewithal needed to win power. The way forward is for the NF to accept the need for us to build a movement before any party can hope for electoral success. We need the NF to join us in building a movement of national salvation.
Eddy
- Edit
What I meant by toxic, as you well know, was that this is how the public regard the NF. I left the NF thirty-six years ago because of this and my opinion has never changed. The group that uses the name National Front today has no connection with the organisation that was formed in 1967 apart from using the same name, to imply that it is the same Movement in untrue.
If you want WS to be taken seriously then you have to start showing some results, otherwise you are just an unrealistic fantasy, which many people suspect you are.
Max Musson
- Edit
The NF is now a very different organisation to the one started in 1967, and much of their efforts in recent years have been ineffective, and the NF ‘brand’ has been tarnished by decades of media denigration and self-inflicted injuries, but it is unrealistic to expect those who currently lead that party to simply disband the organisation and admit failure, and neither should they.
.
What is needed is for the leaders of the NF to enter into dialogue with other nationalist groups and be willing to change so they can become more effective and perhaps evolve into something new, a core constituent of a new, broader movement of national salvation. It would be an ignominious end for the NF to simply disband in abject failure, but it would be a vindication of the sacrifices and struggles of all of their past members if the organisation became an integral part of a new organisation that led us to success.
.
What you have to appreciate Eddy, regarding Western Spring, is that we are not a political party and we are not dependent upon constantly attracting the maximum level of publicity in order to maximise our results at the polls. Our primary mission is to guide the disparate factions within the nationalist movement towards greater unity and professionalism and this is a process that requires us to conduct much of what we do in private, away from the spotlight. This website is the window through which people can learn about us and what we aim to do.
.
The existence of the Regional Forums, modelled on the success of the London Forum, is as a result of our lobbying and encouragement of the people involved. The recent Leaders Conference which was intended as an initial move promoting co-operation between nationalist groups and with the aim of establishing a process of gradual convergence towards unity, was our initiative, planned and sponsored by us. These are just two of our initiatives and there will be more such initiatives.
.
Our dream is that we act as a catalyst enabling our people to achieve salvation, freedom and self-determination. We simply state truthfully what will be needed for salvation to become a reality and if others believe our aims to be an unrealistic fantasy, then they are simply demonstrating that they lack the first prerequisite of success, i.e. belief in our ability to win. To win, we must first believe we can win, and that belief comes from identifying what will be needed to win and devising a way of obtaining whatever that is.
Tom Rogers
- Edit
Will Western Spring now openly call for the dissolution of the National Front? Surely 84 votes (or whatever they got) has to mean the end is nigh? They can’t go on.
I notice somebody has called for the NF’s dissolution already on a certain forum, and Joe Owens’ latest video effectively calls for the same.
I know it’s a matter for the members, but the NF is an embarrassment and always has been. It’s in the way of our message and we can’t progress as long as these people occupy that space and present Nationalism in that way.
I know we all want some fun now and again and we all need to get things off our chest – people are angry – but there’s a need for seriousness and professionalism. At the moment, Nationalism is like driving a sports car along a country lane behind a slow tractor.
John Salisbury
- Edit
All of those parties should simply disband. They are not just a pointless waste of resources, but an active hindrance to the movement as they make us look weak. Western Spring and its meta-political strategy is the best and only way forward at this point. We will eventually need a political party, and so when that time comes, we can craft one to the specifications we need with a brand new and untainted image.
Shaun
- Edit
OK….
Here are my points:
Indeed…. Nationalist parties must mobilize the sizeable support they have within their respective communities.
For this you need:
1. Community activities that let the White people know you’re a presence in the area — I’m not into the litter picking philosophy to please the papers, but if we had nationalist bars, gyms, shops, and all the rest of it I reckon the more un-cucked part of the population would support the local nationalist party? Maybe? — prerequisite 2.
2. I don’t know how but there needs to be a mainstream media outlet (not nessecerly on the TV) that undermines the power structure, puts forward populist ideas, and builds a power base of supporters — prerequisite 4.
I don’t know how this can be done but it needs to happen. None the less, a Trump victory on November the 8th will be a metaphysical atom bomb on the left, and … will…. create the environment where the right type of people come forward; rather than, in my case often, people who haven’t got anything to lose than their next pint of Guinness in their local bar. We need proper people, educated people, stinking rich people.
Can we, the nationalist types, manage to create a survival-movement out of perhaps the most individualistic, miscegination-loving people to have ever existed? Them people: the White British!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can we?
It took the White English nearly 600 years to overthrow the Normans.
I don’t know if we’ve got the minerals?
NEWS Reporter
- Edit
All Englishmen are white Shaun, unless they’ve been sunbathing on the beach in Bognor Regis or Stamford Bridge!
It was exceptional circumstances in the upper echelons of English/Danish [Danglish] society that led to the Norman takeover.
A ‘thing’ the Witan had foreseen but unfortunately couldn’t prevent owing to Halley’s Comet coming along at an inopportune moment.
Max Musson
- Edit
You are sounding very cynical at the moment Shaun, but if we British can vote for Brexit and the Americans can vote for Trump, then there is no reason why we can’t summon up what is needed to save ourselves in the long-term.
AAA
- Edit
Shaun,
With regard to your mention of gyms in point 1, I have previously suggested the production of Legion MAC t-shirts and for them to be worn while working out. The gym is a great recruiting ground and will at least elicit discussion when our folk are seen wearing eye-catching t-shirts conveying an image and an organisation promoting fitness, struggle, and superiority.
Our comrades in the States are on to the power of t-shirts: https://ineedmerch.com/product/ftn-dd/ An alternative site that provides such a cheap service: https://teespring.com/shop
Regarding your second point, I personally do not feel at this stage that the Fourth Pre-requisite is so fundamental when we have many such media outlets propagating the message of our Cause. Red Ice being the most obvious of such outlets: https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio, along with The Right Stuff Radio: https://radio.therightstuff.biz/ and radio Aryan: https://www.radioaryan.com/
Generally (not aimed at you) we need less words and more action. It really is that simple.
Cheers
Wolf of the Sun
- Edit
Among many nadirs, this is surely a low point in terms of input (the decision by nationalists to engage in cut-throat electoralism) and outcome (the pathetic voting figures). We’re in nails and coffins territory now, but it appears that many nationalists will not or cannot grasp this reality. Perhaps they’ll nail the lid on from the inside. I look forward to Max’s ‘guerrilla politics articles, and I hope that they at least touch upon one fundamental material reality – that if we are to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children then there need to be white children: in this era, under these conditions, every white birth is an act of GENETIC INSURRECTION (apologies for the shouting).
Max Musson
- Edit
Wolfie, I agree entirely!
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
To blame the National Front for any lack of electoral success is misleading. For example, Liberty GB was first in the field at Batley and Spen. It had a young likeable candidate, fresh image, and consciously avoided the “Anti-Semite” smear, and… yet, still only managed to obtain about half a percentage point more than the NF.
Nor should we belittle any of those candidates who had the courage to stick their neck out in a constituency where the fanatics of the ‘Left’ could well have been seeking some sort of vengeance for the brutal murder of Mrs. Cox.
What Max says is true of course to the point of being self-evident, we need to build communities which in turn provide the wherewithal for success. Richard Edmonds would know this from the time he was a leading National Front activist in Lewisham.
But, just one further thought…all the well oiled political machines in the world won’t take us an inch further if we don’t have men of integrity who can inspire trust. It’s up to each one of us, whatever our talents, to provide that leadership.
Folkvar
- Edit
Agree with the article but we don’t have that kind of time left. Zionist pig May has kicked the door open to even more third worlders. This disgusting creature is a self-confessed blarite. The Jews/Communists are rapidly succeeding in their white genocide policy.
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Off with her head!
Max Musson
- Edit
We do have that much time!
.
There are agents of our enemies posting videos and messages online that are intended to demoralise our people by making us believe that it is already too late. However it is not – not while there are still millions of White people available for us to recruit.
.
We need to ignore the doom-sayers and keep our nerve. As we build militant intentionally White communities we will slow the rate of deterioration and buy ourselves more time. In fact, the very existence of a network of militant intentionally White communities will ensure the future survival of our people. There is no excuse for inaction, all is not lost and there is much to do!
Shaun
- Edit
My friend, Folkvar, you’re right!!!!!!! For some reason, the White race seems to be the only race on earth (that I know of) who seems to think they’re above Natural Law. I was thinking this today.
Look at this way: every life form understands the concept of the gene wars —- that genes matter!!!! H. Millard writes about this all the time. Whites, however, have taken on a way of thinking where individualism triumphs over collectivism. Collectivism being the acknowledgement that a folk/people/nation are stronger together. It benefits the individual to side with a group with the same identity.
Why has this happened? Simple: wealth! Rich, pampered people assume there’s an abundance of resources so they don’t mind sharing. Poorer people (East Europeans for example) understand that scarcity means death…..
These White people, as Tom Metzger says, have to take a ”collective” battering as the White Americans have; then they’re start to realise this world wasn’t designed for their own gratification. Westerners are, taken as a group, the proverbial spoilt brats of the ”mankind” due to the conditions they have created for their own citizens. ISIS aren’t the terrorists; it’s our own attachment to comfort that’s the real terrorists.
If you think I’m wrong; check the attitude of the left.
Philip
- Edit
While the result was entirely predictable I believe it was only part to do with competing nationalist entities and poor political structures. Frankly you are either in agreement with the nationalist agenda and philosophy or your not. And if not why not? The ethnic people of this country have been so dumbed down by years of leftist propaganda from the mass media and in particular ‘The Great Satan’ the BBC that they are no longer capable of discernment. While there are a growing number sites on the internet that question, educate, and explain what is happening in their world, few bother to investigate. We live in an age of bread and circuses. Strictly is a must, the latest signing for United will make ‘us’ great again. Miscegenation with sub Saharans is cool as is feminism. You can all add to the list.
Can it be reversed? Well once again I point to examples from some of our brethren on the Continent. Jobbik I believe started as a youth movement so can that be replicated here? The Baltic States have innumerable cultural and national identity societies, same in Austria with the FPO. Diversity is not welcomed in Eastern Europe or eastern parts of Germany where ethnic identity remains strong. Until we bring back ethnic pride and not national pride (who gives a damn about the England football team) we are going nowhere. But how to do it when the establishment, the media, the legal system condemns you? Not an easy task.
John Salisbury
- Edit
Hi Philip,
I agree that the result was entirely predictable – in fact, Max Musson DID predict the result in his article prior to the election. However even if you combine all the nationalist and vaguely-nationalist votes cast, it still doesn’t come to much more than a tenth of Labour’s vote. Therefore this defeat is nothing whatsoever to do with competing nationalist entities.
This defeat results from the fact that political victory is simply not possible via the ballot box at this time, and radically different tactics are needed until that time comes about, as Max has outlined and continues to outline in every article he writes on this subject.
John
Julie Lake
- Edit
How many factions are there now ? 13 or 14 ? Let’s be brutally honest. Nationalism is not recruiting young people This is a vicious circle that gets repeated over and over. You can not draw young people in, unless the party is out there on the streets being seen and heard. No one stumbles upon a website and becomes a nationalist. The only thing that works in nationalism, is sheer hard work.It was fine when Eddy Butler challenged Griffin because there were few parties and room for another Let’s be honest, it’s become ridiculous. Yet, if the party does not have the activists nor the finances, they are not being seen. The glory days of the BNP in 2009, was due to a big personality, activists plenty and local branches plenty. They did not need a recruitment drive as recruitment came with activists being seen and heard all over the country. People are naturally drawn to something that appears to be growing and successful What has happened since, is some, and i stress, not all, but some, believe, all they have to do, is clone BNP policies, self appoint themselves as leaders, and have a Facebook group. When you look at Griffin and Farage, they have a lot in common Educated, and experienced along with big big personalities. Yet, along come those who self appoint themselves as leaders when they have not even won an election, and they believe, they will recruit thousands and be the next Griffin or Farage. They copy policies, and remain so deluded, they think, nationalists will flock to them. Then, as was the case in Worcester earlier this year, after registering their new party and operating for a few months, from Facebook, they stand in an election and get 11 votes. In the process, they damage the movement while continuing to profess that they are the latest big movement Sorry, but it’s pathetic and we do not need these people. They prostitute themselves round any old nationalist radio show spouting wholly inaccurate claptrap while actively behaving as if nationalism is a competition and stir up nationalists against nationalists. These are the very waste of space that we should be barring from our movement. They are not there for the cause but self promotion. While we call for unity and co-operation, these ego’s need removing from our arena.
Julie Lake
- Edit
For the record. I went to Batley and Spen at the weekend. No other reason than to hopefully cost Labour some votes. Jack Buckby was going to go down the route of accusing other candidates of being anti-Semitic. I advised him to not do this. He changed tact to Muslim grooming gangs. He made a cake with ‘ Muslim rape gangs’ on it and i went to the Labour office in Batley high street, with him to deliver it. He was assaulted by Labour activists. For a party who accuses us of hatred, it was another example of just how vile these people are. It is a great shame, Jack takes this stance on Zionism as he is young, has fresh new idea’s not afraid of taking risks and i have to say, his leaflet design was genius and bold, sporting the headline ‘ Labour screwed you, now screw Labour’. On the other side, the three monkeys, see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. It was good to see the BNP boys again and other activists. The town was awash with sickening posters everywhere stating ‘ Love like Jo’…Ironically, not one resident i spoke to in the high street, felt it was disrespectful to contest the seat. All i did was talk to people about Airey Neave, Sir Anthony Berry and Ian Gow, all Tory MP’s murdered and where Labour contested all three seats. It was a great effort by all in Batley but we were simply outnumbered with an enormous dollop of emotional blackmail from Labour. Co-operation, that’s what it is all about.
Chris
- Edit
Militant White Communities. Where are they? Hi
Max Musson
- Edit
The intention is that you create them where you live.
Chris
- Edit
A bit like the Lone Wolf idea, only not so lonely?
Max Musson
- Edit
If the mode activity resembles that of a ‘lone wolf’ then you will not be doing it properly. There is a choice: either to identify other like minded people in your area and create the nucleus of a militant White enclave where you live, or to find out where someone has already started and move to wherever they are to join them. In essence however it should entail community building, and that obviously requires the involvement of more than one person.
RWB
- Edit
Miltant White enclave where you live, or to find out where someone has already started and move to wherever they are to join them – Are you aware how cranky this sounds? I’ll pack up my children and mortgage and move to an Militant Enclave to safe guard what? This isn’t the real world! What’s next white hood and crosses? It’s cultish
Max Musson
- Edit
Hello RWB, the greater the density of White nationalists living in your area, especially if they agree to act as an organised group, the more likely that your children will grow up in a community that instils in them the values that will make them consciously and intentionally White. This means your family will live and your children grow up in an environment that will be largely free of the dysfunctional aspects of the multiracial/multicultural society and one which as far as is possible, secures and safeguards your posterity and your children’s future.
.
If that sounds cranky and cultish to you, then stay in the multicultural neighbourhood in which you currently reside and lap up all that cultural ‘enrichment’!
RWB
- Edit
Max,
I don’t live in a Multicultural neighbourhood. Epic fail. The values of our heritage and identity will be installed by myself and partner to our children. This pipe dream of militant neighbourhoods isn’t going to happen. Unless we have something along the lines of Orania in South Africa.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
Each nationalist candidate is to be commended for having the fortitude to stand, in Batley and Spen especially as it was widely portrayed that they were purveyors of hatred and thus were showing contempt for the memories of the previous MP, the late Joe Cox.. Unfortunately the nationalist vote was divided, and all candidates except Labour lost their deposit, A pan-nationalist candidate who was local to the area would have been preferable, especially as the other main parties had declined to contest the seat, and the combined votes would have at least ensured the saving of the deposit. However nationalists have shown a distinct inability to cooperate for the “Cause” and lt is unlikely lessons will be learnt. There have been numerous calls for one nationalist party to emerge to unite the disparate strands of the nationalist movement, and the consequences of fragmentation were clearly seen at the by-election. We must remain hopeful and take every opportunity to advise receptive people to the evils of Cultural Marxism and the globalist agenda.
Stefan
- Edit
Yes a complete waste of resources.
Keith Axon
- Edit
Out of Chaos comes order
Dear comrade.
The movement is plagued with at least 7 civic = 2 other pro zionist and one Racial nationalist parties and then the two phony parties ,LibertyGB and Britain first whose leadership is hostile to us politically and then we have the NF making the 10 parties on the nationalist scene nearly all competing in elections with each other thereby canceling out each other votes,this cahos, is the movement untold damage and demoralisation how much longer must this stupidity exist for?
The problem being faced by the movement is non of them will talk with each other as to giving up the party Titles and create an umbrella name that to begin with would be the vehicle to fight elections under just one Title and not 7 or 10 as they all think the are the real thing and to make matters worse one of them the NF keeps repeating the same mantra that everybody must rejoin the mother party being the NF well this has not happened and will not happen so that FACT must be faced as a fact.
A new front name is needed and not a national front as the name.
So who has enough credibility to be able to get the list around a table and talk ? in my opinion you ……. are such a man and then perhaps ….. …. in support although he has been off the street scene for a long time but he has street cred and trust as to MM well he is trying as to what success MM has had i do not know ?its all about trust and street cred and if you don’t have it ! well.
All the so called leader want to protect their own little fiefdoms don’t they and that includes the NF as little fish in a big sea these are the little men of the indecision holding everything back,they all know that United we stand and Divided we all fall and fail our people who will curse us for this Impasse.
All 7/10 need a big kick up the arse as to what the **** do they think they are playing at this is real and not a game of postering they need to be told in know uncertain word and it requires Harsh language so the message is get your fking arses into gear and meet and TALK the time for little boys games are over and the time for action is at this 11th hour. others who are advocating a new way forward are encouraging you to take that STEP a New front must be created to unify the movement to a the new path.
A new front name was created in 1966 it must be created again a New Front and it will take Bold men as was then and must be now.
keith axon
Max Musson
- Edit
In broad terms you are correct regarding the motivations that have to date kept nationalism divided. You were not a party to the Leadership Conference we held earlier this autumn, which was attended by representatives of a number of organisations and strands within nationalism and which achieved our initial objectives, but if you were, you would have a clearer idea of factors at play and the progress made. We will be holding further conferences of this sort in the months and probably years to come and my expectation is that we will see a gradual coming together and the formation of a critical mass from the existing active groups in a broad movement such as you and most other individual nationalists desire.
.
There are a number of groups who already collaborate on various activities and this is something that we need to build upon, and as for the NF, there are factions within that party who are responding favourably to our overtures and we must encourage them also. Great advances are never easy or simple to achieve, but my belief is that the unity initiative driven by Western Spring will bring us eventual success, albeit quite slowly at first.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
I would heartily agree with Keith Axon that it is futile for disparate nationalist groups to continue contesting elections in competition with each other as had occurred recently in Batley and Spen. All parties in opposition to Labour had lost their deposits, including the five nationalist parties. The low number of votes for each party was presented as a victory for hope over hate , as Labour sought to present a unity candidate and refused calls for hustings so that policies would not be discussed and examined by the electorate. It is difficult to see how Labour could claim its campaign was successful when only 26% voted rendering the election almost meaningless. However if we are to be successful in forming one main nationalist party, we need to avoid insulting rival groups as not being genuine nationalist organisations or being mere civic nationalists, otherwise they would not be inclined to enter constructive dialogue. The Brexit vote clearly shows that despite over 60 years of poisonous propaganda, many native Britons have retained their sense of national identity and this has further been reinforced by events in the USA. These events indeed present us with a golden opportunity to found a new political organisation which will shake the establishment to its rotten and corrupt foundations. Let us make history!