For approximately six or seven years now following the rapid decline of the BNP, the nationalist movement has fragmented and drifted, largely without direction, and most importantly without any one group within the movement achieving the critical mass required to either propel it to a position of electoral promise or to enable it to eclipse all other nationalist groups and become the de facto vehicle of choice for those campaigning in our nation’s interests.
There were approximately 12,000 members of the BNP at its height in 2009 and in that year 943,598 people voted for the party in the European Union election. Now however, the party’s membership discounting life members who are no longer actively supporting the party, has fallen to fewer than 200 people making the party significantly smaller than the National Front, and the combined membership of all British nationalist, White nationalist or ethno-nationalist groups and political parties across the country is fewer than 1,000 people.
Worse still, those 1,000 nationalists are fragmented and divided, sometimes on an ideological basis, but more often than not on the basis of personal hatreds, rivalries and factional feuding, into more than a dozen different groups, and discounting Western Spring, none of them has a metaphorical ‘pot to piss in’.
This however has not stopped die-hard campaigners regularly embarrassing themselves in futile election campaigns, fought on a shoe-string, in which they often receive fewer votes than the Monster Raving Loony candidate, and sometimes less votes than the ten nominations needed in order to stand as a candidate in an election at all. Furthermore it has not stopped them holding marches in which thirty or so people make a spectacle of themselves, shuffling out of step to a dismal sound reminiscent of a two year old beating an empty biscuit tin with a spoon!
This is a harsh assessment I know, but it is the truth and it is largely self-inflicted, and if we are to have any hope of achieving our objective of restoring the British people to primacy in our own land, we must accept the truth and act accordingly – that is, we must do things differently in future.
As I first stated more than five years ago, “if we keep on doing what we’ve always done, we’ll keep on getting what we’ve always got”, and so far, electioneering and street demonstrations in the current socio-political environment have achieved nothing but to reduce us to a shadow of what we formerly were.
The key words in the above paragraph are “in the current socio-political environment”, because many people look back to 2009 — to the glory days of the BNP — and they deduce that the BNP ‘did not do so badly’ through electioneering and street demonstrations. What such people fail to realise however, is that the socio-political environment has for us worsened significantly since 2009.
In 2009 the BNP managed to win two of the seventy-eight European parliamentary seats allocated to the UK (that’s 2½% of the total); they had one of the twenty-five seats on the Greater London Authority (4% of the total); and they had fifty-five elected councillors across the UK, out of a total of 20,588 (a quarter of 1% of the total). Therefore while the BNP were more successful than any British nationalist political party has ever been, they were by any objective measure a long, long way away from political power, and now eight years later in our much reduced circumstances we are much further away than that.
The socio-political climate has changed in that following the self-destruction of the BNP, UKIP have replaced the BNP as the premier patriotic party in the UK and while UKIP exists, even in its current reduced state following Brexit, it will act as a ‘road block’, blocking the electoral path to power of any other right-wing, nationalist or patriotic political party.
Furthermore, in response to public disquiet over Islamic terrorism and following constant campaigning by Jewish and Muslim advocacy groups, there has been a hardening of the attitude of government and the police towards any public or private expressions of dissent regarding enforced multiculturalism. Even prior to the 2015 general election, Theresa May, then the Home Secretary, was pledging to introduce banning orders for ‘extremist groups’ and extremism disruption orders for ‘extremists who spread hate but do not break existing laws’. As a consequence the catch-all clauses within existing ‘hate speech’ legislation and the Terrorism Act 2000 are now being routinely used in ways that were never initially intended, to disrupt the lives of nationalist activists and to criminalise legitimate and lawful nationalist resistance to the genocide of our people.
In response to government pressure, IT companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter have also started to actively disrupt the online activity of nationalists, banning us from social media and now taking steps to deny Internet access to some of the most prominent nationalist websites.
For the last two years I have been calling for nationalist groups to participate in a convergence process in the hope that we can bring the warring factions together and thereby achieve the critical mass needed to break out of the downward spiral in which we find ourselves. So far, other than responding appreciatively to the hospitality provided at events Western Spring have organised, the response from the leaders of most other nationalist groups has been unenthusiastic at best.
It has been said that trying to organise nationalists is rather like herding cats, in that there is a distinct disinclination on the part of most individuals towards moving in the direction indicated by any aspiring cat-herd. This is a generalisation of course, as there are nationalists who intelligently are prepared to co-operate with their comrades and conform when the organisation to which they belong demonstrates leadership, but we are in the minority.
There are in excess of a dozen nationalist organisations sharing less than 1,000 members and we are all rendered in varying degrees ineffective as a result, and yet we still find that two more nationalist groups have announced their existence in recent months alone, and there are more to come.
One would think that bearing in mind the dire state of our nation, nationalists of whatever stamp would be prepared to compromise and set aside their differences in order to bring about movement wide unity and the emergence of a single organisation with the numbers and wherewithal needed to grow and expand our influence, but no, it seems that even the looming genocide of our people is not enough of an incentive to induce many to co-operate and we must ask why this is?
This is a question that I have been wrestling with in recent months and I think I have now identified the root of our problem, which can be explained through the following analogy:
In any population of people there are those who are prepared to co-operate and to conform and there are those that are not, and if we imagine a saucepan containing a salt water solution, the molecules of water that make up the water content of the solution represent people who are prepared to co-operate and conform, while the much smaller number of molecules of salt represent those who are not.
Under normal conditions the salt water solution maintains its volume, just as the human group it represents remains united by the will of the co-operative and conformist majority, but if the socio-political climate is made hostile and a burner is turned on beneath the saucepan, the water molecules respond to that heat by evaporating, leaving an increasingly salty solution behind, disproportionately made up of the least co-operative and least conformist individuals.
Over time, if the heat continues or is turned up, as Theresa May’s government has turned up the heat, more and more water evaporates and the solution becomes saltier and saltier until only a very densely salty residue is left composed of people who are prepared to die rather than submit to the ‘heat’ applied by the establishment.
The nationalist movement today is composed of many courageous individuals who are stubbornly resisting the pressure upon us to submit to multiracialism and accept our genocide happily, but this strength that we have, this capacity to resist and refuse to conform and co-operate with our treasonous government, is also our greatest weakness, because it makes us less predisposed to co-operate and conform — even amongst ourselves — even when our very survival and the survival of our race depends upon it.
The remainder of 2017 and 2018 will therefore see a change of emphasis within Western Spring, away from attempting to unite the nationalist movement and targeted more towards winning what the Alt-Right call ‘normies’ to our cause. If we are to build a mass movement we need to attract back the ‘water molecules’ that have floated away, and furthermore attract ‘water molecules’ that have never before occupied the ‘saucepan’ of our movement. We will direct our efforts primarily towards winning the support of people who may have never been nationalists or politically active before. There are tens of millions of them.
We will of course continue to work with those groups and individual nationalists who desire greater unity, and I am overwhelmed with gratitude and admiration for those nationalists and patriots who have already pledged themselves to our cause, but we will leave those groups who fail to respond to whatever fate befalls them.
Our raison d’etre is to secure the future survival and wellbeing of our people and to restore our people to primacy in our own land. There must be no place within our movement for people whose preoccupation with denigrating fellow nationalists over some real or imagined slight, or whose preoccupation with petty personal rivalries and jealousies, takes precedence over our sacred mission.
Are you part of the salt, or part of the solution?
By Max Musson © 2017
# # # #
JOIN WESTERN SPRING
Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:
[contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]# # # #
janet mills
- Edit
you are overlooking “know thine enemy”. the enemy has been at this since at least the 1970s and they are fanatical and well organized and they have the big bucks. I just read yesterday that the Queen is NOT happy with that Mayor of London so she understands, and that is worth something, surely. The enemy is relentless and when they suffer a loss, they just take a step back and regroup and then continue their attack again and again into perpetuity. it is a mental disorder, i’m sure. A very real example is Hillary Clinton. She has been the embodiment of that group of people, the globalists who are pushing their agenda on us, ever since its inception, and she won’t stop beating that dead horse as long as she has breath left in her. The ugly truth is that to get rid of your cuckoos and cowbirds, there is going to have to be a bloody revolution against them. otherwise they will engulf you and in many places in the UK, as you know, they already have won. But if there would be some way to get the Queen to outlaw their rabid sharia courts, that would be the way to start the beginning of the end for them. and of course, cut off their welfare. The goal of these nasty people who finances all the misery in the world is to cut the population, truly, and that means you and me and all our cousins–i.e., people who are capable of seeing the truth. Now, Vladimir Putin is a Christian and perhaps if you could arm the Christians and encourage them to guard their families, maybe you could get somewhere. You are thinking there is a rational way to overcome waves and waves of irrational people but that thought is just wishful thinking. you can understand rabies in a pack of dogs coming at you but that does not stop them.
As things stand now, I see only Tommy Robinson crying in the wilderness and no one has the courage to stand with him.
perhaps you could call yourselves “Loyalists” instead of the dirty word “nationalists” since that evokes a knee-jerk reaction. “Loyalists” could be seen as loyal to the Queen and the Royal Family which represents the English way of life, or British way of life or UK way of life or however you prefer to put it. can you petition the Queen to take steps to intervene in the destruction of your country and your way of life? Knowing that she is actually pretty put off by that phony Mayor of London is a big plus. As i have said previously, the man has no heart for England or the English or the people of London, but his heart actually lies with taking over on behalf of muslims and seeing to it that they do not have to pay for their crimes: “get used to it” is what he tells you about muslim violence. He is not an Englishman and never will be any more than a traitor who has insinuated himself into your midst with false pretenses. You would be better off and have a more loyal Mayor of London if you brought in an American or a Canadian–we have a LOT of Anglophiles who care what happens to our cousins and our original native land. That man is exactly like Obama–playing a role that ultimately will further the destruction of your country. (and don’t get me started on what a traitor that candy-ass young Trudeau is.)
Keith Axon
- Edit
My reply to Andrew Brons regarding his article in H & D MAGAZINE issue 89.
This was not printed in the last edition.
Sir,
In regards to the article in H & D issue 89 by A Brons
Unfortunately, A B does not suggest any solution or strategy towards unifying the movement into a viable electoral force. Nor does he offer any solution, to present to the public generally. Or even the possibility of perhaps a coalition of parties involved, in fighting an election, to prevent competing with each other for the crumbs that the public will throw our way.
After surveying the present state of the parties registered and able to fight elections surely these must be our priority and our foremost objectives!
The parties capable of fighting elections are:
The British National Party – whose leader is A. Walker and represents a Civic Nationalist Party.
The English Democrats – whose leader is Robin Tilbrook are also Civic Nationalists.
The British Democrats – whose leader is Jim Lewthwaite.
Patria – whose leader is Andrew Emerson.
Liberty – whose leader is Paul Weston.
Well, not one of the five civic parties will join anyone as their leaders have their fiefdoms and they want to keep them regardless to any form of unity.
Also, we have the parties listed below:
The National Front, whose leader is Kevin Bryan, and is the exception to the above is ‘A RACIAL Nationalist Party’ and not a ‘Civic’ one.
As for unity, the NF keep repeating the mantra of – ‘everyone must rejoin the Mother party’, that being the National Front.
The Britain First Party, whose leader is Paul Golding represents a ‘Civic Christian Patriotic Party’. Although this party has not yet contested any election that I know of. They do however aim to contest elections in 2018 and are building a base and will have the money, and the backup of support and a full use of social media and a street presence that will out flank any other party for its candidates.
As to street activity, they are top of the league and can turn out at a minimum 150 street activists.
Nationalist groups are not included in this list because they are just street gangs and drinking clubs. They are irrelevant as their leadership is virtually unknown and of no importance to this discussion.
But the impasse continues. Electorally all six are irrelevant to the voting public but as to the fortunes of Britain First we will need to wait and see.
So what chance is there of unity within the movement electorally? None for the foreseeable future, but I pose a question is civic nationalism a way forward?
Keith Axon
ps
For any Nationalist party to survive the wilderness year it needs to develop its socialism and Nationalism and its culture and folk history into its future strategy making it into a party of the family with cultural events to sustain it.
The present situation of electioneering and holding meetings is just not good enough.
(NB the original letter submitted to H&D has been edited)
Max Musson
- Edit
You are correct in your assessment of the ‘civic nationalist’ political parties, Keith. I did not include them in my article because the term ‘civic nationalist’ is an oxymoron. Nationalism is by definition an ideology based upon shared ancestry and therefore only racial nationalism and ethno-nationalism are genuine forms of nationalism.
.
‘Civic nationalism’ is an ideology based upon a sense of identity formed by a random assemblage of people living within a geographical area defined and governed by a single sovereign civic authority. ‘Civic’ nationalism does not distinguish on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion, recognising as fellow citizens, people of all races, all ethnicities and all religions. ‘Civic nationalism’ should correctly be termed and classified as ‘civicism’ rather than a form of nationalism.
.
Britain first could one day be led by a Sikh or a Jew or a Muslim, just as long as the individual concerned publicly swears allegiance to the Queen and pays lip-service to the idea that Britain is a Christian country, and irrespective of that person’s racial composition, be they African, Asian or Chinese. That is not nationalism, it is civicism.
Keith Axon
- Edit
First of all I am a Racial Nationalist
Well from Racial Nationalism the BNP became Civic in a small way and reached its peak in 2005/6 and then went into termanal decline because of Bad management so we now have back to squar One and no chance of any Revival on the Horizon.
As to civic nationalism BNP style achieved as a soft option to the public did make more of an advance than the Hard line Racial nationalism of the past as an example the National Front verry poor show in elections as to a big fat ZERO S what now and I pose the Question do we give up completly on Elections or just to a minimal either way the movement must unite in this and creat an even bigger than in the past A social nationalist movement built around our culture and the Family to keep the movement alive for when a more nformed and angry voteing public are more inclined to join us and more receptive to vote for us but that will not happen if the movement is Fragmented ,so a Unified movement is the only option at the momen we are in the wilderness years and it will be a verry long time.
Racial Nationalism /civic BNP style has been the only window to a small amount of power in 50 years of British Nationalism and the Leadership FAILED us all so will the movement get another chance soon ?I dought it but it might and the key to take advantage to this event when it arives will be our UNITY as a Movement and not the fragmentation of partys into partys and so on that they are just dring clubs going knowhere but down the drain of even moor isolation that is the present IMPASS.
I am shure the miniscule of minds of the present crop of so called ! leaders log onto Western Spring so perhaps they would like to comment of if not hold their heads in shame a the preside over the mess that the movement is in and do nothing to achieve a step forward to even talking to one another to achieve and creat UNITY
Max Musson
- Edit
Under pressure from the Equality & Human Rights Commission the BNP did move from racial nationalism to civicism, but this was not until 2010, just after the BNP had reached its acme.
.
BNP membership fluctuated under John Tyndall’s leadership, eventually rising to c. 1,200 in 1999 during which the party was most definitely a racial nationalist party. Its growth increased during the Nick Griffin era, with the membership rising from 2,174 in 2001, to 3,487 in 2002, to 5,737 in 2003, to 7,916 in 2004, to 9,297 in 2007, to 12,000 in 2009, then falling to 10,276 in spring 2010. We can see from this that the BNP reached its acme in 2009, just prior to the demoralising court hearings before the Equality & Human Rights Commission, just prior to Nick Griffin’s disastrous appearance on Question Time, and just prior to the decision to admit non-Whites to the party.
.
It is interesting that the total popular vote for the BNP also peaked in 2009, with 943,598 votes in the European Elections in May of that year. The total popular vote for the BNP fell in the General Election the following year to 563,743.
.
All of this demonstrates that it was the BNP’s period of racial nationalism that brought the party the largest membership and the greatest electoral success, and that the tipping point where the party went into decline occurred during the latter half of 2009 and early months of 2010 when the party moved to civicism.
Eddy
- Edit
I think Keith has put his finger on this unity nonsense by listing the various ‘Nationalist’ groups, what exactly is there to unite? Many of us had high hopes of the BDP, however, this was soon dashed when the ‘Leadership’ of this group decided to do absolutely nothing, and have steadfastly done nothing over four long years. The NF is living in the past and marching around back streets every six months is not going to move the Movement forward one inch. Many of the people who joined the BNP in its last years joined a very active party that appeared to be going places, they were not street fighters or revoluntionaries, but normal people who joined a (semi) mainstream party. Most of these people are gone forever, many were burnt when the BNP membership list was leaked etc. I don’t know what the answer is, however, I know what the answers isn’t, and that’s trying to unite various street gangs, armchair Nationalists and fantasts into a party.
Keith Axon
- Edit
Its about time Eddy for some sence but something must be dun in regards to creating a Nationalist and Culteral Folk movement of the Family for the future, and as to elections put on the back burner but the movement of the future needs traind people able to fight election in a professional way when needs arive. But in the meantime?
Walter Greenway
- Edit
Fortunately Keith, Western Spring enthusiasts have been light years ahead thinking these things through! It has been extremely frustrating waiting and waiting and waiting and watching? So much time lost so much to do. Such important issues to resolve. Personally I have been advocating leaving the sick and wounded behind for a long time now.
Max Musson
- Edit
Keith, for we nationalists to concern ourselves with thoughts of effectively contesting any kind of election within the foreseeable future, is a fatuous waste of time.
.
The socio-political environment in which we live is so poisoned against nationalism and the values underpinning nationalism that any attempt to get elected will simply be rewarded with a derisory vote. Richard Edmonds stood in a recent parliamentary election, and I recall him commenting on it afterwards, that 40,000 people voted in the constituency in which he stood, but only 40 voted for him.
.
With UKIP parked in the way, occupying the electoral niche that a nationalist political party might otherwise fill, and with civicist parties like the English Democrats and Britain First determined to contest any future election and split the vote in any likely ward or constituency, at best it will take decades before a genuine nationalist party will be in a position to start winning elections and by that time, based on current trends, we British will be in the minority across large swathes of our country and possibly across the country as a whole.
.
The electoral route is a dead end, but that doesn’t mean we should give up and it doesn’t mean that we must resort to terrorism as some meat-heads have deduced, it means we have to find another way, and thankfully we at Western Spring offer that other way.
.
We must work to acquire the Six Prerequisites. In doing so we will create militant communities composed of White people who reject multiculturalism and multiracialism, and in doing so ensure the future biological survival of many of our people. If we can avert the demographic eclipse of our people, we will then be in a position to reverse recent demographic trends and by gradually increasing the size of our enclaves and our population numbers we will be able to create the conditions in which we can win political power.
.
This plan will take a long time to complete and most of us above the age of fifty will probably be dead before it comes to fruition, but at this late stage in the genocide of our people it is the only plan that will work. I will expand more on this issue in future articles.
Johnny Leech
- Edit
It is not all DOOM AND GLOOM!
We as a nation and as a people voted to withdraw from the European Union. Yes, the British people on mass wished to be set free from the chains of a political club that would have pushed this nation probable beyond the realms of disrepair and eventual collapse. The liberal elite have been pushed back rejoice! A number of notable Nationalists never thought for one moment a patriotic ‘out’ vote was possible. Oh ye of little faith!
The political topics of the current climate have never been so nationalist: race and nation is never off the agenda! Yes, it is hard to stomach that there is no principled Nationalist movement in Britain in the main political arena.
Max mentions the height of the BNP vote in the European elections in 2009, and various other credible election results. I would say people voted BNP when they thought it could win or at minimum had a good chance of winning. In my opinion, UKIP did not kill the BNP, the leadership and followers of Griffin did that! However, there is a striking resemblance behind the crash of the UKIP vote at the last election. Almost 4 million voted UKIP in 2015 and they secured one seat and that was the horrid useless Douglas Carswell , in 2017 at the snap election with no Farage and a out vote secured just over half a million voted UKIP. The patriotic vote collapsed because the people did not think they could win!
Nationalism for along time has been incapable of building a mass party. On the other hand, UKIP looked capable of going from a very small party to potentially building a mass movement of patriotic warriors: the lack of Mr Farage could be the downfall.
I for one advocated ‘Entryism’ into UKIP and believe me there are a small number of quality Nationalists amongst their rank and file. We do not have long to save our country and our people a number of Nationalists would love to see the end of UKIP, I think that foolish! Nationalism is about ideas being amongst the rank and file of radical patriotic minded folks is where our ideas gain solid support.
We will know very soon who is to lead UKIP, there is a great possibility Ann Maria Waters the anti Islam candidate (oh yes not hard to punch holes in her cv!) could win. The mass migration of Islam to the West and Britain is a major problem to our survival in my opinion. This could be a new episode in the radicalising of British politics. Who knows what Farage and Banks will do? I very much doubt they will have an appetite to form another libertarian party? Whatever happens: it’s not all doom and gloom!
Byrthnoth
- Edit
The main problem with fringe parties that keeps them in the fringe is that they do not prepare themselves for government by doing the research needed to produce credible manifestos. To match the mainstream parties in this area would require large teams of researchers along with the cooperation of independent think tanks. A good example of this professional approach to electioneering by a semi fringe party is UKIP’s 2015 manifesto which was said to be ‘fully costed, and independently verified by independent economic think-tank the Centre for Economic and Business Research’. If one of these fringe parties actually found itself elected to government it would be stumbling around in the dark and making policy in an ad hoc way similar to the way that the Republicans tried to cobble together their alternative to Obama Care after they had won the election. We know what a fiasco that was, so if a lesser party found itself in that position it would soon loose the confidence of the public.
The other problem for the fringe nationalist parties is racial nationalism. You cannot talk about race if want to get elected, and if you do that means that you are a racist. You have to understand that the population has been subjected to relentless indoctrination since 1948 about the ultimate evil that is Nazism, and this has made the idea of ethnic nationalism repulsive to them even though European states were consciously founded as ethno states. I believe that the white British do have distinct ethnic interests which could be represented by a political party, but the public are not yet ready for such politics, so there is no point in pursuing this angle. Nevertheless, we do see politics in the US being increasingly divided along ethnic lines with the Republicans tending to be the party of the more nationalistic white majority. Such developments could occur in Britain and other developed countries.
John Bell
- Edit
Byrtnoth – you are quite right that you cannot get elected if you talk about race, but in talking about race you are at least getting a discussion started and some people may begin to think about the ideas which you are proposing. If you do not give those ideas a public platform they will be known only to those few who find their way to websites like this, or through the hate-flecked propaganda of our country’s enemies. That is why, in a recent article for Western Spring, I proposed a “Racialist Party” – simply for the propaganda shock value of the name – of course few will vote for it but they will talk about it.
Very distinct from, but providing a voter base for, such a Racialist Party would be Keith Axon’s “family and cultural” group. This would meet a need long felt in nationalist circles for a community of White British people who would support and promote each other, propagate their values and in due course – when and if the general population is no longer White and no longer British – marrying each others sons and daughters. Such a community would presumably be drawn from Max’s “normies”, that great mass of the British public which is still fundamentally patriotic and traditionalist – and I look forward to hearing how he’s going to round them up. (I have even thought of a name for such a community which is patriotic but reassuringly unthreatening – “Homeland”).
I like your name Byrtnoth. Presumably you’ve seen your tomb, walled up in Ely cathedral? Not a bad place to wait for the Day of Judgment.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
All the political strategy and cunning in the world will not get us any further without courageous and inspiring leadership. Such leadership needs courage to ruthlessly expose the lies fed to us by our enemies, those enemies who hate us. Principle amongst such lies is the absurd fairytale that our racial compatriots, the Germans, cold bloodedly murdered ‘Six Million Jews’ when in fact according to their own statistics the Jewish population was slightly raised after the end of the 2nd World War. The perpetuation of this lie has had a devastating effect on the morale of all patriotic Europeans as it has gradually seeped into the blood stream of our whole Western Civilization. The second such lie is the falsehood that “All Men are Born Equal”, stemming from the French Revolution and enshrined in the American Constitution.
The fault with many would be nationalist leaders is that they have thought, and seem to think, that they can skirt around such whoppers instead of confronting them openly.
Only by having the courage to confront the false myths of the past can we hope that a charismatic leader might emerge, inspiring a younger generation in a spiritual revolution, restoring Western Man to his true greatness.
Alec Suchi
- Edit
We must all remain positive and not despair as the future cannot be predicted with any certainty and what seems inevitable may not come to pass.
The Soviet Union’s collapse was unexpected and in earlier times The Roman Empire was considered eternal having continued for 600 years including the years of the Republic.
It is true that early successes electorally have been squandered and the situation appears bleak, but perhaps now is not the time for a new party to emerge like the Phoenix from the ashes.
Meanwhile we should use our individual and collective talents to further the Cause and from our many efforts a secure foundation may emerge.
We should welcome all those who endeavour to further the Cause and not disparage their efforts or criticise those who are not able to commit themselves to racial nationalism. This is hardly surprising following intense indoctrination over the last 70 years testifying to the evils of “racism” , that race does not exist biologically and that we are all equal.
Shaun
- Edit
I think the solution is anti-globalism.
The media has done a very good job of poisoning everyone’s minds against nationalism, to the point that any money you spend on promoting it is mostly wasted, because you only reach people who have been taught that “nationalists are Nazis”.
A lot of people don’t know what globalism is: It is the agenda of putting more and more power into the hands of fewer and fewer people. This is accomplished via so-called “free trade deals” and multinational corporate mergers and the internationalisation of the banking system. It is accompanied by the imposition of vast numbers of laws whose function is the international standardisation of products, countries and people.
Neo-liberal and neo-conservative politics both serve the agenda of globalism.
All of this is being done to suit the purposes of a tiny number of elite megalomaniacs, and I think the reason why this has been going on for such a long time is that each generation has its crop of magalomaniacal nutters and they always want the same thing – which makes it look like a conspiracy, though it’s really more like a family tradition.
A lot of the people who support globalism (such as BREXIT remain voters), don’t know that they are supporting it.
A lot of the people who oppose globalism (such as BREXIT leave voters), don’t know that they are opposed to it.
I think you can see that globalism is the opposite of traditional nationalism – by definition in fact.
Therefore if you promote anti-globalism, you are effectively promoting nationalism, but without the media stigma.
In fact if the media tries to claim that anti-globalists are just neo-Nazis in disguise, you can point out that Hitler was a globalist as well.
I realise that nationalists are concerned about things other than corporatism and the banking system, but those other things (such as repatriation) will not be possible as long as the establishment is controlled by globalists.
There is much more that one can say on this subject, but I’m trying to keep it short 🙂
Max Musson
- Edit
It’s good to see you posting comments again Shaun. 🙂