Science, Uncategorized 30th January 2014

Another “Benefit” of Race Mixing

1,656 Views 16 by Max Musson

By Frederick Dixon:

Readers of Western Spring will need no persuading of the manifold evils of race mixing, most important of which is the destruction of traditional ethnic and cultural identities. We often find cited against us the supposed advantages of “hybrid vigour” although in reality the examples given are often of peoples who are genetically very close but differ culturally – Normans and Saxons for example. We hear very little of the medical disadvantages of hybridisation between genetically very different peoples.

Some of you will have seen advertisements in the on-line editions of some newspapers for volunteers to have themselves tested to see if they could provide a bone marrow transplant for a delightful little one-year old red-head called “Margot”. Margot, the daughter of Yaser and Victoria Martini, is suffering from a very rare form of leukaemia and all attempts to find a match in the international register of donors have failed. In the Evening Standard of the 27th January we are told why:- ” the difficulty is that at least nine antigens must match and Margot has one that’s unusual…genealogy has contributed to Margot’s rare antigens, Yaser is half-Syrian, a quarter Siamese and a quarter Scottish. He grew up in Roehampton. He has a ‘funny name but is a south London boy’….Vicki, who is from Wolverhampton…is half English and half New Zealander. Yaser says ‘as the world increasingly becomes a melting pot donors become more difficult to find”.

So there, in Yaser’s words, we have the problem – for a tissue or organ transplant you must have a donor who is as close to you genetically as possible, and mixed race people with a jumble of unrelated and very different ancestries have no-one who is close to them genetically except, if they are lucky, their own siblings. This case and other like it should stand as a warning to those who might be tempted to start a mixed race family because they run the risk of placing their own children in the unfortunate position that Margot now finds herself in.

By Frederick Dixon © 2014

# # # #

16 thoughts on “Another “Benefit” of Race Mixing”

Nimble

30th January 2014 at 9:42 pm - Edit

‘is half English and half New Zealander’

I’m guessing that means Maori.

I’ve often wondered how African American fare in regards to things like bone marrow transplants, seeing as many are mixed with white genetics, but to varying degrees, so would an African American with 10% white ancestry be able to accept bone marrow from one with 20%?
1. frederickdixon
  
  31st January 2014 at 11:35 pm - Edit
  
  The woman looks completely white so she’s almost certainly one of the majority of New Zealanders of wholly British descent, but if she HAD been part Maori little Margot’s position might have been even more intractable. As for black Americans, I would guess – never having seen any information on the topic – that they would indeed have transplant difficulties.
MsBridgit

31st January 2014 at 12:17 am - Edit

Benefits of race mixing? there isn’t any, for anyone including civilization.
Steve

1st February 2014 at 2:34 pm - Edit

It proves race exists!
Shaun

1st February 2014 at 3:31 pm - Edit

This may sound strange; but I think, if it only carried on for 10 more years, miscegenation might be a good thing for the long-term survival of our race. Not all White people have great genetics; so isn’t it good that the worst of our race blend into the non-White masses.

I think there is a string correlation (according the Bell Curve) between IQ and cohabitation. In other words, stupid people go with stupid people — you get the picture. Do we, in the long term, want White women who are impressed with Zio-Negro propaganda to be the mothers of our race?

Watch Benefits Street on Channel 4. That fat thing, the chain-smoking ”community leader”, is a typical race mixer — in the short term, it may be good to offload our trash into their gene pools.

This is just my opinion, but I have had my fellow nationalists agree with me; so I may be onto something. Deep down, though, I think miscegenation is an insult to the life-force that guides all existence — White guys who go with Chinese women are just as disrespectful toward the Yellow Race as Negros are to our people when they go with trash of our race!
1. frederickdixon
  
  3rd February 2014 at 6:07 pm - Edit
  
  An interesting argument and I think I agree. We will recreate our people from the best of our race, by which I do NOT mean the prettiest, or the cleverest, or the most athletic (although I’ve no objection to any such people!) but from those who have remained faithful to our country and to our racial and cultural identity.
2. Zerstoerer
  
  5th February 2014 at 3:34 am - Edit
  
  Miscegenation is the destruction of races or a mutation into something that loses it’s adaptation to the environment, the blue eyed gene is lost forever. Do you think European’s have bad genetics?. There are plenty of other diseases and genetic disfigurements from 3rd world countries that Europeans don’t get because of our hygiene habits and standards or living. Overall I think personally the Europeans have the best genetic make up, history shown that otherwise.
Steve

7th February 2014 at 12:17 pm - Edit

I was watching a programme about the Nazi’s & their hunt for the holy grail along with their research into the origins of the Aryan race.
Obviously this sort of programme rubbishes all of that but don’t the Israelis do much the same thing looking for artefacts that prove Israel belongs to the Jews & their long history as a specific race?
Steve

7th February 2014 at 12:23 pm - Edit

If humanity was blended into a coffee coloured mass, that would make it vulnerable to one illness that would go through it like wildfire, which might be a plan.
I think the reality is that it won’t happen, that you would still have Africans & Japanese etc but Whites would disappear or at least be a very small remnant, which also could be the real plan.
It’s surprising the amount of Whites who think that might be a good thing.
Rob F

9th February 2014 at 8:16 pm - Edit

I commanded two detachments of US Soldiers in Africa. In Gabon and the Côte d’Ivoire, black American Soldiers who stated they were African-American just got laughed at.
In Zambia and South Africa they got their asses kicked.
Unless you were born and raised in Africa, then legally immigrated the United States, you are NOT an African-American.
The silliest joke ever played on a large group of people.
TheRealThunderChild AKA Sinead Connolly

22nd July 2014 at 8:23 am - Edit

Utter tosh.
Major scientific opinion is that heterogenous populations, such as in Brazil , are genetically healthier.
While this may , sometimes , make the search for bone marrow donors harder, it’s considered to actually protect against genetic tendencies or certain diseases, such as Tay-Sachs.
It might be worth you, and some of these commenters , getting an ancestral DNA test done, as it may well shatter your perceptions of “racial purity”
While I am predominately Scandinavian in my MitDNA, I share some genes with Druze Palestinians, from Galilee.

I’m very, very sorry that the Martini child is suffering, as my own father died from AML, and I think your using their horrible plight as a vector for your poor scientific knowledge and thinly veiled racism is simply repulsive.
Shame on you.
1. Max Musson
  
  22nd July 2014 at 10:08 am - Edit
  
  Scientific opinion is that genetic diversity reduces the risk of congenital illnesses and deformities where such illnesses are carried by recessive genes. However there is already plenty of genetic diversity within the White peoples of Europe and the highest incidence of congenital illnesses/deformities are to be found among the ethnic minorities who practice first cousin marriage, i.e. Asian and Jewish groups. Even the congenital disease that you cite by way of example, Tay-Sachs, is an exclusively Jewish disease.
  .
  What your ancestral DNA test has shown is that you have inherited some Mitochondrial DNA markers from populations that used to live in the Middle East and which have also contributed to the modern day Palestinian gene pool. That does not mean those ancestors were Palestinians as during the last glaciation and for some time thereafter, the climate of the Middle East was similar to that of modern day Eastern Europe and the populations that lived there (early Europeans) then migrated progressively northwards into the European peninsula.
  .
  It therefore might be worth your while researching palaeoanthropology before you try sharing your miniscule knowledge of genetics with people that have done their homework in this respect.
  .
  As for the ethics of using this story, it is entirely proper that we use such stories to educate people such as you, who would otherwise be ignorant of the truth.
2. Eric
  
  13th February 2015 at 5:03 am - Edit
  
  After reading all these comments it’s good to see that one person commenting is not a white supremacist. Let the soul of a person and their character be the compass which guides us to our lover, not the color of their skin. I can’t believe we’re still holding this conversation into the 21st century. White culture is nothing to hold onto and cherish. It is wrought with a vile history of colonization and I look forward to the day when whiteness is swallowed up.
  1. Max Musson
    
    13th February 2015 at 5:33 am - Edit
    
    So what you’re saying Eric is that when deranged White people are foolishly contemplating the obliteration of their genetic heritage through race mixing with non-Whites, that’s okay so long as they are letting their momentary infatuation with what they perceive to be that person’s soul and character outweigh any scientific or empirical evidence about that person’s racially determined genetic predispositions. But when it comes to White people choosing to mate exclusively with other Whites, that’s wrong irrespective of the nature of their individual soul or character, and you look forward to the day when Whites are extinct because of your prejudice regarding what you believe to be the racially determined genetic predisposition of White people.
    .
    You’re a hypocrite Eric and an anti-White racist.
    1. PharmaPhil
      
      13th February 2015 at 11:12 am - Edit
      
      Absolutely correct Max, if Eric said this about anyone else, he would be called a racist but it’s ok to libel Whites in this way.
      I bet he lives with all the benefits that a White society has provided.
      As for Sinead Connolly, go & live in Brazil if you think it so great & healthy, you’ll find plenty else there that stunts life expectancy.
      I’ll give it a miss, if I want a carnival I can go to Notting Hill but I won’t.
  2. MsBridgit
    
    16th February 2015 at 1:41 am - Edit
    
    “White culture is nothing to hold onto and cherish’
    
    Interesting comment….Is a Black culture something to hold onto and cherish?

Comments are closed.