An Introduction to the African Wing of UKIP

Incredibly, some supposed nationalists have suggested that in the wake of troubles within the BNP, that people should go off and join the United Kingdom Independence party (UKIP) instead, because it is “respectable” and has “basically the same policies.”

While experienced nationalists know that to be a lot of hokum, others newer to the scene may not. So for the benefit of those who don’t know, may we introduce the UKIP candidate for the Croydon North by-election, Winston Mckenzie.

Yes, despite his Anglo-Scottish name, Mr McKenzie is as black as the proverbial ace of spades.

Mr Mckenzie’s middle name should be “suitcase” because he has also been a member of the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats.

A good illustration of the level to which UKIP has “dropped” can be gained from Mr Mckenzie’s appalling, humiliating and downright embarrassing “election video” as can be seen below.

No, that is not a joke.

It is a real election video, put out by UKIP and linked from their official website.  Incredible–one might even be tempted to think that they actually want their candidate to be portrayed as a stereotypical oafish black idiot.

UKIP, of course, forbids former prominent members of the BNP from joining and once famously gave its membership list to the extremist communist Jewish supremacists at Searchlight magazine to “check over” to make sure that there were such traces of evil to be found.

Well, I suppose what else could one expect from a party whose “Team Winston” in Croydon North looks like this:

So what are UKIP’s “immigration policies” anyway? Perhaps it is time for a closer look. According to their website, their policies are as follows:

“End mass, uncontrolled immigration. UKIP calls for an immediate five-year freeze on immigration for permanent settlement. We aspire to ensure that any future immigration does not exceed 50,000 people p.a.”

This is an incredible statement, which illustrates almost all that any thinking person needs to know about UKIP’s false, lying and utterly deceitful policies.

Firstly, a “five year freeze” on immigration is pointless. What does it even mean? That after the five years, it can be a free-for-all once again?

Secondly, to even suggest that future immigration should be limited to “50,000” people per year, is just insane in itself.

Ironically, Enoch Powell used this very same figure to warn of the impact of mass Third World immigration in his famous 1968 “Rivers of Blood” speech, saying “We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population.”

Among the other meaningless drivel in the rest of the UKIP “policy,” you will also find this little gem:

“End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies.”

This is a common phrase used by those who have no deeper understanding of what multi-culturalism is or what it actually means.

Multi-culturalism is the propagation of individual cultures within the framework of a single society. It was the dream that all cultures could peacefully co-exist alongside each other, while sharing a common loyalty to a single state.

The flaw in the idea was, of course, that “certain” cultures simply have a much higher birth rate, and eventually swamp those with lower reproduction rates through simple numbers. In this way, a “multicultural” state eventually becomes a “uni-cultural” state through racial demographic displacement.

UKIP (and other uninformed people) argue that the answer to this is “do away with multicultural society.”  What does that actually mean?  It means the enforcement of a single culture – and completely ignores the reality that the “single culture” will merely be a reflection of the majority of that society.

In other words, both “multiculturalism” and its supposed opposite, uni-culturalism in a race-blind society, will have exactly the same outcome: the swamping of white people under a Third World wave.

The only alternative to “multiculturalism” is a racially-homogenous ethno state. Anything less is utterly pointless—and any “nationalists” seeking solace in the UKIP hoax are going to find themselves sorely disappointed.