By Max Musson:
A young English woman, alleged to be 19 year old Coral Millerchip, has been arrested and charged with assault by West Midlands police following an incident in the centre of Coventry on Friday between her and a Sikh man alleged to be 80 years of age.
A video of the incident was captured by a passer-by, which begins with the young woman in an already enraged state, shouting for her friends to get out of her way. Clearly something happened just prior to the start of this video, which enraged the young lady and which caused the passer-by to stop walking and begin filming what happened next.
The video then shows the young lady throw a kick at the Sikh man and as he attempts to kick back, she strikes him around the face with her hand. The Sikh man then stepped forward and appears to protest, provoking another kick at him from the girl, following which he then stepped forward again striking at her.
At this point one of the girl’s male companions began to intervene protesting that the Sikh had ‘hit a bird’, whereupon the young lady launched a final attack striking at the Sikh man and causing him to overbalance and fall onto his back. His turban fell off and the girl stood over him and the video is unclear, but she is alleged to have spat in his face.
What then caused this fracas?
Was it an unprovoked attack as the news media have claimed, or was there provocation?
The only clue comes right at the end of the video recording. As the young lady gathers up her belongings and marches off, she is heard to call back, shouting at the Sikh man, “You don’t touch my fucking tit mate!”
It is not for us to prejudge here, but there again neither is it right for the police and the mass media to prejudge, as there are obviously a number of ways in which this incident could be interpreted.
The Daily Mail apparently chose to assume that in any fracas between a White person and a member of an ethnic minority, the White person must be at fault, and so their article published yesterday stated, “The sickening and unprovoked attack was captured on video by a passer-by …”
It seems the West Midlands Police also chose to assume in advance that the White person was in the wrong, the Daily Mail quoting Chief Superintendent Andy Nicholson saying, “This is a despicable, violent attack on an elderly man in broad daylight … we’re doing everything we can to arrest the man’s attacker as soon as possible”.
Clearly the fracas was not unprovoked, because something obviously caused a passer-by to anticipate that a newsworthy event was taking place, such that they stopped to video what happened. Furthermore, while it would have been despicable if a young woman had attacked an elderly man without provocation, the video clearly records the young lady making reference to the Sikh man touching her in a manner that would constitute a sexual assault, and we should ask ourselves, what might have happened to provoke one of our daughters to such anger?
In these circumstances, the police should have reported without prejudice, that “an incident had taken place in broad daylight, involving a young lady and an elderly man … we’re doing everything we can to contact and question both parties as soon as possible”.
Similarly, the mass media should have reported the incident without bias and without a ‘knee-jerk’ assumption of guilt on the part of a young White girl who for all we know, may have responded valiantly in the face of an unprovoked sexual assault by a ‘dirty old man’, who just happened to be a Sikh.
This is England and a basic tenet of English Law is that someone is innocent until proven guilty, and all the more so when there is video evidence indicating that there is more to this story than has been reported so far.
Now the young lady involved will not be able to obtain a fair trial as the magistrates she will face on Monday, will have had their minds prejudiced by this weekends gutter press.
By Max Musson © 2013
# # # #
Anglo-Australian Alliance
- Edit
Once again we see Western Spring leading the way…
.
Top marks, Max.
rarecockney
- Edit
I watched the video evidence of this, the young woman concerned.She was angry at the alleged attempt at having her breast touched, if this is the case she had a right to be very angry Unfortunately I doubt the CPS will take this into account, I hope so.
S.ducain
- Edit
Something happened off camera, perhaps the old guy was looking at her pods and she saw him and mayvbe asked him WTF he was looking at. He might have admitted he was ogling her and she got angry. She was small or he was big. Anyway he certainly was not hurt as he got up quite quick. The whole incident wasn’t worth a mention but some tit decided to film it. That tit should be the only one charged, with incitement to racial hatred.
Credursa14
- Edit
Indeed you are right Max the media have already prejudiced the case and what we now witness is lynch mob mentality by TPTB. the MSM and the left/liberal brigade.
It won’t be long before the media who are guilty of goading and inciting violence get someone killed in a revenge attack.
Anglo-Australian Alliance
- Edit
The FACTS:
.
1) Firstly, if Chief Superintendent Andy Nicholson did indeed say what the Daily Mail allege, then in my view those words prejudicing this case, call into question his fitness to hold the rank of Chief Superintendent. Alternatively, if he has been incorrectly quoted, then he should remonstrate with the newspaper.
.
2) The Daily Mail have, along with their prejudicial trial-by-media headline, disqualified the public from posting their responses to the article by citing, and I quote, “…we are unable to accept comments for legal reasons.” And yet the Daily Express has managed to allow comments. Not only is the Daily Mail statement cowardly it is politically illiterate.
.
3) The Daily Express has now shown its true colours just as I held augurs for it due to its official anti-E.U. position.
.
4) One cannot tell from the video who the initial offender/attacker was, and yet the whores of the Establishment, “journalists”, have prejudiced the case on Monday.
.
5) Neither the Daily Mail or Daily Express gave the names of the journalists in their original report. Isn’t this interesting? It is becoming increasingly clear that journalists are now using “correspondent” or “reporter” instead of their names. A sign that they fear they may be held to account for their wretched lies, half-truth, and falsification of the facts?
Max Musson
- Edit
Sorry, AAA, I had to tone down and abridge your comments somewhat. For genuine legal reasons 😉
Steve
- Edit
Well said “AAA” & thank you Max for stating that the comment has been altered from its original format.
Franks
- Edit
If the young lady was initially sexually assaulted, then obviously she can submit a complaint to the Police and presumably she receives a Case Number?
Steve
- Edit
It would be helpful to do that if it’s part of her defence & her friends should give witness statements.
Steve
- Edit
I don’t know what the truth is in this case.
But here’s some thoughts based on my experiences.
There’s a trick used by muggers where they will go up to a victim & say “Where’s my money or give me back my phone” or variations on that.
This has several effects, one is to confuse & throw the victim off balance & also to confuse potential witnesses.
It’s extremely difficult to get a sense of right & wrong in a situation if you come into it halfway through.
As you say something made a witness start filming but again that’s tempered by whether the witness is independent or attached to the victim or perpetrator.
On the one hand a lot of people have rushed to judgement to say white must be bad & non white must be the victim.
The policeman should have been a bit more careful not to prejudge things.
But I have difficulty believing that an 80 year old Sikh would grope in public an unknown female in the company of her friends.
If he turns out to be serial sex attacker then maybe.
Also the fact that her details were in the public domain almost instantly, with “Twitterers” talking about going round to rape her, which has been a bit of theme on there lately.
Something stinks, maybe something more important is being buried?
Steve
- Edit
What was it that caused the “Cameraman” to start videoing & what is his relationship to anyone involved or is he a truly independent witness?
If so, he can give a clear but verbal picture to what triggered the incident.
S.ducain
- Edit
The Sikh wasn’t hurt at all anyway, so what’s the big deal. Far more serious is the fact that a top Policeman has apparently elected himself judge, jury and hangman. What a nerve. And what a mistake if Coral can get a decent lawyer.
Max Musson
- Edit
I believe the Sikh is reported to have suffered some bruising to his face, and yes, if the police officer concerned did say what the newspapers allege, then a good solicitor should be able to use this in Coral’s defence.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
Maybe we should all carry a video camera/ phone with reasonable recording time/ etc. Well done to whoever recorded it.
Steve
- Edit
The thing is what wasn’t recorded & the quality is poor also.
But us carrying cameras is a good idea.
Interesting side note is that in Russia, in car cameras are very popular due to bad driving & the need to prove who was at fault.
This led to an unexpected bonus in that the meteorite that fell to Earth or bits of it did, was lovingly recorded from all angles, beginning to end, which has never been done before.
Invictus
- Edit
In the video it isn’t clear whether the young woman is claiming that the old man initiated the incident by groping her, or whether she’s referring to contact during the recorded fight.
She appears to be angry about something that happened before the recording began, but we can’t be sure what that was until more information is revealed.
Despite the prejudicial comments by the police, I think it would be difficult to convince the public that Coral Millerchip is being victimised; unless the old man turns out to have done something pretty serious to her before the video was recorded.
Rerevisionist
- Edit
You think it would be difficult??? She’s in gaol.
Steve
- Edit
That’s about the only thing we know for sure.
Invictus
- Edit
I think she is being victimised in a number of ways:
1. The police made an announcement indicating that she was the aggressor before having questioned her.
2. The police used inappropriately emotive language (“despicable”) in their statement. They should use only factual terms.
3. The mainstream media condemned her in strident terms without knowing the background to the incident.
4. She was remanded in custody although the incident was relatively minor.
I think that any reasonable person would accept these points if put to them in conversation.
The problem is that if Nationalists start demonstrating to have her released; the general public, with the guidance of the mainstream media, are more likely to see it as confirmation that Nationalists favour brutality and street violence.
Steve
- Edit
I think you are correct on all points & I am worried by some peoples assumption of her innocence to the detriment of our cause & civilisation.
We need to be better than others but I understand why people back her, they are sick of non whites virtually always being favoured over whites, whether they be victims or perpetrators.
Russell
- Edit
I see the media brainwashing of calling all Muslim criminals ‘asian’ has worked, this man was Sikh, not Muslim. The paranoia in this country caused by MUSLIM grooming gangs, and our pathetic spineless media who insist on using the blanket label ‘Asian’, rather than calling them what they are ‘Muslim’, has managed to confuse every uninformed idiot out there.
Steve
- Edit
There’s a hell of a lot of double speak out there, enough for a dictionary in fact.
Joy riding, mugging, honour killing, knife/gun/gang culture, happy slapping, gay, Romanian, Asian, arranged marriage, grooming, inter faith, cultural centre, slept with, love child, feel free to add many more!
Max Musson
- Edit
I don’t think all of what you suggest is ‘double speak’ Steve, but there is as you say, a lot of it about.
Steve
- Edit
I guess most of it’s euphemisms then, another thing I notice is the softening of quite nasty things to make them sound almost benign & normal.
I think that is encouraged quite deliberately.
In hip hop & rap culture there is the use & the glorification of crime & this spreads into fashion, casual clothing.
I saw a black man the other day wearing a hoodie with the slogan “Criminal damage”, others have “Thug life” & talk about “Grime”.
The way white youth seem to adopt bits of this negative destructive culture is rather sad.
People who are constantly obsessed by crime & violence in their entertainment quite often end up with it in their real lives.
shaunantijihad
- Edit
Indeed. The media are the voice of the enemy within. Traitors and 5th columnists, in fact.
For example, “Muslim grooming “.
Why “grooming”? For it’s associations with, “Horse and groom”, “Well groomed”, and, most importantly, “Bride and groom”.
The use of the word “grooming” in this context is intended to sanitise what is in effect, the anti-White racist, paedophile rape of our young girls, and such behaviour should not be sanitised, but described as what it really is.
Dai
- Edit
If you think she or we will ever get justice your kidding yourselves. We must remove these filthy scum from office,even it it means using force.There`s no other way,is there.
AJ
- Edit
This whole article is written in a manner to make it look like the sikh guy provoked the whole thing, you are no different than the media and everyone else, you are just leaning on the opposite side. Have you have wondered that he may have touched her accidently during the fight (as part of the fight)?
Max Musson
- Edit
No, you are wrong AJ, our article is written in such a way as to point out that: SOMETHING obviously happened prior to the beginning of the video clip, which provoked Coral Millerchip to anger; her remark at the end of the video recording suggests that she believes she had been touched inappropriately by the old man; and that as a consequence, her attack upon him was therefore NOT UNPROVOKED in the way that the media claimed.
Jessie
- Edit
Anyone who thinks a 19 year old beating on an old weak dementia patient is just as sick and twisted as the attacker themselves. I cannot believe anyone thinks beating a man 80 years of age to that point is called for. Shame on you. If the elderly man was an elderly caucasian male would your response be different? Please think before you speak. The 80 year old male passed away three months after this attack. RIP and shame on anyone who thinks this attack was justified. Also she has to stand trial for a burgalry before she can for this attack. Thank you for leaving that important peice of info out in this “article”.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Jessie, our article did not attempt to justify what had taken place between Coral Millerchip and her elderly Sikh adversary, we simply asserted that it was wrong for newspapers and the police to automatically assume that the White girl involved was the guilty party and convey the impression that the incident was unprovoked.
.
If any information was left out of our article it was because that same information had not been released into the public domain at the time.
.
You claim that the Sikh man was a dementia sufferer, but this information was not released at the time of the incident, neither has there to my knowledge has there been a press release to the effect that he has since died.
.
Our article stated that something had obviously happened to enrage Coral Millerchip and which did not feature in the video evidence. If the Sikh man was a dementia sufferer then it is quite possible that he did something that would have sparked Millerchip’s anger, and after all, just like us, she was not to know that he was a dementia sufferer, he did not have a sign hanging around his neck to warn others, and most noticeably, he was not accompanied by a minder who might have intervened to stop him doing anything stupid and to make others aware of his mental condition should that be necessary.
.
My experience of dealing with elderly dementia sufferers in a professional capacity is that they are often known to behave in a sexually inappropriate manner. Coral Millerchip’s final words in video used in evidence, indicate that she believed she had been sexually assaulted. Whether or not this was the case, we cannot tell, but I suspect some at least of the anger that you project onto Coral Millerchip and onto us, results from the guilt felt by the Sikh community that they apparently let an 80 year old dementia sufferer wander around Coventry city centre unaccompanied, and through their neglect he came to be hurt.
Steve
- Edit
Now that’s an interesting twist to the story that I have not heard mentioned anywhere else & gives an angle on it that I hadn’t thought of.
It’s highly irresponsible to allow dementia sufferers to wander round in public unsupervised, I hope someone is held accountable for that.
Steve
- Edit
Why not have an opposing viewpoint if the MSM are so on one side?
I’m still in the middle with this whole thing as certain things have not been clarified & I hope something more definite comes out.
Is the cameraman a truly independent witness, what caused him to start filming?
Maxone42
- Edit
I don’t care if he raped her. You do not do this to an 80 year old person. Do not try to find justifications , because this despicable act is NOT justifiable no matter how you look at it.
That is just a poor educated, vicious, unemployed drunken society scumbag who deserves at least 20 years of hard labor. Stop looking for excuses for despicable things a human being simply DO NOT DO.
Max Musson
- Edit
There are a lot of fathers of young girls that fell victim to Jimmy Savile that might take issue with you over the rape/sexual assault thing Maxone43, and if the old man had been a Nazi war criminal you would have legions of Jews queuing up to pull the lever on the gallows, no matter how old he was. Therefore, depending upon the act committed and the circumstances of the case, lots of people actually do feel it proper to punish 80 year old men.
.
In any event, you have completely missed the point I was making, which is that there should be no presumption of guilt before the trial and there should have been no presumption that Millerchip’s actions were ‘unprovoked’. Only someone who was there would have known what happened and I’m assuming that like me, you weren’t there to witness what happened either. The clue is in the title of my article – the presumption of innocence – which is a basic tenet of English Law – innocent until proven guilty.