By Frederick Dixon:
We stand on the brink of a new year, full of perils for our nation but possibilities for nationalism. The perils, apart from the ever continuing erosion of our nation through mass immigration and contamination of our gene pool by miscegenation, are two and both give rise to uncertainties pregnant with possibility:-
1/ The expected invasion of Balkan gypsies. It may be that it doesn’t materialise, but it almost certainly will and on a scale to dwarf the expectations even of such professional pessimists as Migration Watch. These gypsies have been a running sore in the countries of south eastern Europe for centuries and it beggars belief that our country has become encumbered with governments which have contrived to transfer the problem to our shores! It is not for me to speculate whether this has happened through governmental malignity, negligence or both.
That this invasion will help to bring about substantial gains for UKIP – even an outright victory – at the Euro elections in May is universally expected by commentators. Almost as universally expected is that the same elections will bring about the final eclipse of the BNP. This is a cause for sadness in all of us who pumped so much hope and work and money into the 2009 campaign, but that so many are now prepared to vote for a Party – UKIP – identified with opposition to mass immigration, and because of that opposition, is a very hopeful sign.
A UKIP victory and a similar victory for the FN in France, also widely anticipated, will bring Britain’s exit from the EU much nearer. It is beginning to look more than likely that either Britain will leave the EU within the foreseeable future or that organisation will cease to exist in its present form. Whatever form the change takes it will have come about because of the pressures generated by mass immigration.
2/ The second peril is the forthcoming referendum on Scottish independence. At the present time the opinion polls point to a “no” vote, but Alex Salmond is known as a formidable late campaigner, and it seems that Cameron’s advisers are expecting a “yes” vote. If “yes” is what we get, the whole concept of Britishness will have to be re-thought, may indeed have to be abandoned. That in turn will have consequences for us as racial nationalists. We may never have accepted the multi-racial, multi cultural redefinition of Britishness or the reality of British troops being attacked by dusky “Britons” in far away places, but we have become used to it. We, of course, are the “real British”, but we are also English, Welsh, Scots or Irish and, to their credit, ethnic minority UK citizens do not usually claim to be English etc. because they recognise that these are the names of ethnicities to which they do not belong. But what happens if they can no longer call themselves “British”? Will they claim our ethnic names for themselves, in yet another theft of our identity? And what will that mean for us?
Our nation, its institutions, our racial and cultural identity, all are in a state of flux which has no precedent in our history. What will come out of these revolutions? It is far too soon to tell, but revolutions are perilous times for establishments; we may have no recent experience of revolutions but our continental neighbours have plenty, and they know that when traditional establishments break up anything can happen. As nationalists for whom love of race, nation and country is everything, we must be ready.
May I take this opportunity to wish a very happy new year to all racial comrades!
By Frederick Dixon © 2013
# # # #
Cry Havoc!
- Edit
I pray for a revolution in my lifetime. A revolution that will see our country back in the hands of our folk; with “enrichers” being “persuaded” to leave.
England Expects
- Edit
Nationalism faces many of the same problems that the current political elite faces with regards to the potential change in the status of our “United Kingdom” and we must prove the movement to be more adaptable and a viable alternative to the current system.
When you consider the fact that the Welsh have stood alone in a bid to secure recognition of their own identity and now so are the Scottish it is imperative that the English start concentrating on their own identity post haste. The Welsh and Scottish identity quest has fallen into place along civic lines in a manner of left wing nationalism but that will have to rapidly change if as and when this devolution happens, if it doesn’t their own goal will be the cause of their rapid demise as nations.
Both Scotland and Wales have been happy to secure a separate civic identity under the protective wing of England posing as a United Kingdom but the fact of the matter is that if this devolution goes ahead as the author rightly points out there is going to be a massive issue with the modern identification of non native British citizens.
All of this is happening and regardless of what the liberal controlled media might portray to its herds the system as we know it has changed beyond that of one that is suitable for the protection, governance and rule of the English people. With that in mind we must move towards the formation of parallel structures within our own communities, autonomous groups all prepared to cooperate within a wider society based on the support of our own communities looking to secure a future for our people, a place within our own land working alongside European counterparts facing the same struggle as their European dictatorship crumbles.
The sun has set on the golden age of Britain, many older nationalists must start to see that our youth have not witnessed or experienced the days of good times and prosperity and have been brought into this land stripped of a basic right: Identity. Britain Has gone and it isn’t coming back, that is demographically impossible now so the push must be towards securing a community structure focussing on support, governance, education and a future for the English people, Scottish and Irish as separate nations prepared to co-operate.
Forget this system ever being able to support our people, it hasn’t, it wont and as it stands now it cant even support itself, why bother even trying to take part in its charade, look forward and think along the lines of survival as a nation within a nation as that is what is going to happen.
Lets claim the term English now as its ours not a term for the political elite to award to all non native Britons who will have no title if devolution goes ahead.
Max Musson
- Edit
It is pointless reclaiming the English identity as a banner to fight under, as this merely alienates those people of Scots, Welsh, Irish and other European nationalities that would otherwise fight on our side. We must stop thinking in terms of now defunct nationalities and embrace a racial outlook. We must be White nationalists, fighting for the survival of White people and through that struggle securing the survival of all of the indigenous White people of these British Isles, the continental mainland of Europe and the areas of European/White racial settlement elsewhere in the world.
.
Blair, Cameron and Co., have rendered the terms ‘British’, ‘English’, ‘Irish’, ‘Scots’ and ‘Welsh’ redundant as any featherless biped from anywhere in the world, who holds the requisite passport, can now claim membership of those nations. However a non-White cannot claim to be White and as Martin Webster prophesied many years ago, in the struggle that lies ahead, ‘our uniform will be the colour of our skin’.
England Expects
- Edit
The Scots are Scots, the Welsh are Welsh the Irish are Irish the English are bastards according to the liberal media. Why is that? Because the English identity is the key to Westminster domination.
No one fears British nationalism, its arguable on a civic basis. No one fears Scottish or Welsh nationalism as it does not demographically change the power base in Westminster, they can go or stay and it makes no odds to the elite.
The English waking up to reclaim rights and their identity is crucial in as much as they are the demographic majority that keeps the liberal elite in power. Its the foundation stone which is why the English are denied the same rights of governance as the Welsh and Scott’s, it would render Westminster useless.
At the end of the day you are highlighting the need for help from the Scots and the Welsh as important, I said co-operation is key but why would they even want to assimilate with people who don’t even know who they are and have no national pride? Obviously they don’t as they are trying to split now as we speak.
Co-operation between European brothers is essential but each and everyone one will have their own identity also. You will not get a Frenchman to deny he is French or a German to deny he is German, they will be happy to align under a wider umbrella organisation alongside us all but each will have their own identity. That is natural and so neither would anyone expect the English to hide from who they are and they would all think more of us for having the balls to do so.
Max Musson
- Edit
I’m not suggesting that we should deny who we are, I am simply stating that the time for local nationalisms to be of paramount importance in defining our identity are long gone. We White people are under genocidal attack in whichever part of the world we live. We are a rapidly diminishing minority within the world and we must unite as White people and Europeans first, if we are to survive.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
An England Scorned https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4nFL0-0vU8&feature=plcp
Steve
- Edit
British as a word is quite devalued as almost anyone can now get away with describing themselves as such.
I see myself as English & an European in the racial sense rather than being pro the EU.
Steed
- Edit
I agree wholeheartedly with England Expects, and – with maximum respect – disagree with Max here. I do not wish to see the multitude of unique white subcultures disappear – that, to me, is merely a step towards the ‘Global race’ that our (mis)leaders desire. White nations must of course work closely with mutual respect, but with the option to retain their independence.
.
We are lucky – when compared to Germany, Sweden or France – that we have had an civic umbrella identity called ‘Britishness’ with which to keep non-whites at bay. As England Expects said, they don’t tend to claim ‘English’, ‘Scottish’ or ‘Welsh’ as their identity, but ‘British’. That’s because there is currently no such thing as an English passport or citizenship. England is a purely ethno-cultural term and requires a measurable blood credential.
.
However, I and others have long predicted that the UK government intend to do the same to the ‘English’ (Welsh, Irish, and Scots) identity that they did to the ‘British’ identity; they’ll undermine it by applying it to all who live on English soil. We must fight that tooth and nail.
Max Musson
- Edit
Steed, you demonstrate the flaw in your argument in the last paragraph of your above post. The UK government will apply the term ‘English’ to whomsoever they please and with the support of the mass media the term will become generally accepted to encompass non-Whites with UK passports. The name under which we fight for freedom and self-determination must be racial, so that non-White are by definition excluded.
Steed
- Edit
Yes Max, but the fact that the State intends to undermine the English identity does not mean we should stop fighting them for it. That’s exactly my point – we’ve all but lost the British identity, and now we have a second chance with the English (and Scots, Welsh, Irish) identity(s).
.
No-one in their right mind would oppose the idea of working closely with other European, British and Colonial nations. I agree with you wholeheartedly there. There should be no conflict between the nations of Britain, but I personally have no interest in merging my identity 100% with a white Pole or Irishman. Others can choose to, if they wish, but there will always be an England so long as just a few English bloodlines remain and choose to hold onto that identity.
Max Musson
- Edit
Agreed!
MsBridgit
- Edit
We also have a civic identity called Britons that cannot be stolen from us.One cannot be a mixed race Briton or a Sudanese Briton it is too silly for words.
MsBridgit
- Edit
The only answer I can see is partition. How this occurs is immaterial, but multiculti was never going to work and I suspect was never meant to work it is a death sentence for any race, any people or any country.
frederickdixon
- Edit
I completely agree, and hope to make this issue the subject of another article shortly.
(p.s. Max won’t like it being a White nationalist rather than an English nationalist, but he’s a good sort – most of the time – so maybe he’ll publish it!)
Max Musson
- Edit
I will of course publish your forthcoming article Frederick and I would like to state for the record that I am not entirely unsympathetic to the arguments you and others here are making, I am after all an Englishman. My belief however is that we English are simply the largest and most numerous of the four indigenous tribes of the British Isles and that tactically, it is better for us to engage the support of our Welsh, Scots and Irish brothers and our cousins on the mainland of Europe and elsewhere, by expressing a pan European nationalism, rather than being too insular in outlook.
Tony L
- Edit
1) The gypsy invasion will probably result in UKIP doing well. That won’t bring our EU exit much nearer at all. That decision needs to be made at Westminster. Parliamentary elections are notoriously hard to crack.
2) This is the more interesting possibility. If Scotland goes it alone, then having lost its Scottish MPs, Labour cannot win election to Parliament for a while. The Tories will have it all their own way, but that may encourage Tory protest votes to UKIP knowing that they won’t let in Labour.
Steve
- Edit
If an “independent” Scotland has to renegotiate with the EU over its membership, why won’t we?
It amazes me that there are Scottish people who think that Scotland will be independent in any meaning of the word.
frederickdixon
- Edit
You’re right that Parliamentary elections are hard to crack and it would be surprising if UKIP manages to land any seats in 2015. The importance of UKIP, though, lies in the very justified fear that it inspires in the Tories. UKIP has already succeeded in dragging the debates about immigration and the EU (the two debates are really one debate so long as we remain in the EU) well to the Right, and various Conservative politicians are already positioning themselves for post-Cameron – most obviously Boris who has more than once expressed the view that we could do very nicely outside the EU, thus setting himself up for a deal with Farage.
Labour is not that solid on the EU either, and will become less so as gypsy thieves, beggars and prostitutes begin to infest the areas where their Moslem clients have their homes and businesses. There are already mutterings and they will get worse – note that Labour voted for the recent restrictions on benefits for immigrants.
So, all in all I’m hopeful that we might be out of the EU within the foreseeable future, and in fact we have to get out because we are finished as a recognisably English society if we do not re-establish control of our borders pretty soon.
LEMMYHEAD
- Edit
If the Scots vote ‘yes’ it will be really good for them. In the short term. They will be treated exactly the same as the Irish. Expect the ‘Tartan Tiger’. It will be a false dawn as the Irish found out. The oil that they claim to be theirs will fall into the hands of others through debt. Salmond will enthusiastically go along with the NWO agenda.
The other side of a ‘yes’ vote is what will the Unionists do? Have you ever seen a Rangers match? For these Loyalists the Union is not about borders but their whole existence. The Union for them is their culture. A culture of their history and sacrifice not a mere political name. The Scottish Unionists are strongly aligned with the Ulster Unionists. We have all seen the results of trying to separate Ulster from the UK. A ‘yes’ vote may see a return of the Para-Military elements but with an additional new Scottish element and they might also receive support from Unionist extremists south of the border.
Then the cat would be amongst the pigeons.
Max Musson
- Edit
We live in interesting times, LemmyHead. Once the Union is destabilised, all sorts of old wounds may be re-opened and anything could happen.
Steve
- Edit
In the supermarket I had a look at the headlines of papers I wouldn’t pay for & saw one ridiculous assertion that Romanians are being brought here to fill a skills shortage & the usual doing jobs that the British won’t do.
A Romanian plumber or the like probably won’t be up to the same level as someone trained here.
I have heard of Polish workers who were cheap but the work had to be redone as it was so poor.
England Expects
- Edit
Max, you are right on a Europe wide scale but missing I feel the respect and importance of true identity to each and every people.
We must all co-operate but also must be true to who we are.
We must educate but not force issues, we must teach not indoctrinate and offer support not dictate as this is imperative to all our futures.
Nationalism has been riddled as you well know with arguments, disagreements, ideological fall outs and ego battles. This is in the main exasperated by differences of opinions over base level issues.
The answer to this is to not just build a movement and a future top down but also bottom up and that means back to basics and keeping it simple. As things decline many people will not start looking into deep thesis’s and political psychology they will assimilate with basic motives, survival and identity. Any movement that seeks to override basic instincts will be surpassed.
Groups and parallel structures will manage to co-operate much better if they are based on a firm foundation of who and what they are rather trying to convince them they are anything else or different and with an emphasis on co-operation rather than domination between factions the next step forward might be one in the RIGHT direction.
Max Musson
- Edit
I do not argue with that, but I sense a number of people mistakenly believe that the adoption of English nationalism will somehow act as a magic talisman rapidly bringing us previously unexpected levels of support. I don’t believe this is the case however, and as I have stated, undue emphasis on Englishness, if it is badly handled could lose us support that we might otherwise enjoy.
.
I do however adopt a pragmatic approach. I am an Englishman and have strong feelings of patriotism towards the English; but I am also a Briton with strong feelings of patriotism towards all of the indigenous peoples of these British Isles, including the Southern Irish who I still regard as British, culturally and racially, if not politically; and I am a European with strong feelings of patriotism towards the kindred peoples of Europe. For tactical reasons I will therefore support any one or more of the above if it will bring us victory sooner rather than later as the victory of any one should produce a domino effect eventually setting all of Europe free.
Steve
- Edit
As one writer has commented, if the Scots vote for Independence it will be the end of Labour as a viable force in Westminster. This may be in our favour as when the Tories/UKIP cock the job up, which they most certainly will there will be a place for the political arm of, say, Western Spring if you have had time to put your plans in place.
Michael Woodbridge
- Edit
As Jonathan Bowden once said, “The more English, Welsh Scottish or Irish you are the more British you are. The more British you are the more European you are”. Race is the essence of all European identity but it has to be expressed culturally through our historical homelands.
Sir Oswald Mosley made the mistake of painting with too broad a brush. He rightly offered an inspiring vision of a united Europe but was too inclined to overlook the passionate concerns of those strongly attached to their own particular culture and history.
This is an ideological problem to this day. For example, those who follow in Mosley’s legacy, and I include myself in this, are often too inclined to ignore, or even sneer, at the genuine patriotic and heart felt concerns of UKIP supporters.
Shaun
- Edit
I have family up in Scotland and I have found the people up there to be hyper-nationalistic and hyper-anti-English. They have a selfish, paranoid nationalism that has very little to do with race.
Of course, the Scottish are White. No one is doubting that, but only a small amount of these people would be prepared to submit their national identity for a racial identity. The NWO people will have to be careful up there, however: Scottish civic nationalism will turn into racial nationalism if they don’t adopt the right tactics.
As for what Mr. Musson believes about ethnic nationalism I agree: it is pathetic. All White countries and ONLY white countries are being destroyed. It makes sense to forget our differences.
I have much more in common with a Greek than a Nigerian. I have more in common with a Scot than a Jew. Yes, White nationalism is my belief.
Our race, however, are often petty — in the truest sense — when it comes to nationalist identities, so this has to be understood and overcome.
England Expects
- Edit
It makes sense to be prepared to forget our differences on a wider scale if as and when the time comes, until then………