Whites Should Reject the False Idea that Hitler and the Nazis were Evil

Ask yourself this Whitey:  Wouldn’t Whites be better off today if Hitler and the Nazis had won WWII?

Answer the above question AS a White–that is, for you personally and for your own White family–and not in universal terms or about what is good for lumpen humanity or other kinds of humans.

I emphasize the point about answering personally AS a White because when asked questions about such things, too many Whites are conditioned to answer in universal terms and they’ll babble some socially acceptable (but wrong) answer about how Hitler and the Nazis killed so many (lumpen) humans or various non-White peoples and were just plain evil.

When it is pointed out that war was forced on Hitler and he was defending WHITE people and WHITE interests, they try to deny this very real truth and revert to universalist clichés and usually spout off with the expected anti-White bromides disguised as  anti-Hitler and anti-Nazi nonsense that has been force fed them for years.   In reality, if you are against what Hitler and the Nazis really stood for, then you are against Whites and our survival, expansion and evolution along a White trajectory.  Or more simply, you are against Whites and your own best interests.  And, if you are against Whites and your own best interests one has to ask if you are just stupid or just a neurotic self-hater?

The first law of nature that applies to all organisms is self-preservation, which really means preserving your genome (aka your DNA code).  Only those who are insane don’t work for their own preservation.

Frankly, when I hear some brainwashed Whites spout off universal nonsense about humanity I immediately get a cartoon picture in my mind about red squirrels saying such nonsense about grey squirrels in their midst who are displacing the red squirrels and driving them towards extinction, but who the red squirrels have been conditioned to believe are just like themselves. “Why, red squirrels and grey squirrels all bleed red blood and that means we are the same.”

Whites need to deprogram ourselves from harmful universalist thinking and we need to start using more particularistic thinking that will have us looking out for ourselves. This means that what is good for Whites generally is good for each of us as White individuals and for our White families.  The easiest way of saying and thinking this is that we need to ask of everything: Is this good for Whites?

To be clear, non-Whites and their business and their fates are not our White business unless they pose a danger to us. We must remain separate from them and even try to be completely isolated from them if we can.  We must not mix their interests with our interests and we must not interfere in their affairs; instead we must be indifferent to them as we are indifferent to various other organisms that are not our kind.  This doesn’t mean that we must be impolite, hateful or cruel, but it does mean that we must only look out for ourselves and let other kinds look out for their kind. This is what nature (or God) has set up as part of the natural way of things.  Being a good, just and compassionate White person means, in part, to mind your own White business and leave other kinds alone to their own business.

Related to the above questions about Hitler and the Nazis are questions about racial diversity.  If asked their opinions about racial diversity, too many Whites will give you the company line that racial diversity is wonderful. They will often couch this in some sort of universal terms or will say that racial diversity is great because it has helped Blacks or brings people together, or some variations of these.  But, if you persist and ask them to tell you how diversity is good for themselves and their White families, they can’t give you any sort of rational answer. The reason for this  is that racial diversity is not good for Whites and it is actually  one of the major dangers we face for our continued survival as Whites.

Had the Nazis won the war would we now see our formerly all White lands being invaded by millions of non-Whites who are causing our genocide, by directly killing us in some extreme instances but also by miscegenating with us and turning our White genome non-White? Of course not.  Whites would be much better off today had the Nazis won.  And, remember, the Nazis were our White brothers, sisters and cousins.  They were not alien to our White kind and they wanted to prevent evil miscegenation and the destruction of the White genome and they also wanted to improve it.

So, what did many brainwashed non-German Whites do back then?  They went to kill their White brothers, sisters and cousins while siding with non-Whites and non-White interests.  They took too short a view of existence instead of using their brains to realize that it was not and never is in their best interests to help non-Whites against Whites. They were like red squirrels who fight other red squirrels for the benefit of grey squirrels.

Awakened Whites understand the above and know it’s true because awakened Whites understand some of the basics of nature and evolution.  And, among these basics is the fact that all organisms must struggle to survive and exist and the greatest danger for the continued existence of any particular kind of organism is usually similar organisms that can breed with them and thereby alter their genome and thus cause them not to be as they are and to be replaced.  And, that is genocide and extinction.

Here, again, are the three most important quotes for Whites:

“[T]he varieties of mankind are so different that similar differences found in any other animals would warrant their classification in different species, if not in different genera.” –Charles Darwin

“Living organisms must necessarily compete, for food, for mates and for living space, especially with other members of their own species [i.e. those they can breed with]. They must avoid predators and other dangers. For all these various reasons, some will leave more offspring than others, and it is the genetic characteristics of such preferred replicators which will be passed on preferentially to succeeding generations. This is the essence of natural selection.” — Francis Crick (Nobel laureate and co-discoverer of the shape of DNA) Emphasis added.

“Man is something that shall be overcome. Man is a rope,tied between beast and overman – a rope over an abyss. What is great in man is that he is a bridge and not an end.”– Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra

By H. Millard © 2017

# # # #

JOIN WESTERN SPRING

Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

# # # #

 

29 thoughts on “Whites Should Reject the False Idea that Hitler and the Nazis were Evil

  1. Hitler stopped Europe from being overrun by Communism, but sadly only temporarily. As Patton stated “We defeated the wrong enemy.” Even the Telegraph published an article in 2008 in which it was claimed that Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied policy.

  2. People really need to understand that if Germany had won WWII, we wouldn’t be facing ANY of the problems we’re facing today, Hitler was trying to prevent them exactly – he could se what the future held, as any sane person in his circle could, and just we can now.
    We could have different problems today, of course, no age is without its problems, but at least Whites wouldn’t be facing extinction, which means, we could solve the problems and rebuild, no matter if our societies faced the most disastrous of collapses, because Society is a phenotype of its genotype, its people.

    1. If we unquestioningly accept the traditional Holocaust narrative then what you say is true, however, as each year passes more and more evidence becomes available calling into question that narrative. If those tried and found guilty at the kangaroo courts that were the Nuremburg trials were to be retried today, with an impartial judiciary and normal standards of jurisprudence, there is every reason to believe that the vast majority, if not all, would be found not guilty due to insufficient evidence and the preposterous nature of many of the charges. See: http://www.westernspring.co.uk/is-it-time-for-the-rehabilitation-of-national-socialism/

      1. Breaking The Spell – The Holocaust: Myth & Reality written by Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom is an excellent appraisal of the subject.
        ISBN10:1-59148-071-X
        ISBN13: 978-1-59148-071-6
        Castle Hill Publishers
        As the doctor himself notes the quickest way to get expelled from University is by exploring the truth using scientific methods.
        We truly have a wicked bunch of Zionists ruling over us when they stoop so low as to manipulate the expulsion of such a noble scientist. But on the bright side at least the good doctor didn’t have his car brake pipes cut – at least not yet!

  3. The conventional accounts of WW2 and the Holocaust are questionable and are a basis of undermining the legacy both of National Socialist Germany, and also European culture and values in general. National Socialism was immensely popular in Germany and well respected by many people in other countries but its undoubted successes and benefits to its people threatened international vested interests. From those circumstances a justification was sought to wage war against Germany, and in the process a whole litany of fabrications were before, during and later after the war, culminating in the Nuremburg Trials.

  4. The fact that German’s who innocently question the fairytale about 6,000,000 Jews being gassed by the National Socialists are still incarcerated, 70 years after the War, should in itself be sufficient evidence to throw contempt on the whole “holocaust” claim.
    However, whilst completely in agreement with H. Millard’s general thrust I’d like to question two aspects of his thesis. Firstly, there is the minor matter of nomenclature…
    While it’s inevitable that the term “Nazi” will always be applied to National Socialists it has nevertheless become a term of disapprobation used by our racial enemies; so with all due respect to Lincoln Rockwell who named his group, “The American Nazi Party”, we might prefer to use the more accurate description, National Socialist. After all Marxists don’t refer to themselves as “Commies”.
    My second question, while not undermining Millard’s advocacy of White survival, is more profound. That is, are we really to believe that our whole purpose on this planet amounts to no more than a struggle for survival? Is life outside society in Thomas Hobbes words, “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”? (Incidentally Hobbes lived to the ripe old age of 91)
    Of course, I appreciate that Mr. Millard might reply that ours is an evolutionary purpose, but is life really so bleak that we can’t bask in the glory of nature’s diversity? Has our race by virtue of its superiority no responsibility to assume the role of Nature’s guardian and thereby take some controlling interest in the welfare of other peoples?

  5. I am sure Hitler was made aware of Coudenhove-Kalergi’s plan and sought ways to stop them.

    I spoke to a German resident in Scotland three years ago, who has since become an acquaintance. He was a Bavarian Green Party activist, self loathing and was planning to vote in favour of Scottish independence.

    I asked him (Dieter) for his reasons for supporting Scottish independence and he he told me that he supported the idea of the Europe of the regions (at the expense of the nation state) and that he feared that England would vote heavily enough to drag the entire UK out of the EU and that he would be forcibly expelled from the UK.

    Dieter was not pro German at all. He suffered from a self loathing complex. He told me about the several school trips to Auschwitz and that Holocaust guff. Funnily enough he actually liked the English and even boasted about the 1945 Allied bombings of Dresden.

    Anyway, I found an article in the Daily Telegraph (now removed) dated 31st August 2014 by Sean Thomas titled “The self loathing of the British left is a problem for us all”. I forwarded this to Dieter and he instantly recognised the problem we face … He was horrified at what the left had done to Britain. I then turned the article the other way round and wrote a German version of it how it applied to the Germans. To my surprise Dieter actually listened to me and showed the first signs of a long overdue realisation. I gave Dieter a lot a time and attention as I realised that he could be saved from self loathing.

    I wrote an article “German self loathing is a problem for us all” …… I let the cat out of the bag. Dieter wrote to me three days. He told me, “You are right. We have been all been tricked into hating ourselves. You Englanders and we Germans have tricked into hating ourselves”. I told Dieter it didn’t matter which way he voted in the Scottish referendum as either way would lead to an upsurge of English patriotism.

    I sent Dieter copies of the Jay Report into Rotherham … He was realising how duped he was, how conned he was and that we all shared the same for … The jewish origin Bolshevik atheist.

    I told Dieter how climate change policies had only redistributed money from the west to east with the east free to manufacture and pollute as much as they like while we pay for our own asset stripping and job losses.

    From Bovarian Green activist to AfD supporter Dieter has now returned to recognise his true Germanic spirit. He is more than happy with Theresa May’s offer allowing 3.5 million continental residents full rights after Brexit.

    It can be done.

  6. My Grandad on my Mums side would say in the 60s, We would have neen better off if Germany had won the War.
    And I agree.

  7. Frederick Dixon

    - Edit

    It was with shame and dismay that I encountered this piece of political necrophilia on a website with which I had been proud to have been involved since its inception.

    Nothing is more utterly wrong headed than the statement that Hitler was defending White people and White interests. Hitler attacked White people, and White countries, and ONLY White countries, in his determination to build a German empire. It was his intention, which he went a long way to putting into effect, to exterminate, enslave, deport or (if they were lucky enough to be sufficiently Nordic) Germanise and absorb, scores of millions of perfectly good White, Christian Europeans. Poles, Czechs and Slovenes, Lithuanians, Latvians and Estonians, Russians, Belarussians and Ukrainians – all were condemned to this fate. Even his fellow Germanics – Scandinavians, Dutch and Flemings were to lose their countries and their nationalities as they were absorbed into his planned “Greater Germanic Reich of the German Nation”.

    So “Ask yourself this Whitey: Wouldn’t Whites be better off today if Hitler and the Nazis had won WW2?” Not if you belonged to one of those White nations you wouldn’t!!

    It was a monstrous vision which would have brought nothing but oppression and death to the White race. As it was. eighty million people, overwhelmingly White, perished in this “defence of White People and White interests”.

    His baneful effect upon the White race did not end even there. Guilt obsessed political correctness is in large part a reaction to Hitler’s excesses, while those excesses in turn have destroyed the moral foundation for race based resistance to cultural Marxism.

    We all know, or we should know, that there is in fact a perfectly good moral foundation for our case, that traditional racial and cultural identities and the homelands which support them are benign things, necessary for our contentment as a people. The events of more than seventy years ago in central Europe should be utterly irrelevant to where we are now in Britain – yet here we are, dragged back again into the graveyard of a long dead cause, serving no purpose but to utterly undermine us yet again.

    1. Absolute rubbish!
      Traitor Winston Churchill was in on Count Coudenhove- Kalergi’s plans and prefaced at least one of his books – An Idea Conquers the World.
      From Coudehove’s – Prakatischer Idealismus :-
      “The man of the future will be the cross-breed. The Pan-European will be of the Eur-Asian Negroid race, similar in appearance to the ancient Egyptians, and of these the Jews will form a new aristocracy of spiritual grace”
      Churchill and Tony Blair have much in common.

      1. Frederick Dixon

        - Edit

        Presumably this was the same Churchill who wanted the Tories to fight the 1951 general election under the slogan “Keep Britain White”?

        Really, is it not time for Hitler nostalgics to form their own little clique and take themselves off to, say, the Cotswolds, where they can dress up in silly uniforms and stamp around to their hearts’ content bellowing orders at each other? Meanwhile the rest of us, blessedly free from a presence which contrives to be both poisonous and pitiful at the same time, can get on with building a nationalism which is suitable for Britain in the twenty first century rather than Germany in the thirties.

        1. I do think you are being unfair in condemning those who see merit in Mr Millard’s article as nostalgic Nazis. As someone who bought fully into the post WW2 Allied narrative of National-Socialists as psychopaths and oppressors, it came, with the advent of the information superhighway, as a shock to discover that the narrative was full of untruths, half-truths, distortions, exaggerations, and in too many cases downright lies.
          What relevance to our many problems of today does knowing that the 6 million was falsehood? Well in my case it makes me question almost every news item that the globalists and their acolytes in politics and the world media claim as fact. Does anyone actually believe the blatherings of the Governor of the Bank of England on the economy who contradicts himself every other sentence? Does anyone believe Assad is preparing another gas attack on women and children? Does anyone believe diversity and immigration is good for Europeans and their culture? Global warming anyone! I could go on ad nauseam, I didn’t need Donald Trump’s ‘fake news’ to up my cynicism.
          Well the sad fact is that a majority of people do buy into this pulp or don’t care. But for those of a discerning nature discovering the elixir of truth (or is it cynicism) has to start somewhere and debunking the National-Socialist myth is as good a place as any to start.

    2. Having lost two families due to setup to pass Canada’s hate law, and having revised my thinking, I must totally agree with Mr. Dixon. In the mid 60s, I was, unknowingly, surrounded by agents of the defunct “canadian jewish congress”. They, and ALL of the “public” press, prodded this young fool into being the fraudulent & falsified horror vision to make old stock Canadians fear one 23 year old ” POWERFUL NAZI”. This complete conspiracy on the part of the c.j.c., and as said, the “public press”, and the fact that I was their unknowing stooge, down the road led me to actually study AH script in his book. His GERMAN empire plans were in his book, long before WW2, for all to read. Fortunately, I have lived to expose the entire fraud. My sincere apologies to genuine German & all other White Patriots around the globe, for being such a stooge for judah ! I have had this burden of guilt to live with most of my life.

    3. In fairness Fred, the left, the liberals and Marxists all equate racial nationalism with Nazism. Even now after more than 70 years, we British nationalists, German nationalists and nationalists of all other White nations are equated with the Nazis, no matter how much we try to distance ourselves and distinguish ourselves from what are seen as the worst excesses of the Third Reich.
      .
      In such a situation, we either admit that the enemies of our race are correct and that we are wrong, in which case we give up our struggle, or we look at the parallels between National Socialist racial doctrines and the principles of racial nationalism honestly and we have the courage to declare that the Nazis were not all bad, they had a lot of it right and were certainly not uniquely evil.
      .
      Millard is not suggesting that we become Nazi cultists, simply that we recognise that on the most important subject of our racial survival, the principles expounded by the Nazis were very close to our own ideas and on that basis, most Whites would be better off today had the Nazis won WW2. We British would certainly be better off today had we abstained from involvement in WW2, and had we done that, the Germans would have won.

  8. No-one can say with certainty what Europe would be like today if N-S Germany had won the war. The imponderables come thick and fast. Hitler was a sick man in 1945. He actually said few in his family were known for their longevity and he believed his political life was coming to an end irrespective of the war’s outcome. So that leads on to succession. Himmler, Goring, Goebbels perhaps? All in reality were yesterday’s men so his long term successor or successors would have come from next generation of National-Socialists. How would they view a world that was changing fast? Remember countries like Rumania, Hungary, Bulgaria, had all joined in the crusade against Bolshevism, while many others as far away as Spain at the far western end of Europe supplied troops. Their sacrifices I’m sure would not have been overlooked and disregarded. Frederick Dixon mentions ‘Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, Belarusians, Russians et al.’ The Germans during the war gave some of these areas client status so who knows how after the war relationships would have developed.
    Undoubtedly there would initially have been good deal of settling scores ( there was anyway) but would Europe today be a better place for the European? It is only an opinion but I would say yes.

  9. At one level it seems obvious that we should discard references to what occurred in Europe before and during the Second World War, after an interval of over 70 years, as recommended by Mr Dixon. But the war is understood and misrepresented in such a way as to undermine our national identity and a pride in our European legacy and traditions.This has weakened our resolve to oppose mass immigration in the wake of a relentless onslaught by “Cultural Marxists” asserting that nationalism is inherently intolerant and if not controlled or curtailed would risk repeating the “Holocaust”.Therefore reconsidering conventional accounts of WW11 is not an irrelevance or some form of indulgence but a necessary means to rehabilitate the nationalist patriotic cause not as a potential evil but something wholesome, rational, sane and in tune with values which have served society since time immemorial.The conventional accounts of the war are problematical depicting the National Socialist regime as a belligerent power seeking world domination, when vested interests conspired at every turn to force Germany to war. The success of the NS regime in peacetime was phenomenal, allowing vast public investment to occur, a control of the currency thus removing a speculative element, and ensuring that production was to serve the interests of the country as a whole.Lloyd George observed in 1936 that he had never seen such content people, noting the country was full of hope. Such unparallelled success employing methods so different to those in the UK and USA threatened vested interests of those controlling world trade,and who feared contagion should such practices be widely accepted. Let us all challenge the prevailing orthodoxy and lead the charge for our civilisation’s salvation.

  10. Some quotes that need to be understood by all white people. We often target the tools of our destruction (immigration, political correctness, social engineering, miscegenation etc) whilst ignoring those doing it to us.

    “Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we (England) declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the ‘Americans’ Jews around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler’s pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany. instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentless pursued now, only under a different label – Ashamed and Humiliated” – The British Attorney General, Sir Hartle Shawcross, said in a speech at Stourbridge, March 16/84 (AP) Head of the Nuremburg Trials.

    “Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.”- Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book “The New Holy Alliance”).

    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” – David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934

    “We (Jews) intend to turn Europe into a mixed race of Asians and Negros ruled over by the Jews”. Jewish EU Founding Fathers, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi: Praktischer Ideanlismus 1925

    “You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. The Century Magazine January 1928 Volume 115, Number 3 pages 346-350 Marcus Eli Ravage Jewish Leader

    “There is not a single instance when the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of their persecutors. We come to the nations pretending to escape persecution, we (Jews) are the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man.” Jewish writer, publisher and entrepreneur — Samuel Roth, Jews Must Live (NY, NY: The Golden Hind Press, Inc., 1934) pp. 64-65.

    “You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.” – Nobel Prize winning novelist and historian, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    WINSTON CHURCHILL SAID THIS ON FEB 8 1920 in a London Newspaper: “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

    “Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” -Rabbi Steven S. Wise Chief Rabbi of the United States

    A quote from Rabbi Rabinovitch in Budapest in 1952: “Our control Commissions will, in the interest of peace and wiping out our interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with white. The white woman must cohabit with members of the dark races, the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the world. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark people.”

    “Israel won the war [WWI]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.” – The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918

    “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America.” -The Jew, December 1925,Zinobit

    “The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people.” – Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919

    “We Jews regard our race as superior to all humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them.” – Goldwin Smith, Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford University, October, 1981

    “If Gentiles refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this signals their rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence.” Mordechai Nisan, Kivunim official publication of the World Zionist Organization August, 1984, pp. 151-156.

    “Our race (speaking of the Jews) is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves.” – Menachem Begin. – Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset [Israeli Parlament], quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, Begin and the Beasts, New Statesman, June 25, 1982

    “We should turn Her (Russia) into a desert populated with white Niggers. We will impose upon them such a tyranny that was never dreamt by the most hideous despots of the East. The peculiar trait of that tyranny is that it will be enacted from the left rather than the right and it will be red rather than white in color.”– Leon Trotsky real name Lev Bronstein

    BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ON THE JEWS “There is a great danger for the United States of America, this great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the Jews have settled, they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated — they have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain. For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate — namely, that they were driven out of their motherland, but gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires — they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race .”If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than 100 years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of Government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within 200 years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands. “I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children’s children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil our institutions — they should be excluded by the Constitution.” – Statement in the Convention, concerning Jewish immigration to America and the danger it posed (1789)

  11. Frederick Dixon writes, “The events of more than seventy years ago in central Europe should be utterly irrelevant to where we are now in Britain – yet here we are, dragged back again into the graveyard of a long dead cause, serving no purpose but to utterly undermine us yet again.” Strange therefore that the above article should generate so much interest! Could it be that seventy years of lies and distortions generated by Europe’s enemies have left so many unanswered questions?

  12. Regarding the song, ‘Hey There Europa’, shared by Walter Greenway, it must be said that the emphasis on our common European Destiny is to be welcomed, even perhaps especially welcomed, by those of us who’d like Britain to take the leading role in European reconstruction. One serious question though… Why on earth is it deemed necessary to risk undermining the whole message with the use of scatological language? Is the use of such childish, playground language some sort of weird joke?

    1. I agree with you Michael. ‘Get your act together’ would have been better. However it is a catchy song passed on to me by a Western Spring supporter and I am very pleased that he did.

    2. The song is evidently aimed at young people, under 30’s, and so is couched in the kind of language under 30’s use colloquially. That is all.

  13. I left the habitual use of bad language behind when I was about 13 years old and any reversion (becoming more frequent as i advance towards old age) I attribute to second childhood creeping back in. Surprised to hear that it can last up until thirty in some cases.

  14. There is a time and place for all forms of language, formal, colloquial and preferably a preservation of the old dialect forms which are situated closer to the original sources of modern language. For example the Yorkshire word “Buffit” refers to a stool and is derived from Norman French, as is the word to “Bray”, that is to hit somebody. The word “Laiking” means to play in Yorkshire dialect and is derived from the Swedish language.Of course the north was administered under the Danelaw and had been influenced by the Viking settlement.

  15. ToeKnee BelowKnee

    - Edit

    I agree with the sentiments for White advancement once again but not with the evolutionary angle.
    God Almighty created the rayces for His good pleasure. Mixing any of them away is not pleasing to Him. Thru history it has been made quite apparent that He has used the White rayc as the vessel to keep His words reach to the 4 corners. He created us delicate for a reason. Our DNA is dominated. I think that in His sight we are precious and it is our duty by Him to segregate and not mix or diminish.
    – tkbk –

Comments are closed.