By Max Musson:
On a nationalist discussion forum recently, one commenter wrote disparagingly of the value of creating White enclaves. Referring to them as PLEs* he wrote:
“I live in a PLE now, my street as far as I can tell, is devoid of non-Whites.
“I suppose I could just switch off from reality and pretend to myself that this is how the rest of Britain is. Comfort myself that every street is like mine.
“We can take turns to have little get-together’s and help each other out with maintenance and gardening.
“But what if a neighbour moves out and a non-White moves in?
“What if while I’m being jolly walking up and down my street exchanging hello’s with my White neighbours the rest of the city has turned into a third world ghetto?
“How will I stop my beautiful street from being consumed like all the rest when I live in a small bubble and have cut myself totally off from reality and political influence?”
This individual made the common mistake of assuming that any all White area constitutes a PLE* or White enclave as we prefer to call it, but that is not the case.
An entirely White street does not constitute a White enclave, it is merely a street that remains White by default, because no non-Whites have as yet chosen to live there. It is ‘passively’ White, rather than ‘actively’ or ‘intentionally’ White as an enclave must be if it is to serve its purpose.
A White enclave is created only when the White population of a locality decide as a group to take active measures to ensure that their community remains wholly White. A White enclave is a community that remains White, not by default but through their sustained force of will.
Suppose a nationalist lives as the commenter above does, in an entirely White street composed of say, thirty households, and he has two friends who are also nationalists, and who live further up the street. Such a person could do as the very negative commenter suggests and just sit back and passively watch as gradually his White neighbours grow old and die or move house, leaving houses vacant for non-Whites to buy and occupy, or he could take positive steps to secure the future of the neighbourhood in which he lives by creating a consciously White enclave composed of militant White families who wish to remain wholly White and who also wish to keep their area wholly White, and this is how it can be done.
Firstly in any street of this kind there will essentially be four types of people; those who like our nationalist are desirous of keeping the street White and are prepared to take steps to actively make this happen; those who would like the street to remain White but are not prepared to act upon this desire; those who are neutral and don’t care either way; and those who would like to encourage non-White settlement in the street. The first step is to identify which of the street’s residents fall into which category and this can be done either directly or indirectly, by either contriving to engage them individually in conversation and raising the matter obliquely, or by going down the street with a questionnaire and asking each resident directly.
Either method will suffice and both methods will eventually make your neighbours aware of where you stand on the issue, as they are bound to talk among themselves to some degree or another.
Having identified the people who are prepared to take action, the next step is to meet with them and to sell the idea of forming a co-operative for the express purpose of creating a White enclave. This group may initially be small and may consist of only five of the thirty households to begin with, but five households working in concert would be enough initially to begin to effect change.
The next step is to call upon the resources of similarly minded people in the wider neighbourhood and beyond, and even as far away as neighbouring towns, who would be prepared to assist your project and who would ultimately like to support your project by moving into your street.
There will also be some people who will wish to support your idea, albeit that they are not in a position to participate by moving into the enclave themselves. It is a never-ending source of surprise to me just how selflessly altruistic and generous many of our people are.
Once these steps have been followed, with the creation of a bank account for the co-operative, arrangements should be made for all of the people supporting the idea to make regular monthly contributions into the fund and money will begin to accumulate that can be used to buy the houses of those people that the co-operative do not want to remain in the street.
At this stage I should emphasise that the co-operative should adopt a formal constitution and elect officers to administer the assets, initially just money, that the co-operative raises. We at Western Spring can provide support for any groups needing assistance in drafting a constitution and needing advice on the opening of collective bank accounts etc.
It is quite feasible that a co-operative might quite quickly attract support from as many as thirty individual households in and around their neighbourhood and with each household contributing say £50/m each, the co-operative would accumulate money at the rate of £1,500/m or £18,000 per annum.
Each member of the co-operative should also canvass support from amongst their parents as our nationalists will most likely have spouses or partners and have children and the grandparents from both sides of each family will almost certainly have an emotional interest in the future wellbeing of their grandchildren and may be prepared to contribute also. In this way, thirty contributing households could quickly expand to ninety, and scope therefore exists for such an enclave to build capital at a rate of over £50,000 per annum and in a northern town where terraced houses can often sell for as little as £30,000, it will only take about a year before such a co-operative is in a position to raise buy-to-let mortgages on perhaps as many as five houses.
The members of the co-operative should also form an auxiliary organization to run alongside the co-operative, and it should be styled as a ‘residents association’ and one that they will obviously dominate due to their numbers and due to the fact that they will vote as a bloc in any residents’ association meetings. If there is a pre-existing residents association, then the members of the co-operative should join it and take it over by voting as a bloc.
Under the guise of the residents’ association, the co-operative will then be able to take actions and make representations to the authorities without any need to disclose their underlying agenda, and may be able to obtain local authority funding for community events and for the redevelopment of any existing vacant or derelict buildings in the area.
The residents’ association will also be a useful vehicle through which to make representations to the local authority regarding any planning issues in the area and many of the initially less racially minded of the street’s residents can be drawn unwittingly into helping with the arrangement of community events and fund raising events that will obviously benefit the residents’ association, but which may also be arranged in such a way that they also indirectly benefit the co-operative.
The residents’ association will also be helpful in liaising with the police and the establishment of a neighbourhood watch, and it is obviously important that the co-operative control the neighbourhood watch, so that they are in control of any information that gets reported, vis-à-vis antisocial behaviour.
In any community there will be some antisocial elements and it should not be necessary for me to explain in too great a detail, that some ‘antisocial’ behaviour can turn out in the long run to be of benefit to the community, especially if it deters more significant and ultimately more damaging, antisocial behaviour on the part of certain individuals who are determined not to be, shall we say, ‘neighbourly’.
This brings us to the acquisition of houses and the first houses to be targeted should be those occupied by the residents who are inclined to welcome non-White settlement in the street. These residents should be approached individually once sufficient funds have been accumulated and funding has been arranged for the co-operative to acquire their houses on a buy-to-let basis. Most people of a liberal/leftist predisposition will not be overly keen to continue living in a street that is dominated by a group of residents who are militantly racialist and this state of affairs can be subtly and not so subtly conveyed to the unwanted multiracialist residents as circumstances require.
Provided with a little encouragement and offered a fair price for their house and therefore able to move immediately and without paying estate agents fees, all but the most obstinate of the unwanted will eventually accept and sell to the co-operative, where-upon the co-operative will acquire the house and immediately let it to one of the deserving families that are members and supporters of the co-operative, but who have hitherto lived outside the area.
Once all of the residents who might welcome non-White settlement have gone, the danger of non-Whites moving into the street will have receded significantly and the co-operative can begin winning the active support of or replacing the people who are neutral or passive with regard to the project.
It may be that during the course of any year as many as five houses will come up for sale initially owned by people who are not committed to the co-operative, and should that happen, as I have already explained, it should be possible for the co-operative to purchase these and move nationalist tenants into the street, thereby creating a situation in which the entire street will be owned and or controlled by the co-operative or it’s committed members within five to six years.
Once most of a street has been secured, the co-operative can canvass the next street, and so on. Furthermore the co-operative should extend the scope of its activity, making the enclave an ‘enterprise zone’; helping one family to convert their home into a general store; helping another to set up a car repair business in a garage block if one exists; and helping any other members who are in any way entrepreneurial to build small businesses that will provide a reliable income for them and employment for others.
Naturally, all of the members of the co-operative should give their custom to their own people wherever possible, so that the businesses grow, and as I say, employ more people and can benefit from economies of scale and thereby provide goods and services at lower prices.
Any co-operative member who has a teaching background can be assisted to set up a home schooling support group so that parents within the co-operative do not have to expose their children to state brainwashing. If the group becomes large enough, the co-operative can investigate the possibility of setting up a private faith school (open to practicing Cosmotheist children only), and such a venture, under the right conditions and presented in the right way, might even attract some degree of state subsidy.
Eventually, after a number of years an entire neighbourhood, or an entire village could become dominated by the co-operative and a sizeable, militant White community will have been established.
Naturally, if an organization invests all of its time and effort in producing just one such enclave over that kind of period, the single street/village/neighbourhood enclave produced will not offer much succour to our nation, despite constituting a localized White nationalist stronghold. However, if we are able to stimulate the establishment of 1,000 such enclaves in various places across the country, that will represent a significant national resource, sufficient to secure the physical survival of our people and provide the basis for a revival of our nation. Furthermore, in any five year period that would follow, disproportionately greater progress would undoubtedly be made.
In time, as enclaves expand in size, their populations will become sufficient to ensure that White nationalists are initially elected to parish councils, then borough and county councils in the wards covered by the enclaves. Furthermore neighbouring enclaves will ultimately coalesce as they expand and create the prospect of us getting members of parliament elected. In the fullness of time, even if an organization had no other power winning strategy to complement their programme of enclave development, control of enough of our country could be secured, sufficient for us to achieve sovereign political power and self-determination either for part or the whole of the UK.
Naturally, no matter how carefully we proceed with such a project, a point will be reached when our racial enemies will realise what we are doing and where our enclaves are and this will present us with a number of security issues that will need to be dealt with at that time. Such a state of affairs has however been faced by our ancestors many times in the past, when a neighbouring enemy people have treated our presence with hostility, and like them we will have to face up to the dangers presented and overcome them. Such is life!
The thought we must keep fresh in our minds however is that anything is possible once we decide to embark upon a course of action with energy and determination and we at Western Spring have dedicated our lives to the task of bringing salvation to our people.
A revolution is coming … please join us!
By Max Musson © 2014
*PLE – ‘Pioneer Little Europe’
# # # #
Steve
- Edit
PLE? Should be PLA, Please Leave us Alone!
It sounds like another “Little Englander” jibe.
Proud to be one!
Steve
- Edit
The authorities don’t mind anyone else making an area their own but I think they’ll take action if they become aware that white people are doing that & excluding non whites.
Albert
- Edit
We will eventually go back to the Dark Ages like after the Romans left, different tribes fighting for dominance, it took 500 years for England to become one Country..and back then we was all from the same Northern European Race.
Now we are in the position where we have peoples from all races and religions with nothing in common, its only a matter of time before Civil War breaks out.
Little white enclaves are not the answer, what about our people who cannot afford to live in these nice little places.
The way forward is to fight to get our Country back, once the war starts ..all hell will be let loose, The British are a warrior race…that have perfected the art of war….killing on a industrial scale……Good help us.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Albert, I’m afraid you are mistaken, as it is not only a matter of time before civil war breaks out. Your outlook is similar to that of the people who predict a cataclysmic economic catastrophe that will one day eventually cause our people to rise up against our oppressors, but that won’t happen either. We are subject to a process of ‘managed decline’ and there is not going to be a sudden event that will spark change. Therefore we must plan to take power without such a stimulus and the strategy that I have outlined above is just one of a range of strategies that will enable us to do that.
NG
- Edit
I know from whence the original comment came and it is unfortunately a barren place for original thought, especially in relation to white community building.
We have spoken Max and I am confident that you understand the problem as I do and appreciate that with additional effort on behalf of those who care enough about our broad plight, there will be a future for white people in Britain.
I believe that the PLE blueprint, as proposed by the US prospectus, is unworkable in that it promotes a Leith-style “wild dogs” technique that draws immediate attention to itself and therefore renders it stillborn. Only through guile can we undertake such action, we are not (yet) in the position to openly stake our claim due to the strength and endemic nature of our adversaries. But the time will come when our enemies will be forced to negotiate with us and our burgeoning white nation.
We should be under no illusion that this is a long and difficult road and that personal sacrifice will be necessary. We must never allow personas to derail our endeavour and we can never compromise our ideals or inevitable goals.
All the best.
Regards,
N.G.
Max Musson
- Edit
What you say is true NG, we must all pull together.
AAA
- Edit
I’d like to thank Max for taking the time out –from his busy schedule of meeting in person the many contacts/enquiries regularly coming in from around the country– to write this article. In addition to the Great White Hope series*, this piece is a welcome and much-needed indication of how we can initiate action.
.
For ultimately it is action, not words, that is long overdue. More of these articles, please.
Trainspotter
- Edit
Good and thought provoking article, Mr. Musson. Our people need this sort of practical advice, and will ultimately require a full range potential approaches that can be employed to create sustainable networks and secure physical, biological and cultural spaces. Only then can we meaningfully assert ourselves as a people, and ultimately achieve formal sovereignty.
Shaun
- Edit
What Mr. Musson has suggested is very sensible. I think a tribalist approach makes sense. After all, as previous commentators have explained, we existed as individual tribes for long periods of our history.
I think the Highland model might be something to look into. The environmental-technological context doesn’t exist, but there still might be something to learn from the ancient Highlanders.
The Highlanders were a warrior race; and they achieved this state of being through a culture premised on warrior virtues. Each clan had a martial arts school; men were men and women were women. They weren’t that intelligent, but they were great: they proved themselves during The Battle of Calodian.
The world is bigger and the mass media seek to permeate the homes of every person, but there may still be a way we can control LOCAL culture to ensure that the people under our influence don’t develop the pathologies encouraged by the demonic misfits at the top.
I think Plato described how to use cultural controls as a method to advance the race best in The Republic. Understanding the masses as mimics, he wanted a society where true-masculine virtue was the only behavior tolerated. In other words, plays, books, poems, and conversation had to be centered around themes that were against weakness. Lead by example being the best teacher.
On a practical note, I think it would be possible to create all-White enclaves for one reason: people would like to live in them. H. Millard, in his novel Wandering the Wastelands, describes why Whites prefer to live among-st Whites better than I ever could. Low crime and high prosperity.
If these communities started to do well, more and more White people would join them because the mass unemployment, gutter culture and high crime rates that are an expression of the inner soul of the Zio-globalists is almost intolerable. Brainwashed by the mass media many of our people don’t know that most of the problems we have today are due to the parasitical forces retarding and distorting our culture.
If they saw clean, low-crime and prosperous all-White areas they would flock in. House prices would go through the roof. People would live in tents on the outskirts just to be near the place….
Kyle McDermott
- Edit
Putin’s Far-Right Friends in Europe
(http://imrussia.org/en/russia-and-the-world/645#.UtlLw5gJSRM.twitter)
“Kremlin officials realize that the traditional liberal and conservative parties in Europe are gradually losing ground and that now is the time to cautiously align themselves with new forces—the far-right nationalists. “Some people in political circles in Moscow know that in Europe, and particularly in France, as the new family of far-right parties is gaining momentum, they must get to know them better and test the waters,” says Jean-Yves Camus.”
Shaun
- Edit
I’ve always known Putin was a closet nationalist! I read Tony Blair’s autobiography last year and the cretin seemed to suggest that Putin was a nationalist all throughout the lying, repulsive and degenerate story of his life.
If the Russian Government are shifting their alliances towards the far-right then that must mean the European far-right parties are getting close. How wonderful. I think a Russian-Euro alliance is perfect; the devil (sorry America) would have a massive problem if an Axis of Resistance was formed around Moscow.
They didn’t have the minerals to go against Putin on Syria; so if Putin backs Europe’s far-right parties there would be little the Zio-globalists could do except winge about human rights abuses while they, as a collective, attempt to violate the human rights of virtually the whole human race!
In the Information Age that tactic might not work.
I can’t understand these people who believe that Putin is working for the System. The evidence against this is clear: the Americans, after the Duma Elections of 2011, tried to bring down his government using a NGO called the National Endowment for Democracy.
Why would they try to overthrow a government they already controlled? And also … why would Putin support countries that are opposed to the Zio-globalist order?
I’m not an expert in epistemology (unless I find somebody who doesn’t know what ”epistemology” means); but I reckon Putin has got good instincts. Good bless him and Mother Russia…..
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Shaun, Congratulations on getting 99%+ of the movement rushing to find their dictionaries this morning, for a few minutes there you were probably, by your own definition, our expert on the subject of epistemology :D.
.
With regard to Putin, I would certainly agree that of all current leaders of ostensibly White nations, he is by far the most nationalistic. As you say, his leadership of Russia is certainly problematic for the NWO and they would clearly love to see him replaced by someone more malleable and/or compliant.
.
Whether or not Putin can be regarded as a true friend of White racial nationalism, only time will tell, but we nationalists should offer him some measure at least of the benefit of the doubt until there is evidence to the contrary, and abide by the maxim, “There’s no disputin’, we shouldn’t diss Putin”.
Shaun
- Edit
In a way, Putin has proven himself to be a nationalist already. He has said, ”European countries look to in twenty years become the colonies of their colonies….”
He is also on record as saying, ”the White race is suffering from a serious demographic problem.”
His attitude towards homosexuals is spot on. Putin doesn’t allow them to enter their values into the Russian mainstream. In Russia it is ok to be a homosexual, but you can’t be expected to be treated as normal.
This position is justified. As we know, the Zio-nation wreckers don’t care one bit about homosexuals. They use them — and promote them — as a way of breaking up society.
Since Marx identified the family as the bastion of the bourgeois power structure, the Zio-nation wreckers have understood one concept: break up everything that produces population that can resist their evil.
That is why we have homosexuals promoted, lesbians promoted, and transsexual people promoted — all these people, of course, are protected by the system; so they side with it. And, on top of that, these people are promoted as cool.
Yes, AIDs really is brilliant isn’t it?
Nevertheless, as I said, it isn’t really about homosexuals. I don’t care what they do, and I have one homosexual friend. No, it is about breaking up the traditional family and normalizing difference.
In a society where is is promoted as ‘acceptable” for a transvestite to marry his sex-change wife, miscegenation is almost respectable. And miscegenation, without a doubt, is the ultimate aim of the Zio-nation wreckers.
Putin standing strong on this central issue gives Russia a massive chance to build itself up as a nation. A plethora of moron celebrities have attacked Putin as a homophobe; so that alone makes him my hero. Most celebrities haven’t IQs above double figures, so it makes me feel superior when I see them rant on about Putin’s prejudices, etc.
Putin also dealt with Pussy Riot. These girls, described by Alexander Dugin as worthless, tried to weaken Russia’s defenses through attacking the Russian Orthodox Church in protest.
Funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, these evil women sought to divide Russia across liberal-conservative lines and use the sanctity of Mother Russia as a weapon against her.
Putin put them in prison where they belong, and it was great to see Sting, Cher and the Red Hit Chilli Peppers moan knowing they couldn’t do a thing about it.
In short, I think Putin is a great leader and I do think he is one of us….
Kyle McDermott
- Edit
In my opinion, it doesn’t matter, at least at this stage, whether Putin is a nationalist or an opportunist. An “Axis of Resistance was formed around Moscow” would be the wedge for the creation a European confederation of sovereign nation-states, bonded by a revolutionary far right ideology – and then the West could clean house. And then the Zio-plutocrats’ throats would be exposed. I think Putin would go along regardless. But I think Putin is a nationalist looking for a cause, and now he’s got one. The Zionist Occupation Governments currently ruling the West are going the way of the Warsaw Pact regimes.
Crazy Englishman
- Edit
To hide in the middle of no man’s land waiting for the bomb to strike, that’s where the white man has been for decades, this is why we are in such a dire situation.
The people waiting for the white fight should put their hopes in the immigrants starting it because our people certainly aren’t, personally I don’t think the immigrants are that stupid as to upset their winning strategy, not until they accomplished outright majority control.
I have often said that we could learn a lot from the Asian community, I am sure that they practice co-operative schemes, through adopting this strategy they have almost taken our country. (The mosques aren’t just a place of worship, but business centres too)
.
Unless we start reinventing our communities with a shared belief system we will continue to be broken people, many of our morals have gone astray due to the poison we have endured, even if a miracle was to happen and a Nationalist group was elected, no appreciable difference would be noticed from the status quo, we have to now start from the bottom up, displaying an inspirational way of life that others will envy.
I can see how these enclaves will very quickly grow in financial aspects; many home owners can start the ball rolling, investing profit into neighbouring properties.
Properties could be on interest only mortgages, improving the property will increase the house and streets value gaining a better LTV% for lower rents and increased rental profit, allowing further investment into the community, bearing in mind you still have deposit money in the house and is not lost. This property can be purchased of you at cost when the co-operative has a good foundation and financial strength.
This can be started by the individual, although I understand this must ultimately be a community program for faster expansion, but also should be owned by the people to safeguard the future generations.
These are only my thoughts and will be contacting Max soon for his expert advice.
A village not far from me takes great pride in planting flowers along the roadside and hanging baskets from the streetlights, although only aesthetically pleasing, what a great sign of a community creating something better for all to behold. Something we could all aspire to be like if we put our best foot forward.
Thomas a'Becket
- Edit
May I suggest that these Nationalist communities are sited near to a place where either a water or wind mill could be built and operated by our folk. I don’t think I need to go into detail as to all the needs of a what will required. But there are just some things that could prove to be essential assets in the future,
graham
- Edit
Oh I do hate acronyms and the way Nationalist writers bandy them about with giving the ignorant reader an opportunity at the beginning of the article of using the acronym and then put in brackets the meaning of that acronym, just in case there are some of us who do not know what the letters mean. YKWIM.
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Graham, I’m not sure whether you are complaining specifically about my use of the abbreviation ‘PLE’, but I did explain in the first sentence that it was a term meaning ‘White enclave’ and the asterisk was there to indicate that another explanatory note existed below.
.
It is however a strange characteristic of our modern times that we tend to adopt jargon composed primarily of TLAs*, while you have written to complain of my use of a TLA, you have gone one further and introduced the use of an FLA*. Such is life I’m afraid.
.
TTFN*
.
Notes:
TLA = Three letter abbreviation.
FLA = Five letter abbreviation.
TTFN = Ta ta for now. 😉
A Swain
- Edit
This is the state of play in the USA under the orders of the Obama administration with regards to forced integration and the obliteration of majority White areas/enclaves.
I expect their evil plan will extend to homeowners too and not just public housing.
http://truthisahatecrime.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/hud-wants-diversity-in-all.html
Max Musson
- Edit
I would suggest that White Americans begin adopting ‘mixed race’ status when they file their census returns, or claim to be Jewish, Hispanic, or Black.
.
If HUD inspectors call and ask them to explain why they have claimed to be of mixed race when they are apparently White, the Whites can reply, using the arguments of ‘race mixers’, ‘that there are no pure races, that all races are to some extent mongrelised and that despite their impeccably Aryan appearance they believe they must have some non-White blood in them from several generations back’.
.
Similarly, if asked why they claim to be Jewish, the Whites can tell the inspectors they are ‘Maranos’, i.e. Jews who have at some time been forced to convert to Christianity. They can state that although they live and appear to be just like Christian Americans, they are really ‘Secret Jews’.
.
If asked why they claim to be black, the Whites can just insist that they are black, but that in their family vitiligo, the skin condition that allegedly made Michael Jackson turn white, is prevalent and that they have all developed white skin as they have got older. Families could have family photographs taken to provide evidence, photos in which they have blacked up with actors face paint. Alternatively, they could produce a photo of Beyoncé and say, ‘Beyoncé doesn’t look black, but she is, and it’s the same with me’.
.
After decades of stating that ‘race’ does not exist and is simply a social construct, it would be interesting to see HUD inspectors attempting to prove that a White person’s claim to be of mixed race was fraudulent and that they are in fact ‘pure White’.
Adam Hiley
- Edit
with the General election next Year will You campaign & alert people that voting Labour & clueless Ed Miliband will harm Britain greatly getting rid of LibLabCon and dumping the EU ECHR is vital to rescuing Our Country
Max Musson
- Edit
Voting for any of the three main establishment parties is a waste of time, unless of course it is in a ward/constituency where we have subverted their local party organisation and have managed to get one of our members adopted as their local candidate. In such an area voting LibLabCon might produce an outcome that we can all be secretly pleased with.
Adam Hiley
- Edit
We must stop the likes of Cameron and Obama from putting Us all on a Dangerous collision course with Russia who are not Our enemy like Cameron & Obama like to portray President Putin did a favour for Great Britain & the USA by stopping the insane planned assault on Syria planned by Cameron,Obama,Hague and Kerry