By Fionn Westron:
“Religious fervour” – this is exactly the name of the game. We are dealing with a religion.
We all know that many of those who were staunch adherents of the old religions, did not have a jot of inner spirituality. A lot of such people wanted to belong to a religion because it gave one social status, it improved the image and thus the standing of a person amongst their peers and in keeping up with the Jones’s.
It is really depressing, because this really the brain still operating on a base, animalistic level. Animals operate like this, for instance, certain tropical birds have to look, move and dance the part, in order to attract the female. One wrong feather out of place or move that doesn’t quite fit into what their species has grown to expect, and they are rejected.
Multiculturalism is no different, it has been built up into a religion, which is the fashion. It is “cool” to be multicultural, it is cool because it means higher status, it means higher status because the masses have been shown that the world of celebrity indulges in it – e.g Cheryl Cole with a black footballer, and Heidi Klum with a black husband.
White females are led to believe that in order to have higher status one must have one of the new gods on one’s arm…..a black. For the female biology, if we are talking about the most fundamental instincts, consideration of the nest and anything that will be advantageous to the bringing up of the young is what appeals to the female brain at a raw, base fundamental genetic level (males have their own base genetic impetus’ too). Thus females will seek to imitate what they see is promoted in the media as being of higher status and right now, on film and TV, blacks are pushed as being the new gods.
Another aspect of this is for the middle-classes to patronise and exhibit a faux humanitarianism. Having mixed raced kids is regarded as the height of piety, and you see certain middle-class mothers with a new African husband gushing about her little brown ‘jewel’ – not realising how the baby looks nothing like her, and more like she is baby-sitting someone else’s child. She does not realise how she will never see herself, her parents or her grandparents in the features or possibly persona of the child.
Describing this social status idea another way, it is a snobbery. But societal norms come and go. How many people have heard how their parents, used to go on about education, or have a particular admiration or blind spot if a person was “educated”. It is almost possible that they would have said about the serial killer doctor, Dr. Shipman “oooh my God, he murdered all those people……BUT he was a very well educated man though!?!”
Again this is the middle-class multicult attitude to multiculturalism, for them it is not so much a case of truly sincere humanitarianism, it is simply swopping one snobbery for another. Swopping what to them is old fashioned and ridiculous, thus status lowering, for what is perceived to make them appear good; holier-than-thou; righteous; and pious – the new high moral ground……the new religion, the snobbery of the multicult.
Other aspects of the religion, include sin – i.e. pride and enjoyment of one’s own race and culture, which by definition is exclusive. Blasphemy, is expressing the reality of multicult – the violence and harassment meted out to whites, expressing the desire to protect and defend one’s own ethnic group and home.
There are the high-priests, the leftists the clerics of our multicult anti-Christian churches, the EU governments, and the immigration industry NGO’s. We have heretical laws – the incitement to hatred laws, anti freedom of speech laws and so on. We have the witch-hunters, the UAF, ECHR our corrupted police, all who find, root out search and attempt to burn the practitioners of heresy/truth.
There are so many immigrants in our countries, many in Britain know someone who is not ethnically British, and so to support any party which outrightly acknowledges a difference in what is ethnically British and those who are not, but have lived in Britain all their lives, work, drink, play sport with their ethnic “pals”, this presents a problem. People do not want to be ostracised, or to be seen to be hurtful or mean to others, they also do not want, as stated in Max Musson’s recent article on UKIP, to invite the career and family attacks this would involve.
This is one of the reasons a lot of Britons voted UKIP, even those who are not of the nationalist persuasion. It gave them permission to say, or at least let them feel that they have permission to say, “I have a serious problem with immigration, and I love and want to protect my Britishness and this country. UKIP at least gave them that.
By Fionn Westron © 2014
# # # #