By Max Musson:
No revolutionary political movement can succeed in toppling an existing corrupt regime without a vast network of friends within the existing political establishment, without a 5th column extending deep into the enemy’s power structure, which can corrode that power structure from the inside and sabotage its efforts to suppress the new movement. This is true, irrespective of whether the new movement aims to gain power electorally, by extra-parliamentary means, or by force of arms.
An issue often overlooked by nationalists who are overly focused on electioneering, is that just as we nationalists are excluded and marginalised politically by the current regime, so too are many other non-political people excluded and marginalised for other reasons, cultural, religious or economic etc. These people will often harbour a sense of grievance against the current regime, which because they are non-party political, they may regard as the ‘art establishment’, the ‘literary mafia’ etc.
Such people will often lose out to competitors who are less able or gifted than they are simply because the competitors belong to an organised minority that covertly provides them with a ready made support network and a ‘leg-up’ at a vital moment in their careers.
Our ‘outsider’ may not understand the reason for their ‘bad luck’ and may have laboured for decades with mounting frustration and if we can approach these people and give them the helping hand they need to make a giant leap forward in their careers, then they will not only feel gratitude towards us for this, but they will be open and receptive to our political arguments and will hopefully feel inclined to repay our favour at a vital point in the development of our revolution.
We will all be familiar with television talent competitions such as ‘The X Factor’ and ‘The Voice’, and we assume that the winners are fairly decided by an unbiased public vote, yet there is much evidence to suggest that this is not so, that certain contestants who fare unexpectedly well, have previous connections with the judges or others involved in the production and receive fortuitous treatment at vital points during the competition, or receive the blind support of a minority group whose votes are enough to skew the result in their favour.
What many of us will not be aware of is the vast number of amateur singers, actors, dancers, sculptors, painters and writers from within the indigenous White population, whose careers stall and very often fail, simply because they do not receive vital funding during their developmental years. The fates of these unfortunate people are very often decided by the various quangos set up to award bursaries, scholarships and grants from central and local government, the National Lottery, and the many arts charities that exist.
What the public often do not realise is that the dignitaries who sit on these committees are frequently political appointees, heavily weighted in favour of religious, sexual and ethnic minority groups, and as I have often pointed out, it is not necessary for such committees to be constituted by a majority of minority appointees for their decisions to become skewed and dominated by the interests of minority applicants, it is often possible to completely dominate the decision making of a committee if just 30% to 40% of the committee is composed of a sub-group who vote as a bloc, and the decisions of these arts and literary quangos are often rigged in favour of ethnic minority talent to the exclusion of White people.
It is no coincidence that when singers and musicians perform on television nowadays, unless we are considering classical music or classical forms of dance, the backing singers are almost always black, the majority of the backing dancers are black and the majority of backing musicians are black. We must contrast this with the situation that existed just thirty years ago, when ethnic minority artists, as one would expect, comprised only a minority of the backing artists featured on television. Can it be that a whole generation of white people have grown up almost totally bereft of musical, dancing or singing talent, such that television producers have been forced to make do with ethnic minority substitutes, or is the selection process involved heavily biased against White talent?
I think we know the answer to that!
As a consequence of the above, there are legions of young and highly talented young White people for whom the ladder to success is blocked. Youngsters whose talent is such that they could more than hold their own against the kind of people that are paraded before us as ‘stars’ by the mass media, and while it is iniquitous that this situation exists, it does provide us within nationalism with an opportunity.
Often the difference between success and failure in literature and the arts can be very small, the factor which decides who goes on to better things and who falls at any particular ‘hurdle’ can be astonishingly small, and this means that a well funded nationalist movement can give an awfully large number of our youngsters a ‘helping hand’ at a critical time in their careers, at very little cost to us in terms of hard cash.
Such a ‘helping hand’ need not even be one of funding, but may simply be a matter of writing letters of support to the appropriate bodies, or of voting at the right time, or of showing support by buying tickets for the shows and the performances in which they feature or of buying the works of art they have produced.
Imagine the kind of subtle support that we might receive, subtle but of critical value if give at the right time, from large numbers of performance artists, sculptors, painters, and writers who know that they owe their success to a helping hand that we gave them when they were unknown? This would not necessarily be overt political support, but support in helping to shape the cultural milieu in which we operate, creating a vibrant counterculture in which the values that underpin nationalism are reinforced and supported.
Imagine also the kind of subtle support that could be given by a large number of police officers, army officers, civil servants, doctors, scientists, newscasters, journalists, authors and government officials, whose careers were given a boost through the timely intervention of an ‘army’ of covert nationalist activists. Nationalists, whose activism lies in networking and advancing the careers of other nationalists, rather than in futile street demonstrations and futile electioneering?
In traditional Labour areas there are large numbers of White Labour voters within whom the habit of voting Labour is so entrenched that they cannot seem to break it. I have often encountered such people during doorstep canvassing at election times and have been confounded when they tell me that they are opposed to mass immigration, EU membership etc., but still intend to vote Labour, because their fathers did and their grandfathers before them. They conflate loyalty to their forebears political beliefs with loyalty to a political party, even though that political party clearly no longer upholds the beliefs of those forebears.
We should therefore employ the judo technique of using our enemies inertia against them, and through entryism we can as our numbers grow, influence the selection of candidates, so that our members are selected as local Labour candidates, and in this way, our people can vote for ‘our’ Labour candidates and all of the brain-dead, ‘Labour till I die’ voters can also vote for them and we can get our people elected, virtually unopposed.
Once elected, our people will nominally represent the Labour Party, but they will of course place the needs of our people first and will use their influence to protect and where possible promote our enclaves also.
In traditional Tory areas we will similarly practice entryism into the Conservative Party and in this way, we will build up within local government, hundreds of ‘friends’ and may even find ourselves in a situation in which our ‘Labour’ and ‘Conservative’ politicians get selected to represent the establishment parties in ‘safe’ parliamentary seats.
This is a strategy that we have already trialled and which has proven to be successful. All that is needed for us to really capitalise on this strategy is for nationalists across the nation to eschew electioneering as overtly nationalist candidates, to form local covert nationalist associations and to begin gaining entry as ‘individuals’ into the dominant establishment party in their ward/constituency.
Once inside an establishment party, our people simply need to act as a bloc, ensuring that our people get elected as the officers of the constituency organisation, and therefore have the capacity to ensure that our people get selected as candidates.
Again, it is not necessary for our people to become a majority on any selection committee, or in any local constituency party, with 30% to 40% voting as a bloc we can dominate the decision making and within ten years, we could have literally thousands of our people elected to local government, county councils and even elected as members of parliament, all acting in such a way as to subtly skew developments in our favour and waiting for the crucial time when with their weight behind us a ‘tipping point’ will act in our favour and our revolution will move swiftly to the ‘end game’, an ‘end game’ in which we achieve ‘check mate’ and with that, sovereign political power.
By Max Musson © 2014
# # # #
# # # #