By H. Millard:
With all the attacks on Whiteness on our streets and in the media, the above question should be asked by every White person.
And, if you agree with me that we Whites do have a right to exist–and that right is ours because we do exist–then the next question becomes: Do Whites have the right to exist as Whites?
In other words, is it alright to want to be White, to remain White, and to like White culture and White ways? Is it our right to exist as explicit Whites and to be as we are born to be and to become all we can become and to be perfectly happy and proud to be White and to never apologize for who and what we are?
And is it okay to want to live among other Whites, to send our kids to schools that are all White, and to marry only other Whites and to only have White children?
And then one must ask: If we Whites have a right to exist, then is it okay for Whites to work for our survival, our continued existence and our expansion and for our own best interests as Whites?
Another question then pops up: What does it mean to survive and exist as Whites?
Some people say that they are the people of the book, by which they mean that they find their people-hood in religious books. To me, that’s artificial. Where are they in those books? Books are just words on paper. There is no life in them.
People-hood is not written in books, it is written in DNA, which is the code of life. It is in DNA that a people is created and maintained. The Book of Whiteness is within us in every cell with a nucleus in our bodies. It is written small within and written large without. What we are within is seen without.
So, how do distinct peoples survive to exist and expand? By making more like themselves. It is no more complicated than that. A people that is full of life and spirit breeds more like itself. A people that is decadent, dying and on the way to extinction does not make more like itself. Those in this latter group are like whipped dogs lacking in the life force itself as they simply wait for death and non-existence. Don’t be like them. Be ever full of life and hope for the future. Avoid weak-seed Whites who refuse to breed or who miscegenate. Spit! They are full of death and decay even thought they know it not. The stench of death is all around them. Flee from them lest they infect you with their yearning for non-existence.
Nature doesn’t care which living organisms live or die. It is up to the living organisms themselves to ensure that they live. So I repeat: To live and to exist, one must have children like oneself. And, in the case of Whites it means we must have only White children. No other kinds will do for our survival and existence. We must breed only with our fellow Whites.
I’ve had people full of religious altruism and moral codes that they have had placed on them by people of the book ask me why I don’t care about people other than Whites. My answer is always that I practice indifference and non-inerference with non-Whites. They are not my people and they are not my concern. I don’t butt into their business.
And, while it is true that each of us is a part of everyone else and everything else on certain levels–we are all minerals, for example, and we all have DNA–I am most fully me within people of my own kind–White people. And, my survival into the future depends on my family line remaining White. If my children fail to breed or miscegenate part of my DNA code will be absorbed back into the non-White masses and that part of me will no longer exist as White and I will cease to exist (in DNA form) in my most fullest Me-ness–my essential Whiteness.
Nature screams out to all types of organisms: Make more like yourself or go extinct. Are you listening? Are you doing?
By Very White and unapologetic H. Millard © 2015
# # # #
Stefan
- Edit
I think it’s only us that gives us that right & we will have to fight for it.
Dan England
- Edit
Possibly we do not have the right to exist in their eyes, but who has contributed the most in technical and scientific knowledge to this world?
.
Of course they may dig up some obscure data that says other races have contributed to this and that. I used to have a website where I listed all the inventions and scientific knowledge that we lowly whites have introduced to this world. The website was finally taken over and my site disappeared.
Animation was what I was interested in at the time and I used good quality talking characters with natural voices, I still believe that this is a good way to make a point.
.
What really got my back up was the Manchester museum was trying to say that Moslems invented most of what we have today, they actually said that the Renaissance couldn’t have happened without Islam!!
Charlotte
- Edit
The right for ANY organism to survive isn’t up for debate.
heechee
- Edit
No one has the right to destroy any of the human races for social engineering purposes, that is for sure!
Byrhtnoth
- Edit
I am going to be the devils advocate here and put the point of view of the liberal establishment. They believe that whiteness is irrelevant and genetics does not contribute to making us who we are. All that matters is our ‘common humanity’. They do not regard mass Third World immigration as threatening, because they believe that the children of non Europeans will become Europeans if they are born in an European environment. Therefore the indigenous people of Europe are not being displaced by the immigrants, except in a superficial way due to their different appearance, but even that difference can be eliminated by miscegenation.
.
They also regard people as economic units that combine the function of consumers, producers and tax payers, that these units are interchangeable across national national boundaries and need to be continually relocated to where they can be most efficiently deployed. If insufficient economic units are being reproduced in white countries then it is necessary to plug in African units to maintain the breeding and producing population. The fact that such a strategy will mean that Negros will eventually replace Caucasians in Europe does not concern them in the slightest.
Terry
- Edit
This is why those politicians are traitors. And in order to survive, what must a healthy society do with traitors?
Stefan
- Edit
I think some of them full well know that they are race replacing us, that the goal is destroy White people as far as they can.
Maybe some White people are fooled by the liberal reasoning given but we are not.
coco
- Edit
I am not white….but I sympathize with the views expressed on this blog….the white race must remain pure ….. they have given the rest of “lower” humanity the best of technology, science innovation, music, arts, literature, health and medicine and all that is required for good life!
For that very reason I support white supremacy, not the violence or anti-semitism. The white race must remain unadulterated. However other races should practice miscegenation and become a melting pot of mongoloid, brown, black races. It is a scientific fact that blacks have the lowest IQ of all humans, and that might seem like a drag on the rest of humanity….think of vast sums of money poured into Africa in the last 5 decades or so…where are we? Still watching small children with distended bellies and flies on their mouths…
Race is hard wired in humans. People who say they are “not racist” are lying through their teeth, perhaps their ego is scared of being labelled racist. They fail to notice that mother nature / God created races for a reason…..otherwise all of humanity would have been either black or white or mongoloid or brown.
Lets respect racism….especially the white race because they have done more for humanity than all of the other races put together. Toast: to the white race! Long live!
Max Musson
- Edit
It may surprise you to learn that we don’t advocate White supremacy, we advocate White separatism.
.
Racial supremacy can only exist if two or more races occupy the same nation state and one of the racial groups occupies a position of supremacy, dominating the others. We don’t want to dominate other peoples, we want them to have freedom and self-determination in their own lands.
coco
- Edit
thanks for the correction there….. i didn’t really know the difference between “white supremacy” and “white separatism”…..am wiser now
I agree that supremacism, of any race be it white on others, or brown on black, has negative connotations of domination & abuse which is not really what you would want the white race to be associated with…..
thanks, appreciate your thoughts
Max Musson
- Edit
Hi Coco, it is not so much a matter of dominion of one race over another having ‘connotations of domination and abuse’, although that can happen, it is more a matter that the co-existence of one race within the same society and geographical space as another, has a tendency to make liberal-minded elements within dominant race feel pity for the subjugated race — pity which then turns to sympathy — with the result that the liberal eventually campaigns for the emancipation of the subjugated race, leading to race mixing.
.
We do not need the presence of other races in order to flourish, we are quite capable of creating wealth and prosperity and ensuring our own wellbeing without the assistance of other races. We White racialists believe we have a purpose and a destiny that is separate from that of the other races of mankind and if this purpose and destiny is to be fulfilled we must remain separate and increasingly genetically distinct from the other races. Therefore we do not wish to create a society in which there is the potential for race mixing to occur.