Django Explained

Django2Many people will have seen the movie trailers for Quentin Tarantino’s latest film ‘Django Unchained’ and will quite naturally feel somewhat uneasy that Hollywood again appears to have launched yet another violent film with a dangerously anti-White theme.

‘Django Unchained’ follows hot on the heals of ‘Machete’ (2010) and Tarantino’s previous film, ‘Inglourious Basterds’ (2009), depicting non-White ethnic minority ‘heroes’ taking their revenge and inflicting gratuitous violence upon villains who all just happen to be White.

Critics of these films legitimately complain that they run the risk of inciting racial hatred against white people, but their complaints are either ignored or brushed aside by media pundits and the authorities, who claim that these films are simply powerfully themed entertainment and that worries that ethnic minorities may decide to re-enact the scenes of racially charged violence against White people are groundless.

Indeed producer Michael Moore is reported to have Tweeted , “This weekend, go see ‘Django’. I still can’t get this movie outta my head- & I don’t want to! Ignore all nonsense u’ve heard bout ‘violence,’”

Readers may recall that Michael Moore famously wrote a book some years back, entitled, ‘Stupid White Men’, in which he asserted that the White race is the root of all evil, that we should be cease to exist, and in which the second chapter of the book was entitled, ‘Kill Whitey’.

There is a sequence in ‘Django Unchained’ in which the central character played by black actor Jamie Foxx, is asked, “How do you like the bounty hunting business?” to which Django, Foxx’s character replies, “You kill white folks and they pay you for it – what’s not to like?”

Supporters should also take regard of the comments on Twitter posted by black cinemagoers in the US.

On the website Jo Kington comments: “While whites are busy getting offended on our [black people’s] behalf, they miss completely why we are going to see this film. It’s a bIack man killings white people in masses. I will pay to see that every time.

I’ve seen this film 3 times so far and am going again Saturday night. It’s an awesome movie.”

Two people indicated that they ‘liked’ this comment and Jo Kington further stated, ” … we need to milk that sh-t as long as we can. Thank god for white guilt”.

Meanwhile, on the the following Tweets are reported:

“After watching Django, all I wanna do is shoot white people,”

“We need a modern dy django to kill some white people,”

“u wanna kill all white for 30min after you see Django Unchained,”

“After watching Django all I want to do is eat baked beans and biscuits and shoot white people for money”.

More pointedly, when the actor playing the part of Django, Jamie Foxx, hosted NBCs Saturday Night Live in December last year he shocked audiences with his description of his role in the film:

Clearly this genre of film is highly dangerous to the safety of White people, as is born out by the scandalously high levels of black on White crime that exists on both sides of the Atlantic.

More recently still, Foxx attracted more controversy with his acceptance speech at last Friday’s NAACP Image Awards, said, “Black people are the most talented people in the world” (video follows with transcript and commentary):

JAMIE FOXX: “All I can say is I’m so humbled tonight. I was thinking about all the stuff that I was going to say personally about myself, and I was gonna be all about me and how I did it, and how me and me and I and I, and then you watch Harry Belafonte and Sidney Poitier come out, and you say to yourself it’s really not big of a deal of what you are doing just yet.

“I have so many things I wanted to say, but after watching and listening to Harry Belafonte speak, sometimes I feel like somehow I failed a little bit in being caught up in what I do, or maybe that’s the young generation, and that’s what it is. But I guarantee you that I’m going to work a whole lot harder man.

“Black people are the most talented people in the world. I, it’s, I can’t explain it. You can’t sit in this room and not watch Gladys Knight sing and go like, “Golly, what in the world?”

Not only does Foxx appear to like the idea of killing White people, but he also appears to be a very race conscious black supremacist, appearing as he did at a function organised by the American, ‘National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’.

Just imagine the media reaction if a White actor had stood up at a function organised by a ‘National Association for the Advancement of White People’ and stated, “White people are the most talented people in the world”!

One is forced to ask why White people go to the cinema to watch movies like this that are little more than ‘race hate soft porn’?

One might also ask why someone like Quentin Tarantino, who is ostensibly White, would want to produce films that are clearly an incitement to racial hatred?

With a little research, a possible answer to this latter question begins to emerge.

While most Hollywood producers and directors are Jewish and therefore belong to an ethnic group that doesn’t readily identify as ‘White’, in Tarantino’s case the hostility shown in his films towards White people would appear to stem from different motivations.

Tarantino apparently came from a dysfunctional family background. While his father Tony Tarantino was of Italian origin, his mother Connie McHugh, was half Irish and half Cherokee Indian, and it seems they married when Connie became pregnant with Quentin at the tender age of fourteen.

This story is told in greater detail in author Sharon Waxman’s book ‘Rebels on the Backlot – Six Maverick Directors and How they Conquered the Hollywood Studio System’, and the book reveals that Connie soon split with Tarantino’s father and later married a man called, Curt Zastoupil, with whom she and young Tarantino lived for several years.

Sharon Waxman describes in her book how unhappy Tarantino was at school and subject to much bullying and teasing by the other children. Tarantino would have been a school pupil at a time when Western films and TV programmes would have been popular, and at a time when Whites composed c. 90% of the population of the US. With the conflict depicted in films of that time between White settlers and ‘Red Indian’ tribes, one can imagine that much of the teasing Tarantino received at school may have revolved around his part Cherokee ancestry.

I could be wrong, but this may be the reason why Tarantino appears to like making racially charged films that denigrate and demonise the White characters depicted and particularly those White characters who would be presumed to have pride in their race. Perhaps on a subconscious level at least, he is still taking his revenge on the schoolboy tormentors that made him so unhappy at school?

By Max Musson © 2013

# # # #

12 thoughts on “Django Explained

  1. It may well be that Tarantino had a dysfunctional childhood & that manifests itself in his films.
    I think this is encouraged by the powers that be because it serves an agenda, you can find many people like this.
    Spielberg pushes the Jewish agenda more directly & white guilt via the distorted “Lincoln”.
    Just imagine if you reverse what was said above & praised shooting blacks etc, your career would be over & you’d probably find yourself in court for hate speech.

  2. So do you want to take bets on how long it will take for a murder trial to mention this film in defence of a black person killing a white one?

  3. Foxx obviously hates white people in real life as well as on screen, we shouldn’t be to surprised as most African Americans are racist and blame white people for all the problems in their communities. Quentin Tarantino is creating a new John Wayne for black people. There is an trend in US film making for this kind of White Guilt sycophantic propaganda, George Lucas, Red Tails the basic premise of the Film is that Black people won the Allied air war almost singlehandedly and are superior to whites, Stephen Spielberg promoting Jewish propaganda films the whole industry has become very politically correct, a very untruthful ideology promoted by cowards and believed by idiots.

  4. ( SPOILERS ,even though its evil its worth watching)

    when the german bounty hunter shoots that sherrif in the town the deputy and all his mates come to arrest him and django, he just shows the deputy a piece of paper that could easly be forged and it is excepted by the deputy., well lets say its not forged and its an official wanted dead or alive warrant , why not take him alive?
    i dont believe american people in small towns back in that day would take that kind of shit of their goverment, why not give the man a trail? . also the deputy tells all the other men its ok and non of them question him even though the person who would benefit the most from the death of the sherrif would probly be the deputy as he would get promoted.

    later in the film they gun down people without a warrant, by this time the audience trusts them , we the viewer know they are the good guys and trust them to only kill bad guys. near the end of the film django kills an unarmed woman, and the audience laughs ( it was pretty funny), i dont think a woman would have had much say in the way things were done at that time in history so no need to kil her for revenge, only pure hate . thankfully their were no children in the house.

    well if u believe hollywood trys to influence the way people think, especially young people , then their seems to be a frightening agenda behind this film.
    If i was a conspiracy theorist i would say this movie is helping to condition the mindset that its ok for the goverment to kill without trail , and dont worry if its foreign troops on the streets doing the killing and dont worry if prisoners are released and are used as a peacekeeping force, once they have shown you their papers they can do all the killing they want.

    1. I appreciate that you saw through the mind conditioning that is intended regarding films such as this, but the majority of the public are not that perceptive. Furthermore, repeated exposure to this kind of mind polution does eventually affect even the most resilient of us.

      There is an old saying:
      Vice is a creature of such awful mien,
      that to be hated needs but to be seen.
      But seen to often,
      too familiar with it’s face,
      first we endure, then pity, then embrace.

      We would urge the public to boycott this film and all others like it, and to visit local cinemas simply to register a protest at the manager’s office.

      Tell the manager that the film is race hate material and ask him to cease showing it at once. If he does not, then ask him for his name and send an official letter of complaint to: The Crown Prosecution Service, Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London, SE1 9HS, asking them to prosecute under incitement to racial hatred.

  5. It was said years ago that Hollywood was used to float certain ideas, to get them into the public mind & make them acceptable, normal.
    I see it as mainly propaganda full of logic holes & not to be taken seriously.
    It makes me laugh when people say how could people fall for Hitler’s propaganda, when they can’t see what’s in front of their face.

  6. In which way do you think this could be useful to white folks? An in which way is it useful to link to a website mixing “revisionism of history, social sciences, religion, and of science” ?

  7. White people who go and see this film are mentally sick. Often they are “educated” people who watch newsnight review and have Film4, where this film is promoted to death.

    1. i understand your hatred towards these types off films and people like me that pay my hard earned cash to our enemys ( £19 1 ticket) but if we want people to understand the way we are being attacked than i think its important white people watch them, i know max has commented above and made the point that most people wil not understand the agenda and semi brainwashing that is going on, but prehaps later if they stumble across an article like this it might get them thinking a bit more deeply and start noticing other attacks on our race.
      and if one of us is trying to explain to a skeptic we are under attack through the media i think it can only help if they have watched this film

      and as they say “know your enemy” so i would recomend you watch it yourself Rob

      1. I don’t hate people who pay £19 for a ticket to see films like ‘Django Unchained’, I am simply saddened that you feel the need to waste your money subsidising our racial enemies.

        You are right in one sense, that people do need to see a few of these films, just enough for them to learn to recognise the genre. From that point onwards there is no point watching more as they are effectively mind pollution and we should no more wish to view them than drink a glass of sewage water.

        1. I’ll wait until it’s a £5 DVD or for free on TV.
          I thought “Inglorious Basterds” was a daft Jewish wordy wet dream.

Comments are closed.