A Place at the Table for the Indigenous White Majority?

Most people don’t think very far beyond their own immediate needs and wants and those of their close families. As long as they have enough money to provide the warmth, food, light, shelter, and clothing they need, and a few modest luxuries, most people do not consider the distant consequences of their actions, nor the actions of those around them or their government.

Most people accept that there are flaws in the system and that there will always be some degree of petty corruption within government, but as long as they are able to provide for themselves and their loved ones, the basics and a few luxuries as I have said, they don’t concern themselves with the machinations of those in power or the system of government they live under.

Most people assume that the government is composed of people like them, who are basically well intentioned and who, despite their flaws, believe in fair play and have the best interests of the nation at heart.

It comes as something of a shock therefore to most people, who perhaps somewhat later in life take up our nation’s cause, when they realise the disparity that exists between their old perceptions of those in authority compared with reality.

Many who have been law abiding all of their lives: those raised on a diet of ‘Queen and Country’ patriotism and the belief that we live in a free country; and who were raised to believe that our government is elected to promote our interests and to safeguard our people, are shocked to find that rather than promoting OUR interests and safeguarding OUR people, our government behaves iniquitously and in a way which all too often places the interests of others ahead of the interests of our people.

I have written before about the way in which mass immigration is promoted and facilitated by government, both nationally and across the European Union, on the basis that it is ‘good for the economy’. This is because it increases the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of our economy, and the ‘naïve’ assumption is that an increased GDP is automatically good for our nation.

In practice, increases in GDP rarely have any direct beneficial impact on the lives and living standards of the vast majority our people. An increased GDP usually causes an increase in profits for big businesses and major employers, however when the increase has been achieved solely by increasing the size of the population through mass immigration, all that happens is that any benefit that might otherwise trickle down to the man in the street is lost through being shared by a larger number of people. The slightly larger ‘cake’ is divided between rather more people and most people end up with a smaller ‘slice’ than before.

Mass immigration does however lead to greater profits for large employers as a result of the depression of wages through increased competition for a finite number of jobs. This is why the employers association, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) regularly expresses approval of government open door immigration policy.

What we find when we examine the workings of government and the interaction of government with its subjects, is that government responds most keenly to vested interest groups that lobby government ministers and who attract the attention of key politicians by offering them ‘inducements’.

When most people picture the system of government that exists in this country they will have in mind a model similar to that shown in Fig.1.

According to this model, the mass of the British people determine those who govern us through the electoral system, by voting every five years. The naïve assumption here is that our government is answerable to the people and is therefore obliged to govern in our best interests, and in an ideal world, with all other things being equal that would indeed be the case.

In reality however, powerful vested interest groups have grown up and these lobby government, gaining influence over the work of ministers and lessor politicians, by offering them attractive inducements to modify legislation in a way that profits those powerful vested interest groups.

The inducements could range from non-executive directorships on fat salaries, to lucrative speaking fees, all expenses paid ‘business conventions’ in exotic holiday destinations, or in some case, discrete payments of cold, hard, cash — for so called ‘consultancy’ work.

Obviously, when we look at Fig. 2, it becomes obvious how government policy can be impacted in ways that do not benefit the vast majority of our people but which make business leaders rich. Lobbying of this sort not only increases the influence of big business, it reduces the influence over politicians exercised by the public by making the electoral system less effective.

The groups competing for the attention and favour of government are not always commercial or business groups however, they are frequently charitable bodies, most of which are involved in endeavours that will ultimately benefit disadvantaged people from all sections of society, but an increasing number of which work to advance the specific interests of ethnic minorities. Furthermore, when the scope of ‘charitable work’ is expanded to not just address the needs of the genuinely disadvantaged, but also encompasses work aimed at enhancing the economic interests of minority ethnic groups, we can see that there will not be a level ‘playing field’ where social and economic competition between ethnic minorities on the one hand, and the indigenous British people on the other are concerned.

Also, ethnic minority groups competing for the attention and favour of government are not restricted to purely charitable bodies. In 1760, during the reign of George III, the Board of Deputies of British Jews was formed to lobby government in the interests of Jews living in the UK and elsewhere, and for more than two centuries they were the only ethnic minority representative body lobbying the British government. In recent decades however, other ethnic minority groups have copied the tactics of organised Jewry and have created their own representative bodies, which have similarly sought to bypass the electoral system as shown in Fig.3, gaining direct access to government through direct meetings with Home Office staff and in many cases the Home Secretary herself.

As can be appreciated from Fig. 3, the existence of Black and minority ethnic (BAME) lobbying groups has further reduced any democratic influence that might be exercised over government through the electoral system. We British, the indigenous White people of the British Isles, have suffered a massive loss of influence as a result of the lobbying activities of powerful vested interest groups and this issue is in danger of invalidating our entire democratic system to such an extent that many people are now beginning to question whether our system of government any longer has legitimacy.

This latter point is particularly significant when one considers the impediments that have already been put in place by government and non-governmental organisations to frustrate attempts to gain democratic representation and to intimidate and terrorise those legitimately seeking to provide advocacy in the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority population of Britain:

  1. Legislation having been introduced defining much forthright advocacy on behalf of the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority as ‘hate speech’. This especially so when describing the adverse impact of uncontrolled mass immigration in emotive terms.
  2. The application of Draconian ‘catch-all’ provisions within the Terrorism Act 2000 in order to spuriously designate as ‘terrorist’ and thereby unnecessarily criminalise, groups practicing forthright advocacy of the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority;
  3. The failure on the part of the Home Office to apply even-handedly the provisions of the Terrorism Act 2000 in respect of left-wing groups such as Antifa who openly employ violence and terrorist tactics against advocates campaigning in the ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority;
  4. The granting of privileged charitable status to groups such as ‘Hope Not Hate’ who collect, record and maliciously publish information about White advocacy practitioners of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism;
  5. The Home Office designation of forthright advocacy on behalf of the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority as ‘extremism’ and the introduction of extra-statutory control orders and disruption orders intended to hamper the efforts of those practicing such advocacy.
  6. The denial of access to the main stream media for advocates campaigning in the ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority, that media being largely owned and/or controlled by hostile individuals from among the ethnic minorities; and
  7. The sloppy administration of elections such that massive potential exists for widespread electoral fraud and no-one representing a radical or controversial cause can have confidence that elections are conducted honestly or fairly.

There is a suspicion on the part of those in authority, in the current hostile climate they have created, in which continued uncontrolled mass immigration now presents an existential threat to the survival of the indigenous White people of Britain, that young and determined activists in our people’s cause may turn to violence and terrorism. This has prompted a wave of fruitless arrests and trumped-up charges that are unlikely to succeed and which are more likely to prove a self-fulfilling prophecy rather than act as a deterrent to those inclined to extremism.

The repetitious arrests on spurious charges, followed by release on bail, followed by control orders with the eventual dropping of charges with no further action, only for this process to be repeated again and again is more likely to create a substantial body of disaffected young men with an utter contempt for those in authority, than to result in anything positive. A more fertile recruiting ground for potential terrorists one would be hard put to imagine and one sometimes wonders whether it is the intention of those in authority to goad young patriots into committing acts of terrorism, so short-sighted is this policy.

The mistake those in authority make is that having made the electoral process a futile field of endeavour for those advocating in the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority, they assume that recourse to terrorism is the only option available, and through their short-sighted policy of Draconian policing they perhaps inadvertently encourage this view among White advocacy practitioners as I have already explained. In reality there are two further options, as yet largely unexplored:

  1. Local community activism and the building of militant consciously White communities, as advocated by Western Spring for a number of years now; and
  2. The creation of a representative body to advocate on behalf of the indigenous White majority, lobbying government through direct meetings between this body and the Home Office under the same protocols pioneered by the Board of Deputies of British Jews and currently practiced by other ethnic minority representative groups.

It is therefore the intention of Western Spring to explore the possibility of entering into direct discussions with the current Home Secretary with a view to the formation of a representative body representing the specific ethnic interests of the indigenous White majority within the population of the UK.

In making representations to the Home Office, our requests will carry more weight if we are able to demonstrate that the vast majority of White advocacy groups in the UK are willing to participate in this scheme and elect delegates to the representative body we create. I shall therefore be writing shortly to the leaders of all of the White advocacy groups and political parties asking for their co-operation in nominating and electing delegates.

I shall also create a petition that we can use to collect as many signatures from the wider indigenous White majority population as possible supporting the idea of creating the proposed representative body. If we are to succeed and command the attention of the Home Secretary it will be essential that everyone makes a massive effort to collect as many signatures as possible from the British public. We do not need to collect signatures from the majority of our people, we simply need to collect enough to put us on the same footing as the Board of Deputies of British Jews, who can only claim to represent about 275,000 people, the entire Jewish population of Britain.

Once we have established this direct access to the Home office, effectively bypassing the now largely defunct electoral process, we will be able to press the government to make reforms and introduce legislation to protect and further the interests of our people. Furthermore, if we make a success of this, gaining some government co-operation in the fulfilment of our aims, this will prompt more of our people to support us and we could through this initiative win the financial support of the 300,000 people we need to fill our ‘war chest’ and give us the wherewithal to exercise real political influence and bring about the salvation of our people.

By Max Musson © 2017

# # # #


Western Spring is not just a website. We are a community of people dedicated to achieving the Six Prerequisites and thereby acquiring the wherewithal needed to win political power and through that secure the future survival, proliferation and advancement of the British people and other White peoples of European descent, wherever they may live. Please join us:

# # # #

15 thoughts on “A Place at the Table for the Indigenous White Majority?

  1. Brilliant article Max, this is well worth sharing!

    What I like to add is, parliament is lost, party politics is finished, I don’t take notice with the news much because it’s nothing but bad news! It’s time to build White communities which is part of our cause to take our homelands back!

  2. Just remember what happened to Walter ‘Wat’ Tyler if you enter negotiations with the traitors Max.
    Also remember that should they not yield when spoken to politely we have the old drops at the back of the former assize court and the back gate to Angel Lane off Bridge Street waiting for them here in Northampton. Their crimes against the English and the white nations of Europe must and will not go unpunished.

  3. A great article and a good idea. Such a shame we were ever pushed into this corner, but good people trusted the wrong people, so here we are.

  4. Any proposals of creating a body which would represent the interests of White Britons would be resisted and denied by the Establishment on the basis that this would run counter to the requirements of diversity and multiculturalism. We would be told that we enjoy “white” privilege and do not require special considerations while the immigrant non European population suffer gross disadvantages through “racism” and being in an economically disadvantageous position is therefore in need and entitled to special consideration.

    In a climate of cultural relativism all cultures are regarded as equal and deserving respect except European culture which is viewed as inherently xenophobic and intolerant. It is clear that through mass immigration and the promotion of Islam the Left are determined to undermine Western culture and tradition and in time to affect a population replacement of European people with non European ones and in the process irreparably changing Europe’s identity.We must meet this challenge by organising ourselves within self-contained units, and adhering to values which further our interests, in the process rejecting those of contemporary society.

    1. The establishment, and in the first instance the home office will of course attempt to resist our advances, however when the Home Office already entertains direct representation from the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a body representing a group which cannot be portrayed as politically, culturally, socially or economically disadvantaged, there will be no logical reason to deny our requests other than blatant anti-White racism.
      One of our next steps needs to be the collection of statistics regarding BAME on White racist attacks. Such racist incidents, by a convention established first by the Jewish Community Security Trust (CST) and subsequently by the Islamic group Tell Mama, can range from full-on terrorist attacks by ISIS at one end of the scale, all the way down to simple name calling and ‘micro-aggressions’ such as referring to White people in a disrespectful way, at the other. Once we start collecting and publishing such statistics in reports to the Home Office, they will show massive year-on-year increases and we will be able to use them to garner increased support from the White community.
      We will be able to issue press statements and publish memes via social media shaming the government for not giving us the same rights of direct representation that are afforded to the Jewish, Muslim and other BAME communities.
      We can demand grants (similar to those currently provided for the Jewish community) in order to provide security guards at schools, places of worship and other White community centres that we will operate from. There are a myriad number of other pretexts that we can use to shame the government simply by claiming in the name of our people, the many privileges currently only enjoyed by ethnic minorities.
      The liberal-left is based entirely on the premise of ‘fairness’ and ‘equality’ and all we need do in order to win support from those who have through ignorance supported the liberal-left in the past is to demonstrate loudly and clearly that we(they) are not being given what is ours by right because of a prejudice based on skin colour and ethnicity.
      At every step and turn along the way we need to emphasise that the ‘elected’ British government has been elected by only one-in-four of the UK electorate, that it unfairly disadvantages the indigenous White people of Britain by denying us group specific representation or any sense of ethnic identity, and that the ‘elected’ British government does not promote or protect our specific ethnic interests, is malevolent towards us and indifferent to our fate.
      Most importantly, we must position our representative body as the only true defender of the interests of our people, and as the de facto leadership elite of the indigenous White people of Britain. Once we have done this, success at the ballot box will be a mere formality.

  5. Of course we all realise that our nation has been hijacked by an ideological enemy. However, our task is to restore hegemonic control to the White/Aryan people of this country and we must firstly ask ourselves why we lost our country in the first place,,?
    Whatever else might be argued, the essential existential reason is that we have allowed ourselves to become demoralised and cowardly. For example there can be little doubt that if every person who shared our way of thinking were to express himself openly such abominations as “Political Correctness” would evaporate over night.
    We must never forget that we British still represent the vast majority in these Islands, and Max Musson’s simple but superb strategy provides a sure way to achieve our ends. All we need is the courage and personal responsibility to see it through.

  6. Great article. Would the council be involved in advocacy alone or perhaps cultural pursuits which might promote unity and pride in our heritage?

  7. Max Musson’s reasoning regarding the means for obtaining fair representation and funding for furthering the interests of white Britons is sound and follows a consistent logic.However the degenerate Cultural Marxists are quite prepared and will shamelessly indulge in the most absurd contortions to justify why promoting white interest must be prevented. A lack of consistency will not deter these people as they pursue every opportunity to undermine European culture and traditions and instead devote vast resources to promote the culture, traditions and heritage of non Europeans.

    However if we are able to raise awareness and sustain the required pressure, our cause will attract greater support, as the blatant hypocrisy of the Establishment and Government are exposed.We are facing critical times and an existential threat, but the sheer magnitude of the challenge should reveal our best qualities as they have in the past .For the last 500 years Western society has made the most significant contribution to the development of maths, science, technology, the arts and music and will continue to do so, should the present challenge be met.

  8. Disagree. This is a recipe for failure. The biggest organised ethnic advocacy org has evaporated after 7 years of drift.
    There is but a handful of ppl left to get up any petition.
    Even if 300,000 did sign. So what? The msm won’t highlight this. Nor would it highlight white victim status re inter-racial crime stats. It’s had 50 years to do that! The only benefit would be to tap the signatories for support

    1. You are right Tony, that the biggest White ethnic advocacy groups to have existed in this country all missed the opportunity to achieve formal recognition of their status, the last of them being the BNP of course. There is an old saying in this country: “if you don’t ask, you won’t get”, and it is therefore important that we do not follow the lead of those earlier organisations and miss that opportunity again.
      There are about 1,000 active nationalists across the UK at present and if we all set out to get 300 signatures each, that will give us the 300,000 signature we need to present ourselves as a bigger ethnic community than the Jewish community.
      Naturally the MSM are not going to do us any favours, but we don’t really need them to, as we are not participating in the game of standing in elections and forlornly hoping for the mass media to endorse our candidature. This is all about getting the White community ‘organised’ and presenting ourselves to government in a way that copies the ‘blue-print’ devised by an ethnic community considered by the government to be beyond reproach.
      We have a tactical choice at present, we can continue to behave in a way that enables the establishment to easily smear us by association with ‘extremism’, in which case lots of our people will continue to be oppressed by extra-statutory police measures and some will end up residing at Her Majesty’s pleasure, or we can model our organisation on the ethnic group that appears ‘Teflon coated’, has regular audiences with the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister, and is currently holding a political ‘hand of cards’ consisting of all four aces.
      The initiative I have outlined in the above article is an aspirational initiative. It has to be aspirational and not ‘realistic’ because nationalism is at such a low ebb at present that a strictly ‘realistic’ initiative wouldn’t even motivate our most excitable members even if they were juiced up on ecstasy and angel dust!
      Our primary task at present is to get British nationalism back off it’s knees and get it moving in the right direction. To do that we must get our people to lift their heads and set their sights on objectives that are aspirational — to reset their expectations from failure to success — to reset their attitude from one of ‘can’t do’ to one of ‘can do’, because all that stops us from achieving success at present is that too many of us have allowed ourselves to become negative, to expect failure and to therefore give up without a fight.
      Henry Ford once said, “Whether you believe you can, or whether you believe you can’t, you’re right!”
      It is primarily self-belief that is lacking in our people at present and this lack of self-belief is all that is stopping us from achieving our wildest dreams.

  9. Good idea and creating a white british advocacy group is worthy of support.
    Unfortunately, this will obviously be vehemently opposed by the establishment.
    White british interests don’t matter to the Zionist establishment. Whites in Britain and the rest of the western world are earmarked for destruction and our cohesive white nations replaced by a multicultural divided society.
    Home secretary is disgusting cultural marxist and opponent of freedom Amber Rudd who has recently give a speech outlining the (((‘government’ ))) propose up to 15 year jail sentence for visiting websites and viewing online material the edtablishment deems to espouse terrorist propaganda and the making of bombs but also ‘FAR-RIGHT’ propaganda!
    Do you honestly believe this traitorous creature and kosher bankers’ lackey will entertain white advocacy groups?
    This being the case if the (((establishment))) can be pressured, undermined and exposed for the hypocritical, racists they are and the wider white british can be made aware of the true situation, only then perhaps a mass movement can be built to take our country back from our oppressors!

    1. Yes, it is a good idea and worthy of support, and yes, obviously the government are not going to respond favourably at first. No-one said its going to be easy, but it is a strategy that no-one has as yet even tried.
      I spent most of my career in corporate management dealing with other departmental managers, many of whom were not very willing to be helpful and some of whom were complete and utter bastards that hated my guts. I am therefore not perturbed by any expectations of what Amber Rudd’s attitude may be initially, as I am a great believer in the ‘dripping tap’ method of persuasion and I am confident that she will have the utmost difficulty justifying her actions if she continually tries to rebuff us.
      The key to our success in this is that we are resolutely optimistic and above all persistent, and we continue to drip, drip, drip, until we eventually wear down any resistance.

Comments are closed.